You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently new citations are being noted, but not actively reviewed, via the "Alaveteli Professional Weekly Review" document and the fortnightly "Transparency programme sprint planning" call.
If we had a public list of new citations (mysociety/alaveteli#6701) that might enable, and prompt. us to moderate them and/or prompt people to report issues with them.
There is some level of misuse of the feature, some of which may have arisen from a misunderstanding of its intent.
Do we want to proactively or reactively moderate citations?
Do we need tools ("report this" links) to encourage reports?
As this is a new feature and we're intending to give prominence to cited requests some degree of proactive moderation (but still retrospective moderation) might be appropriate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently new citations are being noted, but not actively reviewed, via the "Alaveteli Professional Weekly Review" document and the fortnightly "Transparency programme sprint planning" call.
If we had a public list of new citations (mysociety/alaveteli#6701) that might enable, and prompt. us to moderate them and/or prompt people to report issues with them.
There is some level of misuse of the feature, some of which may have arisen from a misunderstanding of its intent.
Do we want to proactively or reactively moderate citations?
Do we need tools ("report this" links) to encourage reports?
As this is a new feature and we're intending to give prominence to cited requests some degree of proactive moderation (but still retrospective moderation) might be appropriate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: