Behaviour of AVG and Q.AVG?

[samdoshi]

At the moment AVG and Q.AVG perform integer division when calculating the average.

e.g.

AVG 2 3
>>> 2

Should they round instead?

[tehn]

i can definitely see that as being desirable!

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Sam Doshi notifications@github.com
wrote:

At the moment AVG and Q.AVG perform integer division when calculating the
average.

e.g.

AVG 2 3

2

Should they round instead?

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#38

[burnsauce]

In the PR, AVG -32767 -32768 == -32767 and AVG 32766 32767 == 32767, which is "round up" not "round away from zero".

[burnsauce]

GNU C round() goes away from zero.

[tehn]

let's do that then.

…

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Poindexter Frink ***@***.*** > wrote: GNU C round() goes away from zero. — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#38 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAPEcPHiD77jlMHoUHrgnUy2KVPg_j0aks5shpXrgaJpZM4IHZvU> .