Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: deadlink checker ignores https://docs.buf.build/ #737

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 26, 2022

Conversation

seeflood
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: seeflood zhou.qunli@foxmail.com

What this PR does:
Let the deadlink checker ignores https://docs.buf.build/

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes the CI error in #736

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:


Signed-off-by: seeflood <zhou.qunli@foxmail.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 25, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #737 (91d74c2) into main (0b2d62f) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 91d74c2 differs from pull request most recent head d022330. Consider uploading reports for the commit d022330 to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #737   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   60.60%   60.60%           
=======================================
  Files         133      133           
  Lines        8318     8318           
=======================================
  Hits         5041     5041           
  Misses       2700     2700           
  Partials      577      577           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 713a0a5...d022330. Read the comment docs.

@seeflood seeflood merged commit a68dac7 into mosn:main Jul 26, 2022
@seeflood seeflood deleted the ignore_buf_lint branch July 26, 2022 10:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants