Upgrade to debian stretch

[andrusha]

• Jessie is EOL was on 2018-06-17
• Jessie packages are outdated (ie, no jdk-11)
• Emdebian was dead since 2013
• osxcross is upgraded to the latest commit hash

The DarwinSDK needs to be updated (who owns that Dropbox link?), otherwise build fails:

In file included from code-sign-blobs/blob.cpp:29:
In file included from code-sign-blobs/blob.h:45:
In file included from code-sign-blobs/endian.h:34:
code-sign-blobs/memutils.h:96:42: error: unknown type name 'ptrdiff_t'; did you mean 'std::ptrdiff_t'?
inline const T *increment(const void *p, ptrdiff_t offset)
                                         ^~~~~~~~~
                                         std::ptrdiff_t
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6.3.0/../../../../include/x86_64-linux-gnu/c++/6.3.0/bits/c++config.h:202:28: note: 'std::ptrdiff_t' declared here
  typedef __PTRDIFF_TYPE__      ptrdiff_t;
                                ^

[yuzawa-san]

I was playing around with this and found that adding libxml2-dev, libssl-dev, libz-dev to the initial apt-get allowed the build to proceed past the point of failure in the travis ci build.

However, my docker build fails later in this shell section:

crossbuild/Dockerfile

Line 95 in 95a0337

RUN for triple in $(echo ${LINUX_TRIPLES} | tr "," " "); do \

It seems to be using sh instead of bash. Even when I force it to use bash, it does not work. This may be an unrelated bug beyond the scope of your original changes. I'm no docker or bash expert, so I don't really know of a fix. My gut tells me that the glob operations may be returning unexpected output.

What are your thoughts on upgrading to buster instead of stretch?

[inolen]

Hi @andrusha @yuzawa-san ,

I took your work and finished getting it working last night with the current SDK. Tested with the x86_64-apple-darwin, x86_64-w64-mingw32 and default x86_64-linux-gnu triple.

I've attached a patch, do you want to just update this PR with it?

WORKING.txt

[yuzawa-san]

@inolen your patch looks good to me

What do you think about upgrading to buster? I suppose I would yield to the maintainers, but buster is stable per debian's website. I tried your patch with buster and it worked as well.

[inolen]

@yuzawa-san I'd prefer to leave it at the older of the two libc's given the choice.

[lafin]

already solved #41