forked from torvalds/linux
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
don't check for running transaction without transaction log #3
Comments
morbidrsa
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 8, 2020
Abaci Fuzz reported a shift-out-of-bounds BUG in io_uring_create(): [ 59.598207] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in ./include/linux/log2.h:57:13 [ 59.599665] shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int' [ 59.601230] CPU: 0 PID: 963 Comm: a.out Not tainted 5.10.0-rc4+ #3 [ 59.602502] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011 [ 59.603673] Call Trace: [ 59.604286] dump_stack+0x107/0x163 [ 59.605237] ubsan_epilogue+0xb/0x5a [ 59.606094] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds.cold+0xb2/0x20e [ 59.607335] ? lock_downgrade+0x6c0/0x6c0 [ 59.608182] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xaf/0xe0 [ 59.609166] io_uring_create.cold+0x99/0x149 [ 59.610114] io_uring_setup+0xd6/0x140 [ 59.610975] ? io_uring_create+0x2510/0x2510 [ 59.611945] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x286/0x400 [ 59.613007] ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x27/0x80 [ 59.614038] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x5b/0x180 [ 59.615056] do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x40 [ 59.615940] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 59.617007] RIP: 0033:0x7f2bb8a0b239 This is caused by roundup_pow_of_two() if the input entries larger enough, e.g. 2^32-1. For sq_entries, it will check first and we allow at most IORING_MAX_ENTRIES, so it is okay. But for cq_entries, we do round up first, that may overflow and truncate it to 0, which is not the expected behavior. So check the cq size first and then do round up. Fixes: 88ec321 ("io_uring: round-up cq size before comparing with rounded sq size") Reported-by: Abaci Fuzz <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
morbidrsa
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 8, 2020
…nx/linux-xlnx into arm/fixes arm64: soc: ZynqMP SoC fixes for v5.10-rc6 - Fix SD dll reset issue by using proper macro - Fix PM feature checking for Xilinx Versal SoC * tag 'zynqmp-soc-fixes-for-v5.10-rc6' of https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx: (337 commits) firmware: xilinx: Use hash-table for api feature check firmware: xilinx: Fix SD DLL node reset issue Linux 5.10-rc4 kvm: mmu: fix is_tdp_mmu_check when the TDP MMU is not in use afs: Fix afs_write_end() when called with copied == 0 [ver #3] ocfs2: initialize ip_next_orphan panic: don't dump stack twice on warn hugetlbfs: fix anon huge page migration race mm: memcontrol: fix missing wakeup polling thread kernel/watchdog: fix watchdog_allowed_mask not used warning reboot: fix overflow parsing reboot cpu number Revert "kernel/reboot.c: convert simple_strtoul to kstrtoint" compiler.h: fix barrier_data() on clang mm/gup: use unpin_user_pages() in __gup_longterm_locked() mm/slub: fix panic in slab_alloc_node() mailmap: fix entry for Dmitry Baryshkov/Eremin-Solenikov mm/vmscan: fix NR_ISOLATED_FILE corruption on 64-bit mm/compaction: stop isolation if too many pages are isolated and we have pages to migrate mm/compaction: count pages and stop correctly during page isolation drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Use atomic encoder callbacks everywhere ... Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fd5ab967-f3cf-95fb-7947-5477ff85f97e@monstr.eu Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
morbidrsa
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 8, 2020
Filipe reported the following lockdep splat ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.10.0-rc2-btrfs-next-71 #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ find/324157 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8ebc48d293a0 (btrfs-tree-01#2/3){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffff8eb9932c5088 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490 down_write_nested+0x44/0x120 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x120 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0x2a3/0xc50 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] insert_with_overflow+0x44/0x110 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_xattr_item+0xb8/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_setxattr+0xd6/0x4c0 [btrfs] btrfs_setxattr_trans+0x68/0x100 [btrfs] __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80 __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x70/0x200 vfs_setxattr+0x6b/0x120 setxattr+0x125/0x240 path_setxattr+0xba/0xd0 __x64_sys_setxattr+0x27/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (btrfs-tree-01#2/3){++++}-{3:3}: check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60 __lock_acquire+0x1689/0x3130 lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490 down_read_nested+0x45/0x220 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs] btrfs_next_old_leaf+0x27d/0x580 [btrfs] btrfs_real_readdir+0x1e3/0x4b0 [btrfs] iterate_dir+0x170/0x1c0 __x64_sys_getdents64+0x83/0x140 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(btrfs-tree-01#2/3); lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(btrfs-tree-01#2/3); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by find/324157: #0: ffff8ebc502c6e00 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0x4d/0x60 #1: ffff8eb97f689980 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_dir+0x52/0x1c0 #2: ffff8ebaec00ca58 (btrfs-tree-02#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs] #3: ffff8eb98f986f78 (btrfs-tree-01#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs] #4: ffff8eb9932c5088 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs] stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 324157 Comm: find Not tainted 5.10.0-rc2-btrfs-next-71 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8d/0xb5 check_noncircular+0xff/0x110 ? mark_lock.part.0+0x468/0xe90 check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60 __lock_acquire+0x1689/0x3130 ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x5/0x10 lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs] down_read_nested+0x45/0x220 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs] btrfs_next_old_leaf+0x27d/0x580 [btrfs] btrfs_real_readdir+0x1e3/0x4b0 [btrfs] iterate_dir+0x170/0x1c0 __x64_sys_getdents64+0x83/0x140 ? filldir+0x1d0/0x1d0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This happens because btrfs_next_old_leaf searches down to our current key, and then walks up the path until we can move to the next slot, and then reads back down the path so we get the next leaf. However it doesn't unlock any lower levels until it replaces them with the new extent buffer. This is technically fine, but of course causes lockdep to complain, because we could be holding locks on lower levels while locking upper levels. Fix this by dropping all nodes below the level that we use as our new starting point before we start reading back down the path. This also allows us to drop the nested/recursive locking magic, because we're no longer locking two nodes at the same level anymore. Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
morbidrsa
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 8, 2020
A lock dependency loop exists between the root tree lock, the extent tree lock, and the free space tree lock. The root tree lock depends on the free space tree lock because btrfs_create_tree holds the new tree's lock while adding it to the root tree. The extent tree lock depends on the root tree lock because during umount, we write out space cache v1, which writes inodes in the root tree, which results in holding the root tree lock while doing a lookup in the extent tree. Finally, the free space tree depends on the extent tree because populate_free_space_tree holds a locked path in the extent tree and then does a lookup in the free space tree to add the new item. The simplest of the three to break is the one during tree creation: we unlock the leaf before inserting the tree node into the root tree, which fixes the lockdep warning. [30.480136] ====================================================== [30.480830] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [30.481457] 5.9.0-rc8+ torvalds#76 Not tainted [30.481897] ------------------------------------------------------ [30.482500] mount/520 is trying to acquire lock: [30.483064] ffff9babebe03908 (btrfs-free-space-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 [30.484054] but task is already holding lock: [30.484637] ffff9babebe24468 (btrfs-extent-01#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 [30.485581] which lock already depends on the new lock. [30.486397] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [30.487205] -> #2 (btrfs-extent-01#2){++++}-{3:3}: [30.487825] down_read_nested+0x43/0x150 [30.488306] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 [30.488868] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [30.489477] btrfs_search_slot+0x464/0x9b0 [30.490009] check_committed_ref+0x59/0x1d0 [30.490603] btrfs_cross_ref_exist+0x65/0xb0 [30.491108] run_delalloc_nocow+0x405/0x930 [30.491651] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x60/0x6b0 [30.492203] writepage_delalloc+0xd4/0x150 [30.492688] __extent_writepage+0x18d/0x3a0 [30.493199] extent_write_cache_pages+0x2af/0x450 [30.493743] extent_writepages+0x34/0x70 [30.494231] do_writepages+0x31/0xd0 [30.494642] __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xad/0xe0 [30.495194] btrfs_fdatawrite_range+0x1b/0x50 [30.495677] __btrfs_write_out_cache+0x40d/0x460 [30.496227] btrfs_write_out_cache+0x8b/0x110 [30.496716] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x211/0x4e0 [30.497317] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xc0/0xba0 [30.497861] sync_filesystem+0x71/0x90 [30.498303] btrfs_remount+0x81/0x433 [30.498767] reconfigure_super+0x9f/0x210 [30.499261] path_mount+0x9d1/0xa30 [30.499722] do_mount+0x55/0x70 [30.500158] __x64_sys_mount+0xc4/0xe0 [30.500616] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [30.501091] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [30.501629] -> #1 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: [30.502241] down_read_nested+0x43/0x150 [30.502727] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 [30.503291] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [30.503903] btrfs_search_slot+0x464/0x9b0 [30.504405] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x60/0xa0 [30.504973] btrfs_insert_item+0x60/0xd0 [30.505412] btrfs_create_tree+0x1b6/0x210 [30.505913] btrfs_create_free_space_tree+0x54/0x110 [30.506460] btrfs_mount_rw+0x15d/0x20f [30.506937] btrfs_remount+0x356/0x433 [30.507369] reconfigure_super+0x9f/0x210 [30.507868] path_mount+0x9d1/0xa30 [30.508264] do_mount+0x55/0x70 [30.508668] __x64_sys_mount+0xc4/0xe0 [30.509186] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [30.509652] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [30.510271] -> #0 (btrfs-free-space-00){++++}-{3:3}: [30.510972] __lock_acquire+0x11ad/0x1b60 [30.511432] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x360 [30.511917] down_read_nested+0x43/0x150 [30.512383] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 [30.512947] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [30.513455] btrfs_search_slot+0x464/0x9b0 [30.513947] search_free_space_info+0x45/0x90 [30.514465] __add_to_free_space_tree+0x92/0x39d [30.515010] btrfs_create_free_space_tree.cold.22+0x1ee/0x45d [30.515639] btrfs_mount_rw+0x15d/0x20f [30.516142] btrfs_remount+0x356/0x433 [30.516538] reconfigure_super+0x9f/0x210 [30.517065] path_mount+0x9d1/0xa30 [30.517438] do_mount+0x55/0x70 [30.517824] __x64_sys_mount+0xc4/0xe0 [30.518293] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [30.518776] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [30.519335] other info that might help us debug this: [30.520210] Chain exists of: btrfs-free-space-00 --> btrfs-root-00 --> btrfs-extent-01#2 [30.521407] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [30.522037] CPU0 CPU1 [30.522456] ---- ---- [30.522941] lock(btrfs-extent-01#2); [30.523311] lock(btrfs-root-00); [30.523952] lock(btrfs-extent-01#2); [30.524620] lock(btrfs-free-space-00); [30.525068] *** DEADLOCK *** [30.525669] 5 locks held by mount/520: [30.526116] #0: ffff9babebc520e0 (&type->s_umount_key#37){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: path_mount+0x7ef/0xa30 [30.527056] #1: ffff9babebc52640 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x3d5/0x5c0 [30.527960] #2: ffff9babeae8f2e8 (&cache->free_space_lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_free_space_tree.cold.22+0x101/0x45d [30.529118] #3: ffff9babebe24468 (btrfs-extent-01#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 [30.530113] #4: ffff9babebd52eb8 (btrfs-extent-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_try_tree_read_lock+0x16/0x100 [30.531124] stack backtrace: [30.531528] CPU: 0 PID: 520 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.9.0-rc8+ torvalds#76 [30.532166] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.1-4.module_el8.1.0+248+298dec18 04/01/2014 [30.533215] Call Trace: [30.533452] dump_stack+0x8d/0xc0 [30.533797] check_noncircular+0x13c/0x150 [30.534233] __lock_acquire+0x11ad/0x1b60 [30.534667] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x360 [30.535063] ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 [30.535525] down_read_nested+0x43/0x150 [30.535939] ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 [30.536400] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 [30.536862] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [30.537304] btrfs_search_slot+0x464/0x9b0 [30.537713] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0xf0 [30.538148] search_free_space_info+0x45/0x90 [30.538572] __add_to_free_space_tree+0x92/0x39d [30.539071] ? printk+0x48/0x4a [30.539367] btrfs_create_free_space_tree.cold.22+0x1ee/0x45d [30.539972] btrfs_mount_rw+0x15d/0x20f [30.540350] btrfs_remount+0x356/0x433 [30.540773] ? shrink_dcache_sb+0xd9/0x100 [30.541203] reconfigure_super+0x9f/0x210 [30.541642] path_mount+0x9d1/0xa30 [30.542040] do_mount+0x55/0x70 [30.542366] __x64_sys_mount+0xc4/0xe0 [30.542822] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [30.543197] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [30.543691] RIP: 0033:0x7f109f7ab93a [30.546042] RSP: 002b:00007ffc47c4f858 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5 [30.546770] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f109f8cf264 RCX: 00007f109f7ab93a [30.547485] RDX: 0000557e6fc10770 RSI: 0000557e6fc19cf0 RDI: 0000557e6fc19cd0 [30.548185] RBP: 0000557e6fc10520 R08: 0000557e6fc18e30 R09: 0000557e6fc18cb0 [30.548911] R10: 0000000000200020 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [30.549606] R13: 0000557e6fc19cd0 R14: 0000557e6fc10770 R15: 0000557e6fc10520 Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
morbidrsa
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 15, 2020
When built with PROVE_LOCKING, NO_HZ_FULL, and CONTEXT_TRACKING_FORCE will WARN() at boot time that interrupts are enabled when we call context_tracking_user_enter(), despite the DAIF flags indicating that IRQs are masked. The problem is that we're not tracking IRQ flag changes accurately, and so lockdep believes interrupts are enabled when they are not (and vice-versa). We can shuffle things so to make this more accurate. For kernel->user transitions there are a number of constraints we need to consider: 1) When we call __context_tracking_user_enter() HW IRQs must be disabled and lockdep must be up-to-date with this. 2) Userspace should be treated as having IRQs enabled from the PoV of both lockdep and tracing. 3) As context_tracking_user_enter() stops RCU from watching, we cannot use RCU after calling it. 4) IRQ flag tracing and lockdep have state that must be manipulated before RCU is disabled. ... with similar constraints applying for user->kernel transitions, with the ordering reversed. The generic entry code has enter_from_user_mode() and exit_to_user_mode() helpers to handle this. We can't use those directly, so we add arm64 copies for now (without the instrumentation markers which aren't used on arm64). These replace the existing user_exit() and user_exit_irqoff() calls spread throughout handlers, and the exception unmasking is left as-is. Note that: * The accounting for debug exceptions from userspace now happens in el0_dbg() and ret_to_user(), so this is removed from debug_exception_enter() and debug_exception_exit(). As user_exit_irqoff() wakes RCU, the userspace-specific check is removed. * The accounting for syscalls now happens in el0_svc(), el0_svc_compat(), and ret_to_user(), so this is removed from el0_svc_common(). This does not adversely affect the workaround for erratum 1463225, as this does not depend on any of the state tracking. * In ret_to_user() we mask interrupts with local_daif_mask(), and so we need to inform lockdep and tracing. Here a trace_hardirqs_off() is sufficient and safe as we have not yet exited kernel context and RCU is usable. * As PROVE_LOCKING selects TRACE_IRQFLAGS, the ifdeferry in entry.S only needs to check for the latter. * EL0 SError handling will be dealt with in a subsequent patch, as this needs to be treated as an NMI. Prior to this patch, booting an appropriately-configured kernel would result in spats as below: | DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lockdep_hardirqs_enabled()) | WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5280 check_flags.part.54+0x1dc/0x1f0 | Modules linked in: | CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3 #3 | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | pstate: 804003c5 (Nzcv DAIF +PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--) | pc : check_flags.part.54+0x1dc/0x1f0 | lr : check_flags.part.54+0x1dc/0x1f0 | sp : ffff80001003bd80 | x29: ffff80001003bd80 x28: ffff66ce801e0000 | x27: 00000000ffffffff x26: 00000000000003c0 | x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffffc31842527258 | x23: ffffc31842491368 x22: ffffc3184282d000 | x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000000001 | x19: ffffc318432ce000 x18: 0080000000000000 | x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffc31840f18a78 | x15: 0000000000000001 x14: ffffc3184285c810 | x13: 0000000000000001 x12: 0000000000000000 | x11: ffffc318415857a0 x10: ffffc318406614c0 | x9 : ffffc318415857a0 x8 : ffffc31841f1d000 | x7 : 647261685f706564 x6 : ffffc3183ff7c66c | x5 : ffff66ce801e0000 x4 : 0000000000000000 | x3 : ffffc3183fe00000 x2 : ffffc31841500000 | x1 : e956dc24146b3500 x0 : 0000000000000000 | Call trace: | check_flags.part.54+0x1dc/0x1f0 | lock_is_held_type+0x10c/0x188 | rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x70/0x98 | __context_tracking_enter+0x310/0x350 | context_tracking_enter.part.3+0x5c/0xc8 | context_tracking_user_enter+0x6c/0x80 | finish_ret_to_user+0x2c/0x13cr Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201130115950.22492-8-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
morbidrsa
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 15, 2020
Filipe reported the following lockdep splat ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.10.0-rc2-btrfs-next-71 #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ find/324157 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8ebc48d293a0 (btrfs-tree-01#2/3){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffff8eb9932c5088 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490 down_write_nested+0x44/0x120 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x120 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0x2a3/0xc50 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] insert_with_overflow+0x44/0x110 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_xattr_item+0xb8/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_setxattr+0xd6/0x4c0 [btrfs] btrfs_setxattr_trans+0x68/0x100 [btrfs] __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80 __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x70/0x200 vfs_setxattr+0x6b/0x120 setxattr+0x125/0x240 path_setxattr+0xba/0xd0 __x64_sys_setxattr+0x27/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (btrfs-tree-01#2/3){++++}-{3:3}: check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60 __lock_acquire+0x1689/0x3130 lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490 down_read_nested+0x45/0x220 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs] btrfs_next_old_leaf+0x27d/0x580 [btrfs] btrfs_real_readdir+0x1e3/0x4b0 [btrfs] iterate_dir+0x170/0x1c0 __x64_sys_getdents64+0x83/0x140 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(btrfs-tree-01#2/3); lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(btrfs-tree-01#2/3); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by find/324157: #0: ffff8ebc502c6e00 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0x4d/0x60 #1: ffff8eb97f689980 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_dir+0x52/0x1c0 #2: ffff8ebaec00ca58 (btrfs-tree-02#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs] #3: ffff8eb98f986f78 (btrfs-tree-01#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs] #4: ffff8eb9932c5088 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs] stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 324157 Comm: find Not tainted 5.10.0-rc2-btrfs-next-71 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8d/0xb5 check_noncircular+0xff/0x110 ? mark_lock.part.0+0x468/0xe90 check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60 __lock_acquire+0x1689/0x3130 ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x5/0x10 lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs] down_read_nested+0x45/0x220 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x1a0 [btrfs] btrfs_next_old_leaf+0x27d/0x580 [btrfs] btrfs_real_readdir+0x1e3/0x4b0 [btrfs] iterate_dir+0x170/0x1c0 __x64_sys_getdents64+0x83/0x140 ? filldir+0x1d0/0x1d0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This happens because btrfs_next_old_leaf searches down to our current key, and then walks up the path until we can move to the next slot, and then reads back down the path so we get the next leaf. However it doesn't unlock any lower levels until it replaces them with the new extent buffer. This is technically fine, but of course causes lockdep to complain, because we could be holding locks on lower levels while locking upper levels. Fix this by dropping all nodes below the level that we use as our new starting point before we start reading back down the path. This also allows us to drop the nested/recursive locking magic, because we're no longer locking two nodes at the same level anymore. Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
morbidrsa
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 15, 2020
A lock dependency loop exists between the root tree lock, the extent tree lock, and the free space tree lock. The root tree lock depends on the free space tree lock because btrfs_create_tree holds the new tree's lock while adding it to the root tree. The extent tree lock depends on the root tree lock because during umount, we write out space cache v1, which writes inodes in the root tree, which results in holding the root tree lock while doing a lookup in the extent tree. Finally, the free space tree depends on the extent tree because populate_free_space_tree holds a locked path in the extent tree and then does a lookup in the free space tree to add the new item. The simplest of the three to break is the one during tree creation: we unlock the leaf before inserting the tree node into the root tree, which fixes the lockdep warning. [30.480136] ====================================================== [30.480830] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [30.481457] 5.9.0-rc8+ torvalds#76 Not tainted [30.481897] ------------------------------------------------------ [30.482500] mount/520 is trying to acquire lock: [30.483064] ffff9babebe03908 (btrfs-free-space-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 [30.484054] but task is already holding lock: [30.484637] ffff9babebe24468 (btrfs-extent-01#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 [30.485581] which lock already depends on the new lock. [30.486397] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [30.487205] -> #2 (btrfs-extent-01#2){++++}-{3:3}: [30.487825] down_read_nested+0x43/0x150 [30.488306] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 [30.488868] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [30.489477] btrfs_search_slot+0x464/0x9b0 [30.490009] check_committed_ref+0x59/0x1d0 [30.490603] btrfs_cross_ref_exist+0x65/0xb0 [30.491108] run_delalloc_nocow+0x405/0x930 [30.491651] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x60/0x6b0 [30.492203] writepage_delalloc+0xd4/0x150 [30.492688] __extent_writepage+0x18d/0x3a0 [30.493199] extent_write_cache_pages+0x2af/0x450 [30.493743] extent_writepages+0x34/0x70 [30.494231] do_writepages+0x31/0xd0 [30.494642] __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xad/0xe0 [30.495194] btrfs_fdatawrite_range+0x1b/0x50 [30.495677] __btrfs_write_out_cache+0x40d/0x460 [30.496227] btrfs_write_out_cache+0x8b/0x110 [30.496716] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x211/0x4e0 [30.497317] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xc0/0xba0 [30.497861] sync_filesystem+0x71/0x90 [30.498303] btrfs_remount+0x81/0x433 [30.498767] reconfigure_super+0x9f/0x210 [30.499261] path_mount+0x9d1/0xa30 [30.499722] do_mount+0x55/0x70 [30.500158] __x64_sys_mount+0xc4/0xe0 [30.500616] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [30.501091] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [30.501629] -> #1 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: [30.502241] down_read_nested+0x43/0x150 [30.502727] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 [30.503291] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [30.503903] btrfs_search_slot+0x464/0x9b0 [30.504405] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x60/0xa0 [30.504973] btrfs_insert_item+0x60/0xd0 [30.505412] btrfs_create_tree+0x1b6/0x210 [30.505913] btrfs_create_free_space_tree+0x54/0x110 [30.506460] btrfs_mount_rw+0x15d/0x20f [30.506937] btrfs_remount+0x356/0x433 [30.507369] reconfigure_super+0x9f/0x210 [30.507868] path_mount+0x9d1/0xa30 [30.508264] do_mount+0x55/0x70 [30.508668] __x64_sys_mount+0xc4/0xe0 [30.509186] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [30.509652] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [30.510271] -> #0 (btrfs-free-space-00){++++}-{3:3}: [30.510972] __lock_acquire+0x11ad/0x1b60 [30.511432] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x360 [30.511917] down_read_nested+0x43/0x150 [30.512383] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 [30.512947] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [30.513455] btrfs_search_slot+0x464/0x9b0 [30.513947] search_free_space_info+0x45/0x90 [30.514465] __add_to_free_space_tree+0x92/0x39d [30.515010] btrfs_create_free_space_tree.cold.22+0x1ee/0x45d [30.515639] btrfs_mount_rw+0x15d/0x20f [30.516142] btrfs_remount+0x356/0x433 [30.516538] reconfigure_super+0x9f/0x210 [30.517065] path_mount+0x9d1/0xa30 [30.517438] do_mount+0x55/0x70 [30.517824] __x64_sys_mount+0xc4/0xe0 [30.518293] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [30.518776] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [30.519335] other info that might help us debug this: [30.520210] Chain exists of: btrfs-free-space-00 --> btrfs-root-00 --> btrfs-extent-01#2 [30.521407] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [30.522037] CPU0 CPU1 [30.522456] ---- ---- [30.522941] lock(btrfs-extent-01#2); [30.523311] lock(btrfs-root-00); [30.523952] lock(btrfs-extent-01#2); [30.524620] lock(btrfs-free-space-00); [30.525068] *** DEADLOCK *** [30.525669] 5 locks held by mount/520: [30.526116] #0: ffff9babebc520e0 (&type->s_umount_key#37){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: path_mount+0x7ef/0xa30 [30.527056] #1: ffff9babebc52640 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x3d5/0x5c0 [30.527960] #2: ffff9babeae8f2e8 (&cache->free_space_lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_free_space_tree.cold.22+0x101/0x45d [30.529118] #3: ffff9babebe24468 (btrfs-extent-01#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 [30.530113] #4: ffff9babebd52eb8 (btrfs-extent-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_try_tree_read_lock+0x16/0x100 [30.531124] stack backtrace: [30.531528] CPU: 0 PID: 520 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.9.0-rc8+ torvalds#76 [30.532166] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.1-4.module_el8.1.0+248+298dec18 04/01/2014 [30.533215] Call Trace: [30.533452] dump_stack+0x8d/0xc0 [30.533797] check_noncircular+0x13c/0x150 [30.534233] __lock_acquire+0x11ad/0x1b60 [30.534667] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x360 [30.535063] ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 [30.535525] down_read_nested+0x43/0x150 [30.535939] ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 [30.536400] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 [30.536862] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [30.537304] btrfs_search_slot+0x464/0x9b0 [30.537713] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0xf0 [30.538148] search_free_space_info+0x45/0x90 [30.538572] __add_to_free_space_tree+0x92/0x39d [30.539071] ? printk+0x48/0x4a [30.539367] btrfs_create_free_space_tree.cold.22+0x1ee/0x45d [30.539972] btrfs_mount_rw+0x15d/0x20f [30.540350] btrfs_remount+0x356/0x433 [30.540773] ? shrink_dcache_sb+0xd9/0x100 [30.541203] reconfigure_super+0x9f/0x210 [30.541642] path_mount+0x9d1/0xa30 [30.542040] do_mount+0x55/0x70 [30.542366] __x64_sys_mount+0xc4/0xe0 [30.542822] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [30.543197] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [30.543691] RIP: 0033:0x7f109f7ab93a [30.546042] RSP: 002b:00007ffc47c4f858 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5 [30.546770] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f109f8cf264 RCX: 00007f109f7ab93a [30.547485] RDX: 0000557e6fc10770 RSI: 0000557e6fc19cf0 RDI: 0000557e6fc19cd0 [30.548185] RBP: 0000557e6fc10520 R08: 0000557e6fc18e30 R09: 0000557e6fc18cb0 [30.548911] R10: 0000000000200020 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [30.549606] R13: 0000557e6fc19cd0 R14: 0000557e6fc10770 R15: 0000557e6fc10520 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 22, 2021
While testing the error paths in relocation, I hit the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.10.0-rc3+ torvalds#206 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs-balance/1571 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8cdbcc8f77d0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 but task is already holding lock: ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: down_write_nested+0x43/0x80 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 btrfs_search_slot+0x248/0x890 relocate_tree_blocks+0x490/0x650 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50 -> #1 (btrfs-csum-01){++++}-{3:3}: down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100 btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 btrfs_search_slot+0x5ab/0x890 btrfs_del_csums+0x10b/0x3c0 __btrfs_free_extent+0x49d/0x8e0 __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x283/0x11f0 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x220 btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x2ba/0x520 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50 -> #0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280 walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0 btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260 do_relocation+0x52e/0x660 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &head_ref->mutex --> btrfs-csum-01 --> btrfs-tree-00 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(btrfs-csum-01); lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(&head_ref->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by btrfs-balance/1571: #0: ffff8cdb89749ff8 (&fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0x563/0xf40 #1: ffff8cdb89748838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x156/0x300 #2: ffff8cdbc2c16650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x413/0x5c0 #3: ffff8cdbc135f538 (btrfs-treloc-01){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 #4: ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 1571 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3+ torvalds#206 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? trace_call_bpf+0x139/0x260 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0 ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30 ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170 btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280 walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0 btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260 do_relocation+0x52e/0x660 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650 ? add_tree_block+0x149/0x1b0 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0 elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40 ? elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40 ? btrfs_balance+0x796/0xf40 ? __kthread_parkme+0x66/0x90 ? btrfs_balance+0xf40/0xf40 ? balance_kthread+0x37/0x50 ? kthread+0x137/0x150 ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60 ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 As you can see this is bogus, we never take another tree's lock under the csum lock. This happens because sometimes we have to read tree blocks from disk without knowing which root they belong to during relocation. We defaulted to an owner of 0, which translates to an fs tree. This is fine as all fs trees have the same class, but obviously isn't fine if the block belongs to a COW only tree. Thankfully COW only trees only have their owners root as a reference to them, and since we already look up the extent information during relocation, go ahead and check and see if this block might belong to a COW only tree, and if so save the owner in the tree_block struct. This allows us to read_tree_block with the proper owner, which gets rid of this lockdep splat. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
morbidrsa
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 25, 2021
While testing the error paths in relocation, I hit the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.10.0-rc3+ torvalds#206 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs-balance/1571 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8cdbcc8f77d0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 but task is already holding lock: ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: down_write_nested+0x43/0x80 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 btrfs_search_slot+0x248/0x890 relocate_tree_blocks+0x490/0x650 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50 -> #1 (btrfs-csum-01){++++}-{3:3}: down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100 btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 btrfs_search_slot+0x5ab/0x890 btrfs_del_csums+0x10b/0x3c0 __btrfs_free_extent+0x49d/0x8e0 __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x283/0x11f0 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x220 btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x2ba/0x520 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50 -> #0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280 walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0 btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260 do_relocation+0x52e/0x660 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &head_ref->mutex --> btrfs-csum-01 --> btrfs-tree-00 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(btrfs-csum-01); lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(&head_ref->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by btrfs-balance/1571: #0: ffff8cdb89749ff8 (&fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0x563/0xf40 #1: ffff8cdb89748838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x156/0x300 #2: ffff8cdbc2c16650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x413/0x5c0 #3: ffff8cdbc135f538 (btrfs-treloc-01){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 #4: ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 1571 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3+ torvalds#206 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? trace_call_bpf+0x139/0x260 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0 ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30 ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170 btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280 walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0 btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260 do_relocation+0x52e/0x660 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650 ? add_tree_block+0x149/0x1b0 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0 elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40 ? elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40 ? btrfs_balance+0x796/0xf40 ? __kthread_parkme+0x66/0x90 ? btrfs_balance+0xf40/0xf40 ? balance_kthread+0x37/0x50 ? kthread+0x137/0x150 ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60 ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 As you can see this is bogus, we never take another tree's lock under the csum lock. This happens because sometimes we have to read tree blocks from disk without knowing which root they belong to during relocation. We defaulted to an owner of 0, which translates to an fs tree. This is fine as all fs trees have the same class, but obviously isn't fine if the block belongs to a COW only tree. Thankfully COW only trees only have their owners root as a reference to them, and since we already look up the extent information during relocation, go ahead and check and see if this block might belong to a COW only tree, and if so save the owner in the tree_block struct. This allows us to read_tree_block with the proper owner, which gets rid of this lockdep splat. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 2, 2021
While testing the error paths in relocation, I hit the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.10.0-rc3+ torvalds#206 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs-balance/1571 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8cdbcc8f77d0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 but task is already holding lock: ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: down_write_nested+0x43/0x80 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 btrfs_search_slot+0x248/0x890 relocate_tree_blocks+0x490/0x650 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50 -> #1 (btrfs-csum-01){++++}-{3:3}: down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100 btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 btrfs_search_slot+0x5ab/0x890 btrfs_del_csums+0x10b/0x3c0 __btrfs_free_extent+0x49d/0x8e0 __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x283/0x11f0 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x220 btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x2ba/0x520 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50 -> #0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280 walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0 btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260 do_relocation+0x52e/0x660 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &head_ref->mutex --> btrfs-csum-01 --> btrfs-tree-00 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(btrfs-csum-01); lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(&head_ref->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by btrfs-balance/1571: #0: ffff8cdb89749ff8 (&fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0x563/0xf40 #1: ffff8cdb89748838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x156/0x300 #2: ffff8cdbc2c16650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x413/0x5c0 #3: ffff8cdbc135f538 (btrfs-treloc-01){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 #4: ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 1571 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3+ torvalds#206 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? trace_call_bpf+0x139/0x260 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0 ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30 ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170 btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280 walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0 btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260 do_relocation+0x52e/0x660 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650 ? add_tree_block+0x149/0x1b0 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0 elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40 ? elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40 ? btrfs_balance+0x796/0xf40 ? __kthread_parkme+0x66/0x90 ? btrfs_balance+0xf40/0xf40 ? balance_kthread+0x37/0x50 ? kthread+0x137/0x150 ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60 ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 As you can see this is bogus, we never take another tree's lock under the csum lock. This happens because sometimes we have to read tree blocks from disk without knowing which root they belong to during relocation. We defaulted to an owner of 0, which translates to an fs tree. This is fine as all fs trees have the same class, but obviously isn't fine if the block belongs to a COW only tree. Thankfully COW only trees only have their owners root as a reference to them, and since we already look up the extent information during relocation, go ahead and check and see if this block might belong to a COW only tree, and if so save the owner in the tree_block struct. This allows us to read_tree_block with the proper owner, which gets rid of this lockdep splat. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 2, 2021
While testing the error paths in relocation, I hit the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.10.0-rc3+ torvalds#206 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs-balance/1571 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8cdbcc8f77d0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 but task is already holding lock: ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: down_write_nested+0x43/0x80 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 btrfs_search_slot+0x248/0x890 relocate_tree_blocks+0x490/0x650 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50 -> #1 (btrfs-csum-01){++++}-{3:3}: down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100 btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 btrfs_search_slot+0x5ab/0x890 btrfs_del_csums+0x10b/0x3c0 __btrfs_free_extent+0x49d/0x8e0 __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x283/0x11f0 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x220 btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x2ba/0x520 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50 -> #0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280 walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0 btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260 do_relocation+0x52e/0x660 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &head_ref->mutex --> btrfs-csum-01 --> btrfs-tree-00 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(btrfs-csum-01); lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(&head_ref->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by btrfs-balance/1571: #0: ffff8cdb89749ff8 (&fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0x563/0xf40 #1: ffff8cdb89748838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x156/0x300 #2: ffff8cdbc2c16650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x413/0x5c0 #3: ffff8cdbc135f538 (btrfs-treloc-01){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 #4: ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 1571 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3+ torvalds#206 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? trace_call_bpf+0x139/0x260 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0 ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30 ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170 btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280 walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0 btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260 do_relocation+0x52e/0x660 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650 ? add_tree_block+0x149/0x1b0 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0 elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40 ? elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40 ? btrfs_balance+0x796/0xf40 ? __kthread_parkme+0x66/0x90 ? btrfs_balance+0xf40/0xf40 ? balance_kthread+0x37/0x50 ? kthread+0x137/0x150 ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60 ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 As you can see this is bogus, we never take another tree's lock under the csum lock. This happens because sometimes we have to read tree blocks from disk without knowing which root they belong to during relocation. We defaulted to an owner of 0, which translates to an fs tree. This is fine as all fs trees have the same class, but obviously isn't fine if the block belongs to a COW only tree. Thankfully COW only trees only have their owners root as a reference to them, and since we already look up the extent information during relocation, go ahead and check and see if this block might belong to a COW only tree, and if so save the owner in the tree_block struct. This allows us to read_tree_block with the proper owner, which gets rid of this lockdep splat. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 3, 2021
…/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm64 fixes for 5.11, take #3 - Avoid clobbering extra registers on initialisation
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 3, 2021
While testing the error paths in relocation, I hit the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.10.0-rc3+ torvalds#206 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs-balance/1571 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8cdbcc8f77d0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 but task is already holding lock: ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: down_write_nested+0x43/0x80 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 btrfs_search_slot+0x248/0x890 relocate_tree_blocks+0x490/0x650 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50 -> #1 (btrfs-csum-01){++++}-{3:3}: down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100 btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 btrfs_search_slot+0x5ab/0x890 btrfs_del_csums+0x10b/0x3c0 __btrfs_free_extent+0x49d/0x8e0 __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x283/0x11f0 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x220 btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x2ba/0x520 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50 -> #0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280 walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0 btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260 do_relocation+0x52e/0x660 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &head_ref->mutex --> btrfs-csum-01 --> btrfs-tree-00 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(btrfs-csum-01); lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(&head_ref->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by btrfs-balance/1571: #0: ffff8cdb89749ff8 (&fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0x563/0xf40 #1: ffff8cdb89748838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x156/0x300 #2: ffff8cdbc2c16650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x413/0x5c0 #3: ffff8cdbc135f538 (btrfs-treloc-01){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 #4: ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 1571 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3+ torvalds#206 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? trace_call_bpf+0x139/0x260 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0 ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30 ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170 btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280 walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0 btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260 do_relocation+0x52e/0x660 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650 ? add_tree_block+0x149/0x1b0 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0 elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40 ? elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40 ? btrfs_balance+0x796/0xf40 ? __kthread_parkme+0x66/0x90 ? btrfs_balance+0xf40/0xf40 ? balance_kthread+0x37/0x50 ? kthread+0x137/0x150 ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60 ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 As you can see this is bogus, we never take another tree's lock under the csum lock. This happens because sometimes we have to read tree blocks from disk without knowing which root they belong to during relocation. We defaulted to an owner of 0, which translates to an fs tree. This is fine as all fs trees have the same class, but obviously isn't fine if the block belongs to a COW only tree. Thankfully COW only trees only have their owners root as a reference to them, and since we already look up the extent information during relocation, go ahead and check and see if this block might belong to a COW only tree, and if so save the owner in the tree_block struct. This allows us to read_tree_block with the proper owner, which gets rid of this lockdep splat. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 1, 2021
The ordering of MSI-X enable in hardware is dysfunctional: 1) MSI-X is disabled in the control register 2) Various setup functions 3) pci_msi_setup_msi_irqs() is invoked which ends up accessing the MSI-X table entries 4) MSI-X is enabled and masked in the control register with the comment that enabling is required for some hardware to access the MSI-X table Step #4 obviously contradicts #3. The history of this is an issue with the NIU hardware. When #4 was introduced the table access actually happened in msix_program_entries() which was invoked after enabling and masking MSI-X. This was changed in commit d71d643 ("PCI/MSI: Kill redundant call of irq_set_msi_desc() for MSI-X interrupts") which removed the table write from msix_program_entries(). Interestingly enough nobody noticed and either NIU still works or it did not get any testing with a kernel 3.19 or later. Nevertheless this is inconsistent and there is no reason why MSI-X can't be enabled and masked in the control register early on, i.e. move step #4 above to step #1. This preserves the NIU workaround and has no side effects on other hardware. Fixes: d71d643 ("PCI/MSI: Kill redundant call of irq_set_msi_desc() for MSI-X interrupts") Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210729222542.344136412@linutronix.de
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 1, 2021
Btrfs sometimes needs to flush dirty pages on a bunch of dirty inodes in order to reclaim metadata reservations. Unfortunately most helpers in this area are too smart for us: 1) The normal filemap_fdata* helpers only take range and sync modes, and don't give any indication of how much was written, so we can only flush full inodes, which isn't what we want in most cases. 2) The normal writeback path requires us to have the s_umount sem held, but we can't unconditionally take it in this path because we could deadlock. 3) The normal writeback path also skips inodes with I_SYNC set if we write with WB_SYNC_NONE. This isn't the behavior we want under heavy ENOSPC pressure, we want to actually make sure the pages are under writeback before returning, and if another thread is in the middle of writing the file we may return before they're under writeback and miss our ordered extents and not properly wait for completion. 4) sync_inode() uses the normal writeback path and has the same problem as #3. What we really want is to call do_writepages() with our wbc. This way we can make sure that writeback is actually started on the pages, and we can control how many pages are written as a whole as we write many inodes using the same wbc. Accomplish this with a new helper that does just that so we can use it for our ENOSPC flushing infrastructure. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 13, 2021
[ Upstream commit 21e3980 ] vctrl_enable() and vctrl_disable() call regulator_enable() and regulator_disable(), respectively. However, vctrl_* are regulator ops and should not be calling the locked regulator APIs. Doing so results in a lockdep warning. Instead of exporting more internal regulator ops, model the ctrl supply as an actual supply to vctrl-regulator. At probe time this driver still needs to use the consumer API to fetch its constraints, but otherwise lets the regulator core handle the upstream supply for it. The enable/disable/is_enabled ops are not removed, but now only track state internally. This preserves the original behavior with the ops being available, but one could argue that the original behavior was already incorrect: the internal state would not match the upstream supply if that supply had another consumer that enabled the supply, while vctrl-regulator was not enabled. The lockdep warning is as follows: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc6 #2 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffc011306d00 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_dependent (arch/arm64/include/asm/current.h:19 include/linux/ww_mutex.h:111 drivers/regulator/core.c:329) but task is already holding lock: ffffff8004a77160 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_recursive (drivers/regulator/core.c:156 drivers/regulator/core.c:263) which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common (include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:606 include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:29 kernel/locking/mutex.c:103 kernel/locking/mutex.c:144 kernel/locking/mutex.c:963) ww_mutex_lock (kernel/locking/mutex.c:1199) regulator_lock_recursive (drivers/regulator/core.c:156 drivers/regulator/core.c:263) regulator_lock_dependent (drivers/regulator/core.c:343) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808) set_machine_constraints (drivers/regulator/core.c:1536) regulator_register (drivers/regulator/core.c:5486) devm_regulator_register (drivers/regulator/devres.c:196) reg_fixed_voltage_probe (drivers/regulator/fixed.c:289) platform_probe (drivers/base/platform.c:1427) [...] -> #1 (regulator_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}: regulator_lock_dependent (include/linux/ww_mutex.h:129 drivers/regulator/core.c:329) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808) set_machine_constraints (drivers/regulator/core.c:1536) regulator_register (drivers/regulator/core.c:5486) devm_regulator_register (drivers/regulator/devres.c:196) reg_fixed_voltage_probe (drivers/regulator/fixed.c:289) [...] -> #0 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3052 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015 (discriminator 4)) lock_acquire (arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:39 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:438 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5627) __mutex_lock_common (include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:606 include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:29 kernel/locking/mutex.c:103 kernel/locking/mutex.c:144 kernel/locking/mutex.c:963) mutex_lock_nested (kernel/locking/mutex.c:1125) regulator_lock_dependent (arch/arm64/include/asm/current.h:19 include/linux/ww_mutex.h:111 drivers/regulator/core.c:329) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808) vctrl_enable (drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c:400) _regulator_do_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2617) _regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2764) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:308 drivers/regulator/core.c:2809) _set_opp (drivers/opp/core.c:819 drivers/opp/core.c:1072) dev_pm_opp_set_rate (drivers/opp/core.c:1164) set_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:62) __cpufreq_driver_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2216 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2271) cpufreq_online (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1488 (discriminator 2)) cpufreq_add_dev (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1563) subsys_interface_register (drivers/base/bus.c:?) cpufreq_register_driver (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2819) dt_cpufreq_probe (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:344) [...] other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: regulator_list_mutex --> regulator_ww_class_acquire --> regulator_ww_class_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(regulator_ww_class_mutex); lock(regulator_ww_class_acquire); lock(regulator_ww_class_mutex); lock(regulator_list_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 6 locks held by swapper/0/1: #0: ffffff8002d32188 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_driver_lock (drivers/base/dd.c:1030) #1: ffffffc0111a0520 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpufreq_register_driver (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2792 (discriminator 2)) #2: ffffff8002a8d918 (subsys mutex#9){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: subsys_interface_register (drivers/base/bus.c:1033) #3: ffffff800341bb90 (&policy->rwsem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpufreq_online (include/linux/bitmap.h:285 include/linux/cpumask.h:405 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1399) #4: ffffffc011f0b7b8 (regulator_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808) #5: ffffff8004a77160 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_recursive (drivers/regulator/core.c:156 drivers/regulator/core.c:263) stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc6 #2 7c8f8996d021ed0f65271e6aeebf7999de74a9fa Hardware name: Google Scarlet (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:161) show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:218) dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:106 (discriminator 2)) dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:113) print_circular_bug (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:?) check_noncircular (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:?) __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3052 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015 (discriminator 4)) lock_acquire (arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:39 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:438 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5627) __mutex_lock_common (include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:606 include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:29 kernel/locking/mutex.c:103 kernel/locking/mutex.c:144 kernel/locking/mutex.c:963) mutex_lock_nested (kernel/locking/mutex.c:1125) regulator_lock_dependent (arch/arm64/include/asm/current.h:19 include/linux/ww_mutex.h:111 drivers/regulator/core.c:329) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808) vctrl_enable (drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c:400) _regulator_do_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2617) _regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2764) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:308 drivers/regulator/core.c:2809) _set_opp (drivers/opp/core.c:819 drivers/opp/core.c:1072) dev_pm_opp_set_rate (drivers/opp/core.c:1164) set_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:62) __cpufreq_driver_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2216 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2271) cpufreq_online (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1488 (discriminator 2)) cpufreq_add_dev (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1563) subsys_interface_register (drivers/base/bus.c:?) cpufreq_register_driver (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2819) dt_cpufreq_probe (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:344) [...] Reported-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> Fixes: f8702f9 ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking") Fixes: e915331 ("regulator: vctrl-regulator: Avoid deadlock getting and setting the voltage") Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210825033704.3307263-3-wenst@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 13, 2021
[ Upstream commit 6fa54bc ] If em28xx_ir_init fails, it would decrease the refcount of dev. However, in the em28xx_ir_fini, when ir is NULL, it goes to ref_put and decrease the refcount of dev. This will lead to a refcount bug. Fix this bug by removing the kref_put in the error handling code of em28xx_ir_init. refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 7 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0x18e/0x1a0 lib/refcount.c:28 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.13.0 #3 Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x18e/0x1a0 lib/refcount.c:28 Call Trace: kref_put.constprop.0+0x60/0x85 include/linux/kref.h:69 em28xx_usb_disconnect.cold+0xd7/0xdc drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c:4150 usb_unbind_interface+0xbf/0x3a0 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:458 __device_release_driver drivers/base/dd.c:1201 [inline] device_release_driver_internal+0x22a/0x230 drivers/base/dd.c:1232 bus_remove_device+0x108/0x160 drivers/base/bus.c:529 device_del+0x1fe/0x510 drivers/base/core.c:3540 usb_disable_device+0xd1/0x1d0 drivers/usb/core/message.c:1419 usb_disconnect+0x109/0x330 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:2221 hub_port_connect drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5151 [inline] hub_port_connect_change drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5440 [inline] port_event drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5586 [inline] hub_event+0xf81/0x1d40 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5668 process_one_work+0x2c9/0x610 kernel/workqueue.c:2276 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:2338 [inline] worker_thread+0x333/0x5b0 kernel/workqueue.c:2424 kthread+0x188/0x1d0 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 Reported-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@gmail.com> Fixes: ac56886 ("media: em28xx: Fix possible memory leak of em28xx struct") Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 13, 2021
commit 13be2ef upstream. As previously noted in commit 66e4f4a ("rtc: cmos: Use spin_lock_irqsave() in cmos_interrupt()"): <4>[ 254.192378] WARNING: inconsistent lock state <4>[ 254.192384] 5.12.0-rc1-CI-CI_DRM_9834+ #1 Not tainted <4>[ 254.192396] -------------------------------- <4>[ 254.192400] inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage. <4>[ 254.192409] rtcwake/5309 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: <4>[ 254.192429] ffffffff8263c5f8 (rtc_lock){?...}-{2:2}, at: cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100 <4>[ 254.192481] {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at: <4>[ 254.192488] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x3d0 <4>[ 254.192504] _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 <4>[ 254.192519] cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100 <4>[ 254.192536] rtc_handler+0x1f/0xc0 <4>[ 254.192553] acpi_ev_fixed_event_detect+0x109/0x13c <4>[ 254.192574] acpi_ev_sci_xrupt_handler+0xb/0x28 <4>[ 254.192596] acpi_irq+0x13/0x30 <4>[ 254.192620] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x43/0x2c0 <4>[ 254.192641] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x2b/0x70 <4>[ 254.192661] handle_irq_event+0x2f/0x50 <4>[ 254.192680] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x9e/0x150 <4>[ 254.192693] __common_interrupt+0x76/0x140 <4>[ 254.192715] common_interrupt+0x96/0xc0 <4>[ 254.192732] asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40 <4>[ 254.192750] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x38/0x60 <4>[ 254.192767] resume_irqs+0xba/0xf0 <4>[ 254.192786] dpm_resume_noirq+0x245/0x3d0 <4>[ 254.192811] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x230/0xaa0 <4>[ 254.192835] pm_suspend.cold.8+0x301/0x34a <4>[ 254.192859] state_store+0x7b/0xe0 <4>[ 254.192879] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11d/0x1c0 <4>[ 254.192899] new_sync_write+0x11d/0x1b0 <4>[ 254.192916] vfs_write+0x265/0x390 <4>[ 254.192933] ksys_write+0x5a/0xd0 <4>[ 254.192949] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 <4>[ 254.192965] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae <4>[ 254.192986] irq event stamp: 43775 <4>[ 254.192994] hardirqs last enabled at (43775): [<ffffffff81c00c42>] asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20 <4>[ 254.193023] hardirqs last disabled at (43774): [<ffffffff81aa691a>] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa/0xb0 <4>[ 254.193049] softirqs last enabled at (42548): [<ffffffff81e00342>] __do_softirq+0x342/0x48e <4>[ 254.193074] softirqs last disabled at (42543): [<ffffffff810b45fd>] irq_exit_rcu+0xad/0xd0 <4>[ 254.193101] other info that might help us debug this: <4>[ 254.193107] Possible unsafe locking scenario: <4>[ 254.193112] CPU0 <4>[ 254.193117] ---- <4>[ 254.193121] lock(rtc_lock); <4>[ 254.193137] <Interrupt> <4>[ 254.193142] lock(rtc_lock); <4>[ 254.193156] *** DEADLOCK *** <4>[ 254.193161] 6 locks held by rtcwake/5309: <4>[ 254.193174] #0: ffff888104861430 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x5a/0xd0 <4>[ 254.193232] #1: ffff88810f823288 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xe7/0x1c0 <4>[ 254.193282] #2: ffff888100cef3c0 (kn->active#285 <7>[ 254.192706] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_modeset_setup_hw_state [i915]] [CRTC:51:pipe A] hw state readout: disabled <4>[ 254.193307] ){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xf0/0x1c0 <4>[ 254.193333] #3: ffffffff82649fa8 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend.cold.8+0xce/0x34a <4>[ 254.193387] #4: ffffffff827a2108 (acpi_scan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: acpi_suspend_begin+0x47/0x70 <4>[ 254.193433] #5: ffff8881019ea178 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_resume+0x68/0x1e0 <4>[ 254.193485] stack backtrace: <4>[ 254.193492] CPU: 1 PID: 5309 Comm: rtcwake Not tainted 5.12.0-rc1-CI-CI_DRM_9834+ #1 <4>[ 254.193514] Hardware name: Google Soraka/Soraka, BIOS MrChromebox-4.10 08/25/2019 <4>[ 254.193524] Call Trace: <4>[ 254.193536] dump_stack+0x7f/0xad <4>[ 254.193567] mark_lock.part.47+0x8ca/0xce0 <4>[ 254.193604] __lock_acquire+0x39b/0x2590 <4>[ 254.193626] ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20 <4>[ 254.193660] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x3d0 <4>[ 254.193677] ? cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100 <4>[ 254.193716] _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 <4>[ 254.193735] ? cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100 <4>[ 254.193758] cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100 <4>[ 254.193785] cmos_resume+0x2ac/0x2d0 <4>[ 254.193813] ? acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup+0x1f/0x110 <4>[ 254.193842] ? pnp_bus_suspend+0x10/0x10 <4>[ 254.193864] pnp_bus_resume+0x5e/0x90 <4>[ 254.193885] dpm_run_callback+0x5f/0x240 <4>[ 254.193914] device_resume+0xb2/0x1e0 <4>[ 254.193942] ? pm_dev_err+0x25/0x25 <4>[ 254.193974] dpm_resume+0xea/0x3f0 <4>[ 254.194005] dpm_resume_end+0x8/0x10 <4>[ 254.194030] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x29b/0xaa0 <4>[ 254.194066] pm_suspend.cold.8+0x301/0x34a <4>[ 254.194094] state_store+0x7b/0xe0 <4>[ 254.194124] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11d/0x1c0 <4>[ 254.194151] new_sync_write+0x11d/0x1b0 <4>[ 254.194183] vfs_write+0x265/0x390 <4>[ 254.194207] ksys_write+0x5a/0xd0 <4>[ 254.194232] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 <4>[ 254.194251] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae <4>[ 254.194274] RIP: 0033:0x7f07d79691e7 <4>[ 254.194293] Code: 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb bb 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24 <4>[ 254.194312] RSP: 002b:00007ffd9cc2c768 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 <4>[ 254.194337] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007f07d79691e7 <4>[ 254.194352] RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 0000556ebfc63590 RDI: 000000000000000b <4>[ 254.194366] RBP: 0000556ebfc63590 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000004 <4>[ 254.194379] R10: 0000556ebf0ec2a6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000004 which breaks S3-resume on fi-kbl-soraka presumably as that's slow enough to trigger the alarm during the suspend. Fixes: 6950d04 ("rtc: cmos: Replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock in hard IRQ") References: 66e4f4a ("rtc: cmos: Use spin_lock_irqsave() in cmos_interrupt()"): Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210305122140.28774-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 13, 2021
commit 57f0ff0 upstream. It's later supposed to be either a correct address or NULL. Without the initialization, it may contain an undefined value which results in the following segmentation fault: # perf top --sort comm -g --ignore-callees=do_idle terminates with: #0 0x00007ffff56b7685 in __strlen_avx2 () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007ffff55e3802 in strdup () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x00005555558cb139 in hist_entry__init (callchain_size=<optimized out>, sample_self=true, template=0x7fffde7fb110, he=0x7fffd801c250) at util/hist.c:489 #3 hist_entry__new (template=template@entry=0x7fffde7fb110, sample_self=sample_self@entry=true) at util/hist.c:564 #4 0x00005555558cb4ba in hists__findnew_entry (hists=hists@entry=0x5555561d9e38, entry=entry@entry=0x7fffde7fb110, al=al@entry=0x7fffde7fb420, sample_self=sample_self@entry=true) at util/hist.c:657 #5 0x00005555558cba1b in __hists__add_entry (hists=hists@entry=0x5555561d9e38, al=0x7fffde7fb420, sym_parent=<optimized out>, bi=bi@entry=0x0, mi=mi@entry=0x0, sample=sample@entry=0x7fffde7fb4b0, sample_self=true, ops=0x0, block_info=0x0) at util/hist.c:288 #6 0x00005555558cbb70 in hists__add_entry (sample_self=true, sample=0x7fffde7fb4b0, mi=0x0, bi=0x0, sym_parent=<optimized out>, al=<optimized out>, hists=0x5555561d9e38) at util/hist.c:1056 #7 iter_add_single_cumulative_entry (iter=0x7fffde7fb460, al=<optimized out>) at util/hist.c:1056 #8 0x00005555558cc8a4 in hist_entry_iter__add (iter=iter@entry=0x7fffde7fb460, al=al@entry=0x7fffde7fb420, max_stack_depth=<optimized out>, arg=arg@entry=0x7fffffff7db0) at util/hist.c:1231 #9 0x00005555557cdc9a in perf_event__process_sample (machine=<optimized out>, sample=0x7fffde7fb4b0, evsel=<optimized out>, event=<optimized out>, tool=0x7fffffff7db0) at builtin-top.c:842 #10 deliver_event (qe=<optimized out>, qevent=<optimized out>) at builtin-top.c:1202 #11 0x00005555558a9318 in do_flush (show_progress=false, oe=0x7fffffff80e0) at util/ordered-events.c:244 #12 __ordered_events__flush (oe=oe@entry=0x7fffffff80e0, how=how@entry=OE_FLUSH__TOP, timestamp=timestamp@entry=0) at util/ordered-events.c:323 #13 0x00005555558a9789 in __ordered_events__flush (timestamp=<optimized out>, how=<optimized out>, oe=<optimized out>) at util/ordered-events.c:339 #14 ordered_events__flush (how=OE_FLUSH__TOP, oe=0x7fffffff80e0) at util/ordered-events.c:341 #15 ordered_events__flush (oe=oe@entry=0x7fffffff80e0, how=how@entry=OE_FLUSH__TOP) at util/ordered-events.c:339 #16 0x00005555557cd631 in process_thread (arg=0x7fffffff7db0) at builtin-top.c:1114 #17 0x00007ffff7bb817a in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #18 0x00007ffff5656dc3 in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 If you look at the frame #2, the code is: 488 if (he->srcline) { 489 he->srcline = strdup(he->srcline); 490 if (he->srcline == NULL) 491 goto err_rawdata; 492 } If he->srcline is not NULL (it is not NULL if it is uninitialized rubbish), it gets strdupped and strdupping a rubbish random string causes the problem. Also, if you look at the commit 1fb7d06, it adds the srcline property into the struct, but not initializing it everywhere needed. Committer notes: Now I see, when using --ignore-callees=do_idle we end up here at line 2189 in add_callchain_ip(): 2181 if (al.sym != NULL) { 2182 if (perf_hpp_list.parent && !*parent && 2183 symbol__match_regex(al.sym, &parent_regex)) 2184 *parent = al.sym; 2185 else if (have_ignore_callees && root_al && 2186 symbol__match_regex(al.sym, &ignore_callees_regex)) { 2187 /* Treat this symbol as the root, 2188 forgetting its callees. */ 2189 *root_al = al; 2190 callchain_cursor_reset(cursor); 2191 } 2192 } And the al that doesn't have the ->srcline field initialized will be copied to the root_al, so then, back to: 1211 int hist_entry_iter__add(struct hist_entry_iter *iter, struct addr_location *al, 1212 int max_stack_depth, void *arg) 1213 { 1214 int err, err2; 1215 struct map *alm = NULL; 1216 1217 if (al) 1218 alm = map__get(al->map); 1219 1220 err = sample__resolve_callchain(iter->sample, &callchain_cursor, &iter->parent, 1221 iter->evsel, al, max_stack_depth); 1222 if (err) { 1223 map__put(alm); 1224 return err; 1225 } 1226 1227 err = iter->ops->prepare_entry(iter, al); 1228 if (err) 1229 goto out; 1230 1231 err = iter->ops->add_single_entry(iter, al); 1232 if (err) 1233 goto out; 1234 That al at line 1221 is what hist_entry_iter__add() (called from sample__resolve_callchain()) saw as 'root_al', and then: iter->ops->add_single_entry(iter, al); will go on with al->srcline with a bogus value, I'll add the above sequence to the cset and apply, thanks! Signed-off-by: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com> CC: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Fixes: 1fb7d06 ("perf report Use srcline from callchain for hist entries") Link: https //lore.kernel.org/r/20210719145332.29747-1-mpetlan@redhat.com Reported-by: Juri Lelli <jlelli@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 13, 2021
[ Upstream commit 340fa66 ] Recent changes exposed a bug where specifically-timed requests to the path manager netlink API could trigger a divide-by-zero in __tcp_select_window(), as syzkaller does: divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 0 PID: 9667 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc6+ #3 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__tcp_select_window+0x509/0xa60 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3016 Code: 44 89 ff e8 c9 29 e9 fd 45 39 e7 0f 8d 20 ff ff ff e8 db 28 e9 fd 44 89 e3 e9 13 ff ff ff e8 ce 28 e9 fd 44 89 e0 44 89 e3 99 <f7> 7c 24 04 29 d3 e9 fc fe ff ff e8 b7 28 e9 fd 44 89 f1 48 89 ea RSP: 0018:ffff888031ccf020 EFLAGS: 00010216 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000040000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88811532c080 RDI: 0000000000000002 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffff835807c2 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000004 R11: ffffed1020b92441 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 1ffff11006399e08 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007fa4c8344700(0000) GS:ffff88811ae00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000001b2f424000 CR3: 000000003e4e2003 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: tcp_select_window net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:264 [inline] __tcp_transmit_skb+0xc00/0x37a0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1351 __tcp_send_ack.part.0+0x3ec/0x760 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3972 __tcp_send_ack net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3978 [inline] tcp_send_ack+0x7d/0xa0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3978 mptcp_pm_nl_addr_send_ack+0x1ab/0x380 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:654 mptcp_pm_remove_addr+0x161/0x200 net/mptcp/pm.c:58 mptcp_nl_remove_id_zero_address+0x197/0x460 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1328 mptcp_nl_cmd_del_addr+0x98b/0xd40 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1359 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x225/0x340 net/netlink/genetlink.c:731 genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:775 [inline] genl_rcv_msg+0x341/0x5b0 net/netlink/genetlink.c:792 netlink_rcv_skb+0x148/0x430 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2504 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:803 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1314 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x537/0x750 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1340 netlink_sendmsg+0x846/0xd80 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1929 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0x14e/0x190 net/socket.c:724 ____sys_sendmsg+0x709/0x870 net/socket.c:2403 ___sys_sendmsg+0xff/0x170 net/socket.c:2457 __sys_sendmsg+0xe5/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2486 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae mptcp_pm_nl_addr_send_ack() was attempting to send a TCP ACK on the first subflow in the MPTCP socket's connection list without validating that the subflow was in a suitable connection state. To address this, always validate subflow state when sending extra ACKs on subflows for address advertisement or subflow priority change. Fixes: 84dfe36 ("mptcp: send out dedicated ADD_ADDR packet") Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#229 Co-developed-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 13, 2021
commit 98e2e40 upstream. When the refcount is decreased to 0, the resource reclamation branch is entered. Before CPU0 reaches the race point (1), CPU1 may obtain the spinlock and traverse the rbtree to find 'root', see nilfs_lookup_root(). Although CPU1 will call refcount_inc() to increase the refcount, it is obviously too late. CPU0 will release 'root' directly, CPU1 then accesses 'root' and triggers UAF. Use refcount_dec_and_lock() to ensure that both the operations of decrease refcount to 0 and link deletion are lock protected eliminates this risk. CPU0 CPU1 nilfs_put_root(): <-------- (1) spin_lock(&nilfs->ns_cptree_lock); rb_erase(&root->rb_node, &nilfs->ns_cptree); spin_unlock(&nilfs->ns_cptree_lock); kfree(root); <-------- use-after-free refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 9476 at lib/refcount.c:28 \ refcount_warn_saturate+0x1cf/0x210 lib/refcount.c:28 Modules linked in: CPU: 2 PID: 9476 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.10.45-rc1+ #3 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), ... RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x1cf/0x210 lib/refcount.c:28 ... ... Call Trace: __refcount_sub_and_test include/linux/refcount.h:283 [inline] __refcount_dec_and_test include/linux/refcount.h:315 [inline] refcount_dec_and_test include/linux/refcount.h:333 [inline] nilfs_put_root+0xc1/0xd0 fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c:795 nilfs_segctor_destroy fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2749 [inline] nilfs_detach_log_writer+0x3fa/0x570 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2812 nilfs_put_super+0x2f/0xf0 fs/nilfs2/super.c:467 generic_shutdown_super+0xcd/0x1f0 fs/super.c:464 kill_block_super+0x4a/0x90 fs/super.c:1446 deactivate_locked_super+0x6a/0xb0 fs/super.c:335 deactivate_super+0x85/0x90 fs/super.c:366 cleanup_mnt+0x277/0x2e0 fs/namespace.c:1118 __cleanup_mnt+0x15/0x20 fs/namespace.c:1125 task_work_run+0x8e/0x110 kernel/task_work.c:151 tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:164 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x13c/0x170 kernel/entry/common.c:191 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x16/0x30 kernel/entry/common.c:266 do_syscall_64+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:56 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 There is no reproduction program, and the above is only theoretical analysis. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1629859428-5906-1-git-send-email-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Fixes: ba65ae4 ("nilfs2: add checkpoint tree to nilfs object") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210723012317.4146-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 13, 2021
[ Upstream commit 8f96a5b ] We update the ctime/mtime of a block device when we remove it so that blkid knows the device changed. However we do this by re-opening the block device and calling filp_update_time. This is more correct because it'll call the inode->i_op->update_time if it exists, but the block dev inodes do not do this. Instead call generic_update_time() on the bd_inode in order to avoid the blkdev_open path and get rid of the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2+ torvalds#406 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/11596 is trying to acquire lock: ffff939640d2f538 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 but task is already holding lock: ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x56/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 file_open_name+0xc7/0x170 filp_open+0x2c/0x50 btrfs_scratch_superblocks.part.0+0x10f/0x170 btrfs_rm_device.cold+0xe8/0xed btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop] loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop] process_one_work+0x26b/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x245/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/11596: #0: ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 11596 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ torvalds#406 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 13, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3fa421d ] When removing the device we call blkdev_put() on the device once we've removed it, and because we have an EXCL open we need to take the ->open_mutex on the block device to clean it up. Unfortunately during device remove we are holding the sb writers lock, which results in the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2+ torvalds#407 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/11595 is trying to acquire lock: ffff973ac35dd138 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 but task is already holding lock: ffff973ac9812c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 blkdev_put+0x3a/0x220 btrfs_rm_device.cold+0x62/0xe5 btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop] loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop] process_one_work+0x26b/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x245/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/11595: #0: ffff973ac9812c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 11595 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ torvalds#407 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7fc21255d4cb So instead save the bdev and do the put once we've dropped the sb writers lock in order to avoid the lockdep recursion. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 23, 2024
The test_tag test triggers an unhandled page fault: # ./test_tag [ 130.640218] CPU 0 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff80001b898004, era == 9000000003137f7c, ra == 9000000003139e70 [ 130.640501] Oops[#3]: [ 130.640553] CPU: 0 PID: 1326 Comm: test_tag Tainted: G D O 6.7.0-rc4-loong-devel-gb62ab1a397cf #47 61985c1d94084daa2432f771daa45b56b10d8d2a [ 130.640764] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022 [ 130.640874] pc 9000000003137f7c ra 9000000003139e70 tp 9000000104cb4000 sp 9000000104cb7a40 [ 130.641001] a0 ffff80001b894000 a1 ffff80001b897ff8 a2 000000006ba210be a3 0000000000000000 [ 130.641128] a4 000000006ba210be a5 00000000000000f1 a6 00000000000000b3 a7 0000000000000000 [ 130.641256] t0 0000000000000000 t1 00000000000007f6 t2 0000000000000000 t3 9000000004091b70 [ 130.641387] t4 000000006ba210be t5 0000000000000004 t6 fffffffffffffff0 t7 90000000040913e0 [ 130.641512] t8 0000000000000005 u0 0000000000000dc0 s9 0000000000000009 s0 9000000104cb7ae0 [ 130.641641] s1 00000000000007f6 s2 0000000000000009 s3 0000000000000095 s4 0000000000000000 [ 130.641771] s5 ffff80001b894000 s6 ffff80001b897fb0 s7 9000000004090c50 s8 0000000000000000 [ 130.641900] ra: 9000000003139e70 build_body+0x1fcc/0x4988 [ 130.642007] ERA: 9000000003137f7c build_body+0xd8/0x4988 [ 130.642112] CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) [ 130.642261] PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE) [ 130.642353] EUEN: 00000003 (+FPE +SXE -ASXE -BTE) [ 130.642458] ECFG: 00071c1c (LIE=2-4,10-12 VS=7) [ 130.642554] ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0) [ 130.642658] BADV: ffff80001b898004 [ 130.642719] PRID: 0014c010 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3A5000) [ 130.642815] Modules linked in: [last unloaded: bpf_testmod(O)] [ 130.642924] Process test_tag (pid: 1326, threadinfo=00000000f7f4015f, task=000000006499f9fd) [ 130.643062] Stack : 0000000000000000 9000000003380724 0000000000000000 0000000104cb7be8 [ 130.643213] 0000000000000000 25af8d9b6e600558 9000000106250ea0 9000000104cb7ae0 [ 130.643378] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 9000000104cb7be8 90000000049f6000 [ 130.643538] 0000000000000090 9000000106250ea0 ffff80001b894000 ffff80001b894000 [ 130.643685] 00007ffffb917790 900000000313ca94 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 130.643831] ffff80001b894000 0000000000000ff7 0000000000000000 9000000100468000 [ 130.643983] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000040 25af8d9b6e600558 [ 130.644131] 0000000000000bb7 ffff80001b894048 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 130.644276] 9000000104cb7be8 90000000049f6000 0000000000000090 9000000104cb7bdc [ 130.644423] ffff80001b894000 0000000000000000 00007ffffb917790 90000000032acfb0 [ 130.644572] ... [ 130.644629] Call Trace: [ 130.644641] [<9000000003137f7c>] build_body+0xd8/0x4988 [ 130.644785] [<900000000313ca94>] bpf_int_jit_compile+0x228/0x4ec [ 130.644891] [<90000000032acfb0>] bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x158/0x1b0 [ 130.645003] [<90000000032b3504>] bpf_prog_load+0x760/0xb44 [ 130.645089] [<90000000032b6744>] __sys_bpf+0xbb8/0x2588 [ 130.645175] [<90000000032b8388>] sys_bpf+0x20/0x2c [ 130.645259] [<9000000003f6ab38>] do_syscall+0x7c/0x94 [ 130.645369] [<9000000003121c5c>] handle_syscall+0xbc/0x158 [ 130.645507] [ 130.645539] Code: 380839f6 380831f9 28412bae <24000ca6> 004081ad 0014cb50 004083e8 02bff34c 58008e91 [ 130.645729] [ 130.646418] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- On my machine, which has CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_16KB=y, the test failed at loading a BPF prog with 2039 instructions: prog = (struct bpf_prog *)ffff80001b894000 insn = (struct bpf_insn *)(prog->insnsi)ffff80001b894048 insn + 2039 = (struct bpf_insn *)ffff80001b898000 <- end of the page In the build_insn() function, we are trying to access next instruction unconditionally, i.e. `(insn + 1)->imm`. The address lies in the next page and can be not owned by the current process, thus an page fault is inevitable and then segfault. So, let's access next instruction only under `dst = imm64` context. With this fix, we have: # ./test_tag test_tag: OK (40945 tests) Fixes: bbfddb9 ("LoongArch: BPF: Avoid declare variables in switch-case") Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 23, 2024
Andrii Nakryiko says: ==================== Tighten up arg:ctx type enforcement Follow up fixes for kernel-side and libbpf-side logic around handling arg:ctx (__arg_ctx) tagged arguments of BPF global subprogs. Patch #1 adds libbpf feature detection of kernel-side __arg_ctx support to avoid unnecessary rewriting BTF types. With stricter kernel-side type enforcement this is now mandatory to avoid problems with using `struct bpf_user_pt_regs_t` instead of actual typedef. For __arg_ctx tagged arguments verifier is now supporting either `bpf_user_pt_regs_t` typedef or resolves it down to the actual struct (pt_regs/user_pt_regs/user_regs_struct), depending on architecture), but for old kernels without __arg_ctx support it's more backwards compatible for libbpf to use `struct bpf_user_pt_regs_t` rewrite which will work on wider range of kernels. So feature detection prevent libbpf accidentally breaking global subprogs on new kernels. We also adjust selftests to do similar feature detection (much simpler, but potentially breaking due to kernel source code refactoring, which is fine for selftests), and skip tests expecting libbpf's BTF type rewrites. Patch #2 is preparatory refactoring for patch #3 which adds type enforcement for arg:ctx tagged global subprog args. See the patch for specifics. Patch #4 adds many new cases to ensure type logic works as expected. Finally, patch #5 adds a relevant subset of kernel-side type checks to __arg_ctx cases that libbpf supports rewrite of. In libbpf's case, type violations are reported as warnings and BTF rewrite is not performed, which will eventually lead to BPF verifier complaining at program verification time. Good care was taken to avoid conflicts between bpf and bpf-next tree (which has few follow up refactorings in the same code area). Once trees converge some of the code will be moved around a bit (and some will be deleted), but with no change to functionality or general shape of the code. v2->v3: - support `bpf_user_pt_regs_t` typedef for KPROBE and PERF_EVENT (CI); v1->v2: - add user_pt_regs and user_regs_struct support for PERF_EVENT (CI); - drop FEAT_ARG_CTX_TAG enum leftover from patch #1; - fix warning about default: without break in the switch (CI). ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240118033143.3384355-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 23, 2024
Petr Machata says: ==================== mlxsw: Miscellaneous fixes This patchset is a bric-a-brac of fixes for bugs impacting mlxsw. - Patches #1 and #2 fix issues in ACL handling error paths. - Patch #3 fixes stack corruption in ACL code that a recent FW update has uncovered. - Patch #4 fixes an issue in handling of IPIP next hops. - Patch #5 fixes a typo in a the qos_pfc selftest - Patch #6 fixes the same selftest to work with 8-lane ports. ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1705502064.git.petrm@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 23, 2024
When I was testing mongodb over bcachefs with compression, there is a lockdep warning when snapshotting mongodb data volume. $ cat test.sh prog=bcachefs $prog subvolume create /mnt/data $prog subvolume create /mnt/data/snapshots while true;do $prog subvolume snapshot /mnt/data /mnt/data/snapshots/$(date +%s) sleep 1s done $ cat /etc/mongodb.conf systemLog: destination: file logAppend: true path: /mnt/data/mongod.log storage: dbPath: /mnt/data/ lockdep reports: [ 3437.452330] ====================================================== [ 3437.452750] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 3437.453168] 6.7.0-rc7-custom+ torvalds#85 Tainted: G E [ 3437.453562] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 3437.453981] bcachefs/35533 is trying to acquire lock: [ 3437.454325] ffffa0a02b2b1418 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.454875] but task is already holding lock: [ 3437.455268] ffffa0a02b2b10e0 (&type->s_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.456009] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 3437.456553] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 3437.457054] -> #3 (&type->s_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}: [ 3437.457507] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 3437.457772] bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.458206] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0 [ 3437.458498] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.458779] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.459155] -> #2 (&c->snapshot_create_lock){++++}-{3:3}: [ 3437.459615] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 3437.459878] bch2_truncate+0x82/0x110 [bcachefs] [ 3437.460276] bchfs_truncate+0x254/0x3c0 [bcachefs] [ 3437.460686] notify_change+0x1f1/0x4a0 [ 3437.461283] do_truncate+0x7f/0xd0 [ 3437.461555] path_openat+0xa57/0xce0 [ 3437.461836] do_filp_open+0xb4/0x160 [ 3437.462116] do_sys_openat2+0x91/0xc0 [ 3437.462402] __x64_sys_openat+0x53/0xa0 [ 3437.462701] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.462982] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.463359] -> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3437.463843] down_write+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3437.464223] bch2_write_iter+0x5b/0xcc0 [bcachefs] [ 3437.464493] vfs_write+0x21b/0x4c0 [ 3437.464653] ksys_write+0x69/0xf0 [ 3437.464839] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.465009] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.465231] -> #0 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}: [ 3437.465471] __lock_acquire+0x1455/0x21b0 [ 3437.465656] lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0 [ 3437.465822] mnt_want_write+0x46/0x1a0 [ 3437.465996] filename_create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.466175] user_path_create+0x2d/0x50 [ 3437.466352] bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x2ec/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.466617] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0 [ 3437.466791] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.466957] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.467180] other info that might help us debug this: [ 3437.469670] 2 locks held by bcachefs/35533: other info that might help us debug this: [ 3437.467507] Chain exists of: sb_writers#10 --> &c->snapshot_create_lock --> &type->s_umount_key#48 [ 3437.467979] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 3437.468223] CPU0 CPU1 [ 3437.468405] ---- ---- [ 3437.468585] rlock(&type->s_umount_key#48); [ 3437.468758] lock(&c->snapshot_create_lock); [ 3437.469030] lock(&type->s_umount_key#48); [ 3437.469291] rlock(sb_writers#10); [ 3437.469434] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 3437.469670] 2 locks held by bcachefs/35533: [ 3437.469838] #0: ffffa0a02ce00a88 (&c->snapshot_create_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x1e3/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.470294] #1: ffffa0a02b2b10e0 (&type->s_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.470744] stack backtrace: [ 3437.470922] CPU: 7 PID: 35533 Comm: bcachefs Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 6.7.0-rc7-custom+ torvalds#85 [ 3437.471313] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.16.3-1-1 04/01/2014 [ 3437.471694] Call Trace: [ 3437.471795] <TASK> [ 3437.471884] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x90 [ 3437.472035] check_noncircular+0x132/0x150 [ 3437.472202] __lock_acquire+0x1455/0x21b0 [ 3437.472369] lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0 [ 3437.472518] ? filename_create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.472683] ? lock_is_held_type+0x97/0x110 [ 3437.472856] mnt_want_write+0x46/0x1a0 [ 3437.473025] ? filename_create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.473204] filename_create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.473380] user_path_create+0x2d/0x50 [ 3437.473555] bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x2ec/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.473819] ? lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0 [ 3437.474002] ? __fget_files+0x2a/0x190 [ 3437.474195] ? __fget_files+0xbc/0x190 [ 3437.474380] ? lock_release+0xc5/0x270 [ 3437.474567] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0 [ 3437.474764] ? __pfx_bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [bcachefs] [ 3437.475090] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0 [ 3437.475277] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.475454] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.475691] RIP: 0033:0x7f2743c313af ====================================================== In __bch2_ioctl_subvolume_create(), we grab s_umount unconditionally and unlock it at the end of the function. There is a comment "why do we need this lock?" about the lock coming from commit 42d2373 ("bcachefs: Snapshot creation, deletion") The reason is that __bch2_ioctl_subvolume_create() calls sync_inodes_sb() which enforce locked s_umount to writeback all dirty nodes before doing snapshot works. Fix it by read locking s_umount for snapshotting only and unlocking s_umount after sync_inodes_sb(). Signed-off-by: Su Yue <glass.su@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 30, 2024
The cited change refactored mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_peer_flow() to only clear DUP flag when list of peer flows has become empty. However, if any concurrent user holds a reference to a peer flow (for example, the neighbor update workqueue task is updating peer flow's parent encap entry concurrently), then the flow will not be removed from the peer list and, consecutively, DUP flag will remain set. Since mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_peers_flow() calls mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_peer_flow() for every possible peer index the algorithm will try to remove the flow from eswitch instances that it has never peered with causing either NULL pointer dereference when trying to remove the flow peer list head of peer_index that was never initialized or a warning if the list debug config is enabled[0]. Fix the issue by always removing the peer flow from the list even when not releasing the last reference to it. [0]: [ 3102.985806] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3102.986223] list_del corruption, ffff888139110698->next is NULL [ 3102.986757] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 22109 at lib/list_debug.c:53 __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x4f/0xc0 [ 3102.987561] Modules linked in: act_ct nf_flow_table bonding act_tunnel_key act_mirred act_skbedit vxlan cls_matchall nfnetlink_cttimeout act_gact cls_flower sch_ingress mlx5_vdpa vringh vhost_iotlb vdpa openvswitch nsh xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink iptable_nat xt_addrtype xt_conntrack nf_nat br_netfilter rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcg ss oid_registry overlay rpcrdma rdma_ucm ib_iser libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ib_umad rdma_cm ib_ipoib iw_cm ib_cm mlx5_ib ib_uverbs ib_core mlx5_core [last unloaded: bonding] [ 3102.991113] CPU: 2 PID: 22109 Comm: revalidator28 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc6+ #3 [ 3102.991695] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 3102.992605] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x4f/0xc0 [ 3102.993122] Code: 39 c2 74 56 48 8b 32 48 39 fe 75 62 48 8b 51 08 48 39 f2 75 73 b8 01 00 00 00 c3 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 48 fd 0a 82 e8 41 0b ad ff <0f> 0b 31 c0 c3 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 70 fd 0a 82 e8 2d 0b ad ff 0f 0b [ 3102.994615] RSP: 0018:ffff8881383e7710 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 3102.995078] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 3102.995670] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff88885f89b640 RDI: ffff88885f89b640 [ 3102.997188] DEL flow 00000000be367878 on port 0 [ 3102.998594] RBP: dead000000000122 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: c0000000ffffdfff [ 3102.999604] R10: 0000000000000008 R11: ffff8881383e7598 R12: dead000000000100 [ 3103.000198] R13: 0000000000000002 R14: ffff888139110000 R15: ffff888101901240 [ 3103.000790] FS: 00007f424cde4700(0000) GS:ffff88885f880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 3103.001486] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 3103.001986] CR2: 00007fd42e8dcb70 CR3: 000000011e68a003 CR4: 0000000000370ea0 [ 3103.002596] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 3103.003190] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 3103.003787] Call Trace: [ 3103.004055] <TASK> [ 3103.004297] ? __warn+0x7d/0x130 [ 3103.004623] ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x4f/0xc0 [ 3103.005094] ? report_bug+0xf1/0x1c0 [ 3103.005439] ? console_unlock+0x4a/0xd0 [ 3103.005806] ? handle_bug+0x3f/0x70 [ 3103.006149] ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60 [ 3103.006531] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 [ 3103.007430] ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x4f/0xc0 [ 3103.007910] mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_peers_flow+0xcf/0x240 [mlx5_core] [ 3103.008463] mlx5e_tc_del_flow+0x46/0x270 [mlx5_core] [ 3103.008944] mlx5e_flow_put+0x26/0x50 [mlx5_core] [ 3103.009401] mlx5e_delete_flower+0x25f/0x380 [mlx5_core] [ 3103.009901] tc_setup_cb_destroy+0xab/0x180 [ 3103.010292] fl_hw_destroy_filter+0x99/0xc0 [cls_flower] [ 3103.010779] __fl_delete+0x2d4/0x2f0 [cls_flower] [ 3103.011207] fl_delete+0x36/0x80 [cls_flower] [ 3103.011614] tc_del_tfilter+0x56f/0x750 [ 3103.011982] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0xff/0x3a0 [ 3103.012362] ? netlink_ack+0x1c7/0x4e0 [ 3103.012719] ? rtnl_calcit.isra.44+0x130/0x130 [ 3103.013134] netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100 [ 3103.013533] netlink_unicast+0x1ca/0x2b0 [ 3103.013902] netlink_sendmsg+0x361/0x4d0 [ 3103.014269] __sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x60 [ 3103.014643] ____sys_sendmsg+0x1f2/0x200 [ 3103.015018] ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x72/0xa0 [ 3103.015265] ___sys_sendmsg+0x87/0xd0 [ 3103.016608] ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x72/0xa0 [ 3103.017014] ? ___sys_recvmsg+0x9b/0xd0 [ 3103.017381] ? ttwu_do_activate.isra.137+0x58/0x180 [ 3103.017821] ? wake_up_q+0x49/0x90 [ 3103.018157] ? futex_wake+0x137/0x160 [ 3103.018521] ? __sys_sendmsg+0x51/0x90 [ 3103.018882] __sys_sendmsg+0x51/0x90 [ 3103.019230] ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x56/0x130 [ 3103.019670] do_syscall_64+0x3c/0x80 [ 3103.020017] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 [ 3103.020469] RIP: 0033:0x7f4254811ef4 [ 3103.020816] Code: 89 f3 48 83 ec 10 48 89 7c 24 08 48 89 14 24 e8 42 eb ff ff 48 8b 14 24 41 89 c0 48 89 de 48 8b 7c 24 08 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 30 44 89 c7 48 89 04 24 e8 78 eb ff ff 48 8b [ 3103.022290] RSP: 002b:00007f424cdd9480 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e [ 3103.022970] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f424cdd9510 RCX: 00007f4254811ef4 [ 3103.023564] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007f424cdd9510 RDI: 0000000000000012 [ 3103.024158] RBP: 00007f424cdda238 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007f41d801a4b0 [ 3103.024748] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 3103.025341] R13: 00007f424cdd9510 R14: 00007f424cdda240 R15: 00007f424cdd99a0 [ 3103.025931] </TASK> [ 3103.026182] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 3103.027033] ------------[ cut here ]------------ Fixes: 9be6c21 ("net/mlx5e: Handle offloads flows per peer") Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 30, 2024
Similar to a reported issue (check the commit b33fb5b ("net: qualcomm: rmnet: fix global oob in rmnet_policy"), my local fuzzer finds another global out-of-bounds read for policy ksmbd_nl_policy. See bug trace below: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in validate_nla lib/nlattr.c:386 [inline] BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in __nla_validate_parse+0x24af/0x2750 lib/nlattr.c:600 Read of size 1 at addr ffffffff8f24b100 by task syz-executor.1/62810 CPU: 0 PID: 62810 Comm: syz-executor.1 Tainted: G N 6.1.0 #3 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x8b/0xb3 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:284 [inline] print_report+0x172/0x475 mm/kasan/report.c:395 kasan_report+0xbb/0x1c0 mm/kasan/report.c:495 validate_nla lib/nlattr.c:386 [inline] __nla_validate_parse+0x24af/0x2750 lib/nlattr.c:600 __nla_parse+0x3e/0x50 lib/nlattr.c:697 __nlmsg_parse include/net/netlink.h:748 [inline] genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse.constprop.0+0x1b0/0x290 net/netlink/genetlink.c:565 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xda/0x330 net/netlink/genetlink.c:734 genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:833 [inline] genl_rcv_msg+0x441/0x780 net/netlink/genetlink.c:850 netlink_rcv_skb+0x14f/0x410 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2540 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:861 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x54e/0x800 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345 netlink_sendmsg+0x930/0xe50 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0x154/0x190 net/socket.c:734 ____sys_sendmsg+0x6df/0x840 net/socket.c:2482 ___sys_sendmsg+0x110/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2536 __sys_sendmsg+0xf3/0x1c0 net/socket.c:2565 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7fdd66a8f359 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 19 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fdd65e00168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fdd66bbcf80 RCX: 00007fdd66a8f359 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000500 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007fdd66ada493 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffc84b81aff R14: 00007fdd65e00300 R15: 0000000000022000 </TASK> The buggy address belongs to the variable: ksmbd_nl_policy+0x100/0xa80 The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page:0000000034f47940 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x1ccc4b flags: 0x200000000001000(reserved|node=0|zone=2) raw: 0200000000001000 ffffea00073312c8 ffffea00073312c8 0000000000000000 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected Memory state around the buggy address: ffffffff8f24b000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffffffff8f24b080: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >ffffffff8f24b100: f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 07 f9 ^ ffffffff8f24b180: f9 f9 f9 f9 00 05 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 05 ffffffff8f24b200: f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 03 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 04 f9 ================================================================== To fix it, add a placeholder named __KSMBD_EVENT_MAX and let KSMBD_EVENT_MAX to be its original value - 1 according to what other netlink families do. Also change two sites that refer the KSMBD_EVENT_MAX to correct value. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 0626e66 ("cifsd: add server handler for central processing and tranport layers") Signed-off-by: Lin Ma <linma@zju.edu.cn> Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 6, 2024
Many devices with a single alternate setting do not have a Valid Alternate Setting Control and validation performed by validate_sample_rate_table_v2v3() doesn't work on them and is not really needed. So check the presense of control before sending altsetting validation requests. MOTU Microbook IIc is suffering the most without this check. It takes up to 40 seconds to bootup due to how slow it switches sampling rates: [ 2659.164824] usb 3-2: New USB device found, idVendor=07fd, idProduct=0004, bcdDevice= 0.60 [ 2659.164827] usb 3-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0 [ 2659.164829] usb 3-2: Product: MicroBook IIc [ 2659.164830] usb 3-2: Manufacturer: MOTU [ 2659.166204] usb 3-2: Found last interface = 3 [ 2679.322298] usb 3-2: No valid sample rate available for 1:1, assuming a firmware bug [ 2679.322306] usb 3-2: 1:1: add audio endpoint 0x3 [ 2679.322321] usb 3-2: Creating new data endpoint #3 [ 2679.322552] usb 3-2: 1:1 Set sample rate 96000, clock 1 [ 2684.362250] usb 3-2: 2:1: cannot get freq (v2/v3): err -110 [ 2694.444700] usb 3-2: No valid sample rate available for 2:1, assuming a firmware bug [ 2694.444707] usb 3-2: 2:1: add audio endpoint 0x84 [ 2694.444721] usb 3-2: Creating new data endpoint torvalds#84 [ 2699.482103] usb 3-2: 2:1 Set sample rate 96000, clock 1 Signed-off-by: Alexander Tsoy <alexander@tsoy.me> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240129121254.3454481-1-alexander@tsoy.me Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 26, 2024
…kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm64 fixes for 6.8, take #3 - Check for the validity of interrupts handled by a MOVALL command - Check for the validity of interrupts while reading the pending state on enabling LPIs.
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 27, 2024
Hou Tao says: ==================== Fix the read of vsyscall page through bpf From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Hi, As reported by syzboot [1] and [2], when trying to read vsyscall page by using bpf_probe_read_kernel() or bpf_probe_read(), oops may happen. Thomas Gleixner had proposed a test patch [3], but it seems that no formal patch is posted after about one month [4], so I post it instead and add an Originally-by tag in patch #2. Patch #1 makes is_vsyscall_vaddr() being a common helper. Patch #2 fixes the problem by disallowing vsyscall page read for copy_from_kernel_nofault(). Patch #3 adds one test case to ensure the read of vsyscall page through bpf is rejected. Please see individual patches for more details. Comments are always welcome. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAG48ez06TZft=ATH1qh2c5mpS5BT8UakwNkzi6nvK5_djC-4Nw@mail.gmail.com/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CABOYnLynjBoFZOf3Z4BhaZkc5hx_kHfsjiW+UWLoB=w33LvScw@mail.gmail.com/ [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/87r0jwquhv.ffs@tglx/ [4]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/e24b125c-8ff4-9031-6c53-67ff2e01f316@huaweicloud.com/ Change Log: v3: * rephrase commit message for patch #1 & #2 (Sohil) * reword comments in copy_from_kernel_nofault_allowed() (Sohil) * add Rvb tag for patch #1 and Acked-by tag for patch #3 (Sohil, Yonghong) v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240126115423.3943360-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ * move is_vsyscall_vaddr to asm/vsyscall.h instead (Sohil) * elaborate on the reason for disallowing of vsyscall page read in copy_from_kernel_nofault_allowed() (Sohil) * update the commit message of patch #2 to more clearly explain how the oops occurs. (Sohil) * update the commit message of patch #3 to explain the expected return values of various bpf helpers (Yonghong) v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240119073019.1528573-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240202103935.3154011-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 27, 2024
... cdns3_gadget_ep_free_request(&priv_ep->endpoint, &priv_req->request); list_del_init(&priv_req->list); ... 'priv_req' actually free at cdns3_gadget_ep_free_request(). But list_del_init() use priv_req->list after it. [ 1542.642868][ T534] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free read in __list_del_entry_valid+0x10/0xd4 [ 1542.642868][ T534] [ 1542.653162][ T534] Use-after-free read at 0x000000009ed0ba99 (in kfence-#3): [ 1542.660311][ T534] __list_del_entry_valid+0x10/0xd4 [ 1542.665375][ T534] cdns3_gadget_ep_disable+0x1f8/0x388 [cdns3] [ 1542.671571][ T534] usb_ep_disable+0x44/0xe4 [ 1542.675948][ T534] ffs_func_eps_disable+0x64/0xc8 [ 1542.680839][ T534] ffs_func_set_alt+0x74/0x368 [ 1542.685478][ T534] ffs_func_disable+0x18/0x28 Move list_del_init() before cdns3_gadget_ep_free_request() to resolve this problem. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 7733f6c ("usb: cdns3: Add Cadence USB3 DRD Driver") Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240202154217.661867-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 24, 2024
…git/netfilter/nf Pablo Neira Ayuso says: ==================== Netfilter fixes for net Patch #1 restores NFPROTO_INET with nft_compat, from Ignat Korchagin. Patch #2 fixes an issue with bridge netfilter and broadcast/multicast packets. There is a day 0 bug in br_netfilter when used with connection tracking. Conntrack assumes that an nf_conn structure that is not yet added to hash table ("unconfirmed"), is only visible by the current cpu that is processing the sk_buff. For bridge this isn't true, sk_buff can get cloned in between, and clones can be processed in parallel on different cpu. This patch disables NAT and conntrack helpers for multicast packets. Patch #3 adds a selftest to cover for the br_netfilter bug. netfilter pull request 24-02-29 * tag 'nf-24-02-29' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf: selftests: netfilter: add bridge conntrack + multicast test case netfilter: bridge: confirm multicast packets before passing them up the stack netfilter: nf_tables: allow NFPROTO_INET in nft_(match/target)_validate() ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240229000135.8780-1-pablo@netfilter.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 9, 2024
As for ice bug fixed by commit b7306b4 ("ice: manage interrupts during poll exit") followed by commit 23be707 ("ice: fix software generating extra interrupts") I'm seeing the similar issue also with i40e driver. In certain situation when busy-loop is enabled together with adaptive coalescing, the driver occasionally misses that there are outstanding descriptors to clean when exiting busy poll. Try to catch the remaining work by triggering a software interrupt when exiting busy poll. No extra interrupts will be generated when busy polling is not used. The issue was found when running sockperf ping-pong tcp test with adaptive coalescing and busy poll enabled (50 as value busy_pool and busy_read sysctl knobs) and results in huge latency spikes with more than 100000us. The fix is inspired from the ice driver and do the following: 1) During napi poll exit in case of busy-poll (napo_complete_done() returns false) this is recorded to q_vector that we were in busy loop. 2) Extends i40e_buildreg_itr() to be able to add an enforced software interrupt into built value 2) In i40e_update_enable_itr() enforces a software interrupt trigger if we are exiting busy poll to catch any pending clean-ups 3) Reuses unused 3rd ITR (interrupt throttle) index and set it to 20K interrupts per second to limit the number of these sw interrupts. Test results ============ Prior: [root@dell-per640-07 net]# sockperf ping-pong -i 10.9.9.1 --tcp -m 1000 --mps=max -t 120 sockperf: == version #3.10-no.git == sockperf[CLIENT] send on:sockperf: using recvfrom() to block on socket(s) [ 0] IP = 10.9.9.1 PORT = 11111 # TCP sockperf: Warmup stage (sending a few dummy messages)... sockperf: Starting test... sockperf: Test end (interrupted by timer) sockperf: Test ended sockperf: [Total Run] RunTime=119.999 sec; Warm up time=400 msec; SentMessages=2438563; ReceivedMessages=2438562 sockperf: ========= Printing statistics for Server No: 0 sockperf: [Valid Duration] RunTime=119.549 sec; SentMessages=2429473; ReceivedMessages=2429473 sockperf: ====> avg-latency=24.571 (std-dev=93.297, mean-ad=4.904, median-ad=1.510, siqr=1.063, cv=3.797, std-error=0.060, 99.0% ci=[24.417, 24.725]) sockperf: # dropped messages = 0; # duplicated messages = 0; # out-of-order messages = 0 sockperf: Summary: Latency is 24.571 usec sockperf: Total 2429473 observations; each percentile contains 24294.73 observations sockperf: ---> <MAX> observation = 103294.331 sockperf: ---> percentile 99.999 = 45.633 sockperf: ---> percentile 99.990 = 37.013 sockperf: ---> percentile 99.900 = 35.910 sockperf: ---> percentile 99.000 = 33.390 sockperf: ---> percentile 90.000 = 28.626 sockperf: ---> percentile 75.000 = 27.741 sockperf: ---> percentile 50.000 = 26.743 sockperf: ---> percentile 25.000 = 25.614 sockperf: ---> <MIN> observation = 12.220 After: [root@dell-per640-07 net]# sockperf ping-pong -i 10.9.9.1 --tcp -m 1000 --mps=max -t 120 sockperf: == version #3.10-no.git == sockperf[CLIENT] send on:sockperf: using recvfrom() to block on socket(s) [ 0] IP = 10.9.9.1 PORT = 11111 # TCP sockperf: Warmup stage (sending a few dummy messages)... sockperf: Starting test... sockperf: Test end (interrupted by timer) sockperf: Test ended sockperf: [Total Run] RunTime=119.999 sec; Warm up time=400 msec; SentMessages=2400055; ReceivedMessages=2400054 sockperf: ========= Printing statistics for Server No: 0 sockperf: [Valid Duration] RunTime=119.549 sec; SentMessages=2391186; ReceivedMessages=2391186 sockperf: ====> avg-latency=24.965 (std-dev=5.934, mean-ad=4.642, median-ad=1.485, siqr=1.067, cv=0.238, std-error=0.004, 99.0% ci=[24.955, 24.975]) sockperf: # dropped messages = 0; # duplicated messages = 0; # out-of-order messages = 0 sockperf: Summary: Latency is 24.965 usec sockperf: Total 2391186 observations; each percentile contains 23911.86 observations sockperf: ---> <MAX> observation = 195.841 sockperf: ---> percentile 99.999 = 45.026 sockperf: ---> percentile 99.990 = 39.009 sockperf: ---> percentile 99.900 = 35.922 sockperf: ---> percentile 99.000 = 33.482 sockperf: ---> percentile 90.000 = 28.902 sockperf: ---> percentile 75.000 = 27.821 sockperf: ---> percentile 50.000 = 26.860 sockperf: ---> percentile 25.000 = 25.685 sockperf: ---> <MIN> observation = 12.277 Fixes: 0bcd952 ("ethernet/intel: consolidate NAPI and NAPI exit") Reported-by: Hugo Ferreira <hferreir@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> Tested-by: Pucha Himasekhar Reddy <himasekharx.reddy.pucha@intel.com> (A Contingent worker at Intel) Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 9, 2024
The driver creates /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/mob_ttm even when the corresponding ttm_resource_manager is not allocated. This leads to a crash when trying to read from this file. Add a check to create mob_ttm, system_mob_ttm, and gmr_ttm debug file only when the corresponding ttm_resource_manager is allocated. crash> bt PID: 3133409 TASK: ffff8fe4834a5000 CPU: 3 COMMAND: "grep" #0 [ffffb954506b3b20] machine_kexec at ffffffffb2a6bec3 #1 [ffffb954506b3b78] __crash_kexec at ffffffffb2bb598a #2 [ffffb954506b3c38] crash_kexec at ffffffffb2bb68c1 #3 [ffffb954506b3c50] oops_end at ffffffffb2a2a9b1 #4 [ffffb954506b3c70] no_context at ffffffffb2a7e913 #5 [ffffb954506b3cc8] __bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffffb2a7ec8c #6 [ffffb954506b3d10] do_page_fault at ffffffffb2a7f887 #7 [ffffb954506b3d40] page_fault at ffffffffb360116e [exception RIP: ttm_resource_manager_debug+0x11] RIP: ffffffffc04afd11 RSP: ffffb954506b3df0 RFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffff8fe41a6d1200 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000940 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffc04b4338 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffb954506b3e08 R8: ffff8fee3ffad000 R9: 0000000000000000 R10: ffff8fe41a76a000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 00000000ffffffff R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff8fe5bb6f3900 R15: ffff8fe41a6d1200 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #8 [ffffb954506b3e00] ttm_resource_manager_show at ffffffffc04afde7 [ttm] #9 [ffffb954506b3e30] seq_read at ffffffffb2d8f9f3 RIP: 00007f4c4eda8985 RSP: 00007ffdbba9e9f8 RFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000037e000 RCX: 00007f4c4eda8985 RDX: 000000000037e000 RSI: 00007f4c41573000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 000000000037e000 R8: 0000000000000000 R9: 000000000037fe30 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f4c41573000 R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 00007f4c41572010 R15: 0000000000000003 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000 CS: 0033 SS: 002b Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com> Fixes: af4a25b ("drm/vmwgfx: Add debugfs entries for various ttm resource managers") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zack Rusin <zack.rusin@broadcom.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240312093551.196609-1-jfalempe@redhat.com
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 9, 2024
…git/netfilter/nf Pablo Neira Ayuso says: ==================== Netfilter fixes for net The following patchset contains Netfilter fixes for net: Patch #1 reject destroy chain command to delete device hooks in netdev family, hence, only delchain commands are allowed. Patch #2 reject table flag update interference with netdev basechain hook updates, this can leave hooks in inconsistent registration/unregistration state. Patch #3 do not unregister netdev basechain hooks if table is dormant. Otherwise, splat with double unregistration is possible. Patch #4 fixes Kconfig to allow to restore IP_NF_ARPTABLES, from Kuniyuki Iwashima. There are a more fixes still in progress on my side that need more work. * tag 'nf-24-03-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf: netfilter: arptables: Select NETFILTER_FAMILY_ARP when building arp_tables.c netfilter: nf_tables: skip netdev hook unregistration if table is dormant netfilter: nf_tables: reject table flag and netdev basechain updates netfilter: nf_tables: reject destroy command to remove basechain hooks ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328031855.2063-1-pablo@netfilter.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 9, 2024
…git/netfilter/nf Pablo Neira Ayuso says: ==================== Netfilter fixes for net The following patchset contains Netfilter fixes for net: Patch #1 unlike early commit path stage which triggers a call to abort, an explicit release of the batch is required on abort, otherwise mutex is released and commit_list remains in place. Patch #2 release mutex after nft_gc_seq_end() in commit path, otherwise async GC worker could collect expired objects. Patch #3 flush pending destroy work in module removal path, otherwise UaF is possible. Patch #4 and #6 restrict the table dormant flag with basechain updates to fix state inconsistency in the hook registration. Patch #5 adds missing RCU read side lock to flowtable type to avoid races with module removal. * tag 'nf-24-04-04' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf: netfilter: nf_tables: discard table flag update with pending basechain deletion netfilter: nf_tables: Fix potential data-race in __nft_flowtable_type_get() netfilter: nf_tables: reject new basechain after table flag update netfilter: nf_tables: flush pending destroy work before exit_net release netfilter: nf_tables: release mutex after nft_gc_seq_end from abort path netfilter: nf_tables: release batch on table validation from abort path ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240404104334.1627-1-pablo@netfilter.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 21, 2024
At current x1e80100 interface table, interface #3 is wrongly connected to DP controller #0 and interface #4 wrongly connected to DP controller #2. Fix this problem by connect Interface #3 to DP controller #0 and interface #4 connect to DP controller #1. Also add interface #6, #7 and #8 connections to DP controller to complete x1e80100 interface table. Changs in V3: -- add v2 changes log Changs in V2: -- add x1e80100 to subject -- add Fixes Fixes: e3b1f36 ("drm/msm/dpu: Add X1E80100 support") Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com> Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com> Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/585549/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1711741586-9037-1-git-send-email-quic_khsieh@quicinc.com Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 11, 2024
Andrii Nakryiko says: ==================== Fix BPF multi-uprobe PID filtering logic It turns out that current implementation of multi-uprobe PID filtering logic is broken. It filters by thread, while the promise is filtering by process. Patch #1 fixes the logic trivially. The rest is testing and mitigations that are necessary for libbpf to not break users of USDT programs. v1->v2: - fix selftest in last patch (CI); - use semicolon in patch #3 (Jiri). ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240521163401.3005045-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 11, 2024
…git/netfilter/nf Pablo Neira Ayuso says: ==================== Netfilter fixes for net The following patchset contains Netfilter fixes for net: Patch #1 syzbot reports that nf_reinject() could be called without rcu_read_lock() when flushing pending packets at nfnetlink queue removal, from Eric Dumazet. Patch #2 flushes ipset list:set when canceling garbage collection to reference to other lists to fix a race, from Jozsef Kadlecsik. Patch #3 restores q-in-q matching with nft_payload by reverting f6ae9f1 ("netfilter: nft_payload: add C-VLAN support"). Patch #4 fixes vlan mangling in skbuff when vlan offload is present in skbuff, without this patch nft_payload corrupts packets in this case. Patch #5 fixes possible nul-deref in tproxy no IP address is found in netdevice, reported by syzbot and patch from Florian Westphal. Patch #6 removes a superfluous restriction which prevents loose fib lookups from input and forward hooks, from Eric Garver. My assessment is that patches #1, #2 and #5 address possible kernel crash, anything else in this batch fixes broken features. netfilter pull request 24-05-29 * tag 'nf-24-05-29' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf: netfilter: nft_fib: allow from forward/input without iif selector netfilter: tproxy: bail out if IP has been disabled on the device netfilter: nft_payload: skbuff vlan metadata mangle support netfilter: nft_payload: restore vlan q-in-q match support netfilter: ipset: Add list flush to cancel_gc netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: acquire rcu_read_lock() in instance_destroy_rcu() ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240528225519.1155786-1-pablo@netfilter.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 11, 2024
We have been seeing crashes on duplicate keys in btrfs_set_item_key_safe(): BTRFS critical (device vdb): slot 4 key (450 108 8192) new key (450 108 8192) ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 0 PID: 3139 Comm: xfs_io Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0 #6 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0x11f/0x290 [btrfs] With the following stack trace: #0 btrfs_set_item_key_safe (fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620:4) #1 btrfs_drop_extents (fs/btrfs/file.c:411:4) #2 log_one_extent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4732:9) #3 btrfs_log_changed_extents (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4955:9) #4 btrfs_log_inode (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6626:9) #5 btrfs_log_inode_parent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7070:8) #6 btrfs_log_dentry_safe (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7171:8) #7 btrfs_sync_file (fs/btrfs/file.c:1933:8) #8 vfs_fsync_range (fs/sync.c:188:9) #9 vfs_fsync (fs/sync.c:202:9) #10 do_fsync (fs/sync.c:212:9) #11 __do_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:225:9) #12 __se_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1) #13 __x64_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1) #14 do_syscall_x64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52:14) #15 do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:83:7) #16 entry_SYSCALL_64+0xaf/0x14c (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121) So we're logging a changed extent from fsync, which is splitting an extent in the log tree. But this split part already exists in the tree, triggering the BUG(). This is the state of the log tree at the time of the crash, dumped with drgn (https://github.com/osandov/drgn/blob/main/contrib/btrfs_tree.py) to get more details than btrfs_print_leaf() gives us: >>> print_extent_buffer(prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0]["eb"]) leaf 33439744 level 0 items 72 generation 9 owner 18446744073709551610 leaf 33439744 flags 0x100000000000000 fs uuid e5bd3946-400c-4223-8923-190ef1f18677 chunk uuid d58cb17e-6d02-494a-829a-18b7d8a399da item 0 key (450 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160 generation 7 transid 9 size 8192 nbytes 8473563889606862198 block group 0 mode 100600 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 204 flags 0x10(PREALLOC) atime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43) ctime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44) mtime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44) otime 17592186044416.000000000 (559444-03-08 01:40:16) item 1 key (450 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 16110 itemsize 13 index 195 namelen 3 name: 193 item 2 key (450 XATTR_ITEM 1640047104) itemoff 16073 itemsize 37 location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR transid 7 data_len 1 name_len 6 name: user.a data a item 3 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 16020 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 1 (regular) extent data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 12288 extent compression 0 (none) item 4 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 4096) itemoff 15967 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 2 (prealloc) prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 prealloc data offset 4096 nr 8192 item 5 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 15914 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 2 (prealloc) prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 prealloc data offset 8192 nr 4096 ... So the real problem happened earlier: notice that items 4 (4k-12k) and 5 (8k-12k) overlap. Both are prealloc extents. Item 4 straddles i_size and item 5 starts at i_size. Here is the state of the filesystem tree at the time of the crash: >>> root = prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[2]["inode"].root >>> ret, nodes, slots = btrfs_search_slot(root, BtrfsKey(450, 0, 0)) >>> print_extent_buffer(nodes[0]) leaf 30425088 level 0 items 184 generation 9 owner 5 leaf 30425088 flags 0x100000000000000 fs uuid e5bd3946-400c-4223-8923-190ef1f18677 chunk uuid d58cb17e-6d02-494a-829a-18b7d8a399da ... item 179 key (450 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 4907 itemsize 160 generation 7 transid 7 size 4096 nbytes 12288 block group 0 mode 100600 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 6 flags 0x10(PREALLOC) atime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43) ctime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43) mtime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43) otime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43) item 180 key (450 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 4894 itemsize 13 index 195 namelen 3 name: 193 item 181 key (450 XATTR_ITEM 1640047104) itemoff 4857 itemsize 37 location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR transid 7 data_len 1 name_len 6 name: user.a data a item 182 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 4804 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 1 (regular) extent data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 extent data offset 0 nr 8192 ram 12288 extent compression 0 (none) item 183 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 4751 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 2 (prealloc) prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 prealloc data offset 8192 nr 4096 Item 5 in the log tree corresponds to item 183 in the filesystem tree, but nothing matches item 4. Furthermore, item 183 is the last item in the leaf. btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() is responsible for logging prealloc extents beyond i_size. It first truncates any previously logged prealloc extents that start beyond i_size. Then, it walks the filesystem tree and copies the prealloc extent items to the log tree. If it hits the end of a leaf, then it calls btrfs_next_leaf(), which unlocks the tree and does another search. However, while the filesystem tree is unlocked, an ordered extent completion may modify the tree. In particular, it may insert an extent item that overlaps with an extent item that was already copied to the log tree. This may manifest in several ways depending on the exact scenario, including an EEXIST error that is silently translated to a full sync, overlapping items in the log tree, or this crash. This particular crash is triggered by the following sequence of events: - Initially, the file has i_size=4k, a regular extent from 0-4k, and a prealloc extent beyond i_size from 4k-12k. The prealloc extent item is the last item in its B-tree leaf. - The file is fsync'd, which copies its inode item and both extent items to the log tree. - An xattr is set on the file, which sets the BTRFS_INODE_COPY_EVERYTHING flag. - The range 4k-8k in the file is written using direct I/O. i_size is extended to 8k, but the ordered extent is still in flight. - The file is fsync'd. Since BTRFS_INODE_COPY_EVERYTHING is set, this calls copy_inode_items_to_log(), which calls btrfs_log_prealloc_extents(). - btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() finds the 4k-12k prealloc extent in the filesystem tree. Since it starts before i_size, it skips it. Since it is the last item in its B-tree leaf, it calls btrfs_next_leaf(). - btrfs_next_leaf() unlocks the path. - The ordered extent completion runs, which converts the 4k-8k part of the prealloc extent to written and inserts the remaining prealloc part from 8k-12k. - btrfs_next_leaf() does a search and finds the new prealloc extent 8k-12k. - btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() copies the 8k-12k prealloc extent into the log tree. Note that it overlaps with the 4k-12k prealloc extent that was copied to the log tree by the first fsync. - fsync calls btrfs_log_changed_extents(), which tries to log the 4k-8k extent that was written. - This tries to drop the range 4k-8k in the log tree, which requires adjusting the start of the 4k-12k prealloc extent in the log tree to 8k. - btrfs_set_item_key_safe() sees that there is already an extent starting at 8k in the log tree and calls BUG(). Fix this by detecting when we're about to insert an overlapping file extent item in the log tree and truncating the part that would overlap. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 11, 2024
We have been seeing crashes on duplicate keys in btrfs_set_item_key_safe(): BTRFS critical (device vdb): slot 4 key (450 108 8192) new key (450 108 8192) ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 0 PID: 3139 Comm: xfs_io Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0 #6 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0x11f/0x290 [btrfs] With the following stack trace: #0 btrfs_set_item_key_safe (fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620:4) #1 btrfs_drop_extents (fs/btrfs/file.c:411:4) #2 log_one_extent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4732:9) #3 btrfs_log_changed_extents (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4955:9) #4 btrfs_log_inode (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6626:9) #5 btrfs_log_inode_parent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7070:8) #6 btrfs_log_dentry_safe (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7171:8) #7 btrfs_sync_file (fs/btrfs/file.c:1933:8) #8 vfs_fsync_range (fs/sync.c:188:9) #9 vfs_fsync (fs/sync.c:202:9) #10 do_fsync (fs/sync.c:212:9) #11 __do_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:225:9) #12 __se_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1) #13 __x64_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1) #14 do_syscall_x64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52:14) #15 do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:83:7) #16 entry_SYSCALL_64+0xaf/0x14c (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121) So we're logging a changed extent from fsync, which is splitting an extent in the log tree. But this split part already exists in the tree, triggering the BUG(). This is the state of the log tree at the time of the crash, dumped with drgn (https://github.com/osandov/drgn/blob/main/contrib/btrfs_tree.py) to get more details than btrfs_print_leaf() gives us: >>> print_extent_buffer(prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0]["eb"]) leaf 33439744 level 0 items 72 generation 9 owner 18446744073709551610 leaf 33439744 flags 0x100000000000000 fs uuid e5bd3946-400c-4223-8923-190ef1f18677 chunk uuid d58cb17e-6d02-494a-829a-18b7d8a399da item 0 key (450 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160 generation 7 transid 9 size 8192 nbytes 8473563889606862198 block group 0 mode 100600 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 204 flags 0x10(PREALLOC) atime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43) ctime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44) mtime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44) otime 17592186044416.000000000 (559444-03-08 01:40:16) item 1 key (450 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 16110 itemsize 13 index 195 namelen 3 name: 193 item 2 key (450 XATTR_ITEM 1640047104) itemoff 16073 itemsize 37 location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR transid 7 data_len 1 name_len 6 name: user.a data a item 3 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 16020 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 1 (regular) extent data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 12288 extent compression 0 (none) item 4 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 4096) itemoff 15967 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 2 (prealloc) prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 prealloc data offset 4096 nr 8192 item 5 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 15914 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 2 (prealloc) prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 prealloc data offset 8192 nr 4096 ... So the real problem happened earlier: notice that items 4 (4k-12k) and 5 (8k-12k) overlap. Both are prealloc extents. Item 4 straddles i_size and item 5 starts at i_size. Here is the state of the filesystem tree at the time of the crash: >>> root = prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[2]["inode"].root >>> ret, nodes, slots = btrfs_search_slot(root, BtrfsKey(450, 0, 0)) >>> print_extent_buffer(nodes[0]) leaf 30425088 level 0 items 184 generation 9 owner 5 leaf 30425088 flags 0x100000000000000 fs uuid e5bd3946-400c-4223-8923-190ef1f18677 chunk uuid d58cb17e-6d02-494a-829a-18b7d8a399da ... item 179 key (450 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 4907 itemsize 160 generation 7 transid 7 size 4096 nbytes 12288 block group 0 mode 100600 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 6 flags 0x10(PREALLOC) atime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43) ctime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43) mtime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43) otime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43) item 180 key (450 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 4894 itemsize 13 index 195 namelen 3 name: 193 item 181 key (450 XATTR_ITEM 1640047104) itemoff 4857 itemsize 37 location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR transid 7 data_len 1 name_len 6 name: user.a data a item 182 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 4804 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 1 (regular) extent data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 extent data offset 0 nr 8192 ram 12288 extent compression 0 (none) item 183 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 4751 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 2 (prealloc) prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 prealloc data offset 8192 nr 4096 Item 5 in the log tree corresponds to item 183 in the filesystem tree, but nothing matches item 4. Furthermore, item 183 is the last item in the leaf. btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() is responsible for logging prealloc extents beyond i_size. It first truncates any previously logged prealloc extents that start beyond i_size. Then, it walks the filesystem tree and copies the prealloc extent items to the log tree. If it hits the end of a leaf, then it calls btrfs_next_leaf(), which unlocks the tree and does another search. However, while the filesystem tree is unlocked, an ordered extent completion may modify the tree. In particular, it may insert an extent item that overlaps with an extent item that was already copied to the log tree. This may manifest in several ways depending on the exact scenario, including an EEXIST error that is silently translated to a full sync, overlapping items in the log tree, or this crash. This particular crash is triggered by the following sequence of events: - Initially, the file has i_size=4k, a regular extent from 0-4k, and a prealloc extent beyond i_size from 4k-12k. The prealloc extent item is the last item in its B-tree leaf. - The file is fsync'd, which copies its inode item and both extent items to the log tree. - An xattr is set on the file, which sets the BTRFS_INODE_COPY_EVERYTHING flag. - The range 4k-8k in the file is written using direct I/O. i_size is extended to 8k, but the ordered extent is still in flight. - The file is fsync'd. Since BTRFS_INODE_COPY_EVERYTHING is set, this calls copy_inode_items_to_log(), which calls btrfs_log_prealloc_extents(). - btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() finds the 4k-12k prealloc extent in the filesystem tree. Since it starts before i_size, it skips it. Since it is the last item in its B-tree leaf, it calls btrfs_next_leaf(). - btrfs_next_leaf() unlocks the path. - The ordered extent completion runs, which converts the 4k-8k part of the prealloc extent to written and inserts the remaining prealloc part from 8k-12k. - btrfs_next_leaf() does a search and finds the new prealloc extent 8k-12k. - btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() copies the 8k-12k prealloc extent into the log tree. Note that it overlaps with the 4k-12k prealloc extent that was copied to the log tree by the first fsync. - fsync calls btrfs_log_changed_extents(), which tries to log the 4k-8k extent that was written. - This tries to drop the range 4k-8k in the log tree, which requires adjusting the start of the 4k-12k prealloc extent in the log tree to 8k. - btrfs_set_item_key_safe() sees that there is already an extent starting at 8k in the log tree and calls BUG(). Fix this by detecting when we're about to insert an overlapping file extent item in the log tree and truncating the part that would overlap. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 26, 2024
With commit c4cb231 ("iommu/amd: Add support for enable/disable IOPF") we are hitting below issue. This happens because in IOPF enablement path it holds spin lock with irq disable and then tries to take mutex lock. dmesg: ----- [ 0.938739] ============================= [ 0.938740] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 0.938742] 6.10.0-rc1+ #1 Not tainted [ 0.938745] ----------------------------- [ 0.938746] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 0.938748] ffffffff8c9f01d8 (&port_lock_key){....}-{3:3}, at: serial8250_console_write+0x78/0x4a0 [ 0.938767] other info that might help us debug this: [ 0.938768] context-{5:5} [ 0.938769] 7 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 0.938772] #0: ffff888101a91310 (&group->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bus_iommu_probe+0x70/0x160 [ 0.938790] #1: ffff888101d1f1b8 (&domain->lock){....}-{3:3}, at: amd_iommu_attach_device+0xa5/0x700 [ 0.938799] #2: ffff888101cc3d18 (&dev_data->lock){....}-{3:3}, at: amd_iommu_attach_device+0xc5/0x700 [ 0.938806] #3: ffff888100052830 (&iommu->lock){....}-{2:2}, at: amd_iommu_iopf_add_device+0x3f/0xa0 [ 0.938813] #4: ffffffff8945a340 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: _printk+0x48/0x50 [ 0.938822] #5: ffffffff8945a390 (console_srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: console_flush_all+0x58/0x4e0 [ 0.938867] #6: ffffffff82459f80 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}, at: console_flush_all+0x1f0/0x4e0 [ 0.938872] stack backtrace: [ 0.938874] CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc1+ #1 [ 0.938877] Hardware name: HP HP EliteBook 745 G3/807E, BIOS N73 Ver. 01.39 04/16/2019 Fix above issue by re-arranging code in attach device path: - move device PASID/IOPF enablement outside lock in AMD IOMMU driver. This is safe as core layer holds group->mutex lock before calling iommu_ops->attach_dev. Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Reported-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com> Fixes: c4cb231 ("iommu/amd: Add support for enable/disable IOPF") Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Tested-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com> Tested-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240530084801.10758-1-vasant.hegde@amd.com Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 26, 2024
…PLES event" This reverts commit 7d1405c. This causes segfaults in some cases, as reported by Milian: ``` sudo /usr/bin/perf record -z --call-graph dwarf -e cycles -e raw_syscalls:sys_enter ls ... [ perf record: Woken up 3 times to write data ] malloc(): invalid next size (unsorted) Aborted ``` Backtrace with GDB + debuginfod: ``` malloc(): invalid next size (unsorted) Thread 1 "perf" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=signo@entry=6, no_tid=no_tid@entry=0) at pthread_kill.c:44 Downloading source file /usr/src/debug/glibc/glibc/nptl/pthread_kill.c 44 return INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERROR_P (ret) ? INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERRNO (ret) : 0; (gdb) bt #0 __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=signo@entry=6, no_tid=no_tid@entry=0) at pthread_kill.c:44 #1 0x00007ffff6ea8eb3 in __pthread_kill_internal (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=6) at pthread_kill.c:78 #2 0x00007ffff6e50a30 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/posix/ raise.c:26 #3 0x00007ffff6e384c3 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79 #4 0x00007ffff6e39354 in __libc_message_impl (fmt=fmt@entry=0x7ffff6fc22ea "%s\n") at ../sysdeps/posix/libc_fatal.c:132 #5 0x00007ffff6eb3085 in malloc_printerr (str=str@entry=0x7ffff6fc5850 "malloc(): invalid next size (unsorted)") at malloc.c:5772 #6 0x00007ffff6eb657c in _int_malloc (av=av@entry=0x7ffff6ff6ac0 <main_arena>, bytes=bytes@entry=368) at malloc.c:4081 #7 0x00007ffff6eb877e in __libc_calloc (n=<optimized out>, elem_size=<optimized out>) at malloc.c:3754 #8 0x000055555569bdb6 in perf_session.do_write_header () #9 0x00005555555a373a in __cmd_record.constprop.0 () #10 0x00005555555a6846 in cmd_record () #11 0x000055555564db7f in run_builtin () #12 0x000055555558ed77 in main () ``` Valgrind memcheck: ``` ==45136== Invalid write of size 8 ==45136== at 0x2B38A5: perf_event__synthesize_id_sample (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x157069: __cmd_record.constprop.0 (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x15A845: cmd_record (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x201B7E: run_builtin (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x142D76: main (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== Address 0x6a866a8 is 0 bytes after a block of size 40 alloc'd ==45136== at 0x4849BF3: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:1675) ==45136== by 0x3574AB: zalloc (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x1570E0: __cmd_record.constprop.0 (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x15A845: cmd_record (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x201B7E: run_builtin (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x142D76: main (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== ==45136== Syscall param write(buf) points to unaddressable byte(s) ==45136== at 0x575953D: __libc_write (write.c:26) ==45136== by 0x575953D: write (write.c:24) ==45136== by 0x35761F: ion (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x357778: writen (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x1548F7: record__write (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x15708A: __cmd_record.constprop.0 (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x15A845: cmd_record (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x201B7E: run_builtin (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x142D76: main (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== Address 0x6a866a8 is 0 bytes after a block of size 40 alloc'd ==45136== at 0x4849BF3: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:1675) ==45136== by 0x3574AB: zalloc (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x1570E0: __cmd_record.constprop.0 (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x15A845: cmd_record (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x201B7E: run_builtin (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x142D76: main (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== ----- Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/23879991.0LEYPuXRzz@milian-workstation/ Reported-by: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com> Tested-by: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: stable@kernel.org # 6.8+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Zl9ksOlHJHnKM70p@x1 Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 26, 2024
…git/netfilter/nf Pablo Neira Ayuso says: ==================== Netfilter fixes for net The following patchset contains Netfilter fixes for net: Patch #1 fixes insufficient sanitization of netlink attributes for the inner expression which can trigger nul-pointer dereference, from Davide Ornaghi. Patch #2 address a report that there is a race condition between namespace cleanup and the garbage collection of the list:set type. This patch resolves this issue with other minor issues as well, from Jozsef Kadlecsik. Patch #3 ip6_route_me_harder() ignores flowlabel/dsfield when ip dscp has been mangled, this unbreaks ip6 dscp set $v, from Florian Westphal. All of these patches address issues that are present in several releases. * tag 'nf-24-06-11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf: netfilter: Use flowlabel flow key when re-routing mangled packets netfilter: ipset: Fix race between namespace cleanup and gc in the list:set type netfilter: nft_inner: validate mandatory meta and payload ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240611220323.413713-1-pablo@netfilter.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 26, 2024
Nikolay Aleksandrov says: ==================== net: bridge: mst: fix suspicious rcu usage warning This set fixes a suspicious RCU usage warning triggered by syzbot[1] in the bridge's MST code. After I converted br_mst_set_state to RCU, I forgot to update the vlan group dereference helper. Fix it by using the proper helper, in order to do that we need to pass the vlan group which is already obtained correctly by the callers for their respective context. Patch 01 is a requirement for the fix in patch 02. Note I did consider rcu_dereference_rtnl() but the churn is much bigger and in every part of the bridge. We can do that as a cleanup in net-next. [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9bbe2de1bc9d470eb5fe ============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00235-g8a92980606e3 #0 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/bridge/br_private.h:1599 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 4 locks held by syz-executor.1/5374: #0: ffff888022d50b18 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: mmap_read_lock include/linux/mmap_lock.h:144 [inline] #0: ffff888022d50b18 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: __mm_populate+0x1b0/0x460 mm/gup.c:2111 #1: ffffc90000a18c00 ((&p->forward_delay_timer)){+.-.}-{0:0}, at: call_timer_fn+0xc0/0x650 kernel/time/timer.c:1789 #2: ffff88805fb2ccb8 (&br->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline] #2: ffff88805fb2ccb8 (&br->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: br_forward_delay_timer_expired+0x50/0x440 net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c:86 #3: ffffffff8e333fa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline] #3: ffffffff8e333fa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 [inline] #3: ffffffff8e333fa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: br_mst_set_state+0x171/0x7a0 net/bridge/br_mst.c:105 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 5374 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00235-g8a92980606e3 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024 Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114 lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x221/0x340 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6712 nbp_vlan_group net/bridge/br_private.h:1599 [inline] br_mst_set_state+0x29e/0x7a0 net/bridge/br_mst.c:106 br_set_state+0x28a/0x7b0 net/bridge/br_stp.c:47 br_forward_delay_timer_expired+0x176/0x440 net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c:88 call_timer_fn+0x18e/0x650 kernel/time/timer.c:1792 expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1843 [inline] __run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:2417 [inline] __run_timer_base+0x66a/0x8e0 kernel/time/timer.c:2428 run_timer_base kernel/time/timer.c:2437 [inline] run_timer_softirq+0xb7/0x170 kernel/time/timer.c:2447 handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554 __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:588 [inline] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:428 [inline] __irq_exit_rcu+0xf4/0x1c0 kernel/softirq.c:637 irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:649 instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1043 [inline] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa6/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1043 </IRQ> <TASK> ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240609103654.914987-1-razor@blackwall.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 26, 2024
The syzbot fuzzer found that the interrupt-URB completion callback in the cdc-wdm driver was taking too long, and the driver's immediate resubmission of interrupt URBs with -EPROTO status combined with the dummy-hcd emulation to cause a CPU lockup: cdc_wdm 1-1:1.0: nonzero urb status received: -71 cdc_wdm 1-1:1.0: wdm_int_callback - 0 bytes watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 26s! [syz-executor782:6625] CPU#0 Utilization every 4s during lockup: #1: 98% system, 0% softirq, 3% hardirq, 0% idle #2: 98% system, 0% softirq, 3% hardirq, 0% idle #3: 98% system, 0% softirq, 3% hardirq, 0% idle #4: 98% system, 0% softirq, 3% hardirq, 0% idle #5: 98% system, 1% softirq, 3% hardirq, 0% idle Modules linked in: irq event stamp: 73096 hardirqs last enabled at (73095): [<ffff80008037bc00>] console_emit_next_record kernel/printk/printk.c:2935 [inline] hardirqs last enabled at (73095): [<ffff80008037bc00>] console_flush_all+0x650/0xb74 kernel/printk/printk.c:2994 hardirqs last disabled at (73096): [<ffff80008af10b00>] __el1_irq arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:533 [inline] hardirqs last disabled at (73096): [<ffff80008af10b00>] el1_interrupt+0x24/0x68 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:551 softirqs last enabled at (73048): [<ffff8000801ea530>] softirq_handle_end kernel/softirq.c:400 [inline] softirqs last enabled at (73048): [<ffff8000801ea530>] handle_softirqs+0xa60/0xc34 kernel/softirq.c:582 softirqs last disabled at (73043): [<ffff800080020de8>] __do_softirq+0x14/0x20 kernel/softirq.c:588 CPU: 0 PID: 6625 Comm: syz-executor782 Tainted: G W 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-g8867bbd4a056 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024 Testing showed that the problem did not occur if the two error messages -- the first two lines above -- were removed; apparently adding material to the kernel log takes a surprisingly large amount of time. In any case, the best approach for preventing these lockups and to avoid spamming the log with thousands of error messages per second is to ratelimit the two dev_err() calls. Therefore we replace them with dev_err_ratelimited(). Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Suggested-by: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+5f996b83575ef4058638@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/00000000000073d54b061a6a1c65@google.com/ Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+1b2abad17596ad03dcff@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/000000000000f45085061aa9b37e@google.com/ Fixes: 9908a32 ("USB: remove err() macro from usb class drivers") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/40dfa45b-5f21-4eef-a8c1-51a2f320e267@rowland.harvard.edu/ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/29855215-52f5-4385-b058-91f42c2bee18@rowland.harvard.edu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 26, 2024
…git/netfilter/nf Pablo Neira Ayuso says: ==================== Netfilter fixes for net The following patchset contains Netfilter fixes for net: Patch #1 fixes the suspicious RCU usage warning that resulted from the recent fix for the race between namespace cleanup and gc in ipset left out checking the pernet exit phase when calling rcu_dereference_protected(), from Jozsef Kadlecsik. Patch #2 fixes incorrect input and output netdevice in SRv6 prerouting hooks, from Jianguo Wu. Patch #3 moves nf_hooks_lwtunnel sysctl toggle to the netfilter core. The connection tracking system is loaded on-demand, this ensures availability of this knob regardless. Patch #4-#5 adds selftests for SRv6 netfilter hooks also from Jianguo Wu. netfilter pull request 24-06-19 * tag 'nf-24-06-19' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf: selftests: add selftest for the SRv6 End.DX6 behavior with netfilter selftests: add selftest for the SRv6 End.DX4 behavior with netfilter netfilter: move the sysctl nf_hooks_lwtunnel into the netfilter core seg6: fix parameter passing when calling NF_HOOK() in End.DX4 and End.DX6 behaviors netfilter: ipset: Fix suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240619170537.2846-1-pablo@netfilter.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 27, 2024
…play During inode logging (and log replay too), we are holding a transaction handle and we often need to call btrfs_iget(), which will read an inode from its subvolume btree if it's not loaded in memory and that results in allocating an inode with GFP_KERNEL semantics at the btrfs_alloc_inode() callback - and this may recurse into the filesystem in case we are under memory pressure and attempt to commit the current transaction, resulting in a deadlock since the logging (or log replay) task is holding a transaction handle open. Syzbot reported this with the following stack traces: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00361-g061d1af7b030 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.1/9919 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline] ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline] ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline] ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x58/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:4020 but task is already holding lock: ffff88804b569358 (&ei->log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_log_inode+0x39c/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6481 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&ei->log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x175/0x9c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 btrfs_log_inode+0x39c/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6481 btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x8cb/0x2a90 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7079 btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x59/0x80 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7180 btrfs_sync_file+0x9c1/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1959 vfs_fsync_range+0x141/0x230 fs/sync.c:188 generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2794 [inline] btrfs_do_write_iter+0x584/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/file.c:1705 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline] vfs_write+0x6b6/0x1140 fs/read_write.c:590 ksys_write+0x12f/0x260 fs/read_write.c:643 do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline] __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386 do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e -> #2 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}: join_transaction+0x164/0xf40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:315 start_transaction+0x427/0x1a70 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:700 btrfs_commit_super+0xa1/0x110 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4170 close_ctree+0xcb0/0xf90 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4324 generic_shutdown_super+0x159/0x3d0 fs/super.c:642 kill_anon_super+0x3a/0x60 fs/super.c:1226 btrfs_kill_super+0x3b/0x50 fs/btrfs/super.c:2096 deactivate_locked_super+0xbe/0x1a0 fs/super.c:473 deactivate_super+0xde/0x100 fs/super.c:506 cleanup_mnt+0x222/0x450 fs/namespace.c:1267 task_work_run+0x14e/0x250 kernel/task_work.c:180 resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x278/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 __do_fast_syscall_32+0x80/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:389 do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e -> #1 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}: __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5468 [inline] lock_release+0x33e/0x6c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5774 percpu_up_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:99 [inline] __sb_end_write include/linux/fs.h:1650 [inline] sb_end_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1767 [inline] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x5ca/0x920 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1071 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x228/0x330 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301 btrfs_evict_inode+0x960/0xe80 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5291 evict+0x2ed/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:667 iput_final fs/inode.c:1741 [inline] iput.part.0+0x5a8/0x7f0 fs/inode.c:1767 iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1757 dentry_unlink_inode+0x295/0x480 fs/dcache.c:400 __dentry_kill+0x1d0/0x600 fs/dcache.c:603 dput.part.0+0x4b1/0x9b0 fs/dcache.c:845 dput+0x1f/0x30 fs/dcache.c:835 ovl_stack_put+0x60/0x90 fs/overlayfs/util.c:132 ovl_destroy_inode+0xc6/0x190 fs/overlayfs/super.c:182 destroy_inode+0xc4/0x1b0 fs/inode.c:311 iput_final fs/inode.c:1741 [inline] iput.part.0+0x5a8/0x7f0 fs/inode.c:1767 iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1757 dentry_unlink_inode+0x295/0x480 fs/dcache.c:400 __dentry_kill+0x1d0/0x600 fs/dcache.c:603 shrink_kill fs/dcache.c:1048 [inline] shrink_dentry_list+0x140/0x5d0 fs/dcache.c:1075 prune_dcache_sb+0xeb/0x150 fs/dcache.c:1156 super_cache_scan+0x32a/0x550 fs/super.c:221 do_shrink_slab+0x44f/0x11c0 mm/shrinker.c:435 shrink_slab_memcg mm/shrinker.c:548 [inline] shrink_slab+0xa87/0x1310 mm/shrinker.c:626 shrink_one+0x493/0x7c0 mm/vmscan.c:4790 shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4851 [inline] lru_gen_shrink_node+0x89f/0x1750 mm/vmscan.c:4951 shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5910 [inline] kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6720 [inline] balance_pgdat+0x1105/0x1970 mm/vmscan.c:6911 kswapd+0x5ea/0xbf0 mm/vmscan.c:7180 kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 -> #0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719 __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3801 [inline] fs_reclaim_acquire+0x102/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:3815 might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline] slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x58/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:4020 btrfs_alloc_inode+0x118/0xb20 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8411 alloc_inode+0x5d/0x230 fs/inode.c:261 iget5_locked fs/inode.c:1235 [inline] iget5_locked+0x1c9/0x2c0 fs/inode.c:1228 btrfs_iget_locked fs/btrfs/inode.c:5590 [inline] btrfs_iget_path fs/btrfs/inode.c:5607 [inline] btrfs_iget+0xfb/0x230 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5636 add_conflicting_inode fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5657 [inline] copy_inode_items_to_log+0x1039/0x1e30 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5928 btrfs_log_inode+0xa48/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6592 log_new_delayed_dentries fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6363 [inline] btrfs_log_inode+0x27dd/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6718 btrfs_log_all_parents fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6833 [inline] btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x22ba/0x2a90 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7141 btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x59/0x80 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7180 btrfs_sync_file+0x9c1/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1959 vfs_fsync_range+0x141/0x230 fs/sync.c:188 generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2794 [inline] btrfs_do_write_iter+0x584/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/file.c:1705 do_iter_readv_writev+0x504/0x780 fs/read_write.c:741 vfs_writev+0x36f/0xde0 fs/read_write.c:971 do_pwritev+0x1b2/0x260 fs/read_write.c:1072 __do_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1218 [inline] __se_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1210 [inline] __ia32_compat_sys_pwritev2+0x121/0x1b0 fs/read_write.c:1210 do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline] __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386 do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: fs_reclaim --> btrfs_trans_num_extwriters --> &ei->log_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&ei->log_mutex); lock(btrfs_trans_num_extwriters); lock(&ei->log_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); *** DEADLOCK *** 7 locks held by syz-executor.1/9919: #0: ffff88802be20420 (sb_writers#23){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: do_pwritev+0x1b2/0x260 fs/read_write.c:1072 #1: ffff888065c0f8f0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#33){++++}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:791 [inline] #1: ffff888065c0f8f0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#33){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_inode_lock+0xc8/0x110 fs/btrfs/inode.c:385 #2: ffff888065c0f778 (&ei->i_mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_inode_lock+0xee/0x110 fs/btrfs/inode.c:388 #3: ffff88802be20610 (sb_internal#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_sync_file+0x95b/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1952 #4: ffff8880546323f0 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x430/0xf40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:290 #5: ffff888054632418 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x430/0xf40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:290 #6: ffff88804b569358 (&ei->log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_log_inode+0x39c/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6481 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 9919 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00361-g061d1af7b030 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:114 check_noncircular+0x31a/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719 __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3801 [inline] fs_reclaim_acquire+0x102/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:3815 might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline] slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x58/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:4020 btrfs_alloc_inode+0x118/0xb20 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8411 alloc_inode+0x5d/0x230 fs/inode.c:261 iget5_locked fs/inode.c:1235 [inline] iget5_locked+0x1c9/0x2c0 fs/inode.c:1228 btrfs_iget_locked fs/btrfs/inode.c:5590 [inline] btrfs_iget_path fs/btrfs/inode.c:5607 [inline] btrfs_iget+0xfb/0x230 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5636 add_conflicting_inode fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5657 [inline] copy_inode_items_to_log+0x1039/0x1e30 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5928 btrfs_log_inode+0xa48/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6592 log_new_delayed_dentries fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6363 [inline] btrfs_log_inode+0x27dd/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6718 btrfs_log_all_parents fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6833 [inline] btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x22ba/0x2a90 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7141 btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x59/0x80 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7180 btrfs_sync_file+0x9c1/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1959 vfs_fsync_range+0x141/0x230 fs/sync.c:188 generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2794 [inline] btrfs_do_write_iter+0x584/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/file.c:1705 do_iter_readv_writev+0x504/0x780 fs/read_write.c:741 vfs_writev+0x36f/0xde0 fs/read_write.c:971 do_pwritev+0x1b2/0x260 fs/read_write.c:1072 __do_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1218 [inline] __se_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1210 [inline] __ia32_compat_sys_pwritev2+0x121/0x1b0 fs/read_write.c:1210 do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline] __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386 do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e RIP: 0023:0xf7334579 Code: b8 01 10 06 03 (...) RSP: 002b:00000000f5f265ac EFLAGS: 00000292 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000017b RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00000000200002c0 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000292 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 Fix this by ensuring we are under a NOFS scope whenever we call btrfs_iget() during inode logging and log replay. Reported-by: syzbot+8576cfa84070dce4d59b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000274a3a061abbd928@google.com/ Fixes: 712e36c ("btrfs: use GFP_KERNEL in btrfs_alloc_inode") Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 25, 2024
…play During inode logging (and log replay too), we are holding a transaction handle and we often need to call btrfs_iget(), which will read an inode from its subvolume btree if it's not loaded in memory and that results in allocating an inode with GFP_KERNEL semantics at the btrfs_alloc_inode() callback - and this may recurse into the filesystem in case we are under memory pressure and attempt to commit the current transaction, resulting in a deadlock since the logging (or log replay) task is holding a transaction handle open. Syzbot reported this with the following stack traces: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00361-g061d1af7b030 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.1/9919 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline] ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline] ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline] ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x58/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:4020 but task is already holding lock: ffff88804b569358 (&ei->log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_log_inode+0x39c/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6481 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&ei->log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x175/0x9c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 btrfs_log_inode+0x39c/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6481 btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x8cb/0x2a90 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7079 btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x59/0x80 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7180 btrfs_sync_file+0x9c1/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1959 vfs_fsync_range+0x141/0x230 fs/sync.c:188 generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2794 [inline] btrfs_do_write_iter+0x584/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/file.c:1705 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline] vfs_write+0x6b6/0x1140 fs/read_write.c:590 ksys_write+0x12f/0x260 fs/read_write.c:643 do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline] __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386 do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e -> #2 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}: join_transaction+0x164/0xf40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:315 start_transaction+0x427/0x1a70 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:700 btrfs_commit_super+0xa1/0x110 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4170 close_ctree+0xcb0/0xf90 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4324 generic_shutdown_super+0x159/0x3d0 fs/super.c:642 kill_anon_super+0x3a/0x60 fs/super.c:1226 btrfs_kill_super+0x3b/0x50 fs/btrfs/super.c:2096 deactivate_locked_super+0xbe/0x1a0 fs/super.c:473 deactivate_super+0xde/0x100 fs/super.c:506 cleanup_mnt+0x222/0x450 fs/namespace.c:1267 task_work_run+0x14e/0x250 kernel/task_work.c:180 resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x278/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 __do_fast_syscall_32+0x80/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:389 do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e -> #1 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}: __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5468 [inline] lock_release+0x33e/0x6c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5774 percpu_up_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:99 [inline] __sb_end_write include/linux/fs.h:1650 [inline] sb_end_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1767 [inline] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x5ca/0x920 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1071 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x228/0x330 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301 btrfs_evict_inode+0x960/0xe80 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5291 evict+0x2ed/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:667 iput_final fs/inode.c:1741 [inline] iput.part.0+0x5a8/0x7f0 fs/inode.c:1767 iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1757 dentry_unlink_inode+0x295/0x480 fs/dcache.c:400 __dentry_kill+0x1d0/0x600 fs/dcache.c:603 dput.part.0+0x4b1/0x9b0 fs/dcache.c:845 dput+0x1f/0x30 fs/dcache.c:835 ovl_stack_put+0x60/0x90 fs/overlayfs/util.c:132 ovl_destroy_inode+0xc6/0x190 fs/overlayfs/super.c:182 destroy_inode+0xc4/0x1b0 fs/inode.c:311 iput_final fs/inode.c:1741 [inline] iput.part.0+0x5a8/0x7f0 fs/inode.c:1767 iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1757 dentry_unlink_inode+0x295/0x480 fs/dcache.c:400 __dentry_kill+0x1d0/0x600 fs/dcache.c:603 shrink_kill fs/dcache.c:1048 [inline] shrink_dentry_list+0x140/0x5d0 fs/dcache.c:1075 prune_dcache_sb+0xeb/0x150 fs/dcache.c:1156 super_cache_scan+0x32a/0x550 fs/super.c:221 do_shrink_slab+0x44f/0x11c0 mm/shrinker.c:435 shrink_slab_memcg mm/shrinker.c:548 [inline] shrink_slab+0xa87/0x1310 mm/shrinker.c:626 shrink_one+0x493/0x7c0 mm/vmscan.c:4790 shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4851 [inline] lru_gen_shrink_node+0x89f/0x1750 mm/vmscan.c:4951 shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5910 [inline] kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6720 [inline] balance_pgdat+0x1105/0x1970 mm/vmscan.c:6911 kswapd+0x5ea/0xbf0 mm/vmscan.c:7180 kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 -> #0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719 __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3801 [inline] fs_reclaim_acquire+0x102/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:3815 might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline] slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x58/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:4020 btrfs_alloc_inode+0x118/0xb20 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8411 alloc_inode+0x5d/0x230 fs/inode.c:261 iget5_locked fs/inode.c:1235 [inline] iget5_locked+0x1c9/0x2c0 fs/inode.c:1228 btrfs_iget_locked fs/btrfs/inode.c:5590 [inline] btrfs_iget_path fs/btrfs/inode.c:5607 [inline] btrfs_iget+0xfb/0x230 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5636 add_conflicting_inode fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5657 [inline] copy_inode_items_to_log+0x1039/0x1e30 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5928 btrfs_log_inode+0xa48/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6592 log_new_delayed_dentries fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6363 [inline] btrfs_log_inode+0x27dd/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6718 btrfs_log_all_parents fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6833 [inline] btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x22ba/0x2a90 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7141 btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x59/0x80 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7180 btrfs_sync_file+0x9c1/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1959 vfs_fsync_range+0x141/0x230 fs/sync.c:188 generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2794 [inline] btrfs_do_write_iter+0x584/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/file.c:1705 do_iter_readv_writev+0x504/0x780 fs/read_write.c:741 vfs_writev+0x36f/0xde0 fs/read_write.c:971 do_pwritev+0x1b2/0x260 fs/read_write.c:1072 __do_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1218 [inline] __se_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1210 [inline] __ia32_compat_sys_pwritev2+0x121/0x1b0 fs/read_write.c:1210 do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline] __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386 do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: fs_reclaim --> btrfs_trans_num_extwriters --> &ei->log_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&ei->log_mutex); lock(btrfs_trans_num_extwriters); lock(&ei->log_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); *** DEADLOCK *** 7 locks held by syz-executor.1/9919: #0: ffff88802be20420 (sb_writers#23){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: do_pwritev+0x1b2/0x260 fs/read_write.c:1072 #1: ffff888065c0f8f0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#33){++++}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:791 [inline] #1: ffff888065c0f8f0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#33){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_inode_lock+0xc8/0x110 fs/btrfs/inode.c:385 #2: ffff888065c0f778 (&ei->i_mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_inode_lock+0xee/0x110 fs/btrfs/inode.c:388 #3: ffff88802be20610 (sb_internal#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_sync_file+0x95b/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1952 #4: ffff8880546323f0 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x430/0xf40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:290 #5: ffff888054632418 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x430/0xf40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:290 #6: ffff88804b569358 (&ei->log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_log_inode+0x39c/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6481 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 9919 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00361-g061d1af7b030 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:114 check_noncircular+0x31a/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719 __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3801 [inline] fs_reclaim_acquire+0x102/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:3815 might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline] slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x58/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:4020 btrfs_alloc_inode+0x118/0xb20 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8411 alloc_inode+0x5d/0x230 fs/inode.c:261 iget5_locked fs/inode.c:1235 [inline] iget5_locked+0x1c9/0x2c0 fs/inode.c:1228 btrfs_iget_locked fs/btrfs/inode.c:5590 [inline] btrfs_iget_path fs/btrfs/inode.c:5607 [inline] btrfs_iget+0xfb/0x230 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5636 add_conflicting_inode fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5657 [inline] copy_inode_items_to_log+0x1039/0x1e30 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5928 btrfs_log_inode+0xa48/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6592 log_new_delayed_dentries fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6363 [inline] btrfs_log_inode+0x27dd/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6718 btrfs_log_all_parents fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6833 [inline] btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x22ba/0x2a90 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7141 btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x59/0x80 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7180 btrfs_sync_file+0x9c1/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1959 vfs_fsync_range+0x141/0x230 fs/sync.c:188 generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2794 [inline] btrfs_do_write_iter+0x584/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/file.c:1705 do_iter_readv_writev+0x504/0x780 fs/read_write.c:741 vfs_writev+0x36f/0xde0 fs/read_write.c:971 do_pwritev+0x1b2/0x260 fs/read_write.c:1072 __do_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1218 [inline] __se_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1210 [inline] __ia32_compat_sys_pwritev2+0x121/0x1b0 fs/read_write.c:1210 do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline] __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386 do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e RIP: 0023:0xf7334579 Code: b8 01 10 06 03 (...) RSP: 002b:00000000f5f265ac EFLAGS: 00000292 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000017b RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00000000200002c0 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000292 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 Fix this by ensuring we are under a NOFS scope whenever we call btrfs_iget() during inode logging and log replay. Reported-by: syzbot+8576cfa84070dce4d59b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000274a3a061abbd928@google.com/ Fixes: 712e36c ("btrfs: use GFP_KERNEL in btrfs_alloc_inode") Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 25, 2024
The code in ocfs2_dio_end_io_write() estimates number of necessary transaction credits using ocfs2_calc_extend_credits(). This however does not take into account that the IO could be arbitrarily large and can contain arbitrary number of extents. Extent tree manipulations do often extend the current transaction but not in all of the cases. For example if we have only single block extents in the tree, ocfs2_mark_extent_written() will end up calling ocfs2_replace_extent_rec() all the time and we will never extend the current transaction and eventually exhaust all the transaction credits if the IO contains many single block extents. Once that happens a WARN_ON(jbd2_handle_buffer_credits(handle) <= 0) is triggered in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() and subsequently OCFS2 aborts in response to this error. This was actually triggered by one of our customers on a heavily fragmented OCFS2 filesystem. To fix the issue make sure the transaction always has enough credits for one extent insert before each call of ocfs2_mark_extent_written(). Heming Zhao said: ------ PANIC: "Kernel panic - not syncing: OCFS2: (device dm-1): panic forced after error" PID: xxx TASK: xxxx CPU: 5 COMMAND: "SubmitThread-CA" #0 machine_kexec at ffffffff8c069932 #1 __crash_kexec at ffffffff8c1338fa #2 panic at ffffffff8c1d69b9 #3 ocfs2_handle_error at ffffffffc0c86c0c [ocfs2] #4 __ocfs2_abort at ffffffffc0c88387 [ocfs2] #5 ocfs2_journal_dirty at ffffffffc0c51e98 [ocfs2] #6 ocfs2_split_extent at ffffffffc0c27ea3 [ocfs2] #7 ocfs2_change_extent_flag at ffffffffc0c28053 [ocfs2] #8 ocfs2_mark_extent_written at ffffffffc0c28347 [ocfs2] #9 ocfs2_dio_end_io_write at ffffffffc0c2bef9 [ocfs2] #10 ocfs2_dio_end_io at ffffffffc0c2c0f5 [ocfs2] #11 dio_complete at ffffffff8c2b9fa7 #12 do_blockdev_direct_IO at ffffffff8c2bc09f #13 ocfs2_direct_IO at ffffffffc0c2b653 [ocfs2] #14 generic_file_direct_write at ffffffff8c1dcf14 #15 __generic_file_write_iter at ffffffff8c1dd07b #16 ocfs2_file_write_iter at ffffffffc0c49f1f [ocfs2] #17 aio_write at ffffffff8c2cc72e #18 kmem_cache_alloc at ffffffff8c248dde #19 do_io_submit at ffffffff8c2ccada #20 do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8c004984 #21 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff8c8000ba Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240617095543.6971-1-jack@suse.cz Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240614145243.8837-1-jack@suse.cz Fixes: c15471f ("ocfs2: fix sparse file & data ordering issue in direct io") Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn> Cc: Gang He <ghe@suse.com> Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
naota
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 25, 2024
Bos can be put with multiple unrelated dma-resv locks held. But imported bos attempt to grab the bo dma-resv during dma-buf detach that typically happens during cleanup. That leads to lockde splats similar to the below and a potential ABBA deadlock. Fix this by always taking the delayed workqueue cleanup path for imported bos. Requesting stable fixes from when the Xe driver was introduced, since its usage of drm_exec and wide vm dma_resvs appear to be the first reliable trigger of this. [22982.116427] ============================================ [22982.116428] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [22982.116429] 6.10.0-rc2+ #10 Tainted: G U W [22982.116430] -------------------------------------------- [22982.116430] glxgears:sh0/5785 is trying to acquire lock: [22982.116431] ffff8c2bafa539a8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0 [22982.116438] but task is already holding lock: [22982.116438] ffff8c2d9aba6da8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x49/0x2b0 [drm_exec] [22982.116442] other info that might help us debug this: [22982.116442] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [22982.116443] CPU0 [22982.116444] ---- [22982.116444] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [22982.116445] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [22982.116447] *** DEADLOCK *** [22982.116447] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [22982.116448] 5 locks held by glxgears:sh0/5785: [22982.116449] #0: ffff8c2d9aba58c8 (&xef->vm.lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: xe_file_close+0xde/0x1c0 [xe] [22982.116507] #1: ffff8c2e28cc8480 (&vm->lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: xe_vm_close_and_put+0x161/0x9b0 [xe] [22982.116578] #2: ffff8c2e31982970 (&val->lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: xe_validation_ctx_init+0x6d/0x70 [xe] [22982.116647] #3: ffffacdc469478a8 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: xe_vma_destroy_unlocked+0x7f/0xe0 [xe] [22982.116716] #4: ffff8c2d9aba6da8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x49/0x2b0 [drm_exec] [22982.116719] stack backtrace: [22982.116720] CPU: 8 PID: 5785 Comm: glxgears:sh0 Tainted: G U W 6.10.0-rc2+ #10 [22982.116721] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 2001 02/01/2023 [22982.116723] Call Trace: [22982.116724] <TASK> [22982.116725] dump_stack_lvl+0x77/0xb0 [22982.116727] __lock_acquire+0x1232/0x2160 [22982.116730] lock_acquire+0xcb/0x2d0 [22982.116732] ? dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0 [22982.116734] ? __lock_acquire+0x417/0x2160 [22982.116736] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0xd0/0x13b0 [22982.116738] ? dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0 [22982.116741] ? dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0 [22982.116743] ? ww_mutex_lock+0x2b/0x90 [22982.116745] ww_mutex_lock+0x2b/0x90 [22982.116747] dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0 [22982.116749] drm_prime_gem_destroy+0x2f/0x40 [drm] [22982.116775] xe_ttm_bo_destroy+0x32/0x220 [xe] [22982.116818] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x3a/0x290 [22982.116821] drm_exec_unlock_all+0xa1/0xd0 [drm_exec] [22982.116823] drm_exec_fini+0x12/0xb0 [drm_exec] [22982.116824] xe_validation_ctx_fini+0x15/0x40 [xe] [22982.116892] xe_vma_destroy_unlocked+0xb1/0xe0 [xe] [22982.116959] xe_vm_close_and_put+0x41a/0x9b0 [xe] [22982.117025] ? xa_find+0xe3/0x1e0 [22982.117028] xe_file_close+0x10a/0x1c0 [xe] [22982.117074] drm_file_free+0x22a/0x280 [drm] [22982.117099] drm_release_noglobal+0x22/0x70 [drm] [22982.117119] __fput+0xf1/0x2d0 [22982.117122] task_work_run+0x59/0x90 [22982.117125] do_exit+0x330/0xb40 [22982.117127] do_group_exit+0x36/0xa0 [22982.117129] get_signal+0xbd2/0xbe0 [22982.117131] arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x3e/0x240 [22982.117134] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1e7/0x290 [22982.117137] do_syscall_64+0xa1/0x180 [22982.117139] ? lock_acquire+0xcb/0x2d0 [22982.117140] ? __set_task_comm+0x28/0x1e0 [22982.117141] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 [22982.117144] ? __set_task_comm+0xe1/0x1e0 [22982.117145] ? lock_release+0xca/0x290 [22982.117147] ? __do_sys_prctl+0x245/0xab0 [22982.117149] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xde/0x190 [22982.117150] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xb0/0x290 [22982.117152] ? do_syscall_64+0xa1/0x180 [22982.117154] ? __lock_acquire+0x417/0x2160 [22982.117155] ? reacquire_held_locks+0xd1/0x1f0 [22982.117156] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x30c/0x790 [22982.117158] ? lock_acquire+0xcb/0x2d0 [22982.117160] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 [22982.117162] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x357/0x790 [22982.117163] ? lock_release+0xca/0x290 [22982.117164] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x361/0x790 [22982.117166] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0x4b/0xc0 [22982.117168] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x45/0xa0 [22982.117170] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x45/0xa0 [22982.117172] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x45/0xa0 [22982.117174] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [22982.117176] RIP: 0033:0x7f943d267169 [22982.117192] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f943d26713f. [22982.117193] RSP: 002b:00007f9430bffc80 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca [22982.117195] RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f943d267169 [22982.117196] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000189 RDI: 00005622f89579d0 [22982.117197] RBP: 00007f9430bffcb0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000ffffffff [22982.117198] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [22982.117199] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00005622f89579d0 [22982.117202] </TASK> Fixes: dd08ebf ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs") Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.8+ Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240628153848.4989-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Don't check for a running transaction without the transaction log held.
Additionally change the loop to use btrfs_next_item()
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/f4dbd994-edac-c275-7838-78f3429f35c9@toxicpanda.com
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: