Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Portions of Non-conformal boundaries that do not overlap #586

Closed
mhamadmahdialloush opened this issue May 15, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Portions of Non-conformal boundaries that do not overlap #586

mhamadmahdialloush opened this issue May 15, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@mhamadmahdialloush
Copy link

Hi,

Does the non-conformal boundary treatment in the code assume that the two boundaries should always be overlapping? What if I have one large boundary interfacing with another smaller one? How is the non overlapping boundary treated here?

Regards and Many Thanks!

@spdomin
Copy link
Contributor

spdomin commented May 16, 2022

Greetings,

The non-conformal algorithm (see the JCP manuscript, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.01.007 ) assumes that 1) the two surfaces are close, i.e., no gaps, and 2)the surfaces are of similar geometric fidelity, i.e,, consider a curved section with faceting from low-order meshes.

We have not formalized the behavior when there are disparate mesh resolutions on either boundary. In our paper above, we ran mesh disparities of roughly a factor of two. Ideally, those are close as well.

best,

@spdomin
Copy link
Contributor

spdomin commented Jun 4, 2022

Closing. If you have further questions, let us know.

@spdomin spdomin closed this as completed Jun 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants