-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 624
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Existence of validator signer should not be used to check is-validator condition #11821
Comments
staffik
changed the title
Existence of validator signer should be used to check is-validator condition
Existence of validator signer should not be used to check is-validator condition
Jul 22, 2024
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 23, 2024
See #11821 for context. Check if this is a current validator using current epoch info, not merely the fact that validator key exists. # Testing ## Current Mainnet (protocol version 67) Pre-requirements for the check to kick-in: * `tracked_shards=[]` in `config.json` * `validator_key.json` exists Tested with different validator IDs: * `node` - dummy validator ID, it **did not** crash * `gritsly.poolv1.near` - existing validator with the lowest stake, not marked as `CP` in the debug page, it **did not** crash * `solidstate.poolv1.near` - existing validator with the lowest stake that was marked as `CP` in the debug page, it **crashed** ## Current Testnet (protocol version 69) Pre-requirements for the check to kick-in: * `tracked_shards=[0]` in `config.json` * `validator_key.json` exists Tested with different validator IDs: * `node` - dummy validator ID, it **did not** crash * `lavenderfive.pool.f863973.m0` - existing validator with the lowest stake, not marked as `CV` in the debug page, it **did not** crash * `snsmlnn.pool.f863973.m0` - existing validator with the lowest stake that was marked as `CV` in the debug page, it **crashed**
marcelo-gonzalez
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 24, 2024
See #11821 for context. Check if this is a current validator using current epoch info, not merely the fact that validator key exists. # Testing ## Current Mainnet (protocol version 67) Pre-requirements for the check to kick-in: * `tracked_shards=[]` in `config.json` * `validator_key.json` exists Tested with different validator IDs: * `node` - dummy validator ID, it **did not** crash * `gritsly.poolv1.near` - existing validator with the lowest stake, not marked as `CP` in the debug page, it **did not** crash * `solidstate.poolv1.near` - existing validator with the lowest stake that was marked as `CP` in the debug page, it **crashed** ## Current Testnet (protocol version 69) Pre-requirements for the check to kick-in: * `tracked_shards=[0]` in `config.json` * `validator_key.json` exists Tested with different validator IDs: * `node` - dummy validator ID, it **did not** crash * `lavenderfive.pool.f863973.m0` - existing validator with the lowest stake, not marked as `CV` in the debug page, it **did not** crash * `snsmlnn.pool.f863973.m0` - existing validator with the lowest stake that was marked as `CV` in the debug page, it **crashed**
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
See related thread: https://near.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/407237-core.2Fstateless-validation/topic/bug.20in.20tracked.20shards/near/452604183
In general a node could have a validator key and initialize the validator signer using it, but existence of validator signer should not be used to check if the node is currently a validator.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: