Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added hardfork to RpcClient #825

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 26, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions src/RpcClient/Models/RpcVersion.cs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,6 +9,9 @@
// modifications are permitted.

using Neo.Json;
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;

namespace Neo.Network.RPC.Models
{
Expand All @@ -25,6 +28,7 @@ public class RpcProtocol
public uint MaxTransactionsPerBlock { get; set; }
public int MemoryPoolMaxTransactions { get; set; }
public ulong InitialGasDistribution { get; set; }
public IReadOnlyDictionary<Hardfork, uint> Hardforks { get; set; }

public JObject ToJson()
{
Expand All @@ -38,6 +42,11 @@ public JObject ToJson()
json["maxtransactionsperblock"] = MaxTransactionsPerBlock;
json["memorypoolmaxtransactions"] = MemoryPoolMaxTransactions;
json["initialgasdistribution"] = InitialGasDistribution;
json["hardforks"] = new JArray(Hardforks.Select(s => new JObject()
{
["name"] = s.Key,
["blockheight"] = s.Value,
}));
return json;
}

Expand All @@ -54,6 +63,7 @@ public static RpcProtocol FromJson(JObject json)
MaxTransactionsPerBlock = (uint)json["maxtransactionsperblock"].AsNumber(),
MemoryPoolMaxTransactions = (int)json["memorypoolmaxtransactions"].AsNumber(),
InitialGasDistribution = (ulong)json["initialgasdistribution"].AsNumber(),
Hardforks = new Dictionary<Hardfork, uint>(((JArray)json["hardforks"]).Select(s => new KeyValuePair<Hardfork, uint>(Enum.Parse<Hardfork>(s["name"].AsString()), (uint)s["blockheight"].AsNumber()))),
};
}
}
Expand Down
8 changes: 7 additions & 1 deletion tests/Neo.Network.RPC.Tests/RpcTestCases.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2491,7 +2491,13 @@
"addressversion": 0,
"maxtransactionsperblock": 0,
"memorypoolmaxtransactions": 0,
"initialgasdistribution": 0
"initialgasdistribution": 0,
"hardforks": [
{
"name": "HF_Aspidochelone",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

BTW, speaking of #822, can we avoid HF_ prefixes here? It's hardforks section already.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

but it based off Enum Hardfork, So its parses the name, i guess i could put value, i believe that works.

Copy link
Member Author

@cschuchardt88 cschuchardt88 Sep 16, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh i see what your saying, Thats how its used in #823.

public enum Hardfork : byte
{
    HF_Aspidochelone,
    HF_Basilisk
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, it's not a client problem and not something client should be bothered with. It's just that I've only noticed it here. But server-side it'd probably be a bit better.

Copy link
Member Author

@cschuchardt88 cschuchardt88 Sep 17, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

forkJson["name"] = hf.Key;

Code uses key of the enum which in our case is HF_Aspidochelone and HF_Basilisk. We would have to change the server to use the value instead. If you would like me to proceed in changing the server let me know.

Edit: I feel that you think the server didn't implement this. but it did, thats why im doing this. Yes i do think they merged it too fast #823.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, it's not a client problem and not something client should be bothered with. It's just that I've only noticed it here. But server-side it'd probably be a bit better.

Why we need it in server? We can remove it from both

Copy link
Member Author

@cschuchardt88 cschuchardt88 Sep 26, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remember this #823 someone merged it. To late in 3.6.1

"blockheight": 0
}
]
}
}
}
Expand Down