Age and QSO number written as one word

[n4af]

Suddenly, there was a problem since 4.44.9 and above.
If EXCHANGE RECEIVED = AGE AND QSO NUMBER
accidentally age and number written as one word (24001),
then there is a program reset. See the clipboard 10, then 11.
When separate records (24 001) - all OK.
4.44.8 and below are not the problem.
(de UR7QM)

[gm0gav]

On 08/02/2016 12:44, Howie Hoyt wrote:

Suddenly, there was a problem since 4449 and above
If EXCHANGE RECEIVED = AGE AND QSO NUMBER
accidentally age and number written as one word (24001),
then there is a program reset See the clipboard 10, then 11
When separate records (24 001) - all OK
4448 and below are not the problem
(de UR7QM)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#92.

Can we find out the contest where this happens?

[n4af]

This is a contest based on modifcation of General QSO.

73, Howie

CONTEST = GENERAL QSO
CONTEST NAME = R0J-CONTEST
AUTO DUPE ENABLE CQ = TRUE
AUTO DUPE ENABLE S AND P = TRUE
BAND = 80
DIGITAL MODE ENABLE = FALSE
DOMESTIC MULTIPLIER = NONE
DUPE SHEET AUTO RESET = TRUE
DX MULTIPLIER = NONE
EXCHANGE MEMORY ENABLE = TRUE
EXCHANGE RECEIVED = AGE AND QSO NUMBER

http://n4af.net

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:59 AM, gm0gav notifications@github.com wrote:

On 08/02/2016 12:44, Howie Hoyt wrote:

Suddenly, there was a problem since 4449 and above
If EXCHANGE RECEIVED = AGE AND QSO NUMBER
accidentally age and number written as one word (24001),
then there is a program reset See the clipboard 10, then 11
When separate records (24 001) - all OK
4448 and below are not the problem
(de UR7QM)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#92.

Can we find out the contest where this happens?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#92 (comment).

[n4af]

Fixed in 4.45.7
Validation now requires a minimum of two fields entered when
EXCHANGE RECEIVED = AGE AND QSO NUMBER

[ny4i]

Howie, I already had a 4.45.2. Did you just add this fix to that branch?

Tom
Principal Solutions Architect, ITIL®v3
Better Software Solutions, Inc.
727-437-BSS1 (727-437-2771)
@BSSI_Consulting

On Feb 8, 2016, at 8:48 AM, Howie Hoyt notifications@github.com wrote:

Fixed in 4.45.2
Validation now requires a minimum of two fields entered when
EXCHANGE RECEIVED = AGE AND QSO NUMBER

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #92 (comment).

[n4af]

no. it was changed in issues to 4.45.7 - which I have not pushed up yet...

http://n4af.net

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Tom Schaefer notifications@github.com
wrote:

Howie, I already had a 4.45.2. Did you just add this fix to that branch?

Tom
Principal Solutions Architect, ITIL®v3
Better Software Solutions, Inc.
727-437-BSS1 (727-437-2771)
@BSSI_Consulting

On Feb 8, 2016, at 8:48 AM, Howie Hoyt notifications@github.com wrote:

Fixed in 4.45.2
Validation now requires a minimum of two fields entered when
EXCHANGE RECEIVED = AGE AND QSO NUMBER

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub <
https://github.com/n4af/TR4W/issues/92#issuecomment-181375754>.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#92 (comment).

[ny4i]

You had fixed in 4.45.2 which threw me.

As it turns out, I found a potentially critical error in the UDP code that could cause an access violation if a configured serial port was not available.

If you have not merged 4.45.2 yet, I can make the fix there. It’s a one lines but I want to test it properly.

Tom
Principal Solutions Architect, ITIL®v3
Better Software Solutions, Inc.
727-437-BSS1 (727-437-2771)
@BSSI_Consulting

On Feb 8, 2016, at 2:18 PM, Howie Hoyt notifications@github.com wrote:

Fixed in 4.45.2

[n4af]

Hi Tom -

AFAIK, I fixed at 4.45.7
I just pushed a comment correction to indicate 4.45.7 in the logstuff
comment.

73, Howie

http://n4af.net

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Tom Schaefer notifications@github.com
wrote:

You had fixed in 4.45.2 which threw me.

As it turns out, I found a potentially critical error in the UDP code that
could cause an access violation if a configured serial port was not
available.

If you have not merged 4.45.2 yet, I can make the fix there. It’s a one
lines but I want to test it properly.

Tom
Principal Solutions Architect, ITIL®v3
Better Software Solutions, Inc.
727-437-BSS1 (727-437-2771)
@BSSI_Consulting

On Feb 8, 2016, at 2:18 PM, Howie Hoyt notifications@github.com wrote:

Fixed in 4.45.2

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#92 (comment).