fix: avoid IndexError by handling empty strings after event removal in rich transcription processing #2681
Conversation
…sing (def rich_transcription_postprocess(s))
Summary of ChangesHello @TnR2, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a critical Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
TnR2
changed the title
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly addresses a potential IndexError in rich_transcription_postprocess by adding a check for empty strings. The fix is effective. My review includes a suggestion to refactor the related code for improved readability and efficiency by avoiding redundant function calls.
| if get_event(s_list[i]) == cur_ent_event and get_event(s_list[i]) != None: | ||
| s_list[i] = s_list[i][1:] | ||
| if len(s_list[i]) == 0: | ||
| continue | ||
| # else: | ||
| cur_ent_event = get_event(s_list[i]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While the added check correctly prevents the IndexError, this block of code can be refactored for better readability and efficiency.
Currently, get_event(s_list[i]) is called multiple times. You can store its result in a variable to avoid these redundant calls. This also allows for restructuring the logic to make the update to cur_ent_event clearer and more efficient.
| if get_event(s_list[i]) == cur_ent_event and get_event(s_list[i]) != None: | |
| s_list[i] = s_list[i][1:] | |
| if len(s_list[i]) == 0: | |
| continue | |
| # else: | |
| cur_ent_event = get_event(s_list[i]) | |
| event = get_event(s_list[i]) | |
| if event is not None and event == cur_ent_event: | |
| s_list[i] = s_list[i][1:] | |
| if not s_list[i]: | |
| continue | |
| cur_ent_event = get_event(s_list[i]) | |
| else: | |
| cur_ent_event = event |
2 participants
Description:
Fix
IndexErrorwhen processing empty strings after event removal inrich_transcription_postprocess(s).Problem:
After removing the event character from
s_list[i]whenget_event(s_list[i]) == cur_ent_event, the string could become empty''. This empty string was then passed toget_event(s)function, which attempts to accesss[0]causing anIndexError: string index out of range.Example:
When
rich_transcription_postprocess(s)input:When
for i in range(1, len(s_list))meetsi==2,s_list[2]is'🎼'(BGM event), after event removal:s_list[2] = s_list[2][1:], s_list[2] becomes''and then is passed toget_event(s[i]), which causesIndexError.Solution:
Added string check after event removal.