-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Interface addressing #39
Conversation
@@ -34,6 +34,14 @@ spec: | |||
spec: | |||
description: TBD how do we distinguish the loopback from the vnic(s) | |||
properties: | |||
addressing: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
K8s uses ipFamilyPolicy and ipFamilies for Service: https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/kubernetes-api/service-resources/service-v1/#ServiceSpec
Can/should we follow the same practice?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I aligned with the IPFamily convention. The IPFamily Policy is slightly different, but I reused the naming
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: johnbelamaric The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Right now we only allocate 1 IP address family.
With this PR the author of the package is able to select what type of addressing he/she wants: ipv4only, ipv6only dual stack or none (which means L2)