-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Template builds inappropriate resources into zip by misapplying lists of downstream resources #12
Comments
Unfortunately new maintainer is using issue locking when someone says "please don't close things that aren't fixed just because you don't want to learn about them" I guess this isn't a safe project for me anymore |
To me, your request is still very vague, but I would like clear visibility on the issue you've apparently identified. Just to confirm, the change you would like to see is If my assumption above is incorrect, please add a concise and clear description of the problem. |
I'm not sure what you find vague, unclear or imprecise about "you're building things into the deployed bundle that the deployed bundle doesn't want or need"
The problem is not in the outside. It is that the built package is listing the build tools as dependencies. The thing that goes to |
resolved in #14 |
thank you |
@StoneCypher no, thank you. I apologise for the way I handled your first ticket and am very happy you were persistent with this problem. |
Default project builds dependencies of node-lambda into lambda zipfile. Hello world now carries
commander
,graceful-readlink
,sax
,xml2js
,xmlbuilder
, etc. ~771k of deps.New project maintainer closed the original #4 because he misunderstands it. I was trying to explain but he locked the issue because I asked him to not close it.
The actual problem is not that
node-lambda
builds things in because they're in use; it's thatnode-lambda-template
is incorrectly propositioning its own tools as part of the downstream build.This is a problem in the template, despite that the new maintainer closed an issue while the issue's creator was trying to explain what they misunderstood.
@motdotla - please help with the overly aggressive new issue burying mod, thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: