Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add TimeFlowStartMs and TimeFlowEndMs to Netflow v5, v9, v10 (IPFIX) #81

Merged
merged 3 commits into from May 7, 2022
Merged

Add TimeFlowStartMs and TimeFlowEndMs to Netflow v5, v9, v10 (IPFIX) #81

merged 3 commits into from May 7, 2022

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented May 7, 2022

Action

Closes #78.

Description

In #78 was proposed to change the TimeFlowStart and TimeFlowEnd units from seconds to milliseconds as it is specified both in RFC 3954 and NetFlow Version 9 Flow-Record Format for Netflow v9, which specified FIRST_SWITCHED and LAST_SWITCHED as System uptime in milliseconds. However as this would break many current implementations the fields TimeFlowStartMs and TimeFlowEndMs have been added to goflow2 for Netflow v5, v9 and v10 (IPFIX), as proposed in #78 and mentioned in #80.

@lspgn
Copy link
Member

lspgn commented May 7, 2022

Thank you!
This looks great.

@lspgn lspgn merged commit 0c878cd into netsampler:main May 7, 2022
vishnubraj pushed a commit to vishnubraj/goflow2 that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2022
…w-start-end-ms

Add TimeFlowStartMs and TimeFlowEndMs to Netflow v5, v9, v10 (IPFIX)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

FIRST_SWITCHED and LAST_SWITCH not corresponding RFC or CISCO
2 participants