Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

don't check for running transaction without transaction log #3

Closed
morbidrsa opened this issue Nov 9, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

don't check for running transaction without transaction log #3

morbidrsa opened this issue Nov 9, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@morbidrsa
Copy link
Collaborator

Don't check for a running transaction without the transaction log held.

Additionally change the loop to use btrfs_next_item()

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/f4dbd994-edac-c275-7838-78f3429f35c9@toxicpanda.com

@morbidrsa morbidrsa self-assigned this Nov 9, 2020
morbidrsa pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2020
Abaci Fuzz reported a shift-out-of-bounds BUG in io_uring_create():

[ 59.598207] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in ./include/linux/log2.h:57:13
[ 59.599665] shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'
[ 59.601230] CPU: 0 PID: 963 Comm: a.out Not tainted 5.10.0-rc4+ #3
[ 59.602502] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011
[ 59.603673] Call Trace:
[ 59.604286] dump_stack+0x107/0x163
[ 59.605237] ubsan_epilogue+0xb/0x5a
[ 59.606094] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds.cold+0xb2/0x20e
[ 59.607335] ? lock_downgrade+0x6c0/0x6c0
[ 59.608182] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xaf/0xe0
[ 59.609166] io_uring_create.cold+0x99/0x149
[ 59.610114] io_uring_setup+0xd6/0x140
[ 59.610975] ? io_uring_create+0x2510/0x2510
[ 59.611945] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x286/0x400
[ 59.613007] ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x27/0x80
[ 59.614038] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x5b/0x180
[ 59.615056] do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x40
[ 59.615940] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[ 59.617007] RIP: 0033:0x7f2bb8a0b239

This is caused by roundup_pow_of_two() if the input entries larger
enough, e.g. 2^32-1. For sq_entries, it will check first and we allow
at most IORING_MAX_ENTRIES, so it is okay. But for cq_entries, we do
round up first, that may overflow and truncate it to 0, which is not
the expected behavior. So check the cq size first and then do round up.

Fixes: 88ec321 ("io_uring: round-up cq size before comparing with rounded sq size")
Reported-by: Abaci Fuzz <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
morbidrsa pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2020
…nx/linux-xlnx into arm/fixes

arm64: soc: ZynqMP SoC fixes for v5.10-rc6

- Fix SD dll reset issue by using proper macro
- Fix PM feature checking for Xilinx Versal SoC

* tag 'zynqmp-soc-fixes-for-v5.10-rc6' of https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx: (337 commits)
  firmware: xilinx: Use hash-table for api feature check
  firmware: xilinx: Fix SD DLL node reset issue
  Linux 5.10-rc4
  kvm: mmu: fix is_tdp_mmu_check when the TDP MMU is not in use
  afs: Fix afs_write_end() when called with copied == 0 [ver #3]
  ocfs2: initialize ip_next_orphan
  panic: don't dump stack twice on warn
  hugetlbfs: fix anon huge page migration race
  mm: memcontrol: fix missing wakeup polling thread
  kernel/watchdog: fix watchdog_allowed_mask not used warning
  reboot: fix overflow parsing reboot cpu number
  Revert "kernel/reboot.c: convert simple_strtoul to kstrtoint"
  compiler.h: fix barrier_data() on clang
  mm/gup: use unpin_user_pages() in __gup_longterm_locked()
  mm/slub: fix panic in slab_alloc_node()
  mailmap: fix entry for Dmitry Baryshkov/Eremin-Solenikov
  mm/vmscan: fix NR_ISOLATED_FILE corruption on 64-bit
  mm/compaction: stop isolation if too many pages are isolated and we have pages to migrate
  mm/compaction: count pages and stop correctly during page isolation
  drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Use atomic encoder callbacks everywhere
  ...

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fd5ab967-f3cf-95fb-7947-5477ff85f97e@monstr.eu
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
morbidrsa pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2020
Filipe reported the following lockdep splat

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.10.0-rc2-btrfs-next-71 #1 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  find/324157 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff8ebc48d293a0 (btrfs-tree-01#2/3){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs]

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff8eb9932c5088 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs]

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
	 lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490
	 down_write_nested+0x44/0x120
	 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x120 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x2a3/0xc50 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs]
	 insert_with_overflow+0x44/0x110 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_insert_xattr_item+0xb8/0x1d0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_setxattr+0xd6/0x4c0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_setxattr_trans+0x68/0x100 [btrfs]
	 __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80
	 __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x70/0x200
	 vfs_setxattr+0x6b/0x120
	 setxattr+0x125/0x240
	 path_setxattr+0xba/0xd0
	 __x64_sys_setxattr+0x27/0x30
	 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #0 (btrfs-tree-01#2/3){++++}-{3:3}:
	 check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60
	 __lock_acquire+0x1689/0x3130
	 lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490
	 down_read_nested+0x45/0x220
	 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_next_old_leaf+0x27d/0x580 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_real_readdir+0x1e3/0x4b0 [btrfs]
	 iterate_dir+0x170/0x1c0
	 __x64_sys_getdents64+0x83/0x140
	 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  other info that might help us debug this:

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(btrfs-tree-00);
				 lock(btrfs-tree-01#2/3);
				 lock(btrfs-tree-00);
    lock(btrfs-tree-01#2/3);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  5 locks held by find/324157:
   #0: ffff8ebc502c6e00 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0x4d/0x60
   #1: ffff8eb97f689980 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_dir+0x52/0x1c0
   #2: ffff8ebaec00ca58 (btrfs-tree-02#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs]
   #3: ffff8eb98f986f78 (btrfs-tree-01#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs]
   #4: ffff8eb9932c5088 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs]

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 2 PID: 324157 Comm: find Not tainted 5.10.0-rc2-btrfs-next-71 #1
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x8d/0xb5
   check_noncircular+0xff/0x110
   ? mark_lock.part.0+0x468/0xe90
   check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60
   __lock_acquire+0x1689/0x3130
   ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30
   ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x5/0x10
   lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490
   ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs]
   down_read_nested+0x45/0x220
   ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs]
   __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_next_old_leaf+0x27d/0x580 [btrfs]
   btrfs_real_readdir+0x1e3/0x4b0 [btrfs]
   iterate_dir+0x170/0x1c0
   __x64_sys_getdents64+0x83/0x140
   ? filldir+0x1d0/0x1d0
   do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

This happens because btrfs_next_old_leaf searches down to our current
key, and then walks up the path until we can move to the next slot, and
then reads back down the path so we get the next leaf.

However it doesn't unlock any lower levels until it replaces them with
the new extent buffer.  This is technically fine, but of course causes
lockdep to complain, because we could be holding locks on lower levels
while locking upper levels.

Fix this by dropping all nodes below the level that we use as our new
starting point before we start reading back down the path.  This also
allows us to drop the nested/recursive locking magic, because we're no
longer locking two nodes at the same level anymore.

Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
morbidrsa pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2020
A lock dependency loop exists between the root tree lock, the extent tree
lock, and the free space tree lock.

The root tree lock depends on the free space tree lock because
btrfs_create_tree holds the new tree's lock while adding it to the root
tree.

The extent tree lock depends on the root tree lock because during
umount, we write out space cache v1, which writes inodes in the root
tree, which results in holding the root tree lock while doing a lookup
in the extent tree.

Finally, the free space tree depends on the extent tree because
populate_free_space_tree holds a locked path in the extent tree and then
does a lookup in the free space tree to add the new item.

The simplest of the three to break is the one during tree creation: we
unlock the leaf before inserting the tree node into the root tree, which
fixes the lockdep warning.

  [30.480136] ======================================================
  [30.480830] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  [30.481457] 5.9.0-rc8+ torvalds#76 Not tainted
  [30.481897] ------------------------------------------------------
  [30.482500] mount/520 is trying to acquire lock:
  [30.483064] ffff9babebe03908 (btrfs-free-space-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
  [30.484054]
	      but task is already holding lock:
  [30.484637] ffff9babebe24468 (btrfs-extent-01#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
  [30.485581]
	      which lock already depends on the new lock.

  [30.486397]
	      the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
  [30.487205]
	      -> #2 (btrfs-extent-01#2){++++}-{3:3}:
  [30.487825]        down_read_nested+0x43/0x150
  [30.488306]        __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
  [30.488868]        __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50
  [30.489477]        btrfs_search_slot+0x464/0x9b0
  [30.490009]        check_committed_ref+0x59/0x1d0
  [30.490603]        btrfs_cross_ref_exist+0x65/0xb0
  [30.491108]        run_delalloc_nocow+0x405/0x930
  [30.491651]        btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x60/0x6b0
  [30.492203]        writepage_delalloc+0xd4/0x150
  [30.492688]        __extent_writepage+0x18d/0x3a0
  [30.493199]        extent_write_cache_pages+0x2af/0x450
  [30.493743]        extent_writepages+0x34/0x70
  [30.494231]        do_writepages+0x31/0xd0
  [30.494642]        __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xad/0xe0
  [30.495194]        btrfs_fdatawrite_range+0x1b/0x50
  [30.495677]        __btrfs_write_out_cache+0x40d/0x460
  [30.496227]        btrfs_write_out_cache+0x8b/0x110
  [30.496716]        btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x211/0x4e0
  [30.497317]        btrfs_commit_transaction+0xc0/0xba0
  [30.497861]        sync_filesystem+0x71/0x90
  [30.498303]        btrfs_remount+0x81/0x433
  [30.498767]        reconfigure_super+0x9f/0x210
  [30.499261]        path_mount+0x9d1/0xa30
  [30.499722]        do_mount+0x55/0x70
  [30.500158]        __x64_sys_mount+0xc4/0xe0
  [30.500616]        do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
  [30.501091]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  [30.501629]
	      -> #1 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}:
  [30.502241]        down_read_nested+0x43/0x150
  [30.502727]        __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
  [30.503291]        __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50
  [30.503903]        btrfs_search_slot+0x464/0x9b0
  [30.504405]        btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x60/0xa0
  [30.504973]        btrfs_insert_item+0x60/0xd0
  [30.505412]        btrfs_create_tree+0x1b6/0x210
  [30.505913]        btrfs_create_free_space_tree+0x54/0x110
  [30.506460]        btrfs_mount_rw+0x15d/0x20f
  [30.506937]        btrfs_remount+0x356/0x433
  [30.507369]        reconfigure_super+0x9f/0x210
  [30.507868]        path_mount+0x9d1/0xa30
  [30.508264]        do_mount+0x55/0x70
  [30.508668]        __x64_sys_mount+0xc4/0xe0
  [30.509186]        do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
  [30.509652]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  [30.510271]
	      -> #0 (btrfs-free-space-00){++++}-{3:3}:
  [30.510972]        __lock_acquire+0x11ad/0x1b60
  [30.511432]        lock_acquire+0xa2/0x360
  [30.511917]        down_read_nested+0x43/0x150
  [30.512383]        __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
  [30.512947]        __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50
  [30.513455]        btrfs_search_slot+0x464/0x9b0
  [30.513947]        search_free_space_info+0x45/0x90
  [30.514465]        __add_to_free_space_tree+0x92/0x39d
  [30.515010]        btrfs_create_free_space_tree.cold.22+0x1ee/0x45d
  [30.515639]        btrfs_mount_rw+0x15d/0x20f
  [30.516142]        btrfs_remount+0x356/0x433
  [30.516538]        reconfigure_super+0x9f/0x210
  [30.517065]        path_mount+0x9d1/0xa30
  [30.517438]        do_mount+0x55/0x70
  [30.517824]        __x64_sys_mount+0xc4/0xe0
  [30.518293]        do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
  [30.518776]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  [30.519335]
	      other info that might help us debug this:

  [30.520210] Chain exists of:
		btrfs-free-space-00 --> btrfs-root-00 --> btrfs-extent-01#2

  [30.521407]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

  [30.522037]        CPU0                    CPU1
  [30.522456]        ----                    ----
  [30.522941]   lock(btrfs-extent-01#2);
  [30.523311]                                lock(btrfs-root-00);
  [30.523952]                                lock(btrfs-extent-01#2);
  [30.524620]   lock(btrfs-free-space-00);
  [30.525068]
	       *** DEADLOCK ***

  [30.525669] 5 locks held by mount/520:
  [30.526116]  #0: ffff9babebc520e0 (&type->s_umount_key#37){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: path_mount+0x7ef/0xa30
  [30.527056]  #1: ffff9babebc52640 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x3d5/0x5c0
  [30.527960]  #2: ffff9babeae8f2e8 (&cache->free_space_lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_free_space_tree.cold.22+0x101/0x45d
  [30.529118]  #3: ffff9babebe24468 (btrfs-extent-01#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
  [30.530113]  #4: ffff9babebd52eb8 (btrfs-extent-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_try_tree_read_lock+0x16/0x100
  [30.531124]
	      stack backtrace:
  [30.531528] CPU: 0 PID: 520 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.9.0-rc8+ torvalds#76
  [30.532166] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.1-4.module_el8.1.0+248+298dec18 04/01/2014
  [30.533215] Call Trace:
  [30.533452]  dump_stack+0x8d/0xc0
  [30.533797]  check_noncircular+0x13c/0x150
  [30.534233]  __lock_acquire+0x11ad/0x1b60
  [30.534667]  lock_acquire+0xa2/0x360
  [30.535063]  ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
  [30.535525]  down_read_nested+0x43/0x150
  [30.535939]  ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
  [30.536400]  __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
  [30.536862]  __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50
  [30.537304]  btrfs_search_slot+0x464/0x9b0
  [30.537713]  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0xf0
  [30.538148]  search_free_space_info+0x45/0x90
  [30.538572]  __add_to_free_space_tree+0x92/0x39d
  [30.539071]  ? printk+0x48/0x4a
  [30.539367]  btrfs_create_free_space_tree.cold.22+0x1ee/0x45d
  [30.539972]  btrfs_mount_rw+0x15d/0x20f
  [30.540350]  btrfs_remount+0x356/0x433
  [30.540773]  ? shrink_dcache_sb+0xd9/0x100
  [30.541203]  reconfigure_super+0x9f/0x210
  [30.541642]  path_mount+0x9d1/0xa30
  [30.542040]  do_mount+0x55/0x70
  [30.542366]  __x64_sys_mount+0xc4/0xe0
  [30.542822]  do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
  [30.543197]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  [30.543691] RIP: 0033:0x7f109f7ab93a
  [30.546042] RSP: 002b:00007ffc47c4f858 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5
  [30.546770] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f109f8cf264 RCX: 00007f109f7ab93a
  [30.547485] RDX: 0000557e6fc10770 RSI: 0000557e6fc19cf0 RDI: 0000557e6fc19cd0
  [30.548185] RBP: 0000557e6fc10520 R08: 0000557e6fc18e30 R09: 0000557e6fc18cb0
  [30.548911] R10: 0000000000200020 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
  [30.549606] R13: 0000557e6fc19cd0 R14: 0000557e6fc10770 R15: 0000557e6fc10520

Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
morbidrsa pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 15, 2020
When built with PROVE_LOCKING, NO_HZ_FULL, and CONTEXT_TRACKING_FORCE
will WARN() at boot time that interrupts are enabled when we call
context_tracking_user_enter(), despite the DAIF flags indicating that
IRQs are masked.

The problem is that we're not tracking IRQ flag changes accurately, and
so lockdep believes interrupts are enabled when they are not (and
vice-versa). We can shuffle things so to make this more accurate. For
kernel->user transitions there are a number of constraints we need to
consider:

1) When we call __context_tracking_user_enter() HW IRQs must be disabled
   and lockdep must be up-to-date with this.

2) Userspace should be treated as having IRQs enabled from the PoV of
   both lockdep and tracing.

3) As context_tracking_user_enter() stops RCU from watching, we cannot
   use RCU after calling it.

4) IRQ flag tracing and lockdep have state that must be manipulated
   before RCU is disabled.

... with similar constraints applying for user->kernel transitions, with
the ordering reversed.

The generic entry code has enter_from_user_mode() and
exit_to_user_mode() helpers to handle this. We can't use those directly,
so we add arm64 copies for now (without the instrumentation markers
which aren't used on arm64). These replace the existing user_exit() and
user_exit_irqoff() calls spread throughout handlers, and the exception
unmasking is left as-is.

Note that:

* The accounting for debug exceptions from userspace now happens in
  el0_dbg() and ret_to_user(), so this is removed from
  debug_exception_enter() and debug_exception_exit(). As
  user_exit_irqoff() wakes RCU, the userspace-specific check is removed.

* The accounting for syscalls now happens in el0_svc(),
  el0_svc_compat(), and ret_to_user(), so this is removed from
  el0_svc_common(). This does not adversely affect the workaround for
  erratum 1463225, as this does not depend on any of the state tracking.

* In ret_to_user() we mask interrupts with local_daif_mask(), and so we
  need to inform lockdep and tracing. Here a trace_hardirqs_off() is
  sufficient and safe as we have not yet exited kernel context and RCU
  is usable.

* As PROVE_LOCKING selects TRACE_IRQFLAGS, the ifdeferry in entry.S only
  needs to check for the latter.

* EL0 SError handling will be dealt with in a subsequent patch, as this
  needs to be treated as an NMI.

Prior to this patch, booting an appropriately-configured kernel would
result in spats as below:

| DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lockdep_hardirqs_enabled())
| WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5280 check_flags.part.54+0x1dc/0x1f0
| Modules linked in:
| CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3 #3
| Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
| pstate: 804003c5 (Nzcv DAIF +PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
| pc : check_flags.part.54+0x1dc/0x1f0
| lr : check_flags.part.54+0x1dc/0x1f0
| sp : ffff80001003bd80
| x29: ffff80001003bd80 x28: ffff66ce801e0000
| x27: 00000000ffffffff x26: 00000000000003c0
| x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffffc31842527258
| x23: ffffc31842491368 x22: ffffc3184282d000
| x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000000001
| x19: ffffc318432ce000 x18: 0080000000000000
| x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffc31840f18a78
| x15: 0000000000000001 x14: ffffc3184285c810
| x13: 0000000000000001 x12: 0000000000000000
| x11: ffffc318415857a0 x10: ffffc318406614c0
| x9 : ffffc318415857a0 x8 : ffffc31841f1d000
| x7 : 647261685f706564 x6 : ffffc3183ff7c66c
| x5 : ffff66ce801e0000 x4 : 0000000000000000
| x3 : ffffc3183fe00000 x2 : ffffc31841500000
| x1 : e956dc24146b3500 x0 : 0000000000000000
| Call trace:
|  check_flags.part.54+0x1dc/0x1f0
|  lock_is_held_type+0x10c/0x188
|  rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x70/0x98
|  __context_tracking_enter+0x310/0x350
|  context_tracking_enter.part.3+0x5c/0xc8
|  context_tracking_user_enter+0x6c/0x80
|  finish_ret_to_user+0x2c/0x13cr

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201130115950.22492-8-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
morbidrsa pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 15, 2020
Filipe reported the following lockdep splat

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.10.0-rc2-btrfs-next-71 #1 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  find/324157 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff8ebc48d293a0 (btrfs-tree-01#2/3){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs]

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff8eb9932c5088 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs]

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
	 lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490
	 down_write_nested+0x44/0x120
	 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x120 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x2a3/0xc50 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs]
	 insert_with_overflow+0x44/0x110 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_insert_xattr_item+0xb8/0x1d0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_setxattr+0xd6/0x4c0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_setxattr_trans+0x68/0x100 [btrfs]
	 __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80
	 __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x70/0x200
	 vfs_setxattr+0x6b/0x120
	 setxattr+0x125/0x240
	 path_setxattr+0xba/0xd0
	 __x64_sys_setxattr+0x27/0x30
	 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #0 (btrfs-tree-01#2/3){++++}-{3:3}:
	 check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60
	 __lock_acquire+0x1689/0x3130
	 lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490
	 down_read_nested+0x45/0x220
	 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_next_old_leaf+0x27d/0x580 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_real_readdir+0x1e3/0x4b0 [btrfs]
	 iterate_dir+0x170/0x1c0
	 __x64_sys_getdents64+0x83/0x140
	 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  other info that might help us debug this:

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(btrfs-tree-00);
				 lock(btrfs-tree-01#2/3);
				 lock(btrfs-tree-00);
    lock(btrfs-tree-01#2/3);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  5 locks held by find/324157:
   #0: ffff8ebc502c6e00 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0x4d/0x60
   #1: ffff8eb97f689980 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_dir+0x52/0x1c0
   #2: ffff8ebaec00ca58 (btrfs-tree-02#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs]
   #3: ffff8eb98f986f78 (btrfs-tree-01#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs]
   #4: ffff8eb9932c5088 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs]

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 2 PID: 324157 Comm: find Not tainted 5.10.0-rc2-btrfs-next-71 #1
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x8d/0xb5
   check_noncircular+0xff/0x110
   ? mark_lock.part.0+0x468/0xe90
   check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60
   __lock_acquire+0x1689/0x3130
   ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30
   ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x5/0x10
   lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490
   ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs]
   down_read_nested+0x45/0x220
   ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs]
   __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_next_old_leaf+0x27d/0x580 [btrfs]
   btrfs_real_readdir+0x1e3/0x4b0 [btrfs]
   iterate_dir+0x170/0x1c0
   __x64_sys_getdents64+0x83/0x140
   ? filldir+0x1d0/0x1d0
   do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

This happens because btrfs_next_old_leaf searches down to our current
key, and then walks up the path until we can move to the next slot, and
then reads back down the path so we get the next leaf.

However it doesn't unlock any lower levels until it replaces them with
the new extent buffer.  This is technically fine, but of course causes
lockdep to complain, because we could be holding locks on lower levels
while locking upper levels.

Fix this by dropping all nodes below the level that we use as our new
starting point before we start reading back down the path.  This also
allows us to drop the nested/recursive locking magic, because we're no
longer locking two nodes at the same level anymore.

Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
morbidrsa pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 15, 2020
A lock dependency loop exists between the root tree lock, the extent tree
lock, and the free space tree lock.

The root tree lock depends on the free space tree lock because
btrfs_create_tree holds the new tree's lock while adding it to the root
tree.

The extent tree lock depends on the root tree lock because during
umount, we write out space cache v1, which writes inodes in the root
tree, which results in holding the root tree lock while doing a lookup
in the extent tree.

Finally, the free space tree depends on the extent tree because
populate_free_space_tree holds a locked path in the extent tree and then
does a lookup in the free space tree to add the new item.

The simplest of the three to break is the one during tree creation: we
unlock the leaf before inserting the tree node into the root tree, which
fixes the lockdep warning.

  [30.480136] ======================================================
  [30.480830] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  [30.481457] 5.9.0-rc8+ torvalds#76 Not tainted
  [30.481897] ------------------------------------------------------
  [30.482500] mount/520 is trying to acquire lock:
  [30.483064] ffff9babebe03908 (btrfs-free-space-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
  [30.484054]
	      but task is already holding lock:
  [30.484637] ffff9babebe24468 (btrfs-extent-01#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
  [30.485581]
	      which lock already depends on the new lock.

  [30.486397]
	      the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
  [30.487205]
	      -> #2 (btrfs-extent-01#2){++++}-{3:3}:
  [30.487825]        down_read_nested+0x43/0x150
  [30.488306]        __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
  [30.488868]        __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50
  [30.489477]        btrfs_search_slot+0x464/0x9b0
  [30.490009]        check_committed_ref+0x59/0x1d0
  [30.490603]        btrfs_cross_ref_exist+0x65/0xb0
  [30.491108]        run_delalloc_nocow+0x405/0x930
  [30.491651]        btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x60/0x6b0
  [30.492203]        writepage_delalloc+0xd4/0x150
  [30.492688]        __extent_writepage+0x18d/0x3a0
  [30.493199]        extent_write_cache_pages+0x2af/0x450
  [30.493743]        extent_writepages+0x34/0x70
  [30.494231]        do_writepages+0x31/0xd0
  [30.494642]        __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xad/0xe0
  [30.495194]        btrfs_fdatawrite_range+0x1b/0x50
  [30.495677]        __btrfs_write_out_cache+0x40d/0x460
  [30.496227]        btrfs_write_out_cache+0x8b/0x110
  [30.496716]        btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x211/0x4e0
  [30.497317]        btrfs_commit_transaction+0xc0/0xba0
  [30.497861]        sync_filesystem+0x71/0x90
  [30.498303]        btrfs_remount+0x81/0x433
  [30.498767]        reconfigure_super+0x9f/0x210
  [30.499261]        path_mount+0x9d1/0xa30
  [30.499722]        do_mount+0x55/0x70
  [30.500158]        __x64_sys_mount+0xc4/0xe0
  [30.500616]        do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
  [30.501091]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  [30.501629]
	      -> #1 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}:
  [30.502241]        down_read_nested+0x43/0x150
  [30.502727]        __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
  [30.503291]        __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50
  [30.503903]        btrfs_search_slot+0x464/0x9b0
  [30.504405]        btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x60/0xa0
  [30.504973]        btrfs_insert_item+0x60/0xd0
  [30.505412]        btrfs_create_tree+0x1b6/0x210
  [30.505913]        btrfs_create_free_space_tree+0x54/0x110
  [30.506460]        btrfs_mount_rw+0x15d/0x20f
  [30.506937]        btrfs_remount+0x356/0x433
  [30.507369]        reconfigure_super+0x9f/0x210
  [30.507868]        path_mount+0x9d1/0xa30
  [30.508264]        do_mount+0x55/0x70
  [30.508668]        __x64_sys_mount+0xc4/0xe0
  [30.509186]        do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
  [30.509652]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  [30.510271]
	      -> #0 (btrfs-free-space-00){++++}-{3:3}:
  [30.510972]        __lock_acquire+0x11ad/0x1b60
  [30.511432]        lock_acquire+0xa2/0x360
  [30.511917]        down_read_nested+0x43/0x150
  [30.512383]        __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
  [30.512947]        __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50
  [30.513455]        btrfs_search_slot+0x464/0x9b0
  [30.513947]        search_free_space_info+0x45/0x90
  [30.514465]        __add_to_free_space_tree+0x92/0x39d
  [30.515010]        btrfs_create_free_space_tree.cold.22+0x1ee/0x45d
  [30.515639]        btrfs_mount_rw+0x15d/0x20f
  [30.516142]        btrfs_remount+0x356/0x433
  [30.516538]        reconfigure_super+0x9f/0x210
  [30.517065]        path_mount+0x9d1/0xa30
  [30.517438]        do_mount+0x55/0x70
  [30.517824]        __x64_sys_mount+0xc4/0xe0
  [30.518293]        do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
  [30.518776]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  [30.519335]
	      other info that might help us debug this:

  [30.520210] Chain exists of:
		btrfs-free-space-00 --> btrfs-root-00 --> btrfs-extent-01#2

  [30.521407]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

  [30.522037]        CPU0                    CPU1
  [30.522456]        ----                    ----
  [30.522941]   lock(btrfs-extent-01#2);
  [30.523311]                                lock(btrfs-root-00);
  [30.523952]                                lock(btrfs-extent-01#2);
  [30.524620]   lock(btrfs-free-space-00);
  [30.525068]
	       *** DEADLOCK ***

  [30.525669] 5 locks held by mount/520:
  [30.526116]  #0: ffff9babebc520e0 (&type->s_umount_key#37){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: path_mount+0x7ef/0xa30
  [30.527056]  #1: ffff9babebc52640 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x3d5/0x5c0
  [30.527960]  #2: ffff9babeae8f2e8 (&cache->free_space_lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_free_space_tree.cold.22+0x101/0x45d
  [30.529118]  #3: ffff9babebe24468 (btrfs-extent-01#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
  [30.530113]  #4: ffff9babebd52eb8 (btrfs-extent-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_try_tree_read_lock+0x16/0x100
  [30.531124]
	      stack backtrace:
  [30.531528] CPU: 0 PID: 520 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.9.0-rc8+ torvalds#76
  [30.532166] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.1-4.module_el8.1.0+248+298dec18 04/01/2014
  [30.533215] Call Trace:
  [30.533452]  dump_stack+0x8d/0xc0
  [30.533797]  check_noncircular+0x13c/0x150
  [30.534233]  __lock_acquire+0x11ad/0x1b60
  [30.534667]  lock_acquire+0xa2/0x360
  [30.535063]  ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
  [30.535525]  down_read_nested+0x43/0x150
  [30.535939]  ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
  [30.536400]  __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
  [30.536862]  __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50
  [30.537304]  btrfs_search_slot+0x464/0x9b0
  [30.537713]  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0xf0
  [30.538148]  search_free_space_info+0x45/0x90
  [30.538572]  __add_to_free_space_tree+0x92/0x39d
  [30.539071]  ? printk+0x48/0x4a
  [30.539367]  btrfs_create_free_space_tree.cold.22+0x1ee/0x45d
  [30.539972]  btrfs_mount_rw+0x15d/0x20f
  [30.540350]  btrfs_remount+0x356/0x433
  [30.540773]  ? shrink_dcache_sb+0xd9/0x100
  [30.541203]  reconfigure_super+0x9f/0x210
  [30.541642]  path_mount+0x9d1/0xa30
  [30.542040]  do_mount+0x55/0x70
  [30.542366]  __x64_sys_mount+0xc4/0xe0
  [30.542822]  do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
  [30.543197]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  [30.543691] RIP: 0033:0x7f109f7ab93a
  [30.546042] RSP: 002b:00007ffc47c4f858 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5
  [30.546770] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f109f8cf264 RCX: 00007f109f7ab93a
  [30.547485] RDX: 0000557e6fc10770 RSI: 0000557e6fc19cf0 RDI: 0000557e6fc19cd0
  [30.548185] RBP: 0000557e6fc10520 R08: 0000557e6fc18e30 R09: 0000557e6fc18cb0
  [30.548911] R10: 0000000000200020 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
  [30.549606] R13: 0000557e6fc19cd0 R14: 0000557e6fc10770 R15: 0000557e6fc10520

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 22, 2021
While testing the error paths in relocation, I hit the following lockdep
splat:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.10.0-rc3+ torvalds#206 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  btrfs-balance/1571 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff8cdbcc8f77d0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #2 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_write_nested+0x43/0x80
	 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x248/0x890
	 relocate_tree_blocks+0x490/0x650
	 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
	 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50

  -> #1 (btrfs-csum-01){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130
	 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100
	 btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x5ab/0x890
	 btrfs_del_csums+0x10b/0x3c0
	 __btrfs_free_extent+0x49d/0x8e0
	 __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x283/0x11f0
	 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x220
	 btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x2ba/0x520
	 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50

  -> #0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150
	 lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0
	 btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
	 walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280
	 walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0
	 btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260
	 do_relocation+0x52e/0x660
	 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650
	 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
	 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &head_ref->mutex --> btrfs-csum-01 --> btrfs-tree-00

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(btrfs-tree-00);
				 lock(btrfs-csum-01);
				 lock(btrfs-tree-00);
    lock(&head_ref->mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  5 locks held by btrfs-balance/1571:
   #0: ffff8cdb89749ff8 (&fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0x563/0xf40
   #1: ffff8cdb89748838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x156/0x300
   #2: ffff8cdbc2c16650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x413/0x5c0
   #3: ffff8cdbc135f538 (btrfs-treloc-01){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100
   #4: ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 1 PID: 1571 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3+ torvalds#206
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0
   check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0
   ? trace_call_bpf+0x139/0x260
   __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150
   lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0
   ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0
   ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170
   ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30
   ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170
   btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280
   walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0
   btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260
   do_relocation+0x52e/0x660
   relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650
   ? add_tree_block+0x149/0x1b0
   relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
   elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
   ? elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
   ? btrfs_balance+0x796/0xf40
   ? __kthread_parkme+0x66/0x90
   ? btrfs_balance+0xf40/0xf40
   ? balance_kthread+0x37/0x50
   ? kthread+0x137/0x150
   ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
   ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

As you can see this is bogus, we never take another tree's lock under
the csum lock.  This happens because sometimes we have to read tree
blocks from disk without knowing which root they belong to during
relocation.  We defaulted to an owner of 0, which translates to an fs
tree.  This is fine as all fs trees have the same class, but obviously
isn't fine if the block belongs to a COW only tree.

Thankfully COW only trees only have their owners root as a reference to
them, and since we already look up the extent information during
relocation, go ahead and check and see if this block might belong to a
COW only tree, and if so save the owner in the tree_block struct.  This
allows us to read_tree_block with the proper owner, which gets rid of
this lockdep splat.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
morbidrsa pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 25, 2021
While testing the error paths in relocation, I hit the following lockdep
splat:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.10.0-rc3+ torvalds#206 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  btrfs-balance/1571 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff8cdbcc8f77d0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #2 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_write_nested+0x43/0x80
	 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x248/0x890
	 relocate_tree_blocks+0x490/0x650
	 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
	 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50

  -> #1 (btrfs-csum-01){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130
	 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100
	 btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x5ab/0x890
	 btrfs_del_csums+0x10b/0x3c0
	 __btrfs_free_extent+0x49d/0x8e0
	 __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x283/0x11f0
	 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x220
	 btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x2ba/0x520
	 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50

  -> #0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150
	 lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0
	 btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
	 walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280
	 walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0
	 btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260
	 do_relocation+0x52e/0x660
	 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650
	 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
	 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &head_ref->mutex --> btrfs-csum-01 --> btrfs-tree-00

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(btrfs-tree-00);
				 lock(btrfs-csum-01);
				 lock(btrfs-tree-00);
    lock(&head_ref->mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  5 locks held by btrfs-balance/1571:
   #0: ffff8cdb89749ff8 (&fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0x563/0xf40
   #1: ffff8cdb89748838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x156/0x300
   #2: ffff8cdbc2c16650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x413/0x5c0
   #3: ffff8cdbc135f538 (btrfs-treloc-01){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100
   #4: ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 1 PID: 1571 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3+ torvalds#206
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0
   check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0
   ? trace_call_bpf+0x139/0x260
   __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150
   lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0
   ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0
   ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170
   ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30
   ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170
   btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280
   walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0
   btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260
   do_relocation+0x52e/0x660
   relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650
   ? add_tree_block+0x149/0x1b0
   relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
   elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
   ? elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
   ? btrfs_balance+0x796/0xf40
   ? __kthread_parkme+0x66/0x90
   ? btrfs_balance+0xf40/0xf40
   ? balance_kthread+0x37/0x50
   ? kthread+0x137/0x150
   ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
   ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

As you can see this is bogus, we never take another tree's lock under
the csum lock.  This happens because sometimes we have to read tree
blocks from disk without knowing which root they belong to during
relocation.  We defaulted to an owner of 0, which translates to an fs
tree.  This is fine as all fs trees have the same class, but obviously
isn't fine if the block belongs to a COW only tree.

Thankfully COW only trees only have their owners root as a reference to
them, and since we already look up the extent information during
relocation, go ahead and check and see if this block might belong to a
COW only tree, and if so save the owner in the tree_block struct.  This
allows us to read_tree_block with the proper owner, which gets rid of
this lockdep splat.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 2, 2021
While testing the error paths in relocation, I hit the following lockdep
splat:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.10.0-rc3+ torvalds#206 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  btrfs-balance/1571 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff8cdbcc8f77d0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #2 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_write_nested+0x43/0x80
	 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x248/0x890
	 relocate_tree_blocks+0x490/0x650
	 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
	 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50

  -> #1 (btrfs-csum-01){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130
	 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100
	 btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x5ab/0x890
	 btrfs_del_csums+0x10b/0x3c0
	 __btrfs_free_extent+0x49d/0x8e0
	 __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x283/0x11f0
	 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x220
	 btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x2ba/0x520
	 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50

  -> #0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150
	 lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0
	 btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
	 walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280
	 walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0
	 btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260
	 do_relocation+0x52e/0x660
	 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650
	 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
	 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &head_ref->mutex --> btrfs-csum-01 --> btrfs-tree-00

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(btrfs-tree-00);
				 lock(btrfs-csum-01);
				 lock(btrfs-tree-00);
    lock(&head_ref->mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  5 locks held by btrfs-balance/1571:
   #0: ffff8cdb89749ff8 (&fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0x563/0xf40
   #1: ffff8cdb89748838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x156/0x300
   #2: ffff8cdbc2c16650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x413/0x5c0
   #3: ffff8cdbc135f538 (btrfs-treloc-01){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100
   #4: ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 1 PID: 1571 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3+ torvalds#206
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0
   check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0
   ? trace_call_bpf+0x139/0x260
   __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150
   lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0
   ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0
   ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170
   ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30
   ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170
   btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280
   walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0
   btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260
   do_relocation+0x52e/0x660
   relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650
   ? add_tree_block+0x149/0x1b0
   relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
   elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
   ? elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
   ? btrfs_balance+0x796/0xf40
   ? __kthread_parkme+0x66/0x90
   ? btrfs_balance+0xf40/0xf40
   ? balance_kthread+0x37/0x50
   ? kthread+0x137/0x150
   ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
   ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

As you can see this is bogus, we never take another tree's lock under
the csum lock.  This happens because sometimes we have to read tree
blocks from disk without knowing which root they belong to during
relocation.  We defaulted to an owner of 0, which translates to an fs
tree.  This is fine as all fs trees have the same class, but obviously
isn't fine if the block belongs to a COW only tree.

Thankfully COW only trees only have their owners root as a reference to
them, and since we already look up the extent information during
relocation, go ahead and check and see if this block might belong to a
COW only tree, and if so save the owner in the tree_block struct.  This
allows us to read_tree_block with the proper owner, which gets rid of
this lockdep splat.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 2, 2021
While testing the error paths in relocation, I hit the following lockdep
splat:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.10.0-rc3+ torvalds#206 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  btrfs-balance/1571 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff8cdbcc8f77d0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #2 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_write_nested+0x43/0x80
	 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x248/0x890
	 relocate_tree_blocks+0x490/0x650
	 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
	 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50

  -> #1 (btrfs-csum-01){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130
	 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100
	 btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x5ab/0x890
	 btrfs_del_csums+0x10b/0x3c0
	 __btrfs_free_extent+0x49d/0x8e0
	 __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x283/0x11f0
	 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x220
	 btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x2ba/0x520
	 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50

  -> #0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150
	 lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0
	 btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
	 walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280
	 walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0
	 btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260
	 do_relocation+0x52e/0x660
	 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650
	 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
	 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &head_ref->mutex --> btrfs-csum-01 --> btrfs-tree-00

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(btrfs-tree-00);
				 lock(btrfs-csum-01);
				 lock(btrfs-tree-00);
    lock(&head_ref->mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  5 locks held by btrfs-balance/1571:
   #0: ffff8cdb89749ff8 (&fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0x563/0xf40
   #1: ffff8cdb89748838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x156/0x300
   #2: ffff8cdbc2c16650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x413/0x5c0
   #3: ffff8cdbc135f538 (btrfs-treloc-01){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100
   #4: ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 1 PID: 1571 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3+ torvalds#206
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0
   check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0
   ? trace_call_bpf+0x139/0x260
   __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150
   lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0
   ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0
   ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170
   ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30
   ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170
   btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280
   walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0
   btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260
   do_relocation+0x52e/0x660
   relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650
   ? add_tree_block+0x149/0x1b0
   relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
   elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
   ? elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
   ? btrfs_balance+0x796/0xf40
   ? __kthread_parkme+0x66/0x90
   ? btrfs_balance+0xf40/0xf40
   ? balance_kthread+0x37/0x50
   ? kthread+0x137/0x150
   ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
   ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

As you can see this is bogus, we never take another tree's lock under
the csum lock.  This happens because sometimes we have to read tree
blocks from disk without knowing which root they belong to during
relocation.  We defaulted to an owner of 0, which translates to an fs
tree.  This is fine as all fs trees have the same class, but obviously
isn't fine if the block belongs to a COW only tree.

Thankfully COW only trees only have their owners root as a reference to
them, and since we already look up the extent information during
relocation, go ahead and check and see if this block might belong to a
COW only tree, and if so save the owner in the tree_block struct.  This
allows us to read_tree_block with the proper owner, which gets rid of
this lockdep splat.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 3, 2021
…/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD

KVM/arm64 fixes for 5.11, take #3

- Avoid clobbering extra registers on initialisation
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 3, 2021
While testing the error paths in relocation, I hit the following lockdep
splat:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.10.0-rc3+ torvalds#206 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  btrfs-balance/1571 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff8cdbcc8f77d0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #2 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_write_nested+0x43/0x80
	 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x248/0x890
	 relocate_tree_blocks+0x490/0x650
	 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
	 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50

  -> #1 (btrfs-csum-01){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130
	 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100
	 btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x5ab/0x890
	 btrfs_del_csums+0x10b/0x3c0
	 __btrfs_free_extent+0x49d/0x8e0
	 __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x283/0x11f0
	 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x220
	 btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x2ba/0x520
	 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50

  -> #0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150
	 lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0
	 btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
	 walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280
	 walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0
	 btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260
	 do_relocation+0x52e/0x660
	 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650
	 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
	 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &head_ref->mutex --> btrfs-csum-01 --> btrfs-tree-00

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(btrfs-tree-00);
				 lock(btrfs-csum-01);
				 lock(btrfs-tree-00);
    lock(&head_ref->mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  5 locks held by btrfs-balance/1571:
   #0: ffff8cdb89749ff8 (&fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0x563/0xf40
   #1: ffff8cdb89748838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x156/0x300
   #2: ffff8cdbc2c16650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x413/0x5c0
   #3: ffff8cdbc135f538 (btrfs-treloc-01){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100
   #4: ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 1 PID: 1571 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3+ torvalds#206
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0
   check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0
   ? trace_call_bpf+0x139/0x260
   __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150
   lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0
   ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0
   ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170
   ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30
   ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170
   btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
   walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280
   walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0
   btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260
   do_relocation+0x52e/0x660
   relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650
   ? add_tree_block+0x149/0x1b0
   relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
   elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
   ? elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
   ? btrfs_balance+0x796/0xf40
   ? __kthread_parkme+0x66/0x90
   ? btrfs_balance+0xf40/0xf40
   ? balance_kthread+0x37/0x50
   ? kthread+0x137/0x150
   ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
   ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

As you can see this is bogus, we never take another tree's lock under
the csum lock.  This happens because sometimes we have to read tree
blocks from disk without knowing which root they belong to during
relocation.  We defaulted to an owner of 0, which translates to an fs
tree.  This is fine as all fs trees have the same class, but obviously
isn't fine if the block belongs to a COW only tree.

Thankfully COW only trees only have their owners root as a reference to
them, and since we already look up the extent information during
relocation, go ahead and check and see if this block might belong to a
COW only tree, and if so save the owner in the tree_block struct.  This
allows us to read_tree_block with the proper owner, which gets rid of
this lockdep splat.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 1, 2021
The ordering of MSI-X enable in hardware is dysfunctional:

 1) MSI-X is disabled in the control register
 2) Various setup functions
 3) pci_msi_setup_msi_irqs() is invoked which ends up accessing
    the MSI-X table entries
 4) MSI-X is enabled and masked in the control register with the
    comment that enabling is required for some hardware to access
    the MSI-X table

Step #4 obviously contradicts #3. The history of this is an issue with the
NIU hardware. When #4 was introduced the table access actually happened in
msix_program_entries() which was invoked after enabling and masking MSI-X.

This was changed in commit d71d643 ("PCI/MSI: Kill redundant call of
irq_set_msi_desc() for MSI-X interrupts") which removed the table write
from msix_program_entries().

Interestingly enough nobody noticed and either NIU still works or it did
not get any testing with a kernel 3.19 or later.

Nevertheless this is inconsistent and there is no reason why MSI-X can't be
enabled and masked in the control register early on, i.e. move step #4
above to step #1. This preserves the NIU workaround and has no side effects
on other hardware.

Fixes: d71d643 ("PCI/MSI: Kill redundant call of irq_set_msi_desc() for MSI-X interrupts")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210729222542.344136412@linutronix.de
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 1, 2021
Btrfs sometimes needs to flush dirty pages on a bunch of dirty inodes in
order to reclaim metadata reservations.  Unfortunately most helpers in
this area are too smart for us:

1) The normal filemap_fdata* helpers only take range and sync modes, and
   don't give any indication of how much was written, so we can only
   flush full inodes, which isn't what we want in most cases.
2) The normal writeback path requires us to have the s_umount sem held,
   but we can't unconditionally take it in this path because we could
   deadlock.
3) The normal writeback path also skips inodes with I_SYNC set if we
   write with WB_SYNC_NONE.  This isn't the behavior we want under heavy
   ENOSPC pressure, we want to actually make sure the pages are under
   writeback before returning, and if another thread is in the middle of
   writing the file we may return before they're under writeback and
   miss our ordered extents and not properly wait for completion.
4) sync_inode() uses the normal writeback path and has the same problem
   as #3.

What we really want is to call do_writepages() with our wbc.  This way
we can make sure that writeback is actually started on the pages, and we
can control how many pages are written as a whole as we write many
inodes using the same wbc.  Accomplish this with a new helper that does
just that so we can use it for our ENOSPC flushing infrastructure.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2021
[ Upstream commit 21e3980 ]

vctrl_enable() and vctrl_disable() call regulator_enable() and
regulator_disable(), respectively. However, vctrl_* are regulator ops
and should not be calling the locked regulator APIs. Doing so results in
a lockdep warning.

Instead of exporting more internal regulator ops, model the ctrl supply
as an actual supply to vctrl-regulator. At probe time this driver still
needs to use the consumer API to fetch its constraints, but otherwise
lets the regulator core handle the upstream supply for it.

The enable/disable/is_enabled ops are not removed, but now only track
state internally. This preserves the original behavior with the ops
being available, but one could argue that the original behavior was
already incorrect: the internal state would not match the upstream
supply if that supply had another consumer that enabled the supply,
while vctrl-regulator was not enabled.

The lockdep warning is as follows:

	WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
	5.14.0-rc6 #2 Not tainted
	------------------------------------------------------
	swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock:
	ffffffc011306d00 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
		regulator_lock_dependent (arch/arm64/include/asm/current.h:19
					  include/linux/ww_mutex.h:111
					  drivers/regulator/core.c:329)

	but task is already holding lock:
	ffffff8004a77160 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
		regulator_lock_recursive (drivers/regulator/core.c:156
					  drivers/regulator/core.c:263)

	which lock already depends on the new lock.

	the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

	-> #2 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	__mutex_lock_common (include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:606
			     include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:29
			     kernel/locking/mutex.c:103
			     kernel/locking/mutex.c:144
			     kernel/locking/mutex.c:963)
	ww_mutex_lock (kernel/locking/mutex.c:1199)
	regulator_lock_recursive (drivers/regulator/core.c:156
				  drivers/regulator/core.c:263)
	regulator_lock_dependent (drivers/regulator/core.c:343)
	regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808)
	set_machine_constraints (drivers/regulator/core.c:1536)
	regulator_register (drivers/regulator/core.c:5486)
	devm_regulator_register (drivers/regulator/devres.c:196)
	reg_fixed_voltage_probe (drivers/regulator/fixed.c:289)
	platform_probe (drivers/base/platform.c:1427)
	[...]

	-> #1 (regulator_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}:
	regulator_lock_dependent (include/linux/ww_mutex.h:129
				  drivers/regulator/core.c:329)
	regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808)
	set_machine_constraints (drivers/regulator/core.c:1536)
	regulator_register (drivers/regulator/core.c:5486)
	devm_regulator_register (drivers/regulator/devres.c:196)
	reg_fixed_voltage_probe (drivers/regulator/fixed.c:289)
	[...]

	-> #0 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	__lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3052 (discriminator 4)
			kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 (discriminator 4)
			kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 (discriminator 4)
			kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015 (discriminator 4))
	lock_acquire (arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:39
		      kernel/locking/lockdep.c:438
		      kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5627)
	__mutex_lock_common (include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:606
			     include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:29
			     kernel/locking/mutex.c:103
			     kernel/locking/mutex.c:144
			     kernel/locking/mutex.c:963)
	mutex_lock_nested (kernel/locking/mutex.c:1125)
	regulator_lock_dependent (arch/arm64/include/asm/current.h:19
				  include/linux/ww_mutex.h:111
				  drivers/regulator/core.c:329)
	regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808)
	vctrl_enable (drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c:400)
	_regulator_do_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2617)
	_regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2764)
	regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:308
			  drivers/regulator/core.c:2809)
	_set_opp (drivers/opp/core.c:819 drivers/opp/core.c:1072)
	dev_pm_opp_set_rate (drivers/opp/core.c:1164)
	set_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:62)
	__cpufreq_driver_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2216
				 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2271)
	cpufreq_online (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1488 (discriminator 2))
	cpufreq_add_dev (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1563)
	subsys_interface_register (drivers/base/bus.c:?)
	cpufreq_register_driver (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2819)
	dt_cpufreq_probe (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:344)
	[...]

	other info that might help us debug this:

	Chain exists of:
	  regulator_list_mutex --> regulator_ww_class_acquire --> regulator_ww_class_mutex

	 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	       CPU0                    CPU1
	       ----                    ----
	  lock(regulator_ww_class_mutex);
				       lock(regulator_ww_class_acquire);
				       lock(regulator_ww_class_mutex);
	  lock(regulator_list_mutex);

	 *** DEADLOCK ***

	6 locks held by swapper/0/1:
	#0: ffffff8002d32188 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at:
		__device_driver_lock (drivers/base/dd.c:1030)
	#1: ffffffc0111a0520 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at:
		cpufreq_register_driver (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2792 (discriminator 2))
	#2: ffffff8002a8d918 (subsys mutex#9){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
		subsys_interface_register (drivers/base/bus.c:1033)
	#3: ffffff800341bb90 (&policy->rwsem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
		cpufreq_online (include/linux/bitmap.h:285
				include/linux/cpumask.h:405
				drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1399)
	#4: ffffffc011f0b7b8 (regulator_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
		regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808)
	#5: ffffff8004a77160 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
		regulator_lock_recursive (drivers/regulator/core.c:156
		drivers/regulator/core.c:263)

	stack backtrace:
	CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc6 #2 7c8f8996d021ed0f65271e6aeebf7999de74a9fa
	Hardware name: Google Scarlet (DT)
	Call trace:
	dump_backtrace (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:161)
	show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:218)
	dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:106 (discriminator 2))
	dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:113)
	print_circular_bug (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:?)
	check_noncircular (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:?)
	__lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3052 (discriminator 4)
			kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 (discriminator 4)
			kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 (discriminator 4)
			kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015 (discriminator 4))
	lock_acquire (arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:39
		      kernel/locking/lockdep.c:438
		      kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5627)
	__mutex_lock_common (include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:606
			     include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:29
			     kernel/locking/mutex.c:103
			     kernel/locking/mutex.c:144
			     kernel/locking/mutex.c:963)
	mutex_lock_nested (kernel/locking/mutex.c:1125)
	regulator_lock_dependent (arch/arm64/include/asm/current.h:19
				  include/linux/ww_mutex.h:111
				  drivers/regulator/core.c:329)
	regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808)
	vctrl_enable (drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c:400)
	_regulator_do_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2617)
	_regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2764)
	regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:308
			  drivers/regulator/core.c:2809)
	_set_opp (drivers/opp/core.c:819 drivers/opp/core.c:1072)
	dev_pm_opp_set_rate (drivers/opp/core.c:1164)
	set_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:62)
	__cpufreq_driver_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2216
				 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2271)
	cpufreq_online (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1488 (discriminator 2))
	cpufreq_add_dev (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1563)
	subsys_interface_register (drivers/base/bus.c:?)
	cpufreq_register_driver (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2819)
	dt_cpufreq_probe (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:344)
	[...]

Reported-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Fixes: f8702f9 ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking")
Fixes: e915331 ("regulator: vctrl-regulator: Avoid deadlock getting and setting the voltage")
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210825033704.3307263-3-wenst@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2021
[ Upstream commit 6fa54bc ]

If em28xx_ir_init fails, it would decrease the refcount of dev. However,
in the em28xx_ir_fini, when ir is NULL, it goes to ref_put and decrease
the refcount of dev. This will lead to a refcount bug.

Fix this bug by removing the kref_put in the error handling code
of em28xx_ir_init.

refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 7 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0x18e/0x1a0 lib/refcount.c:28
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.13.0 #3
Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event
RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x18e/0x1a0 lib/refcount.c:28
Call Trace:
  kref_put.constprop.0+0x60/0x85 include/linux/kref.h:69
  em28xx_usb_disconnect.cold+0xd7/0xdc drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c:4150
  usb_unbind_interface+0xbf/0x3a0 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:458
  __device_release_driver drivers/base/dd.c:1201 [inline]
  device_release_driver_internal+0x22a/0x230 drivers/base/dd.c:1232
  bus_remove_device+0x108/0x160 drivers/base/bus.c:529
  device_del+0x1fe/0x510 drivers/base/core.c:3540
  usb_disable_device+0xd1/0x1d0 drivers/usb/core/message.c:1419
  usb_disconnect+0x109/0x330 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:2221
  hub_port_connect drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5151 [inline]
  hub_port_connect_change drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5440 [inline]
  port_event drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5586 [inline]
  hub_event+0xf81/0x1d40 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5668
  process_one_work+0x2c9/0x610 kernel/workqueue.c:2276
  process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:2338 [inline]
  worker_thread+0x333/0x5b0 kernel/workqueue.c:2424
  kthread+0x188/0x1d0 kernel/kthread.c:319
  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295

Reported-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@gmail.com>
Fixes: ac56886 ("media: em28xx: Fix possible memory leak of em28xx struct")
Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2021
commit 13be2ef upstream.

As previously noted in commit 66e4f4a ("rtc: cmos: Use
spin_lock_irqsave() in cmos_interrupt()"):

<4>[  254.192378] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
<4>[  254.192384] 5.12.0-rc1-CI-CI_DRM_9834+ #1 Not tainted
<4>[  254.192396] --------------------------------
<4>[  254.192400] inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
<4>[  254.192409] rtcwake/5309 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
<4>[  254.192429] ffffffff8263c5f8 (rtc_lock){?...}-{2:2}, at: cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100
<4>[  254.192481] {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
<4>[  254.192488]   lock_acquire+0xd1/0x3d0
<4>[  254.192504]   _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40
<4>[  254.192519]   cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100
<4>[  254.192536]   rtc_handler+0x1f/0xc0
<4>[  254.192553]   acpi_ev_fixed_event_detect+0x109/0x13c
<4>[  254.192574]   acpi_ev_sci_xrupt_handler+0xb/0x28
<4>[  254.192596]   acpi_irq+0x13/0x30
<4>[  254.192620]   __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x43/0x2c0
<4>[  254.192641]   handle_irq_event_percpu+0x2b/0x70
<4>[  254.192661]   handle_irq_event+0x2f/0x50
<4>[  254.192680]   handle_fasteoi_irq+0x9e/0x150
<4>[  254.192693]   __common_interrupt+0x76/0x140
<4>[  254.192715]   common_interrupt+0x96/0xc0
<4>[  254.192732]   asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40
<4>[  254.192750]   _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x38/0x60
<4>[  254.192767]   resume_irqs+0xba/0xf0
<4>[  254.192786]   dpm_resume_noirq+0x245/0x3d0
<4>[  254.192811]   suspend_devices_and_enter+0x230/0xaa0
<4>[  254.192835]   pm_suspend.cold.8+0x301/0x34a
<4>[  254.192859]   state_store+0x7b/0xe0
<4>[  254.192879]   kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11d/0x1c0
<4>[  254.192899]   new_sync_write+0x11d/0x1b0
<4>[  254.192916]   vfs_write+0x265/0x390
<4>[  254.192933]   ksys_write+0x5a/0xd0
<4>[  254.192949]   do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
<4>[  254.192965]   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
<4>[  254.192986] irq event stamp: 43775
<4>[  254.192994] hardirqs last  enabled at (43775): [<ffffffff81c00c42>] asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20
<4>[  254.193023] hardirqs last disabled at (43774): [<ffffffff81aa691a>] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa/0xb0
<4>[  254.193049] softirqs last  enabled at (42548): [<ffffffff81e00342>] __do_softirq+0x342/0x48e
<4>[  254.193074] softirqs last disabled at (42543): [<ffffffff810b45fd>] irq_exit_rcu+0xad/0xd0
<4>[  254.193101]
                  other info that might help us debug this:
<4>[  254.193107]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

<4>[  254.193112]        CPU0
<4>[  254.193117]        ----
<4>[  254.193121]   lock(rtc_lock);
<4>[  254.193137]   <Interrupt>
<4>[  254.193142]     lock(rtc_lock);
<4>[  254.193156]
                   *** DEADLOCK ***

<4>[  254.193161] 6 locks held by rtcwake/5309:
<4>[  254.193174]  #0: ffff888104861430 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x5a/0xd0
<4>[  254.193232]  #1: ffff88810f823288 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xe7/0x1c0
<4>[  254.193282]  #2: ffff888100cef3c0 (kn->active#285
<7>[  254.192706] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_modeset_setup_hw_state [i915]] [CRTC:51:pipe A] hw state readout: disabled
<4>[  254.193307] ){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xf0/0x1c0
<4>[  254.193333]  #3: ffffffff82649fa8 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend.cold.8+0xce/0x34a
<4>[  254.193387]  #4: ffffffff827a2108 (acpi_scan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: acpi_suspend_begin+0x47/0x70
<4>[  254.193433]  #5: ffff8881019ea178 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_resume+0x68/0x1e0
<4>[  254.193485]
                  stack backtrace:
<4>[  254.193492] CPU: 1 PID: 5309 Comm: rtcwake Not tainted 5.12.0-rc1-CI-CI_DRM_9834+ #1
<4>[  254.193514] Hardware name: Google Soraka/Soraka, BIOS MrChromebox-4.10 08/25/2019
<4>[  254.193524] Call Trace:
<4>[  254.193536]  dump_stack+0x7f/0xad
<4>[  254.193567]  mark_lock.part.47+0x8ca/0xce0
<4>[  254.193604]  __lock_acquire+0x39b/0x2590
<4>[  254.193626]  ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20
<4>[  254.193660]  lock_acquire+0xd1/0x3d0
<4>[  254.193677]  ? cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100
<4>[  254.193716]  _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40
<4>[  254.193735]  ? cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100
<4>[  254.193758]  cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100
<4>[  254.193785]  cmos_resume+0x2ac/0x2d0
<4>[  254.193813]  ? acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup+0x1f/0x110
<4>[  254.193842]  ? pnp_bus_suspend+0x10/0x10
<4>[  254.193864]  pnp_bus_resume+0x5e/0x90
<4>[  254.193885]  dpm_run_callback+0x5f/0x240
<4>[  254.193914]  device_resume+0xb2/0x1e0
<4>[  254.193942]  ? pm_dev_err+0x25/0x25
<4>[  254.193974]  dpm_resume+0xea/0x3f0
<4>[  254.194005]  dpm_resume_end+0x8/0x10
<4>[  254.194030]  suspend_devices_and_enter+0x29b/0xaa0
<4>[  254.194066]  pm_suspend.cold.8+0x301/0x34a
<4>[  254.194094]  state_store+0x7b/0xe0
<4>[  254.194124]  kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11d/0x1c0
<4>[  254.194151]  new_sync_write+0x11d/0x1b0
<4>[  254.194183]  vfs_write+0x265/0x390
<4>[  254.194207]  ksys_write+0x5a/0xd0
<4>[  254.194232]  do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
<4>[  254.194251]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
<4>[  254.194274] RIP: 0033:0x7f07d79691e7
<4>[  254.194293] Code: 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb bb 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24
<4>[  254.194312] RSP: 002b:00007ffd9cc2c768 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
<4>[  254.194337] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007f07d79691e7
<4>[  254.194352] RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 0000556ebfc63590 RDI: 000000000000000b
<4>[  254.194366] RBP: 0000556ebfc63590 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000004
<4>[  254.194379] R10: 0000556ebf0ec2a6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000004

which breaks S3-resume on fi-kbl-soraka presumably as that's slow enough
to trigger the alarm during the suspend.

Fixes: 6950d04 ("rtc: cmos: Replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock in hard IRQ")
References: 66e4f4a ("rtc: cmos: Use spin_lock_irqsave() in cmos_interrupt()"):
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210305122140.28774-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2021
commit 57f0ff0 upstream.

It's later supposed to be either a correct address or NULL. Without the
initialization, it may contain an undefined value which results in the
following segmentation fault:

  # perf top --sort comm -g --ignore-callees=do_idle

terminates with:

  #0  0x00007ffff56b7685 in __strlen_avx2 () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #1  0x00007ffff55e3802 in strdup () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #2  0x00005555558cb139 in hist_entry__init (callchain_size=<optimized out>, sample_self=true, template=0x7fffde7fb110, he=0x7fffd801c250) at util/hist.c:489
  #3  hist_entry__new (template=template@entry=0x7fffde7fb110, sample_self=sample_self@entry=true) at util/hist.c:564
  #4  0x00005555558cb4ba in hists__findnew_entry (hists=hists@entry=0x5555561d9e38, entry=entry@entry=0x7fffde7fb110, al=al@entry=0x7fffde7fb420,
      sample_self=sample_self@entry=true) at util/hist.c:657
  #5  0x00005555558cba1b in __hists__add_entry (hists=hists@entry=0x5555561d9e38, al=0x7fffde7fb420, sym_parent=<optimized out>, bi=bi@entry=0x0, mi=mi@entry=0x0,
      sample=sample@entry=0x7fffde7fb4b0, sample_self=true, ops=0x0, block_info=0x0) at util/hist.c:288
  #6  0x00005555558cbb70 in hists__add_entry (sample_self=true, sample=0x7fffde7fb4b0, mi=0x0, bi=0x0, sym_parent=<optimized out>, al=<optimized out>, hists=0x5555561d9e38)
      at util/hist.c:1056
  #7  iter_add_single_cumulative_entry (iter=0x7fffde7fb460, al=<optimized out>) at util/hist.c:1056
  #8  0x00005555558cc8a4 in hist_entry_iter__add (iter=iter@entry=0x7fffde7fb460, al=al@entry=0x7fffde7fb420, max_stack_depth=<optimized out>, arg=arg@entry=0x7fffffff7db0)
      at util/hist.c:1231
  #9  0x00005555557cdc9a in perf_event__process_sample (machine=<optimized out>, sample=0x7fffde7fb4b0, evsel=<optimized out>, event=<optimized out>, tool=0x7fffffff7db0)
      at builtin-top.c:842
  #10 deliver_event (qe=<optimized out>, qevent=<optimized out>) at builtin-top.c:1202
  #11 0x00005555558a9318 in do_flush (show_progress=false, oe=0x7fffffff80e0) at util/ordered-events.c:244
  #12 __ordered_events__flush (oe=oe@entry=0x7fffffff80e0, how=how@entry=OE_FLUSH__TOP, timestamp=timestamp@entry=0) at util/ordered-events.c:323
  #13 0x00005555558a9789 in __ordered_events__flush (timestamp=<optimized out>, how=<optimized out>, oe=<optimized out>) at util/ordered-events.c:339
  #14 ordered_events__flush (how=OE_FLUSH__TOP, oe=0x7fffffff80e0) at util/ordered-events.c:341
  #15 ordered_events__flush (oe=oe@entry=0x7fffffff80e0, how=how@entry=OE_FLUSH__TOP) at util/ordered-events.c:339
  #16 0x00005555557cd631 in process_thread (arg=0x7fffffff7db0) at builtin-top.c:1114
  #17 0x00007ffff7bb817a in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  #18 0x00007ffff5656dc3 in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6

If you look at the frame #2, the code is:

488	 if (he->srcline) {
489          he->srcline = strdup(he->srcline);
490          if (he->srcline == NULL)
491              goto err_rawdata;
492	 }

If he->srcline is not NULL (it is not NULL if it is uninitialized rubbish),
it gets strdupped and strdupping a rubbish random string causes the problem.

Also, if you look at the commit 1fb7d06, it adds the srcline property
into the struct, but not initializing it everywhere needed.

Committer notes:

Now I see, when using --ignore-callees=do_idle we end up here at line
2189 in add_callchain_ip():

2181         if (al.sym != NULL) {
2182                 if (perf_hpp_list.parent && !*parent &&
2183                     symbol__match_regex(al.sym, &parent_regex))
2184                         *parent = al.sym;
2185                 else if (have_ignore_callees && root_al &&
2186                   symbol__match_regex(al.sym, &ignore_callees_regex)) {
2187                         /* Treat this symbol as the root,
2188                            forgetting its callees. */
2189                         *root_al = al;
2190                         callchain_cursor_reset(cursor);
2191                 }
2192         }

And the al that doesn't have the ->srcline field initialized will be
copied to the root_al, so then, back to:

1211 int hist_entry_iter__add(struct hist_entry_iter *iter, struct addr_location *al,
1212                          int max_stack_depth, void *arg)
1213 {
1214         int err, err2;
1215         struct map *alm = NULL;
1216
1217         if (al)
1218                 alm = map__get(al->map);
1219
1220         err = sample__resolve_callchain(iter->sample, &callchain_cursor, &iter->parent,
1221                                         iter->evsel, al, max_stack_depth);
1222         if (err) {
1223                 map__put(alm);
1224                 return err;
1225         }
1226
1227         err = iter->ops->prepare_entry(iter, al);
1228         if (err)
1229                 goto out;
1230
1231         err = iter->ops->add_single_entry(iter, al);
1232         if (err)
1233                 goto out;
1234

That al at line 1221 is what hist_entry_iter__add() (called from
sample__resolve_callchain()) saw as 'root_al', and then:

        iter->ops->add_single_entry(iter, al);

will go on with al->srcline with a bogus value, I'll add the above
sequence to the cset and apply, thanks!

Signed-off-by: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>
CC: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Fixes: 1fb7d06 ("perf report Use srcline from callchain for hist entries")
Link: https //lore.kernel.org/r/20210719145332.29747-1-mpetlan@redhat.com
Reported-by: Juri Lelli <jlelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2021
[ Upstream commit 340fa66 ]

Recent changes exposed a bug where specifically-timed requests to the
path manager netlink API could trigger a divide-by-zero in
__tcp_select_window(), as syzkaller does:

divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
CPU: 0 PID: 9667 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc6+ #3
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:__tcp_select_window+0x509/0xa60 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3016
Code: 44 89 ff e8 c9 29 e9 fd 45 39 e7 0f 8d 20 ff ff ff e8 db 28 e9 fd 44 89 e3 e9 13 ff ff ff e8 ce 28 e9 fd 44 89 e0 44 89 e3 99 <f7> 7c 24 04 29 d3 e9 fc fe ff ff e8 b7 28 e9 fd 44 89 f1 48 89 ea
RSP: 0018:ffff888031ccf020 EFLAGS: 00010216
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000040000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88811532c080 RDI: 0000000000000002
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffff835807c2 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000004 R11: ffffed1020b92441 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 1ffff11006399e08 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
FS:  00007fa4c8344700(0000) GS:ffff88811ae00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000001b2f424000 CR3: 000000003e4e2003 CR4: 0000000000770ef0
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
 tcp_select_window net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:264 [inline]
 __tcp_transmit_skb+0xc00/0x37a0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1351
 __tcp_send_ack.part.0+0x3ec/0x760 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3972
 __tcp_send_ack net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3978 [inline]
 tcp_send_ack+0x7d/0xa0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3978
 mptcp_pm_nl_addr_send_ack+0x1ab/0x380 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:654
 mptcp_pm_remove_addr+0x161/0x200 net/mptcp/pm.c:58
 mptcp_nl_remove_id_zero_address+0x197/0x460 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1328
 mptcp_nl_cmd_del_addr+0x98b/0xd40 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1359
 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x225/0x340 net/netlink/genetlink.c:731
 genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:775 [inline]
 genl_rcv_msg+0x341/0x5b0 net/netlink/genetlink.c:792
 netlink_rcv_skb+0x148/0x430 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2504
 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:803
 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1314 [inline]
 netlink_unicast+0x537/0x750 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1340
 netlink_sendmsg+0x846/0xd80 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1929
 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline]
 sock_sendmsg+0x14e/0x190 net/socket.c:724
 ____sys_sendmsg+0x709/0x870 net/socket.c:2403
 ___sys_sendmsg+0xff/0x170 net/socket.c:2457
 __sys_sendmsg+0xe5/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2486
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

mptcp_pm_nl_addr_send_ack() was attempting to send a TCP ACK on the
first subflow in the MPTCP socket's connection list without validating
that the subflow was in a suitable connection state. To address this,
always validate subflow state when sending extra ACKs on subflows
for address advertisement or subflow priority change.

Fixes: 84dfe36 ("mptcp: send out dedicated ADD_ADDR packet")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#229
Co-developed-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2021
commit 98e2e40 upstream.

When the refcount is decreased to 0, the resource reclamation branch is
entered.  Before CPU0 reaches the race point (1), CPU1 may obtain the
spinlock and traverse the rbtree to find 'root', see
nilfs_lookup_root().

Although CPU1 will call refcount_inc() to increase the refcount, it is
obviously too late.  CPU0 will release 'root' directly, CPU1 then
accesses 'root' and triggers UAF.

Use refcount_dec_and_lock() to ensure that both the operations of
decrease refcount to 0 and link deletion are lock protected eliminates
this risk.

	     CPU0                      CPU1
	nilfs_put_root():
		    <-------- (1)
				spin_lock(&nilfs->ns_cptree_lock);
				rb_erase(&root->rb_node, &nilfs->ns_cptree);
				spin_unlock(&nilfs->ns_cptree_lock);

	kfree(root);
		    <-------- use-after-free

  refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
  WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 9476 at lib/refcount.c:28 \
  refcount_warn_saturate+0x1cf/0x210 lib/refcount.c:28
  Modules linked in:
  CPU: 2 PID: 9476 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.10.45-rc1+ #3
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), ...
  RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x1cf/0x210 lib/refcount.c:28
  ... ...
  Call Trace:
     __refcount_sub_and_test include/linux/refcount.h:283 [inline]
     __refcount_dec_and_test include/linux/refcount.h:315 [inline]
     refcount_dec_and_test include/linux/refcount.h:333 [inline]
     nilfs_put_root+0xc1/0xd0 fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c:795
     nilfs_segctor_destroy fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2749 [inline]
     nilfs_detach_log_writer+0x3fa/0x570 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2812
     nilfs_put_super+0x2f/0xf0 fs/nilfs2/super.c:467
     generic_shutdown_super+0xcd/0x1f0 fs/super.c:464
     kill_block_super+0x4a/0x90 fs/super.c:1446
     deactivate_locked_super+0x6a/0xb0 fs/super.c:335
     deactivate_super+0x85/0x90 fs/super.c:366
     cleanup_mnt+0x277/0x2e0 fs/namespace.c:1118
     __cleanup_mnt+0x15/0x20 fs/namespace.c:1125
     task_work_run+0x8e/0x110 kernel/task_work.c:151
     tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
     exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:164 [inline]
     exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x13c/0x170 kernel/entry/common.c:191
     syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x16/0x30 kernel/entry/common.c:266
     do_syscall_64+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:56
     entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

There is no reproduction program, and the above is only theoretical
analysis.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1629859428-5906-1-git-send-email-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
Fixes: ba65ae4 ("nilfs2: add checkpoint tree to nilfs object")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210723012317.4146-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2021
[ Upstream commit 8f96a5b ]

We update the ctime/mtime of a block device when we remove it so that
blkid knows the device changed.  However we do this by re-opening the
block device and calling filp_update_time.  This is more correct because
it'll call the inode->i_op->update_time if it exists, but the block dev
inodes do not do this.  Instead call generic_update_time() on the
bd_inode in order to avoid the blkdev_open path and get rid of the
following lockdep splat:

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.14.0-rc2+ torvalds#406 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
losetup/11596 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff939640d2f538 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0

but task is already holding lock:
ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop]

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750
       lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop]
       blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0
       blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0
       blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0
       do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390
       path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20
       do_filp_open+0x96/0x120
       do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130
       __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70
       do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

-> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750
       blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x56/0x3c0
       blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0
       do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390
       path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20
       do_filp_open+0x96/0x120
       file_open_name+0xc7/0x170
       filp_open+0x2c/0x50
       btrfs_scratch_superblocks.part.0+0x10f/0x170
       btrfs_rm_device.cold+0xe8/0xed
       btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
       do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

-> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}:
       lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop]
       loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop]
       process_one_work+0x26b/0x560
       worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
       kthread+0x140/0x160
       ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

-> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       process_one_work+0x245/0x560
       worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
       kthread+0x140/0x160
       ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

-> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90
       lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
       flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0
       drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110
       destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250
       __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop]
       block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
       do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
                               lock(&disk->open_mutex);
                               lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
  lock((wq_completion)loop0);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by losetup/11596:
 #0: ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop]

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 11596 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ torvalds#406
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72
 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0
 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50
 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90
 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0
 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220
 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0
 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0
 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100
 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110
 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250
 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop]
 ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0
 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3fa421d ]

When removing the device we call blkdev_put() on the device once we've
removed it, and because we have an EXCL open we need to take the
->open_mutex on the block device to clean it up.  Unfortunately during
device remove we are holding the sb writers lock, which results in the
following lockdep splat:

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.14.0-rc2+ torvalds#407 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
losetup/11595 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff973ac35dd138 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0

but task is already holding lock:
ffff973ac9812c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop]

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750
       lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop]
       blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0
       blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0
       blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0
       do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390
       path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20
       do_filp_open+0x96/0x120
       do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130
       __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70
       do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

-> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750
       blkdev_put+0x3a/0x220
       btrfs_rm_device.cold+0x62/0xe5
       btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
       do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

-> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}:
       lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop]
       loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop]
       process_one_work+0x26b/0x560
       worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
       kthread+0x140/0x160
       ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

-> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       process_one_work+0x245/0x560
       worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
       kthread+0x140/0x160
       ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

-> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90
       lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
       flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0
       drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110
       destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250
       __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop]
       block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
       do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
                               lock(&disk->open_mutex);
                               lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
  lock((wq_completion)loop0);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by losetup/11595:
 #0: ffff973ac9812c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop]

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 11595 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ torvalds#407
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72
 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0
 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50
 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90
 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0
 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220
 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0
 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0
 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100
 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110
 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250
 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop]
 ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0
 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7fc21255d4cb

So instead save the bdev and do the put once we've dropped the sb
writers lock in order to avoid the lockdep recursion.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2024
The test_tag test triggers an unhandled page fault:

  # ./test_tag
  [  130.640218] CPU 0 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff80001b898004, era == 9000000003137f7c, ra == 9000000003139e70
  [  130.640501] Oops[#3]:
  [  130.640553] CPU: 0 PID: 1326 Comm: test_tag Tainted: G      D    O       6.7.0-rc4-loong-devel-gb62ab1a397cf #47 61985c1d94084daa2432f771daa45b56b10d8d2a
  [  130.640764] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022
  [  130.640874] pc 9000000003137f7c ra 9000000003139e70 tp 9000000104cb4000 sp 9000000104cb7a40
  [  130.641001] a0 ffff80001b894000 a1 ffff80001b897ff8 a2 000000006ba210be a3 0000000000000000
  [  130.641128] a4 000000006ba210be a5 00000000000000f1 a6 00000000000000b3 a7 0000000000000000
  [  130.641256] t0 0000000000000000 t1 00000000000007f6 t2 0000000000000000 t3 9000000004091b70
  [  130.641387] t4 000000006ba210be t5 0000000000000004 t6 fffffffffffffff0 t7 90000000040913e0
  [  130.641512] t8 0000000000000005 u0 0000000000000dc0 s9 0000000000000009 s0 9000000104cb7ae0
  [  130.641641] s1 00000000000007f6 s2 0000000000000009 s3 0000000000000095 s4 0000000000000000
  [  130.641771] s5 ffff80001b894000 s6 ffff80001b897fb0 s7 9000000004090c50 s8 0000000000000000
  [  130.641900]    ra: 9000000003139e70 build_body+0x1fcc/0x4988
  [  130.642007]   ERA: 9000000003137f7c build_body+0xd8/0x4988
  [  130.642112]  CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE)
  [  130.642261]  PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE)
  [  130.642353]  EUEN: 00000003 (+FPE +SXE -ASXE -BTE)
  [  130.642458]  ECFG: 00071c1c (LIE=2-4,10-12 VS=7)
  [  130.642554] ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0)
  [  130.642658]  BADV: ffff80001b898004
  [  130.642719]  PRID: 0014c010 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3A5000)
  [  130.642815] Modules linked in: [last unloaded: bpf_testmod(O)]
  [  130.642924] Process test_tag (pid: 1326, threadinfo=00000000f7f4015f, task=000000006499f9fd)
  [  130.643062] Stack : 0000000000000000 9000000003380724 0000000000000000 0000000104cb7be8
  [  130.643213]         0000000000000000 25af8d9b6e600558 9000000106250ea0 9000000104cb7ae0
  [  130.643378]         0000000000000000 0000000000000000 9000000104cb7be8 90000000049f6000
  [  130.643538]         0000000000000090 9000000106250ea0 ffff80001b894000 ffff80001b894000
  [  130.643685]         00007ffffb917790 900000000313ca94 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
  [  130.643831]         ffff80001b894000 0000000000000ff7 0000000000000000 9000000100468000
  [  130.643983]         0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000040 25af8d9b6e600558
  [  130.644131]         0000000000000bb7 ffff80001b894048 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
  [  130.644276]         9000000104cb7be8 90000000049f6000 0000000000000090 9000000104cb7bdc
  [  130.644423]         ffff80001b894000 0000000000000000 00007ffffb917790 90000000032acfb0
  [  130.644572]         ...
  [  130.644629] Call Trace:
  [  130.644641] [<9000000003137f7c>] build_body+0xd8/0x4988
  [  130.644785] [<900000000313ca94>] bpf_int_jit_compile+0x228/0x4ec
  [  130.644891] [<90000000032acfb0>] bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x158/0x1b0
  [  130.645003] [<90000000032b3504>] bpf_prog_load+0x760/0xb44
  [  130.645089] [<90000000032b6744>] __sys_bpf+0xbb8/0x2588
  [  130.645175] [<90000000032b8388>] sys_bpf+0x20/0x2c
  [  130.645259] [<9000000003f6ab38>] do_syscall+0x7c/0x94
  [  130.645369] [<9000000003121c5c>] handle_syscall+0xbc/0x158
  [  130.645507]
  [  130.645539] Code: 380839f6  380831f9  28412bae <24000ca6> 004081ad  0014cb50  004083e8  02bff34c  58008e91
  [  130.645729]
  [  130.646418] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

On my machine, which has CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_16KB=y, the test failed at
loading a BPF prog with 2039 instructions:

  prog = (struct bpf_prog *)ffff80001b894000
  insn = (struct bpf_insn *)(prog->insnsi)ffff80001b894048
  insn + 2039 = (struct bpf_insn *)ffff80001b898000 <- end of the page

In the build_insn() function, we are trying to access next instruction
unconditionally, i.e. `(insn + 1)->imm`. The address lies in the next
page and can be not owned by the current process, thus an page fault is
inevitable and then segfault.

So, let's access next instruction only under `dst = imm64` context.

With this fix, we have:

  # ./test_tag
  test_tag: OK (40945 tests)

Fixes: bbfddb9 ("LoongArch: BPF: Avoid declare variables in switch-case")
Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2024
Andrii Nakryiko says:

====================
Tighten up arg:ctx type enforcement

Follow up fixes for kernel-side and libbpf-side logic around handling arg:ctx
(__arg_ctx) tagged arguments of BPF global subprogs.

Patch #1 adds libbpf feature detection of kernel-side __arg_ctx support to
avoid unnecessary rewriting BTF types. With stricter kernel-side type
enforcement this is now mandatory to avoid problems with using `struct
bpf_user_pt_regs_t` instead of actual typedef. For __arg_ctx tagged arguments
verifier is now supporting either `bpf_user_pt_regs_t` typedef or resolves it
down to the actual struct (pt_regs/user_pt_regs/user_regs_struct), depending
on architecture), but for old kernels without __arg_ctx support it's more
backwards compatible for libbpf to use `struct bpf_user_pt_regs_t` rewrite
which will work on wider range of kernels. So feature detection prevent libbpf
accidentally breaking global subprogs on new kernels.

We also adjust selftests to do similar feature detection (much simpler, but
potentially breaking due to kernel source code refactoring, which is fine for
selftests), and skip tests expecting libbpf's BTF type rewrites.

Patch #2 is preparatory refactoring for patch #3 which adds type enforcement
for arg:ctx tagged global subprog args. See the patch for specifics.

Patch #4 adds many new cases to ensure type logic works as expected.

Finally, patch #5 adds a relevant subset of kernel-side type checks to
__arg_ctx cases that libbpf supports rewrite of. In libbpf's case, type
violations are reported as warnings and BTF rewrite is not performed, which
will eventually lead to BPF verifier complaining at program verification time.

Good care was taken to avoid conflicts between bpf and bpf-next tree (which
has few follow up refactorings in the same code area). Once trees converge
some of the code will be moved around a bit (and some will be deleted), but
with no change to functionality or general shape of the code.

v2->v3:
  - support `bpf_user_pt_regs_t` typedef for KPROBE and PERF_EVENT (CI);
v1->v2:
  - add user_pt_regs and user_regs_struct support for PERF_EVENT (CI);
  - drop FEAT_ARG_CTX_TAG enum leftover from patch #1;
  - fix warning about default: without break in the switch (CI).
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240118033143.3384355-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2024
Petr Machata says:

====================
mlxsw: Miscellaneous fixes

This patchset is a bric-a-brac of fixes for bugs impacting mlxsw.

- Patches #1 and #2 fix issues in ACL handling error paths.
- Patch #3 fixes stack corruption in ACL code that a recent FW update
  has uncovered.

- Patch #4 fixes an issue in handling of IPIP next hops.

- Patch #5 fixes a typo in a the qos_pfc selftest
- Patch #6 fixes the same selftest to work with 8-lane ports.
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1705502064.git.petrm@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2024
When I was testing mongodb over bcachefs with compression,
there is a lockdep warning when snapshotting mongodb data volume.

$ cat test.sh
prog=bcachefs

$prog subvolume create /mnt/data
$prog subvolume create /mnt/data/snapshots

while true;do
    $prog subvolume snapshot /mnt/data /mnt/data/snapshots/$(date +%s)
    sleep 1s
done

$ cat /etc/mongodb.conf
systemLog:
  destination: file
  logAppend: true
  path: /mnt/data/mongod.log

storage:
  dbPath: /mnt/data/

lockdep reports:
[ 3437.452330] ======================================================
[ 3437.452750] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 3437.453168] 6.7.0-rc7-custom+ torvalds#85 Tainted: G            E
[ 3437.453562] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 3437.453981] bcachefs/35533 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 3437.454325] ffffa0a02b2b1418 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0x62/0x190
[ 3437.454875]
               but task is already holding lock:
[ 3437.455268] ffffa0a02b2b10e0 (&type->s_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs]
[ 3437.456009]
               which lock already depends on the new lock.

[ 3437.456553]
               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 3437.457054]
               -> #3 (&type->s_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}:
[ 3437.457507]        down_read+0x3e/0x170
[ 3437.457772]        bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs]
[ 3437.458206]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0
[ 3437.458498]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0
[ 3437.458779]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
[ 3437.459155]
               -> #2 (&c->snapshot_create_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
[ 3437.459615]        down_read+0x3e/0x170
[ 3437.459878]        bch2_truncate+0x82/0x110 [bcachefs]
[ 3437.460276]        bchfs_truncate+0x254/0x3c0 [bcachefs]
[ 3437.460686]        notify_change+0x1f1/0x4a0
[ 3437.461283]        do_truncate+0x7f/0xd0
[ 3437.461555]        path_openat+0xa57/0xce0
[ 3437.461836]        do_filp_open+0xb4/0x160
[ 3437.462116]        do_sys_openat2+0x91/0xc0
[ 3437.462402]        __x64_sys_openat+0x53/0xa0
[ 3437.462701]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0
[ 3437.462982]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
[ 3437.463359]
               -> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 3437.463843]        down_write+0x3b/0xc0
[ 3437.464223]        bch2_write_iter+0x5b/0xcc0 [bcachefs]
[ 3437.464493]        vfs_write+0x21b/0x4c0
[ 3437.464653]        ksys_write+0x69/0xf0
[ 3437.464839]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0
[ 3437.465009]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
[ 3437.465231]
               -> #0 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}:
[ 3437.465471]        __lock_acquire+0x1455/0x21b0
[ 3437.465656]        lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0
[ 3437.465822]        mnt_want_write+0x46/0x1a0
[ 3437.465996]        filename_create+0x62/0x190
[ 3437.466175]        user_path_create+0x2d/0x50
[ 3437.466352]        bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x2ec/0xc90 [bcachefs]
[ 3437.466617]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0
[ 3437.466791]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0
[ 3437.466957]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
[ 3437.467180]
               other info that might help us debug this:

[ 3437.469670] 2 locks held by bcachefs/35533:
               other info that might help us debug this:

[ 3437.467507] Chain exists of:
                 sb_writers#10 --> &c->snapshot_create_lock --> &type->s_umount_key#48

[ 3437.467979]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[ 3437.468223]        CPU0                    CPU1
[ 3437.468405]        ----                    ----
[ 3437.468585]   rlock(&type->s_umount_key#48);
[ 3437.468758]                                lock(&c->snapshot_create_lock);
[ 3437.469030]                                lock(&type->s_umount_key#48);
[ 3437.469291]   rlock(sb_writers#10);
[ 3437.469434]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[ 3437.469670] 2 locks held by bcachefs/35533:
[ 3437.469838]  #0: ffffa0a02ce00a88 (&c->snapshot_create_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x1e3/0xc90 [bcachefs]
[ 3437.470294]  #1: ffffa0a02b2b10e0 (&type->s_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs]
[ 3437.470744]
               stack backtrace:
[ 3437.470922] CPU: 7 PID: 35533 Comm: bcachefs Kdump: loaded Tainted: G            E      6.7.0-rc7-custom+ torvalds#85
[ 3437.471313] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.16.3-1-1 04/01/2014
[ 3437.471694] Call Trace:
[ 3437.471795]  <TASK>
[ 3437.471884]  dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x90
[ 3437.472035]  check_noncircular+0x132/0x150
[ 3437.472202]  __lock_acquire+0x1455/0x21b0
[ 3437.472369]  lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0
[ 3437.472518]  ? filename_create+0x62/0x190
[ 3437.472683]  ? lock_is_held_type+0x97/0x110
[ 3437.472856]  mnt_want_write+0x46/0x1a0
[ 3437.473025]  ? filename_create+0x62/0x190
[ 3437.473204]  filename_create+0x62/0x190
[ 3437.473380]  user_path_create+0x2d/0x50
[ 3437.473555]  bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x2ec/0xc90 [bcachefs]
[ 3437.473819]  ? lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0
[ 3437.474002]  ? __fget_files+0x2a/0x190
[ 3437.474195]  ? __fget_files+0xbc/0x190
[ 3437.474380]  ? lock_release+0xc5/0x270
[ 3437.474567]  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0
[ 3437.474764]  ? __pfx_bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [bcachefs]
[ 3437.475090]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0
[ 3437.475277]  do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0
[ 3437.475454]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
[ 3437.475691] RIP: 0033:0x7f2743c313af
======================================================

In __bch2_ioctl_subvolume_create(), we grab s_umount unconditionally
and unlock it at the end of the function. There is a comment
"why do we need this lock?" about the lock coming from
commit 42d2373 ("bcachefs: Snapshot creation, deletion")
The reason is that __bch2_ioctl_subvolume_create() calls
sync_inodes_sb() which enforce locked s_umount to writeback all dirty
nodes before doing snapshot works.

Fix it by read locking s_umount for snapshotting only and unlocking
s_umount after sync_inodes_sb().

Signed-off-by: Su Yue <glass.su@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 30, 2024
The cited change refactored mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_peer_flow() to only clear DUP
flag when list of peer flows has become empty. However, if any concurrent
user holds a reference to a peer flow (for example, the neighbor update
workqueue task is updating peer flow's parent encap entry concurrently),
then the flow will not be removed from the peer list and, consecutively,
DUP flag will remain set. Since mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_peers_flow() calls
mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_peer_flow() for every possible peer index the algorithm
will try to remove the flow from eswitch instances that it has never peered
with causing either NULL pointer dereference when trying to remove the flow
peer list head of peer_index that was never initialized or a warning if the
list debug config is enabled[0].

Fix the issue by always removing the peer flow from the list even when not
releasing the last reference to it.

[0]:

[ 3102.985806] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 3102.986223] list_del corruption, ffff888139110698->next is NULL
[ 3102.986757] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 22109 at lib/list_debug.c:53 __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x4f/0xc0
[ 3102.987561] Modules linked in: act_ct nf_flow_table bonding act_tunnel_key act_mirred act_skbedit vxlan cls_matchall nfnetlink_cttimeout act_gact cls_flower sch_ingress mlx5_vdpa vringh vhost_iotlb vdpa openvswitch nsh xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink iptable_nat xt_addrtype xt_conntrack nf_nat br_netfilter rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcg
ss oid_registry overlay rpcrdma rdma_ucm ib_iser libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ib_umad rdma_cm ib_ipoib iw_cm ib_cm mlx5_ib ib_uverbs ib_core mlx5_core [last unloaded: bonding]
[ 3102.991113] CPU: 2 PID: 22109 Comm: revalidator28 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc6+ #3
[ 3102.991695] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 3102.992605] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x4f/0xc0
[ 3102.993122] Code: 39 c2 74 56 48 8b 32 48 39 fe 75 62 48 8b 51 08 48 39 f2 75 73 b8 01 00 00 00 c3 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 48 fd 0a 82 e8 41 0b ad ff <0f> 0b 31 c0 c3 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 70 fd 0a 82 e8 2d 0b ad ff 0f 0b
[ 3102.994615] RSP: 0018:ffff8881383e7710 EFLAGS: 00010286
[ 3102.995078] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 0000000000000000
[ 3102.995670] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff88885f89b640 RDI: ffff88885f89b640
[ 3102.997188] DEL flow 00000000be367878 on port 0
[ 3102.998594] RBP: dead000000000122 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: c0000000ffffdfff
[ 3102.999604] R10: 0000000000000008 R11: ffff8881383e7598 R12: dead000000000100
[ 3103.000198] R13: 0000000000000002 R14: ffff888139110000 R15: ffff888101901240
[ 3103.000790] FS:  00007f424cde4700(0000) GS:ffff88885f880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 3103.001486] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 3103.001986] CR2: 00007fd42e8dcb70 CR3: 000000011e68a003 CR4: 0000000000370ea0
[ 3103.002596] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 3103.003190] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 3103.003787] Call Trace:
[ 3103.004055]  <TASK>
[ 3103.004297]  ? __warn+0x7d/0x130
[ 3103.004623]  ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x4f/0xc0
[ 3103.005094]  ? report_bug+0xf1/0x1c0
[ 3103.005439]  ? console_unlock+0x4a/0xd0
[ 3103.005806]  ? handle_bug+0x3f/0x70
[ 3103.006149]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60
[ 3103.006531]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
[ 3103.007430]  ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x4f/0xc0
[ 3103.007910]  mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_peers_flow+0xcf/0x240 [mlx5_core]
[ 3103.008463]  mlx5e_tc_del_flow+0x46/0x270 [mlx5_core]
[ 3103.008944]  mlx5e_flow_put+0x26/0x50 [mlx5_core]
[ 3103.009401]  mlx5e_delete_flower+0x25f/0x380 [mlx5_core]
[ 3103.009901]  tc_setup_cb_destroy+0xab/0x180
[ 3103.010292]  fl_hw_destroy_filter+0x99/0xc0 [cls_flower]
[ 3103.010779]  __fl_delete+0x2d4/0x2f0 [cls_flower]
[ 3103.011207]  fl_delete+0x36/0x80 [cls_flower]
[ 3103.011614]  tc_del_tfilter+0x56f/0x750
[ 3103.011982]  rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0xff/0x3a0
[ 3103.012362]  ? netlink_ack+0x1c7/0x4e0
[ 3103.012719]  ? rtnl_calcit.isra.44+0x130/0x130
[ 3103.013134]  netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100
[ 3103.013533]  netlink_unicast+0x1ca/0x2b0
[ 3103.013902]  netlink_sendmsg+0x361/0x4d0
[ 3103.014269]  __sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x60
[ 3103.014643]  ____sys_sendmsg+0x1f2/0x200
[ 3103.015018]  ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x72/0xa0
[ 3103.015265]  ___sys_sendmsg+0x87/0xd0
[ 3103.016608]  ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x72/0xa0
[ 3103.017014]  ? ___sys_recvmsg+0x9b/0xd0
[ 3103.017381]  ? ttwu_do_activate.isra.137+0x58/0x180
[ 3103.017821]  ? wake_up_q+0x49/0x90
[ 3103.018157]  ? futex_wake+0x137/0x160
[ 3103.018521]  ? __sys_sendmsg+0x51/0x90
[ 3103.018882]  __sys_sendmsg+0x51/0x90
[ 3103.019230]  ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x56/0x130
[ 3103.019670]  do_syscall_64+0x3c/0x80
[ 3103.020017]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
[ 3103.020469] RIP: 0033:0x7f4254811ef4
[ 3103.020816] Code: 89 f3 48 83 ec 10 48 89 7c 24 08 48 89 14 24 e8 42 eb ff ff 48 8b 14 24 41 89 c0 48 89 de 48 8b 7c 24 08 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 30 44 89 c7 48 89 04 24 e8 78 eb ff ff 48 8b
[ 3103.022290] RSP: 002b:00007f424cdd9480 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
[ 3103.022970] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f424cdd9510 RCX: 00007f4254811ef4
[ 3103.023564] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007f424cdd9510 RDI: 0000000000000012
[ 3103.024158] RBP: 00007f424cdda238 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007f41d801a4b0
[ 3103.024748] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000000000001
[ 3103.025341] R13: 00007f424cdd9510 R14: 00007f424cdda240 R15: 00007f424cdd99a0
[ 3103.025931]  </TASK>
[ 3103.026182] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[ 3103.027033] ------------[ cut here ]------------

Fixes: 9be6c21 ("net/mlx5e: Handle offloads flows per peer")
Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 30, 2024
Similar to a reported issue (check the commit b33fb5b ("net:
qualcomm: rmnet: fix global oob in rmnet_policy"), my local fuzzer finds
another global out-of-bounds read for policy ksmbd_nl_policy. See bug
trace below:

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in validate_nla lib/nlattr.c:386 [inline]
BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in __nla_validate_parse+0x24af/0x2750 lib/nlattr.c:600
Read of size 1 at addr ffffffff8f24b100 by task syz-executor.1/62810

CPU: 0 PID: 62810 Comm: syz-executor.1 Tainted: G                 N 6.1.0 #3
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x8b/0xb3 lib/dump_stack.c:106
 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:284 [inline]
 print_report+0x172/0x475 mm/kasan/report.c:395
 kasan_report+0xbb/0x1c0 mm/kasan/report.c:495
 validate_nla lib/nlattr.c:386 [inline]
 __nla_validate_parse+0x24af/0x2750 lib/nlattr.c:600
 __nla_parse+0x3e/0x50 lib/nlattr.c:697
 __nlmsg_parse include/net/netlink.h:748 [inline]
 genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse.constprop.0+0x1b0/0x290 net/netlink/genetlink.c:565
 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xda/0x330 net/netlink/genetlink.c:734
 genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:833 [inline]
 genl_rcv_msg+0x441/0x780 net/netlink/genetlink.c:850
 netlink_rcv_skb+0x14f/0x410 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2540
 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:861
 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline]
 netlink_unicast+0x54e/0x800 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345
 netlink_sendmsg+0x930/0xe50 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921
 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline]
 sock_sendmsg+0x154/0x190 net/socket.c:734
 ____sys_sendmsg+0x6df/0x840 net/socket.c:2482
 ___sys_sendmsg+0x110/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2536
 __sys_sendmsg+0xf3/0x1c0 net/socket.c:2565
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7fdd66a8f359
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 19 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fdd65e00168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fdd66bbcf80 RCX: 00007fdd66a8f359
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000500 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007fdd66ada493 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007ffc84b81aff R14: 00007fdd65e00300 R15: 0000000000022000
 </TASK>

The buggy address belongs to the variable:
 ksmbd_nl_policy+0x100/0xa80

The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
page:0000000034f47940 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x1ccc4b
flags: 0x200000000001000(reserved|node=0|zone=2)
raw: 0200000000001000 ffffea00073312c8 ffffea00073312c8 0000000000000000
raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected

Memory state around the buggy address:
 ffffffff8f24b000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 ffffffff8f24b080: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>ffffffff8f24b100: f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 07 f9
                   ^
 ffffffff8f24b180: f9 f9 f9 f9 00 05 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 05
 ffffffff8f24b200: f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 03 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 04 f9
==================================================================

To fix it, add a placeholder named __KSMBD_EVENT_MAX and let
KSMBD_EVENT_MAX to be its original value - 1 according to what other
netlink families do. Also change two sites that refer the
KSMBD_EVENT_MAX to correct value.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 0626e66 ("cifsd: add server handler for central processing and tranport layers")
Signed-off-by: Lin Ma <linma@zju.edu.cn>
Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 6, 2024
Many devices with a single alternate setting do not have a Valid
Alternate Setting Control and validation performed by
validate_sample_rate_table_v2v3() doesn't work on them and is not
really needed. So check the presense of control before sending
altsetting validation requests.

MOTU Microbook IIc is suffering the most without this check. It
takes up to 40 seconds to bootup due to how slow it switches
sampling rates:

[ 2659.164824] usb 3-2: New USB device found, idVendor=07fd, idProduct=0004, bcdDevice= 0.60
[ 2659.164827] usb 3-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0
[ 2659.164829] usb 3-2: Product: MicroBook IIc
[ 2659.164830] usb 3-2: Manufacturer: MOTU
[ 2659.166204] usb 3-2: Found last interface = 3
[ 2679.322298] usb 3-2: No valid sample rate available for 1:1, assuming a firmware bug
[ 2679.322306] usb 3-2: 1:1: add audio endpoint 0x3
[ 2679.322321] usb 3-2: Creating new data endpoint #3
[ 2679.322552] usb 3-2: 1:1 Set sample rate 96000, clock 1
[ 2684.362250] usb 3-2: 2:1: cannot get freq (v2/v3): err -110
[ 2694.444700] usb 3-2: No valid sample rate available for 2:1, assuming a firmware bug
[ 2694.444707] usb 3-2: 2:1: add audio endpoint 0x84
[ 2694.444721] usb 3-2: Creating new data endpoint torvalds#84
[ 2699.482103] usb 3-2: 2:1 Set sample rate 96000, clock 1

Signed-off-by: Alexander Tsoy <alexander@tsoy.me>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240129121254.3454481-1-alexander@tsoy.me
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 26, 2024
…kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD

KVM/arm64 fixes for 6.8, take #3

- Check for the validity of interrupts handled by a MOVALL
  command

- Check for the validity of interrupts while reading the
  pending state on enabling LPIs.
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 27, 2024
Hou Tao says:

====================
Fix the read of vsyscall page through bpf

From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>

Hi,

As reported by syzboot [1] and [2], when trying to read vsyscall page
by using bpf_probe_read_kernel() or bpf_probe_read(), oops may happen.

Thomas Gleixner had proposed a test patch [3], but it seems that no
formal patch is posted after about one month [4], so I post it instead
and add an Originally-by tag in patch #2.

Patch #1 makes is_vsyscall_vaddr() being a common helper. Patch #2 fixes
the problem by disallowing vsyscall page read for
copy_from_kernel_nofault(). Patch #3 adds one test case to ensure the
read of vsyscall page through bpf is rejected. Please see individual
patches for more details.

Comments are always welcome.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAG48ez06TZft=ATH1qh2c5mpS5BT8UakwNkzi6nvK5_djC-4Nw@mail.gmail.com/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CABOYnLynjBoFZOf3Z4BhaZkc5hx_kHfsjiW+UWLoB=w33LvScw@mail.gmail.com/
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/87r0jwquhv.ffs@tglx/
[4]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/e24b125c-8ff4-9031-6c53-67ff2e01f316@huaweicloud.com/

Change Log:
v3:
 * rephrase commit message for patch #1 & #2 (Sohil)
 * reword comments in copy_from_kernel_nofault_allowed() (Sohil)
 * add Rvb tag for patch #1 and Acked-by tag for patch #3 (Sohil, Yonghong)

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240126115423.3943360-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/
  * move is_vsyscall_vaddr to asm/vsyscall.h instead (Sohil)
  * elaborate on the reason for disallowing of vsyscall page read in
    copy_from_kernel_nofault_allowed() (Sohil)
  * update the commit message of patch #2 to more clearly explain how
    the oops occurs. (Sohil)
  * update the commit message of patch #3 to explain the expected return
    values of various bpf helpers (Yonghong)

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240119073019.1528573-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240202103935.3154011-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 27, 2024
  ...
  cdns3_gadget_ep_free_request(&priv_ep->endpoint, &priv_req->request);
  list_del_init(&priv_req->list);
  ...

'priv_req' actually free at cdns3_gadget_ep_free_request(). But
list_del_init() use priv_req->list after it.

[ 1542.642868][  T534] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free read in __list_del_entry_valid+0x10/0xd4
[ 1542.642868][  T534]
[ 1542.653162][  T534] Use-after-free read at 0x000000009ed0ba99 (in kfence-#3):
[ 1542.660311][  T534]  __list_del_entry_valid+0x10/0xd4
[ 1542.665375][  T534]  cdns3_gadget_ep_disable+0x1f8/0x388 [cdns3]
[ 1542.671571][  T534]  usb_ep_disable+0x44/0xe4
[ 1542.675948][  T534]  ffs_func_eps_disable+0x64/0xc8
[ 1542.680839][  T534]  ffs_func_set_alt+0x74/0x368
[ 1542.685478][  T534]  ffs_func_disable+0x18/0x28

Move list_del_init() before cdns3_gadget_ep_free_request() to resolve this
problem.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 7733f6c ("usb: cdns3: Add Cadence USB3 DRD Driver")
Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240202154217.661867-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 24, 2024
…git/netfilter/nf

Pablo Neira Ayuso says:

====================
Netfilter fixes for net

Patch #1 restores NFPROTO_INET with nft_compat, from Ignat Korchagin.

Patch #2 fixes an issue with bridge netfilter and broadcast/multicast
packets.

There is a day 0 bug in br_netfilter when used with connection tracking.

Conntrack assumes that an nf_conn structure that is not yet added to
hash table ("unconfirmed"), is only visible by the current cpu that is
processing the sk_buff.

For bridge this isn't true, sk_buff can get cloned in between, and
clones can be processed in parallel on different cpu.

This patch disables NAT and conntrack helpers for multicast packets.

Patch #3 adds a selftest to cover for the br_netfilter bug.

netfilter pull request 24-02-29

* tag 'nf-24-02-29' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf:
  selftests: netfilter: add bridge conntrack + multicast test case
  netfilter: bridge: confirm multicast packets before passing them up the stack
  netfilter: nf_tables: allow NFPROTO_INET in nft_(match/target)_validate()
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240229000135.8780-1-pablo@netfilter.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 9, 2024
As for ice bug fixed by commit b7306b4 ("ice: manage interrupts
during poll exit") followed by commit 23be707 ("ice: fix software
generating extra interrupts") I'm seeing the similar issue also with
i40e driver.

In certain situation when busy-loop is enabled together with adaptive
coalescing, the driver occasionally misses that there are outstanding
descriptors to clean when exiting busy poll.

Try to catch the remaining work by triggering a software interrupt
when exiting busy poll. No extra interrupts will be generated when
busy polling is not used.

The issue was found when running sockperf ping-pong tcp test with
adaptive coalescing and busy poll enabled (50 as value busy_pool
and busy_read sysctl knobs) and results in huge latency spikes
with more than 100000us.

The fix is inspired from the ice driver and do the following:
1) During napi poll exit in case of busy-poll (napo_complete_done()
   returns false) this is recorded to q_vector that we were in busy
   loop.
2) Extends i40e_buildreg_itr() to be able to add an enforced software
   interrupt into built value
2) In i40e_update_enable_itr() enforces a software interrupt trigger
   if we are exiting busy poll to catch any pending clean-ups
3) Reuses unused 3rd ITR (interrupt throttle) index and set it to
   20K interrupts per second to limit the number of these sw interrupts.

Test results
============
Prior:
[root@dell-per640-07 net]# sockperf ping-pong -i 10.9.9.1 --tcp -m 1000 --mps=max -t 120
sockperf: == version #3.10-no.git ==
sockperf[CLIENT] send on:sockperf: using recvfrom() to block on socket(s)

[ 0] IP = 10.9.9.1        PORT = 11111 # TCP
sockperf: Warmup stage (sending a few dummy messages)...
sockperf: Starting test...
sockperf: Test end (interrupted by timer)
sockperf: Test ended
sockperf: [Total Run] RunTime=119.999 sec; Warm up time=400 msec; SentMessages=2438563; ReceivedMessages=2438562
sockperf: ========= Printing statistics for Server No: 0
sockperf: [Valid Duration] RunTime=119.549 sec; SentMessages=2429473; ReceivedMessages=2429473
sockperf: ====> avg-latency=24.571 (std-dev=93.297, mean-ad=4.904, median-ad=1.510, siqr=1.063, cv=3.797, std-error=0.060, 99.0% ci=[24.417, 24.725])
sockperf: # dropped messages = 0; # duplicated messages = 0; # out-of-order messages = 0
sockperf: Summary: Latency is 24.571 usec
sockperf: Total 2429473 observations; each percentile contains 24294.73 observations
sockperf: ---> <MAX> observation = 103294.331
sockperf: ---> percentile 99.999 =   45.633
sockperf: ---> percentile 99.990 =   37.013
sockperf: ---> percentile 99.900 =   35.910
sockperf: ---> percentile 99.000 =   33.390
sockperf: ---> percentile 90.000 =   28.626
sockperf: ---> percentile 75.000 =   27.741
sockperf: ---> percentile 50.000 =   26.743
sockperf: ---> percentile 25.000 =   25.614
sockperf: ---> <MIN> observation =   12.220

After:
[root@dell-per640-07 net]# sockperf ping-pong -i 10.9.9.1 --tcp -m 1000 --mps=max -t 120
sockperf: == version #3.10-no.git ==
sockperf[CLIENT] send on:sockperf: using recvfrom() to block on socket(s)

[ 0] IP = 10.9.9.1        PORT = 11111 # TCP
sockperf: Warmup stage (sending a few dummy messages)...
sockperf: Starting test...
sockperf: Test end (interrupted by timer)
sockperf: Test ended
sockperf: [Total Run] RunTime=119.999 sec; Warm up time=400 msec; SentMessages=2400055; ReceivedMessages=2400054
sockperf: ========= Printing statistics for Server No: 0
sockperf: [Valid Duration] RunTime=119.549 sec; SentMessages=2391186; ReceivedMessages=2391186
sockperf: ====> avg-latency=24.965 (std-dev=5.934, mean-ad=4.642, median-ad=1.485, siqr=1.067, cv=0.238, std-error=0.004, 99.0% ci=[24.955, 24.975])
sockperf: # dropped messages = 0; # duplicated messages = 0; # out-of-order messages = 0
sockperf: Summary: Latency is 24.965 usec
sockperf: Total 2391186 observations; each percentile contains 23911.86 observations
sockperf: ---> <MAX> observation =  195.841
sockperf: ---> percentile 99.999 =   45.026
sockperf: ---> percentile 99.990 =   39.009
sockperf: ---> percentile 99.900 =   35.922
sockperf: ---> percentile 99.000 =   33.482
sockperf: ---> percentile 90.000 =   28.902
sockperf: ---> percentile 75.000 =   27.821
sockperf: ---> percentile 50.000 =   26.860
sockperf: ---> percentile 25.000 =   25.685
sockperf: ---> <MIN> observation =   12.277

Fixes: 0bcd952 ("ethernet/intel: consolidate NAPI and NAPI exit")
Reported-by: Hugo Ferreira <hferreir@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Tested-by: Pucha Himasekhar Reddy <himasekharx.reddy.pucha@intel.com> (A Contingent worker at Intel)
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 9, 2024
The driver creates /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/mob_ttm even when the
corresponding ttm_resource_manager is not allocated.
This leads to a crash when trying to read from this file.

Add a check to create mob_ttm, system_mob_ttm, and gmr_ttm debug file
only when the corresponding ttm_resource_manager is allocated.

crash> bt
PID: 3133409  TASK: ffff8fe4834a5000  CPU: 3    COMMAND: "grep"
 #0 [ffffb954506b3b20] machine_kexec at ffffffffb2a6bec3
 #1 [ffffb954506b3b78] __crash_kexec at ffffffffb2bb598a
 #2 [ffffb954506b3c38] crash_kexec at ffffffffb2bb68c1
 #3 [ffffb954506b3c50] oops_end at ffffffffb2a2a9b1
 #4 [ffffb954506b3c70] no_context at ffffffffb2a7e913
 #5 [ffffb954506b3cc8] __bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffffb2a7ec8c
 #6 [ffffb954506b3d10] do_page_fault at ffffffffb2a7f887
 #7 [ffffb954506b3d40] page_fault at ffffffffb360116e
    [exception RIP: ttm_resource_manager_debug+0x11]
    RIP: ffffffffc04afd11  RSP: ffffb954506b3df0  RFLAGS: 00010246
    RAX: ffff8fe41a6d1200  RBX: 0000000000000000  RCX: 0000000000000940
    RDX: 0000000000000000  RSI: ffffffffc04b4338  RDI: 0000000000000000
    RBP: ffffb954506b3e08   R8: ffff8fee3ffad000   R9: 0000000000000000
    R10: ffff8fe41a76a000  R11: 0000000000000001  R12: 00000000ffffffff
    R13: 0000000000000001  R14: ffff8fe5bb6f3900  R15: ffff8fe41a6d1200
    ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018
 #8 [ffffb954506b3e00] ttm_resource_manager_show at ffffffffc04afde7 [ttm]
 #9 [ffffb954506b3e30] seq_read at ffffffffb2d8f9f3
    RIP: 00007f4c4eda8985  RSP: 00007ffdbba9e9f8  RFLAGS: 00000246
    RAX: ffffffffffffffda  RBX: 000000000037e000  RCX: 00007f4c4eda8985
    RDX: 000000000037e000  RSI: 00007f4c41573000  RDI: 0000000000000003
    RBP: 000000000037e000   R8: 0000000000000000   R9: 000000000037fe30
    R10: 0000000000000000  R11: 0000000000000246  R12: 00007f4c41573000
    R13: 0000000000000003  R14: 00007f4c41572010  R15: 0000000000000003
    ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000  CS: 0033  SS: 002b

Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com>
Fixes: af4a25b ("drm/vmwgfx: Add debugfs entries for various ttm resource managers")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Zack Rusin <zack.rusin@broadcom.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240312093551.196609-1-jfalempe@redhat.com
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 9, 2024
…git/netfilter/nf

Pablo Neira Ayuso says:

====================
Netfilter fixes for net

The following patchset contains Netfilter fixes for net:

Patch #1 reject destroy chain command to delete device hooks in netdev
         family, hence, only delchain commands are allowed.

Patch #2 reject table flag update interference with netdev basechain
	 hook updates, this can leave hooks in inconsistent
	 registration/unregistration state.

Patch #3 do not unregister netdev basechain hooks if table is dormant.
	 Otherwise, splat with double unregistration is possible.

Patch #4 fixes Kconfig to allow to restore IP_NF_ARPTABLES,
	 from Kuniyuki Iwashima.

There are a more fixes still in progress on my side that need more work.

* tag 'nf-24-03-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf:
  netfilter: arptables: Select NETFILTER_FAMILY_ARP when building arp_tables.c
  netfilter: nf_tables: skip netdev hook unregistration if table is dormant
  netfilter: nf_tables: reject table flag and netdev basechain updates
  netfilter: nf_tables: reject destroy command to remove basechain hooks
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328031855.2063-1-pablo@netfilter.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 9, 2024
…git/netfilter/nf

Pablo Neira Ayuso says:

====================
Netfilter fixes for net

The following patchset contains Netfilter fixes for net:

Patch #1 unlike early commit path stage which triggers a call to abort,
         an explicit release of the batch is required on abort, otherwise
         mutex is released and commit_list remains in place.

Patch #2 release mutex after nft_gc_seq_end() in commit path, otherwise
         async GC worker could collect expired objects.

Patch #3 flush pending destroy work in module removal path, otherwise UaF
         is possible.

Patch #4 and #6 restrict the table dormant flag with basechain updates
	 to fix state inconsistency in the hook registration.

Patch #5 adds missing RCU read side lock to flowtable type to avoid races
	 with module removal.

* tag 'nf-24-04-04' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf:
  netfilter: nf_tables: discard table flag update with pending basechain deletion
  netfilter: nf_tables: Fix potential data-race in __nft_flowtable_type_get()
  netfilter: nf_tables: reject new basechain after table flag update
  netfilter: nf_tables: flush pending destroy work before exit_net release
  netfilter: nf_tables: release mutex after nft_gc_seq_end from abort path
  netfilter: nf_tables: release batch on table validation from abort path
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240404104334.1627-1-pablo@netfilter.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 21, 2024
At current x1e80100 interface table, interface #3 is wrongly
connected to DP controller #0 and interface #4 wrongly connected
to DP controller #2. Fix this problem by connect Interface #3 to
DP controller #0 and interface #4 connect to DP controller #1.
Also add interface #6, #7 and #8 connections to DP controller to
complete x1e80100 interface table.

Changs in V3:
-- add v2 changes log

Changs in V2:
-- add x1e80100 to subject
-- add Fixes

Fixes: e3b1f36 ("drm/msm/dpu: Add X1E80100 support")
Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/585549/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1711741586-9037-1-git-send-email-quic_khsieh@quicinc.com
Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 11, 2024
Andrii Nakryiko says:

====================
Fix BPF multi-uprobe PID filtering logic

It turns out that current implementation of multi-uprobe PID filtering logic
is broken. It filters by thread, while the promise is filtering by process.
Patch #1 fixes the logic trivially. The rest is testing and mitigations that
are necessary for libbpf to not break users of USDT programs.

v1->v2:
  - fix selftest in last patch (CI);
  - use semicolon in patch #3 (Jiri).
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240521163401.3005045-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 11, 2024
…git/netfilter/nf

Pablo Neira Ayuso says:

====================
Netfilter fixes for net

The following patchset contains Netfilter fixes for net:

Patch #1 syzbot reports that nf_reinject() could be called without
         rcu_read_lock() when flushing pending packets at nfnetlink
         queue removal, from Eric Dumazet.

Patch #2 flushes ipset list:set when canceling garbage collection to
         reference to other lists to fix a race, from Jozsef Kadlecsik.

Patch #3 restores q-in-q matching with nft_payload by reverting
         f6ae9f1 ("netfilter: nft_payload: add C-VLAN support").

Patch #4 fixes vlan mangling in skbuff when vlan offload is present
         in skbuff, without this patch nft_payload corrupts packets
         in this case.

Patch #5 fixes possible nul-deref in tproxy no IP address is found in
         netdevice, reported by syzbot and patch from Florian Westphal.

Patch #6 removes a superfluous restriction which prevents loose fib
         lookups from input and forward hooks, from Eric Garver.

My assessment is that patches #1, #2 and #5 address possible kernel
crash, anything else in this batch fixes broken features.

netfilter pull request 24-05-29

* tag 'nf-24-05-29' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf:
  netfilter: nft_fib: allow from forward/input without iif selector
  netfilter: tproxy: bail out if IP has been disabled on the device
  netfilter: nft_payload: skbuff vlan metadata mangle support
  netfilter: nft_payload: restore vlan q-in-q match support
  netfilter: ipset: Add list flush to cancel_gc
  netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: acquire rcu_read_lock() in instance_destroy_rcu()
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240528225519.1155786-1-pablo@netfilter.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 11, 2024
We have been seeing crashes on duplicate keys in
btrfs_set_item_key_safe():

  BTRFS critical (device vdb): slot 4 key (450 108 8192) new key (450 108 8192)
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620!
  invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
  CPU: 0 PID: 3139 Comm: xfs_io Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0 #6
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014
  RIP: 0010:btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0x11f/0x290 [btrfs]

With the following stack trace:

  #0  btrfs_set_item_key_safe (fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620:4)
  #1  btrfs_drop_extents (fs/btrfs/file.c:411:4)
  #2  log_one_extent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4732:9)
  #3  btrfs_log_changed_extents (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4955:9)
  #4  btrfs_log_inode (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6626:9)
  #5  btrfs_log_inode_parent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7070:8)
  #6  btrfs_log_dentry_safe (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7171:8)
  #7  btrfs_sync_file (fs/btrfs/file.c:1933:8)
  #8  vfs_fsync_range (fs/sync.c:188:9)
  #9  vfs_fsync (fs/sync.c:202:9)
  #10 do_fsync (fs/sync.c:212:9)
  #11 __do_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:225:9)
  #12 __se_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1)
  #13 __x64_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1)
  #14 do_syscall_x64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52:14)
  #15 do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:83:7)
  #16 entry_SYSCALL_64+0xaf/0x14c (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121)

So we're logging a changed extent from fsync, which is splitting an
extent in the log tree. But this split part already exists in the tree,
triggering the BUG().

This is the state of the log tree at the time of the crash, dumped with
drgn (https://github.com/osandov/drgn/blob/main/contrib/btrfs_tree.py)
to get more details than btrfs_print_leaf() gives us:

  >>> print_extent_buffer(prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0]["eb"])
  leaf 33439744 level 0 items 72 generation 9 owner 18446744073709551610
  leaf 33439744 flags 0x100000000000000
  fs uuid e5bd3946-400c-4223-8923-190ef1f18677
  chunk uuid d58cb17e-6d02-494a-829a-18b7d8a399da
          item 0 key (450 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160
                  generation 7 transid 9 size 8192 nbytes 8473563889606862198
                  block group 0 mode 100600 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0
                  sequence 204 flags 0x10(PREALLOC)
                  atime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)
                  ctime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44)
                  mtime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44)
                  otime 17592186044416.000000000 (559444-03-08 01:40:16)
          item 1 key (450 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 16110 itemsize 13
                  index 195 namelen 3 name: 193
          item 2 key (450 XATTR_ITEM 1640047104) itemoff 16073 itemsize 37
                  location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR
                  transid 7 data_len 1 name_len 6
                  name: user.a
                  data a
          item 3 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 16020 itemsize 53
                  generation 9 type 1 (regular)
                  extent data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288
                  extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 12288
                  extent compression 0 (none)
          item 4 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 4096) itemoff 15967 itemsize 53
                  generation 9 type 2 (prealloc)
                  prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288
                  prealloc data offset 4096 nr 8192
          item 5 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 15914 itemsize 53
                  generation 9 type 2 (prealloc)
                  prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288
                  prealloc data offset 8192 nr 4096
  ...

So the real problem happened earlier: notice that items 4 (4k-12k) and 5
(8k-12k) overlap. Both are prealloc extents. Item 4 straddles i_size and
item 5 starts at i_size.

Here is the state of the filesystem tree at the time of the crash:

  >>> root = prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[2]["inode"].root
  >>> ret, nodes, slots = btrfs_search_slot(root, BtrfsKey(450, 0, 0))
  >>> print_extent_buffer(nodes[0])
  leaf 30425088 level 0 items 184 generation 9 owner 5
  leaf 30425088 flags 0x100000000000000
  fs uuid e5bd3946-400c-4223-8923-190ef1f18677
  chunk uuid d58cb17e-6d02-494a-829a-18b7d8a399da
  	...
          item 179 key (450 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 4907 itemsize 160
                  generation 7 transid 7 size 4096 nbytes 12288
                  block group 0 mode 100600 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0
                  sequence 6 flags 0x10(PREALLOC)
                  atime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)
                  ctime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)
                  mtime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)
                  otime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)
          item 180 key (450 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 4894 itemsize 13
                  index 195 namelen 3 name: 193
          item 181 key (450 XATTR_ITEM 1640047104) itemoff 4857 itemsize 37
                  location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR
                  transid 7 data_len 1 name_len 6
                  name: user.a
                  data a
          item 182 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 4804 itemsize 53
                  generation 9 type 1 (regular)
                  extent data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288
                  extent data offset 0 nr 8192 ram 12288
                  extent compression 0 (none)
          item 183 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 4751 itemsize 53
                  generation 9 type 2 (prealloc)
                  prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288
                  prealloc data offset 8192 nr 4096

Item 5 in the log tree corresponds to item 183 in the filesystem tree,
but nothing matches item 4. Furthermore, item 183 is the last item in
the leaf.

btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() is responsible for logging prealloc extents
beyond i_size. It first truncates any previously logged prealloc extents
that start beyond i_size. Then, it walks the filesystem tree and copies
the prealloc extent items to the log tree.

If it hits the end of a leaf, then it calls btrfs_next_leaf(), which
unlocks the tree and does another search. However, while the filesystem
tree is unlocked, an ordered extent completion may modify the tree. In
particular, it may insert an extent item that overlaps with an extent
item that was already copied to the log tree.

This may manifest in several ways depending on the exact scenario,
including an EEXIST error that is silently translated to a full sync,
overlapping items in the log tree, or this crash. This particular crash
is triggered by the following sequence of events:

- Initially, the file has i_size=4k, a regular extent from 0-4k, and a
  prealloc extent beyond i_size from 4k-12k. The prealloc extent item is
  the last item in its B-tree leaf.
- The file is fsync'd, which copies its inode item and both extent items
  to the log tree.
- An xattr is set on the file, which sets the
  BTRFS_INODE_COPY_EVERYTHING flag.
- The range 4k-8k in the file is written using direct I/O. i_size is
  extended to 8k, but the ordered extent is still in flight.
- The file is fsync'd. Since BTRFS_INODE_COPY_EVERYTHING is set, this
  calls copy_inode_items_to_log(), which calls
  btrfs_log_prealloc_extents().
- btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() finds the 4k-12k prealloc extent in the
  filesystem tree. Since it starts before i_size, it skips it. Since it
  is the last item in its B-tree leaf, it calls btrfs_next_leaf().
- btrfs_next_leaf() unlocks the path.
- The ordered extent completion runs, which converts the 4k-8k part of
  the prealloc extent to written and inserts the remaining prealloc part
  from 8k-12k.
- btrfs_next_leaf() does a search and finds the new prealloc extent
  8k-12k.
- btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() copies the 8k-12k prealloc extent into
  the log tree. Note that it overlaps with the 4k-12k prealloc extent
  that was copied to the log tree by the first fsync.
- fsync calls btrfs_log_changed_extents(), which tries to log the 4k-8k
  extent that was written.
- This tries to drop the range 4k-8k in the log tree, which requires
  adjusting the start of the 4k-12k prealloc extent in the log tree to
  8k.
- btrfs_set_item_key_safe() sees that there is already an extent
  starting at 8k in the log tree and calls BUG().

Fix this by detecting when we're about to insert an overlapping file
extent item in the log tree and truncating the part that would overlap.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 11, 2024
We have been seeing crashes on duplicate keys in
btrfs_set_item_key_safe():

  BTRFS critical (device vdb): slot 4 key (450 108 8192) new key (450 108 8192)
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620!
  invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
  CPU: 0 PID: 3139 Comm: xfs_io Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0 #6
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014
  RIP: 0010:btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0x11f/0x290 [btrfs]

With the following stack trace:

  #0  btrfs_set_item_key_safe (fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620:4)
  #1  btrfs_drop_extents (fs/btrfs/file.c:411:4)
  #2  log_one_extent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4732:9)
  #3  btrfs_log_changed_extents (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4955:9)
  #4  btrfs_log_inode (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6626:9)
  #5  btrfs_log_inode_parent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7070:8)
  #6  btrfs_log_dentry_safe (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7171:8)
  #7  btrfs_sync_file (fs/btrfs/file.c:1933:8)
  #8  vfs_fsync_range (fs/sync.c:188:9)
  #9  vfs_fsync (fs/sync.c:202:9)
  #10 do_fsync (fs/sync.c:212:9)
  #11 __do_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:225:9)
  #12 __se_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1)
  #13 __x64_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1)
  #14 do_syscall_x64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52:14)
  #15 do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:83:7)
  #16 entry_SYSCALL_64+0xaf/0x14c (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121)

So we're logging a changed extent from fsync, which is splitting an
extent in the log tree. But this split part already exists in the tree,
triggering the BUG().

This is the state of the log tree at the time of the crash, dumped with
drgn (https://github.com/osandov/drgn/blob/main/contrib/btrfs_tree.py)
to get more details than btrfs_print_leaf() gives us:

  >>> print_extent_buffer(prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0]["eb"])
  leaf 33439744 level 0 items 72 generation 9 owner 18446744073709551610
  leaf 33439744 flags 0x100000000000000
  fs uuid e5bd3946-400c-4223-8923-190ef1f18677
  chunk uuid d58cb17e-6d02-494a-829a-18b7d8a399da
          item 0 key (450 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160
                  generation 7 transid 9 size 8192 nbytes 8473563889606862198
                  block group 0 mode 100600 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0
                  sequence 204 flags 0x10(PREALLOC)
                  atime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)
                  ctime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44)
                  mtime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44)
                  otime 17592186044416.000000000 (559444-03-08 01:40:16)
          item 1 key (450 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 16110 itemsize 13
                  index 195 namelen 3 name: 193
          item 2 key (450 XATTR_ITEM 1640047104) itemoff 16073 itemsize 37
                  location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR
                  transid 7 data_len 1 name_len 6
                  name: user.a
                  data a
          item 3 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 16020 itemsize 53
                  generation 9 type 1 (regular)
                  extent data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288
                  extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 12288
                  extent compression 0 (none)
          item 4 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 4096) itemoff 15967 itemsize 53
                  generation 9 type 2 (prealloc)
                  prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288
                  prealloc data offset 4096 nr 8192
          item 5 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 15914 itemsize 53
                  generation 9 type 2 (prealloc)
                  prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288
                  prealloc data offset 8192 nr 4096
  ...

So the real problem happened earlier: notice that items 4 (4k-12k) and 5
(8k-12k) overlap. Both are prealloc extents. Item 4 straddles i_size and
item 5 starts at i_size.

Here is the state of the filesystem tree at the time of the crash:

  >>> root = prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[2]["inode"].root
  >>> ret, nodes, slots = btrfs_search_slot(root, BtrfsKey(450, 0, 0))
  >>> print_extent_buffer(nodes[0])
  leaf 30425088 level 0 items 184 generation 9 owner 5
  leaf 30425088 flags 0x100000000000000
  fs uuid e5bd3946-400c-4223-8923-190ef1f18677
  chunk uuid d58cb17e-6d02-494a-829a-18b7d8a399da
  	...
          item 179 key (450 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 4907 itemsize 160
                  generation 7 transid 7 size 4096 nbytes 12288
                  block group 0 mode 100600 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0
                  sequence 6 flags 0x10(PREALLOC)
                  atime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)
                  ctime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)
                  mtime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)
                  otime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)
          item 180 key (450 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 4894 itemsize 13
                  index 195 namelen 3 name: 193
          item 181 key (450 XATTR_ITEM 1640047104) itemoff 4857 itemsize 37
                  location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR
                  transid 7 data_len 1 name_len 6
                  name: user.a
                  data a
          item 182 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 4804 itemsize 53
                  generation 9 type 1 (regular)
                  extent data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288
                  extent data offset 0 nr 8192 ram 12288
                  extent compression 0 (none)
          item 183 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 4751 itemsize 53
                  generation 9 type 2 (prealloc)
                  prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288
                  prealloc data offset 8192 nr 4096

Item 5 in the log tree corresponds to item 183 in the filesystem tree,
but nothing matches item 4. Furthermore, item 183 is the last item in
the leaf.

btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() is responsible for logging prealloc extents
beyond i_size. It first truncates any previously logged prealloc extents
that start beyond i_size. Then, it walks the filesystem tree and copies
the prealloc extent items to the log tree.

If it hits the end of a leaf, then it calls btrfs_next_leaf(), which
unlocks the tree and does another search. However, while the filesystem
tree is unlocked, an ordered extent completion may modify the tree. In
particular, it may insert an extent item that overlaps with an extent
item that was already copied to the log tree.

This may manifest in several ways depending on the exact scenario,
including an EEXIST error that is silently translated to a full sync,
overlapping items in the log tree, or this crash. This particular crash
is triggered by the following sequence of events:

- Initially, the file has i_size=4k, a regular extent from 0-4k, and a
  prealloc extent beyond i_size from 4k-12k. The prealloc extent item is
  the last item in its B-tree leaf.
- The file is fsync'd, which copies its inode item and both extent items
  to the log tree.
- An xattr is set on the file, which sets the
  BTRFS_INODE_COPY_EVERYTHING flag.
- The range 4k-8k in the file is written using direct I/O. i_size is
  extended to 8k, but the ordered extent is still in flight.
- The file is fsync'd. Since BTRFS_INODE_COPY_EVERYTHING is set, this
  calls copy_inode_items_to_log(), which calls
  btrfs_log_prealloc_extents().
- btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() finds the 4k-12k prealloc extent in the
  filesystem tree. Since it starts before i_size, it skips it. Since it
  is the last item in its B-tree leaf, it calls btrfs_next_leaf().
- btrfs_next_leaf() unlocks the path.
- The ordered extent completion runs, which converts the 4k-8k part of
  the prealloc extent to written and inserts the remaining prealloc part
  from 8k-12k.
- btrfs_next_leaf() does a search and finds the new prealloc extent
  8k-12k.
- btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() copies the 8k-12k prealloc extent into
  the log tree. Note that it overlaps with the 4k-12k prealloc extent
  that was copied to the log tree by the first fsync.
- fsync calls btrfs_log_changed_extents(), which tries to log the 4k-8k
  extent that was written.
- This tries to drop the range 4k-8k in the log tree, which requires
  adjusting the start of the 4k-12k prealloc extent in the log tree to
  8k.
- btrfs_set_item_key_safe() sees that there is already an extent
  starting at 8k in the log tree and calls BUG().

Fix this by detecting when we're about to insert an overlapping file
extent item in the log tree and truncating the part that would overlap.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2024
With commit c4cb231 ("iommu/amd: Add support for enable/disable IOPF")
we are hitting below issue. This happens because in IOPF enablement path
it holds spin lock with irq disable and then tries to take mutex lock.

dmesg:
-----
[    0.938739] =============================
[    0.938740] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
[    0.938742] 6.10.0-rc1+ #1 Not tainted
[    0.938745] -----------------------------
[    0.938746] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock:
[    0.938748] ffffffff8c9f01d8 (&port_lock_key){....}-{3:3}, at: serial8250_console_write+0x78/0x4a0
[    0.938767] other info that might help us debug this:
[    0.938768] context-{5:5}
[    0.938769] 7 locks held by swapper/0/1:
[    0.938772]  #0: ffff888101a91310 (&group->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bus_iommu_probe+0x70/0x160
[    0.938790]  #1: ffff888101d1f1b8 (&domain->lock){....}-{3:3}, at: amd_iommu_attach_device+0xa5/0x700
[    0.938799]  #2: ffff888101cc3d18 (&dev_data->lock){....}-{3:3}, at: amd_iommu_attach_device+0xc5/0x700
[    0.938806]  #3: ffff888100052830 (&iommu->lock){....}-{2:2}, at: amd_iommu_iopf_add_device+0x3f/0xa0
[    0.938813]  #4: ffffffff8945a340 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: _printk+0x48/0x50
[    0.938822]  #5: ffffffff8945a390 (console_srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: console_flush_all+0x58/0x4e0
[    0.938867]  #6: ffffffff82459f80 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}, at: console_flush_all+0x1f0/0x4e0
[    0.938872] stack backtrace:
[    0.938874] CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc1+ #1
[    0.938877] Hardware name: HP HP EliteBook 745 G3/807E, BIOS N73 Ver. 01.39 04/16/2019

Fix above issue by re-arranging code in attach device path:
  - move device PASID/IOPF enablement outside lock in AMD IOMMU driver.
    This is safe as core layer holds group->mutex lock before calling
    iommu_ops->attach_dev.

Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Reported-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com>
Fixes: c4cb231 ("iommu/amd: Add support for enable/disable IOPF")
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Tested-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240530084801.10758-1-vasant.hegde@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2024
…PLES event"

This reverts commit 7d1405c.

This causes segfaults in some cases, as reported by Milian:

  ```
  sudo /usr/bin/perf record -z --call-graph dwarf -e cycles -e
  raw_syscalls:sys_enter ls
  ...
  [ perf record: Woken up 3 times to write data ]
  malloc(): invalid next size (unsorted)
  Aborted
  ```

  Backtrace with GDB + debuginfod:

  ```
  malloc(): invalid next size (unsorted)

  Thread 1 "perf" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
  __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=signo@entry=6,
  no_tid=no_tid@entry=0) at pthread_kill.c:44
  Downloading source file /usr/src/debug/glibc/glibc/nptl/pthread_kill.c
  44            return INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERROR_P (ret) ? INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERRNO
  (ret) : 0;
  (gdb) bt
  #0  __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=<optimized out>,
  signo=signo@entry=6, no_tid=no_tid@entry=0) at pthread_kill.c:44
  #1  0x00007ffff6ea8eb3 in __pthread_kill_internal (threadid=<optimized out>,
  signo=6) at pthread_kill.c:78
  #2  0x00007ffff6e50a30 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/posix/
  raise.c:26
  #3  0x00007ffff6e384c3 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
  #4  0x00007ffff6e39354 in __libc_message_impl (fmt=fmt@entry=0x7ffff6fc22ea
  "%s\n") at ../sysdeps/posix/libc_fatal.c:132
  #5  0x00007ffff6eb3085 in malloc_printerr (str=str@entry=0x7ffff6fc5850
  "malloc(): invalid next size (unsorted)") at malloc.c:5772
  #6  0x00007ffff6eb657c in _int_malloc (av=av@entry=0x7ffff6ff6ac0
  <main_arena>, bytes=bytes@entry=368) at malloc.c:4081
  #7  0x00007ffff6eb877e in __libc_calloc (n=<optimized out>,
  elem_size=<optimized out>) at malloc.c:3754
  #8  0x000055555569bdb6 in perf_session.do_write_header ()
  #9  0x00005555555a373a in __cmd_record.constprop.0 ()
  #10 0x00005555555a6846 in cmd_record ()
  #11 0x000055555564db7f in run_builtin ()
  #12 0x000055555558ed77 in main ()
  ```

  Valgrind memcheck:
  ```
  ==45136== Invalid write of size 8
  ==45136==    at 0x2B38A5: perf_event__synthesize_id_sample (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x157069: __cmd_record.constprop.0 (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x15A845: cmd_record (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x201B7E: run_builtin (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x142D76: main (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==  Address 0x6a866a8 is 0 bytes after a block of size 40 alloc'd
  ==45136==    at 0x4849BF3: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:1675)
  ==45136==    by 0x3574AB: zalloc (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x1570E0: __cmd_record.constprop.0 (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x15A845: cmd_record (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x201B7E: run_builtin (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x142D76: main (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==
  ==45136== Syscall param write(buf) points to unaddressable byte(s)
  ==45136==    at 0x575953D: __libc_write (write.c:26)
  ==45136==    by 0x575953D: write (write.c:24)
  ==45136==    by 0x35761F: ion (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x357778: writen (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x1548F7: record__write (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x15708A: __cmd_record.constprop.0 (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x15A845: cmd_record (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x201B7E: run_builtin (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x142D76: main (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==  Address 0x6a866a8 is 0 bytes after a block of size 40 alloc'd
  ==45136==    at 0x4849BF3: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:1675)
  ==45136==    by 0x3574AB: zalloc (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x1570E0: __cmd_record.constprop.0 (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x15A845: cmd_record (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x201B7E: run_builtin (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x142D76: main (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==
 -----

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/23879991.0LEYPuXRzz@milian-workstation/
Reported-by: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
Tested-by: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@kernel.org # 6.8+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Zl9ksOlHJHnKM70p@x1
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2024
…git/netfilter/nf

Pablo Neira Ayuso says:

====================
Netfilter fixes for net

The following patchset contains Netfilter fixes for net:

Patch #1 fixes insufficient sanitization of netlink attributes for the
	 inner expression which can trigger nul-pointer dereference,
	 from Davide Ornaghi.

Patch #2 address a report that there is a race condition between
         namespace cleanup and the garbage collection of the list:set
         type. This patch resolves this issue with other minor issues
	 as well, from Jozsef Kadlecsik.

Patch #3 ip6_route_me_harder() ignores flowlabel/dsfield when ip dscp
	 has been mangled, this unbreaks ip6 dscp set $v,
	 from Florian Westphal.

All of these patches address issues that are present in several releases.

* tag 'nf-24-06-11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf:
  netfilter: Use flowlabel flow key when re-routing mangled packets
  netfilter: ipset: Fix race between namespace cleanup and gc in the list:set type
  netfilter: nft_inner: validate mandatory meta and payload
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240611220323.413713-1-pablo@netfilter.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2024
Nikolay Aleksandrov says:

====================
net: bridge: mst: fix suspicious rcu usage warning

This set fixes a suspicious RCU usage warning triggered by syzbot[1] in
the bridge's MST code. After I converted br_mst_set_state to RCU, I
forgot to update the vlan group dereference helper. Fix it by using
the proper helper, in order to do that we need to pass the vlan group
which is already obtained correctly by the callers for their respective
context. Patch 01 is a requirement for the fix in patch 02.

Note I did consider rcu_dereference_rtnl() but the churn is much bigger
and in every part of the bridge. We can do that as a cleanup in
net-next.

[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9bbe2de1bc9d470eb5fe
 =============================
 WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00235-g8a92980606e3 #0 Not tainted
 -----------------------------
 net/bridge/br_private.h:1599 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage!

 other info that might help us debug this:

 rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
 4 locks held by syz-executor.1/5374:
  #0: ffff888022d50b18 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: mmap_read_lock include/linux/mmap_lock.h:144 [inline]
  #0: ffff888022d50b18 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: __mm_populate+0x1b0/0x460 mm/gup.c:2111
  #1: ffffc90000a18c00 ((&p->forward_delay_timer)){+.-.}-{0:0}, at: call_timer_fn+0xc0/0x650 kernel/time/timer.c:1789
  #2: ffff88805fb2ccb8 (&br->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
  #2: ffff88805fb2ccb8 (&br->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: br_forward_delay_timer_expired+0x50/0x440 net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c:86
  #3: ffffffff8e333fa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline]
  #3: ffffffff8e333fa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 [inline]
  #3: ffffffff8e333fa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: br_mst_set_state+0x171/0x7a0 net/bridge/br_mst.c:105

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 1 PID: 5374 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00235-g8a92980606e3 #0
 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024
 Call Trace:
  <IRQ>
  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
  dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114
  lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x221/0x340 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6712
  nbp_vlan_group net/bridge/br_private.h:1599 [inline]
  br_mst_set_state+0x29e/0x7a0 net/bridge/br_mst.c:106
  br_set_state+0x28a/0x7b0 net/bridge/br_stp.c:47
  br_forward_delay_timer_expired+0x176/0x440 net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c:88
  call_timer_fn+0x18e/0x650 kernel/time/timer.c:1792
  expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1843 [inline]
  __run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:2417 [inline]
  __run_timer_base+0x66a/0x8e0 kernel/time/timer.c:2428
  run_timer_base kernel/time/timer.c:2437 [inline]
  run_timer_softirq+0xb7/0x170 kernel/time/timer.c:2447
  handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
  __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:588 [inline]
  invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:428 [inline]
  __irq_exit_rcu+0xf4/0x1c0 kernel/softirq.c:637
  irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:649
  instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1043 [inline]
  sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa6/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1043
  </IRQ>
  <TASK>
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240609103654.914987-1-razor@blackwall.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2024
The syzbot fuzzer found that the interrupt-URB completion callback in
the cdc-wdm driver was taking too long, and the driver's immediate
resubmission of interrupt URBs with -EPROTO status combined with the
dummy-hcd emulation to cause a CPU lockup:

cdc_wdm 1-1:1.0: nonzero urb status received: -71
cdc_wdm 1-1:1.0: wdm_int_callback - 0 bytes
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 26s! [syz-executor782:6625]
CPU#0 Utilization every 4s during lockup:
	#1:  98% system,	  0% softirq,	  3% hardirq,	  0% idle
	#2:  98% system,	  0% softirq,	  3% hardirq,	  0% idle
	#3:  98% system,	  0% softirq,	  3% hardirq,	  0% idle
	#4:  98% system,	  0% softirq,	  3% hardirq,	  0% idle
	#5:  98% system,	  1% softirq,	  3% hardirq,	  0% idle
Modules linked in:
irq event stamp: 73096
hardirqs last  enabled at (73095): [<ffff80008037bc00>] console_emit_next_record kernel/printk/printk.c:2935 [inline]
hardirqs last  enabled at (73095): [<ffff80008037bc00>] console_flush_all+0x650/0xb74 kernel/printk/printk.c:2994
hardirqs last disabled at (73096): [<ffff80008af10b00>] __el1_irq arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:533 [inline]
hardirqs last disabled at (73096): [<ffff80008af10b00>] el1_interrupt+0x24/0x68 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:551
softirqs last  enabled at (73048): [<ffff8000801ea530>] softirq_handle_end kernel/softirq.c:400 [inline]
softirqs last  enabled at (73048): [<ffff8000801ea530>] handle_softirqs+0xa60/0xc34 kernel/softirq.c:582
softirqs last disabled at (73043): [<ffff800080020de8>] __do_softirq+0x14/0x20 kernel/softirq.c:588
CPU: 0 PID: 6625 Comm: syz-executor782 Tainted: G        W          6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-g8867bbd4a056 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024

Testing showed that the problem did not occur if the two error
messages -- the first two lines above -- were removed; apparently adding
material to the kernel log takes a surprisingly large amount of time.

In any case, the best approach for preventing these lockups and to
avoid spamming the log with thousands of error messages per second is
to ratelimit the two dev_err() calls.  Therefore we replace them with
dev_err_ratelimited().

Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Suggested-by: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+5f996b83575ef4058638@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/00000000000073d54b061a6a1c65@google.com/
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+1b2abad17596ad03dcff@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/000000000000f45085061aa9b37e@google.com/
Fixes: 9908a32 ("USB: remove err() macro from usb class drivers")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/40dfa45b-5f21-4eef-a8c1-51a2f320e267@rowland.harvard.edu/
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/29855215-52f5-4385-b058-91f42c2bee18@rowland.harvard.edu
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2024
…git/netfilter/nf

Pablo Neira Ayuso says:

====================
Netfilter fixes for net

The following patchset contains Netfilter fixes for net:

Patch #1 fixes the suspicious RCU usage warning that resulted from the
	 recent fix for the race between namespace cleanup and gc in
	 ipset left out checking the pernet exit phase when calling
	 rcu_dereference_protected(), from Jozsef Kadlecsik.

Patch #2 fixes incorrect input and output netdevice in SRv6 prerouting
	 hooks, from Jianguo Wu.

Patch #3 moves nf_hooks_lwtunnel sysctl toggle to the netfilter core.
	 The connection tracking system is loaded on-demand, this
	 ensures availability of this knob regardless.

Patch #4-#5 adds selftests for SRv6 netfilter hooks also from Jianguo Wu.

netfilter pull request 24-06-19

* tag 'nf-24-06-19' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf:
  selftests: add selftest for the SRv6 End.DX6 behavior with netfilter
  selftests: add selftest for the SRv6 End.DX4 behavior with netfilter
  netfilter: move the sysctl nf_hooks_lwtunnel into the netfilter core
  seg6: fix parameter passing when calling NF_HOOK() in End.DX4 and End.DX6 behaviors
  netfilter: ipset: Fix suspicious rcu_dereference_protected()
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240619170537.2846-1-pablo@netfilter.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 27, 2024
…play

During inode logging (and log replay too), we are holding a transaction
handle and we often need to call btrfs_iget(), which will read an inode
from its subvolume btree if it's not loaded in memory and that results in
allocating an inode with GFP_KERNEL semantics at the btrfs_alloc_inode()
callback - and this may recurse into the filesystem in case we are under
memory pressure and attempt to commit the current transaction, resulting
in a deadlock since the logging (or log replay) task is holding a
transaction handle open.

Syzbot reported this with the following stack traces:

  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00361-g061d1af7b030 #0 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  syz-executor.1/9919 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline]
  ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline]
  ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline]
  ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x58/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:4020

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff88804b569358 (&ei->log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_log_inode+0x39c/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6481

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #3 (&ei->log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
         __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
         __mutex_lock+0x175/0x9c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
         btrfs_log_inode+0x39c/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6481
         btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x8cb/0x2a90 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7079
         btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x59/0x80 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7180
         btrfs_sync_file+0x9c1/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1959
         vfs_fsync_range+0x141/0x230 fs/sync.c:188
         generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2794 [inline]
         btrfs_do_write_iter+0x584/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/file.c:1705
         new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]
         vfs_write+0x6b6/0x1140 fs/read_write.c:590
         ksys_write+0x12f/0x260 fs/read_write.c:643
         do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
         __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
         do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
         entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e

  -> #2 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}:
         join_transaction+0x164/0xf40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:315
         start_transaction+0x427/0x1a70 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:700
         btrfs_commit_super+0xa1/0x110 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4170
         close_ctree+0xcb0/0xf90 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4324
         generic_shutdown_super+0x159/0x3d0 fs/super.c:642
         kill_anon_super+0x3a/0x60 fs/super.c:1226
         btrfs_kill_super+0x3b/0x50 fs/btrfs/super.c:2096
         deactivate_locked_super+0xbe/0x1a0 fs/super.c:473
         deactivate_super+0xde/0x100 fs/super.c:506
         cleanup_mnt+0x222/0x450 fs/namespace.c:1267
         task_work_run+0x14e/0x250 kernel/task_work.c:180
         resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline]
         exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline]
         exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline]
         __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline]
         syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x278/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218
         __do_fast_syscall_32+0x80/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:389
         do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
         entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e

  -> #1 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}:
         __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5468 [inline]
         lock_release+0x33e/0x6c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5774
         percpu_up_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:99 [inline]
         __sb_end_write include/linux/fs.h:1650 [inline]
         sb_end_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1767 [inline]
         __btrfs_end_transaction+0x5ca/0x920 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1071
         btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x228/0x330 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301
         btrfs_evict_inode+0x960/0xe80 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5291
         evict+0x2ed/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:667
         iput_final fs/inode.c:1741 [inline]
         iput.part.0+0x5a8/0x7f0 fs/inode.c:1767
         iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1757
         dentry_unlink_inode+0x295/0x480 fs/dcache.c:400
         __dentry_kill+0x1d0/0x600 fs/dcache.c:603
         dput.part.0+0x4b1/0x9b0 fs/dcache.c:845
         dput+0x1f/0x30 fs/dcache.c:835
         ovl_stack_put+0x60/0x90 fs/overlayfs/util.c:132
         ovl_destroy_inode+0xc6/0x190 fs/overlayfs/super.c:182
         destroy_inode+0xc4/0x1b0 fs/inode.c:311
         iput_final fs/inode.c:1741 [inline]
         iput.part.0+0x5a8/0x7f0 fs/inode.c:1767
         iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1757
         dentry_unlink_inode+0x295/0x480 fs/dcache.c:400
         __dentry_kill+0x1d0/0x600 fs/dcache.c:603
         shrink_kill fs/dcache.c:1048 [inline]
         shrink_dentry_list+0x140/0x5d0 fs/dcache.c:1075
         prune_dcache_sb+0xeb/0x150 fs/dcache.c:1156
         super_cache_scan+0x32a/0x550 fs/super.c:221
         do_shrink_slab+0x44f/0x11c0 mm/shrinker.c:435
         shrink_slab_memcg mm/shrinker.c:548 [inline]
         shrink_slab+0xa87/0x1310 mm/shrinker.c:626
         shrink_one+0x493/0x7c0 mm/vmscan.c:4790
         shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4851 [inline]
         lru_gen_shrink_node+0x89f/0x1750 mm/vmscan.c:4951
         shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5910 [inline]
         kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6720 [inline]
         balance_pgdat+0x1105/0x1970 mm/vmscan.c:6911
         kswapd+0x5ea/0xbf0 mm/vmscan.c:7180
         kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:389
         ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
         ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244

  -> #0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
         check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
         check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
         validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
         __lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
         lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
         lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
         __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3801 [inline]
         fs_reclaim_acquire+0x102/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:3815
         might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline]
         slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline]
         slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline]
         kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x58/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:4020
         btrfs_alloc_inode+0x118/0xb20 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8411
         alloc_inode+0x5d/0x230 fs/inode.c:261
         iget5_locked fs/inode.c:1235 [inline]
         iget5_locked+0x1c9/0x2c0 fs/inode.c:1228
         btrfs_iget_locked fs/btrfs/inode.c:5590 [inline]
         btrfs_iget_path fs/btrfs/inode.c:5607 [inline]
         btrfs_iget+0xfb/0x230 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5636
         add_conflicting_inode fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5657 [inline]
         copy_inode_items_to_log+0x1039/0x1e30 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5928
         btrfs_log_inode+0xa48/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6592
         log_new_delayed_dentries fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6363 [inline]
         btrfs_log_inode+0x27dd/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6718
         btrfs_log_all_parents fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6833 [inline]
         btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x22ba/0x2a90 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7141
         btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x59/0x80 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7180
         btrfs_sync_file+0x9c1/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1959
         vfs_fsync_range+0x141/0x230 fs/sync.c:188
         generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2794 [inline]
         btrfs_do_write_iter+0x584/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/file.c:1705
         do_iter_readv_writev+0x504/0x780 fs/read_write.c:741
         vfs_writev+0x36f/0xde0 fs/read_write.c:971
         do_pwritev+0x1b2/0x260 fs/read_write.c:1072
         __do_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1218 [inline]
         __se_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1210 [inline]
         __ia32_compat_sys_pwritev2+0x121/0x1b0 fs/read_write.c:1210
         do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
         __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
         do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
         entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    fs_reclaim --> btrfs_trans_num_extwriters --> &ei->log_mutex

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0                    CPU1
         ----                    ----
    lock(&ei->log_mutex);
                                 lock(btrfs_trans_num_extwriters);
                                 lock(&ei->log_mutex);
    lock(fs_reclaim);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  7 locks held by syz-executor.1/9919:
   #0: ffff88802be20420 (sb_writers#23){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: do_pwritev+0x1b2/0x260 fs/read_write.c:1072
   #1: ffff888065c0f8f0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#33){++++}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:791 [inline]
   #1: ffff888065c0f8f0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#33){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_inode_lock+0xc8/0x110 fs/btrfs/inode.c:385
   #2: ffff888065c0f778 (&ei->i_mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_inode_lock+0xee/0x110 fs/btrfs/inode.c:388
   #3: ffff88802be20610 (sb_internal#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_sync_file+0x95b/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1952
   #4: ffff8880546323f0 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x430/0xf40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:290
   #5: ffff888054632418 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x430/0xf40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:290
   #6: ffff88804b569358 (&ei->log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_log_inode+0x39c/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6481

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 2 PID: 9919 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00361-g061d1af7b030 #0
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
   dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:114
   check_noncircular+0x31a/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
   check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
   check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
   validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
   __lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
   lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
   lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
   __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3801 [inline]
   fs_reclaim_acquire+0x102/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:3815
   might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline]
   slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline]
   slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline]
   kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x58/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:4020
   btrfs_alloc_inode+0x118/0xb20 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8411
   alloc_inode+0x5d/0x230 fs/inode.c:261
   iget5_locked fs/inode.c:1235 [inline]
   iget5_locked+0x1c9/0x2c0 fs/inode.c:1228
   btrfs_iget_locked fs/btrfs/inode.c:5590 [inline]
   btrfs_iget_path fs/btrfs/inode.c:5607 [inline]
   btrfs_iget+0xfb/0x230 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5636
   add_conflicting_inode fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5657 [inline]
   copy_inode_items_to_log+0x1039/0x1e30 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5928
   btrfs_log_inode+0xa48/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6592
   log_new_delayed_dentries fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6363 [inline]
   btrfs_log_inode+0x27dd/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6718
   btrfs_log_all_parents fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6833 [inline]
   btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x22ba/0x2a90 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7141
   btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x59/0x80 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7180
   btrfs_sync_file+0x9c1/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1959
   vfs_fsync_range+0x141/0x230 fs/sync.c:188
   generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2794 [inline]
   btrfs_do_write_iter+0x584/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/file.c:1705
   do_iter_readv_writev+0x504/0x780 fs/read_write.c:741
   vfs_writev+0x36f/0xde0 fs/read_write.c:971
   do_pwritev+0x1b2/0x260 fs/read_write.c:1072
   __do_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1218 [inline]
   __se_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1210 [inline]
   __ia32_compat_sys_pwritev2+0x121/0x1b0 fs/read_write.c:1210
   do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
   __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
   do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
   entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e
  RIP: 0023:0xf7334579
  Code: b8 01 10 06 03 (...)
  RSP: 002b:00000000f5f265ac EFLAGS: 00000292 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000017b
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00000000200002c0
  RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
  RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000292 R12: 0000000000000000
  R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000

Fix this by ensuring we are under a NOFS scope whenever we call
btrfs_iget() during inode logging and log replay.

Reported-by: syzbot+8576cfa84070dce4d59b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000274a3a061abbd928@google.com/
Fixes: 712e36c ("btrfs: use GFP_KERNEL in btrfs_alloc_inode")
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2024
…play

During inode logging (and log replay too), we are holding a transaction
handle and we often need to call btrfs_iget(), which will read an inode
from its subvolume btree if it's not loaded in memory and that results in
allocating an inode with GFP_KERNEL semantics at the btrfs_alloc_inode()
callback - and this may recurse into the filesystem in case we are under
memory pressure and attempt to commit the current transaction, resulting
in a deadlock since the logging (or log replay) task is holding a
transaction handle open.

Syzbot reported this with the following stack traces:

  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00361-g061d1af7b030 #0 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  syz-executor.1/9919 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline]
  ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline]
  ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline]
  ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x58/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:4020

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff88804b569358 (&ei->log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_log_inode+0x39c/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6481

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #3 (&ei->log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
         __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
         __mutex_lock+0x175/0x9c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
         btrfs_log_inode+0x39c/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6481
         btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x8cb/0x2a90 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7079
         btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x59/0x80 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7180
         btrfs_sync_file+0x9c1/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1959
         vfs_fsync_range+0x141/0x230 fs/sync.c:188
         generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2794 [inline]
         btrfs_do_write_iter+0x584/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/file.c:1705
         new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]
         vfs_write+0x6b6/0x1140 fs/read_write.c:590
         ksys_write+0x12f/0x260 fs/read_write.c:643
         do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
         __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
         do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
         entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e

  -> #2 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}:
         join_transaction+0x164/0xf40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:315
         start_transaction+0x427/0x1a70 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:700
         btrfs_commit_super+0xa1/0x110 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4170
         close_ctree+0xcb0/0xf90 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4324
         generic_shutdown_super+0x159/0x3d0 fs/super.c:642
         kill_anon_super+0x3a/0x60 fs/super.c:1226
         btrfs_kill_super+0x3b/0x50 fs/btrfs/super.c:2096
         deactivate_locked_super+0xbe/0x1a0 fs/super.c:473
         deactivate_super+0xde/0x100 fs/super.c:506
         cleanup_mnt+0x222/0x450 fs/namespace.c:1267
         task_work_run+0x14e/0x250 kernel/task_work.c:180
         resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline]
         exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline]
         exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline]
         __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline]
         syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x278/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218
         __do_fast_syscall_32+0x80/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:389
         do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
         entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e

  -> #1 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}:
         __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5468 [inline]
         lock_release+0x33e/0x6c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5774
         percpu_up_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:99 [inline]
         __sb_end_write include/linux/fs.h:1650 [inline]
         sb_end_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1767 [inline]
         __btrfs_end_transaction+0x5ca/0x920 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1071
         btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x228/0x330 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301
         btrfs_evict_inode+0x960/0xe80 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5291
         evict+0x2ed/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:667
         iput_final fs/inode.c:1741 [inline]
         iput.part.0+0x5a8/0x7f0 fs/inode.c:1767
         iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1757
         dentry_unlink_inode+0x295/0x480 fs/dcache.c:400
         __dentry_kill+0x1d0/0x600 fs/dcache.c:603
         dput.part.0+0x4b1/0x9b0 fs/dcache.c:845
         dput+0x1f/0x30 fs/dcache.c:835
         ovl_stack_put+0x60/0x90 fs/overlayfs/util.c:132
         ovl_destroy_inode+0xc6/0x190 fs/overlayfs/super.c:182
         destroy_inode+0xc4/0x1b0 fs/inode.c:311
         iput_final fs/inode.c:1741 [inline]
         iput.part.0+0x5a8/0x7f0 fs/inode.c:1767
         iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1757
         dentry_unlink_inode+0x295/0x480 fs/dcache.c:400
         __dentry_kill+0x1d0/0x600 fs/dcache.c:603
         shrink_kill fs/dcache.c:1048 [inline]
         shrink_dentry_list+0x140/0x5d0 fs/dcache.c:1075
         prune_dcache_sb+0xeb/0x150 fs/dcache.c:1156
         super_cache_scan+0x32a/0x550 fs/super.c:221
         do_shrink_slab+0x44f/0x11c0 mm/shrinker.c:435
         shrink_slab_memcg mm/shrinker.c:548 [inline]
         shrink_slab+0xa87/0x1310 mm/shrinker.c:626
         shrink_one+0x493/0x7c0 mm/vmscan.c:4790
         shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4851 [inline]
         lru_gen_shrink_node+0x89f/0x1750 mm/vmscan.c:4951
         shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5910 [inline]
         kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6720 [inline]
         balance_pgdat+0x1105/0x1970 mm/vmscan.c:6911
         kswapd+0x5ea/0xbf0 mm/vmscan.c:7180
         kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:389
         ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
         ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244

  -> #0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
         check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
         check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
         validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
         __lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
         lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
         lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
         __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3801 [inline]
         fs_reclaim_acquire+0x102/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:3815
         might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline]
         slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline]
         slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline]
         kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x58/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:4020
         btrfs_alloc_inode+0x118/0xb20 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8411
         alloc_inode+0x5d/0x230 fs/inode.c:261
         iget5_locked fs/inode.c:1235 [inline]
         iget5_locked+0x1c9/0x2c0 fs/inode.c:1228
         btrfs_iget_locked fs/btrfs/inode.c:5590 [inline]
         btrfs_iget_path fs/btrfs/inode.c:5607 [inline]
         btrfs_iget+0xfb/0x230 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5636
         add_conflicting_inode fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5657 [inline]
         copy_inode_items_to_log+0x1039/0x1e30 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5928
         btrfs_log_inode+0xa48/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6592
         log_new_delayed_dentries fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6363 [inline]
         btrfs_log_inode+0x27dd/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6718
         btrfs_log_all_parents fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6833 [inline]
         btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x22ba/0x2a90 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7141
         btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x59/0x80 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7180
         btrfs_sync_file+0x9c1/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1959
         vfs_fsync_range+0x141/0x230 fs/sync.c:188
         generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2794 [inline]
         btrfs_do_write_iter+0x584/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/file.c:1705
         do_iter_readv_writev+0x504/0x780 fs/read_write.c:741
         vfs_writev+0x36f/0xde0 fs/read_write.c:971
         do_pwritev+0x1b2/0x260 fs/read_write.c:1072
         __do_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1218 [inline]
         __se_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1210 [inline]
         __ia32_compat_sys_pwritev2+0x121/0x1b0 fs/read_write.c:1210
         do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
         __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
         do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
         entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    fs_reclaim --> btrfs_trans_num_extwriters --> &ei->log_mutex

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0                    CPU1
         ----                    ----
    lock(&ei->log_mutex);
                                 lock(btrfs_trans_num_extwriters);
                                 lock(&ei->log_mutex);
    lock(fs_reclaim);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  7 locks held by syz-executor.1/9919:
   #0: ffff88802be20420 (sb_writers#23){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: do_pwritev+0x1b2/0x260 fs/read_write.c:1072
   #1: ffff888065c0f8f0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#33){++++}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:791 [inline]
   #1: ffff888065c0f8f0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#33){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_inode_lock+0xc8/0x110 fs/btrfs/inode.c:385
   #2: ffff888065c0f778 (&ei->i_mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_inode_lock+0xee/0x110 fs/btrfs/inode.c:388
   #3: ffff88802be20610 (sb_internal#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_sync_file+0x95b/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1952
   #4: ffff8880546323f0 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x430/0xf40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:290
   #5: ffff888054632418 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x430/0xf40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:290
   #6: ffff88804b569358 (&ei->log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_log_inode+0x39c/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6481

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 2 PID: 9919 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00361-g061d1af7b030 #0
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
   dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:114
   check_noncircular+0x31a/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
   check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
   check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
   validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
   __lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
   lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
   lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
   __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3801 [inline]
   fs_reclaim_acquire+0x102/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:3815
   might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline]
   slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline]
   slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline]
   kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x58/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:4020
   btrfs_alloc_inode+0x118/0xb20 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8411
   alloc_inode+0x5d/0x230 fs/inode.c:261
   iget5_locked fs/inode.c:1235 [inline]
   iget5_locked+0x1c9/0x2c0 fs/inode.c:1228
   btrfs_iget_locked fs/btrfs/inode.c:5590 [inline]
   btrfs_iget_path fs/btrfs/inode.c:5607 [inline]
   btrfs_iget+0xfb/0x230 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5636
   add_conflicting_inode fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5657 [inline]
   copy_inode_items_to_log+0x1039/0x1e30 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5928
   btrfs_log_inode+0xa48/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6592
   log_new_delayed_dentries fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6363 [inline]
   btrfs_log_inode+0x27dd/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6718
   btrfs_log_all_parents fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6833 [inline]
   btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x22ba/0x2a90 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7141
   btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x59/0x80 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7180
   btrfs_sync_file+0x9c1/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1959
   vfs_fsync_range+0x141/0x230 fs/sync.c:188
   generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2794 [inline]
   btrfs_do_write_iter+0x584/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/file.c:1705
   do_iter_readv_writev+0x504/0x780 fs/read_write.c:741
   vfs_writev+0x36f/0xde0 fs/read_write.c:971
   do_pwritev+0x1b2/0x260 fs/read_write.c:1072
   __do_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1218 [inline]
   __se_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1210 [inline]
   __ia32_compat_sys_pwritev2+0x121/0x1b0 fs/read_write.c:1210
   do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
   __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
   do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
   entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e
  RIP: 0023:0xf7334579
  Code: b8 01 10 06 03 (...)
  RSP: 002b:00000000f5f265ac EFLAGS: 00000292 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000017b
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00000000200002c0
  RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
  RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000292 R12: 0000000000000000
  R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000

Fix this by ensuring we are under a NOFS scope whenever we call
btrfs_iget() during inode logging and log replay.

Reported-by: syzbot+8576cfa84070dce4d59b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000274a3a061abbd928@google.com/
Fixes: 712e36c ("btrfs: use GFP_KERNEL in btrfs_alloc_inode")
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2024
The code in ocfs2_dio_end_io_write() estimates number of necessary
transaction credits using ocfs2_calc_extend_credits().  This however does
not take into account that the IO could be arbitrarily large and can
contain arbitrary number of extents.

Extent tree manipulations do often extend the current transaction but not
in all of the cases.  For example if we have only single block extents in
the tree, ocfs2_mark_extent_written() will end up calling
ocfs2_replace_extent_rec() all the time and we will never extend the
current transaction and eventually exhaust all the transaction credits if
the IO contains many single block extents.  Once that happens a
WARN_ON(jbd2_handle_buffer_credits(handle) <= 0) is triggered in
jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() and subsequently OCFS2 aborts in response to
this error.  This was actually triggered by one of our customers on a
heavily fragmented OCFS2 filesystem.

To fix the issue make sure the transaction always has enough credits for
one extent insert before each call of ocfs2_mark_extent_written().

Heming Zhao said:

------
PANIC: "Kernel panic - not syncing: OCFS2: (device dm-1): panic forced after error"

PID: xxx  TASK: xxxx  CPU: 5  COMMAND: "SubmitThread-CA"
  #0 machine_kexec at ffffffff8c069932
  #1 __crash_kexec at ffffffff8c1338fa
  #2 panic at ffffffff8c1d69b9
  #3 ocfs2_handle_error at ffffffffc0c86c0c [ocfs2]
  #4 __ocfs2_abort at ffffffffc0c88387 [ocfs2]
  #5 ocfs2_journal_dirty at ffffffffc0c51e98 [ocfs2]
  #6 ocfs2_split_extent at ffffffffc0c27ea3 [ocfs2]
  #7 ocfs2_change_extent_flag at ffffffffc0c28053 [ocfs2]
  #8 ocfs2_mark_extent_written at ffffffffc0c28347 [ocfs2]
  #9 ocfs2_dio_end_io_write at ffffffffc0c2bef9 [ocfs2]
#10 ocfs2_dio_end_io at ffffffffc0c2c0f5 [ocfs2]
#11 dio_complete at ffffffff8c2b9fa7
#12 do_blockdev_direct_IO at ffffffff8c2bc09f
#13 ocfs2_direct_IO at ffffffffc0c2b653 [ocfs2]
#14 generic_file_direct_write at ffffffff8c1dcf14
#15 __generic_file_write_iter at ffffffff8c1dd07b
#16 ocfs2_file_write_iter at ffffffffc0c49f1f [ocfs2]
#17 aio_write at ffffffff8c2cc72e
#18 kmem_cache_alloc at ffffffff8c248dde
#19 do_io_submit at ffffffff8c2ccada
#20 do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8c004984
#21 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff8c8000ba

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240617095543.6971-1-jack@suse.cz
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240614145243.8837-1-jack@suse.cz
Fixes: c15471f ("ocfs2: fix sparse file & data ordering issue in direct io")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
Cc: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
naota pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2024
Bos can be put with multiple unrelated dma-resv locks held. But
imported bos attempt to grab the bo dma-resv during dma-buf detach
that typically happens during cleanup. That leads to lockde splats
similar to the below and a potential ABBA deadlock.

Fix this by always taking the delayed workqueue cleanup path for
imported bos.

Requesting stable fixes from when the Xe driver was introduced,
since its usage of drm_exec and wide vm dma_resvs appear to be
the first reliable trigger of this.

[22982.116427] ============================================
[22982.116428] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[22982.116429] 6.10.0-rc2+ #10 Tainted: G     U  W
[22982.116430] --------------------------------------------
[22982.116430] glxgears:sh0/5785 is trying to acquire lock:
[22982.116431] ffff8c2bafa539a8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0
[22982.116438]
               but task is already holding lock:
[22982.116438] ffff8c2d9aba6da8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x49/0x2b0 [drm_exec]
[22982.116442]
               other info that might help us debug this:
[22982.116442]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[22982.116443]        CPU0
[22982.116444]        ----
[22982.116444]   lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
[22982.116445]   lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
[22982.116447]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[22982.116447]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

[22982.116448] 5 locks held by glxgears:sh0/5785:
[22982.116449]  #0: ffff8c2d9aba58c8 (&xef->vm.lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: xe_file_close+0xde/0x1c0 [xe]
[22982.116507]  #1: ffff8c2e28cc8480 (&vm->lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: xe_vm_close_and_put+0x161/0x9b0 [xe]
[22982.116578]  #2: ffff8c2e31982970 (&val->lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: xe_validation_ctx_init+0x6d/0x70 [xe]
[22982.116647]  #3: ffffacdc469478a8 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: xe_vma_destroy_unlocked+0x7f/0xe0 [xe]
[22982.116716]  #4: ffff8c2d9aba6da8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x49/0x2b0 [drm_exec]
[22982.116719]
               stack backtrace:
[22982.116720] CPU: 8 PID: 5785 Comm: glxgears:sh0 Tainted: G     U  W          6.10.0-rc2+ #10
[22982.116721] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 2001 02/01/2023
[22982.116723] Call Trace:
[22982.116724]  <TASK>
[22982.116725]  dump_stack_lvl+0x77/0xb0
[22982.116727]  __lock_acquire+0x1232/0x2160
[22982.116730]  lock_acquire+0xcb/0x2d0
[22982.116732]  ? dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0
[22982.116734]  ? __lock_acquire+0x417/0x2160
[22982.116736]  __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0xd0/0x13b0
[22982.116738]  ? dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0
[22982.116741]  ? dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0
[22982.116743]  ? ww_mutex_lock+0x2b/0x90
[22982.116745]  ww_mutex_lock+0x2b/0x90
[22982.116747]  dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0
[22982.116749]  drm_prime_gem_destroy+0x2f/0x40 [drm]
[22982.116775]  xe_ttm_bo_destroy+0x32/0x220 [xe]
[22982.116818]  ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x3a/0x290
[22982.116821]  drm_exec_unlock_all+0xa1/0xd0 [drm_exec]
[22982.116823]  drm_exec_fini+0x12/0xb0 [drm_exec]
[22982.116824]  xe_validation_ctx_fini+0x15/0x40 [xe]
[22982.116892]  xe_vma_destroy_unlocked+0xb1/0xe0 [xe]
[22982.116959]  xe_vm_close_and_put+0x41a/0x9b0 [xe]
[22982.117025]  ? xa_find+0xe3/0x1e0
[22982.117028]  xe_file_close+0x10a/0x1c0 [xe]
[22982.117074]  drm_file_free+0x22a/0x280 [drm]
[22982.117099]  drm_release_noglobal+0x22/0x70 [drm]
[22982.117119]  __fput+0xf1/0x2d0
[22982.117122]  task_work_run+0x59/0x90
[22982.117125]  do_exit+0x330/0xb40
[22982.117127]  do_group_exit+0x36/0xa0
[22982.117129]  get_signal+0xbd2/0xbe0
[22982.117131]  arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x3e/0x240
[22982.117134]  syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1e7/0x290
[22982.117137]  do_syscall_64+0xa1/0x180
[22982.117139]  ? lock_acquire+0xcb/0x2d0
[22982.117140]  ? __set_task_comm+0x28/0x1e0
[22982.117141]  ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
[22982.117144]  ? __set_task_comm+0xe1/0x1e0
[22982.117145]  ? lock_release+0xca/0x290
[22982.117147]  ? __do_sys_prctl+0x245/0xab0
[22982.117149]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xde/0x190
[22982.117150]  ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xb0/0x290
[22982.117152]  ? do_syscall_64+0xa1/0x180
[22982.117154]  ? __lock_acquire+0x417/0x2160
[22982.117155]  ? reacquire_held_locks+0xd1/0x1f0
[22982.117156]  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x30c/0x790
[22982.117158]  ? lock_acquire+0xcb/0x2d0
[22982.117160]  ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
[22982.117162]  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x357/0x790
[22982.117163]  ? lock_release+0xca/0x290
[22982.117164]  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x361/0x790
[22982.117166]  ? trace_hardirqs_off+0x4b/0xc0
[22982.117168]  ? clear_bhb_loop+0x45/0xa0
[22982.117170]  ? clear_bhb_loop+0x45/0xa0
[22982.117172]  ? clear_bhb_loop+0x45/0xa0
[22982.117174]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[22982.117176] RIP: 0033:0x7f943d267169
[22982.117192] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f943d26713f.
[22982.117193] RSP: 002b:00007f9430bffc80 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca
[22982.117195] RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f943d267169
[22982.117196] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000189 RDI: 00005622f89579d0
[22982.117197] RBP: 00007f9430bffcb0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000ffffffff
[22982.117198] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
[22982.117199] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00005622f89579d0
[22982.117202]  </TASK>

Fixes: dd08ebf ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.8+
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240628153848.4989-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant