Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 5, 2023. It is now read-only.

Tests for more subcommands #43

Closed
marcelm opened this issue Dec 21, 2016 · 0 comments
Closed

Tests for more subcommands #43

marcelm opened this issue Dec 21, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@marcelm
Copy link
Collaborator

marcelm commented Dec 21, 2016

Originally reported by: Marcel Martin (Bitbucket: marcelm, GitHub: marcelm)


Unit testing should include more subcommands. It should also cover a full run of the pipeline on a test dataset.


Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant