-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 692
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Correcting the package name #64
Conversation
Correcting the name of the ROS package containing the move_group_interface_tutorials.launch
As far as I can see the proposed change is not correct. @davetcoleman and @130s were involved with the changes, so one of them hopefully has time to look at this :) |
Took me sometime to figure this out, but I would say the proposed change is correct.
This PR is targeted
(I just found |
So we never released the |
Oh, ok. Now I see the real problem as @v4hn raises.
Yes.
Yes.
Looks like it's not yet, only doc entry is registered. But the package pr2_moveit_tutorials IS released into Indigo within Solution I can think of is to do both:
|
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 08:56:32AM -0800, Isaac I.Y. Saito wrote:
Solution I can think of is to do both:
- On `moveit_pr2` remove `pr2_moveit_tutorials` and make a new release.
I'd like to avoid removing the `pr2_moveit_tutorials` package in indigo.
But I think we could simply release the `moveit_tutorials` package in indigo *too*, right?
- On `moveit_tutorials`, either:
- fix `pr2_moveit_tutorials` packaging. This enables us to add other `*_moveit_tutorials` packages in the future
- use `moveit_tutorials` (so drop this PR). This is easier but in the future once PR2 packages would become unavailable (I hope not though) then we have to update tutorials again.
@davetcoleman pushed the repository consolidation of `moveit_tutorials` to have all documentation in one place.
+1 to keep it that way in the future.
|
Well, I'm afraid that that would:
I think we can release
If this sounds good I can open a PR for the necessary change to this repo for the release. |
@shivangg as you can see this is more of a political/organizational discussion. @130s you raised an interesting point in #65 .
Again, I don't think this is a good idea. The tutorials repo is one package and imho it's a good idea to keep it that way.
So with the current state, we can't do another release of |
@v4hn Okay! That should work. Being quite new, I am still trying to get my head around ROS in general. Trying to get involved in open source. |
I thought so. Welcome to the community and thanks a lot for pointing out the problem! :)
|
That's also possible. I assume you didn't mean that we want to do that though (quite ineffective maintenance cost-wise). |
@130s I didn't mean to imply there will be another indigo-release of |
…orials (address the concern raised in moveit#64).
…orials (address the concern raised in moveit#64). We noticed that some tutorial resources are duplicated, in the form of source and binary. We will want to only use source and https://github.com/ros-planning/moveit_tutorials as a single location to maintain all tutorial resource. This PR tries to show "note" section at the top of every tutorial page to suggest users to clone the source. Hope this is close to the solution what we're discussing in moveit#64.
…orials (address the concern raised in moveit#64). We noticed that some tutorial resources are duplicated, in the form of source and binary. We will want to only use source and https://github.com/ros-planning/moveit_tutorials as a single location to maintain all tutorial resource. This PR tries to show "note" section at the top of every tutorial page to suggest users to clone the source. Hope this is close to the solution what we're discussing in moveit#64.
…orials (address the concern raised in moveit#64). We noticed that some tutorial resources are duplicated, in the form of source and binary. We will want to only use source and https://github.com/ros-planning/moveit_tutorials as a single location to maintain all tutorial resource. This PR tries to show "note" section at the top of every tutorial page to suggest users to clone the source. Hope this is close to the solution what we're discussing in moveit#64.
Sorry for being late to this discussion. I certainly hope we can keep
Correct. I didn't think it necessary to release as a binary since users will probably want to copy/edit/customize the scripts and config files for their robots or use cases. You can't do that with binary releases.
We don't want to do that... it is now called moveit_tutorials since MoveIt! is not married to the PR2 anymore. |
Correcting the name of the ROS package containing the move_group_interface_tutorials.launch