This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 12, 2022. It is now read-only.

Typeless fields need to be documented #15

Closed

JonnieCache opened this issue Aug 10, 2010 · 1 comment

JonnieCache commented Aug 10, 2010

We need some documentation for the use of untyped (polymorphic?) fields.

field :foo, :type => Object

see http://groups.google.com/group/mongoid/browse_thread/thread/49ee6fa5189d1add#

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

Member

durran commented Apr 4, 2011

Adding documentation note on fields without type definitions. Closed by b3721d2

durran closed this as completed

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.