-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update OpenStack installation with the overriding method #75
Update OpenStack installation with the overriding method #75
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Victor, I am getting an error parsing the VCPU
TASK [bootstrap : Checking host has minimum number of CPUS] ********************
Tuesday 28 November 2023 10:23:11 +0000 (0:00:00.052) 0:00:39.916 ******
Tuesday 28 November 2023 10:23:11 +0000 (0:00:00.052) 0:00:39.915 ******
fatal: [127.0.0.1]: FAILED! => {"msg": "The conditional check 'ansible_facts.processor_vcpus >= host_min_vcpu' failed. The error was: Unexpected templating type error occurred on ({% if ansible_facts.processor_vcpus >= host_min_vcpu %} True {% else %} False {% endif %}): '>=' not supported between instances of 'int' and 'str'"}
Interesting, it seems like the value is passed as string, let me try to replicate it in my local environment. |
I found the issue, I was using the |
Signed-off-by: Victor Morales <v.morales@samsung.com>
7d020fc
to
36323c8
Compare
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: lapentad The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@electrocucaracha we did a quite big refactoring of the documentation structure. Would you like to update this pr to follow the new structure or is it okay if I reimplement it in a new pr? |
Hi @electrocucaracha and @CsatariGergely I created the new pr #81 |
This pr can be abandoned, because #81 is meant to fix it |
Closing this in favor of #81 |
No description provided.