Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add support for installing nonKIND cluster via kubeadm #46

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

vjayaramrh
Copy link
Collaborator

allows for installing nonKIND K8S cluster on ubuntu and fedora for e2e test cases

@electrocucaracha
Copy link
Member

There are several things to consider for this approach:

Copy link
Collaborator

@radoslawc radoslawc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
containerd_ver: 1.6.19
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like that those are in vars file, gj

@nephio-prow nephio-prow bot added the approved label May 25, 2023
@vjayaramrh
Copy link
Collaborator Author

There are several things to consider for this approach:

* Maintenance: There are [plenty of mature options](https://www.cncf.io/certification/software-conformance/) to deploy production-ready Kubernetes clusters. [Kubespray](https://kubespray.io/#/) has been used by several projects, but we can make a deep analysis on others.

* Cluster API support: Using non-KinD cluster will result in a different [Infrastructure Cluster API provider](https://cluster-api.sigs.k8s.io/reference/providers.html).

@electrocucaracha Great points, This is now a first step and we should definitely iterate to get there.

@radoslawc
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm

@electrocucaracha
Copy link
Member

electrocucaracha commented Jun 13, 2023

/hold

This needs more discussion and input from others

Copy link
Contributor

nephio-prow bot commented Jun 7, 2024

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

Copy link
Contributor

@dkosteck dkosteck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes noted per testing on Fedora 34, including the change to the Kubernetes repo source and versioning. Either the k8s_ver flag should be removed as suggested, or a higher version that is supported on Fedora should be used for this flag

e2e/provision/vars/kubeadm.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

nephio-prow bot commented Aug 15, 2024

@vjayaramrh: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
provision-linter b7799f6 link true /test provision-linter
install-integration b7799f6 link true /test install-integration
kpt-integration b7799f6 link true /test kpt-integration

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Contributor

nephio-prow bot commented Aug 15, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: radoslawc

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@nephio-prow nephio-prow bot removed the approved label Aug 15, 2024
nephio-prow bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2024
…46) (#296)

* add support for installing nonKIND cluster via kubeadm

allows for installing nonKIND K8S cluster on ubuntu and fedora for e2e test cases

* Add support for installing nonKIND cluster via kubeadm, moving file locations

Co-authored-by: Vishwanath Jayaraman <vjayaram@redhat.com>

* Change yml file suffix in main

---------

Co-authored-by: vjayaramrh <vjayaram@redhat.com>
vjayaramrh added a commit to vjayaramrh/test-infra that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2024
…ephio-project#46) (nephio-project#296)

* add support for installing nonKIND cluster via kubeadm

allows for installing nonKIND K8S cluster on ubuntu and fedora for e2e test cases

* Add support for installing nonKIND cluster via kubeadm, moving file locations

Co-authored-by: Vishwanath Jayaraman <vjayaram@redhat.com>

* Change yml file suffix in main

---------

Co-authored-by: vjayaramrh <vjayaram@redhat.com>
nephio-prow bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2024
* add support for installing nonKIND cluster via kubeadm

allows for installing nonKIND K8S cluster on ubuntu and fedora for e2e test cases

* Add support for installing nonKIND cluster via kubeadm, moving file locations

Co-authored-by: Vishwanath Jayaraman <vjayaram@redhat.com>

* adds prow job to install Nephio components on kubeadm cluster

Co-authored-by: Daniel Kostecki <dkosteck@redhat.com>

* add support for installing nonKIND cluster via kubeadm (previously PR #46) (#296)

* add support for installing nonKIND cluster via kubeadm

allows for installing nonKIND K8S cluster on ubuntu and fedora for e2e test cases

* Add support for installing nonKIND cluster via kubeadm, moving file locations

Co-authored-by: Vishwanath Jayaraman <vjayaram@redhat.com>

* Change yml file suffix in main

---------

Co-authored-by: vjayaramrh <vjayaram@redhat.com>

* adds prow job to install nephio components on kubeadm cluster

Co-authored-by: Daniel Kostecki <dkosteck@redhat.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Daniel Kostecki <dkosteck@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Kostecki <84861140+dkosteck@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants