Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[docs] jss-to-tss migration advise to drop clsx in favor of cx #30527

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 13, 2022
Merged

[docs] jss-to-tss migration advise to drop clsx in favor of cx #30527

merged 7 commits into from
Jan 13, 2022

Conversation

garronej
Copy link
Contributor

@garronej garronej commented Jan 7, 2022

Hi everyone,

Another addition to the jss-to-tss migration guide.
I realised that most people migrating from v4 do not realise that clsx !== cx so I mention it.

Best regards,

https://deploy-preview-30527--material-ui.netlify.app/guides/migration-v4/#2-use-tss-react

@mui-pr-bot
Copy link

mui-pr-bot commented Jan 7, 2022

No bundle size changes

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 265c408

… (and workarounds)

Signed-off-by: garronej <joseph.garrone.gj@gmail.com>
@mui-bot
Copy link

mui-bot commented Jan 12, 2022

No bundle size changes

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 8307fe7

Copy link
Member

@mnajdova mnajdova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perfect, thanks!

@mnajdova mnajdova merged commit 38c1886 into mui:master Jan 13, 2022
@oliviertassinari oliviertassinari added the docs Improvements or additions to the documentation label Jan 15, 2022
@oliviertassinari
Copy link
Member

oliviertassinari commented Jan 15, 2022

In https://deploy-preview-30527--material-ui.netlify.app/guides/migration-v4/#2-use-tss-react, it does the opposite:

Screenshot 2022-01-15 at 16 23 13

It's confusing, I think that we should fix the diff.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Improvements or additions to the documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants