Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add Bedrock mock server #186

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2024

Conversation

jsumners-nr
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed Release Notes

  • Adds a new module that provides a mock server for AWS Bedrock.

Links

Details

This is in support of newrelic/node-newrelic#1968

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 1, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 133 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (71923d4) 77.97% compared to head (c1762f1) 80.07%.

Files Patch % Lines
lib/bedrock-server/index.js 48.24% 133 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #186      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.97%   80.07%   +2.10%     
==========================================
  Files          15       23       +8     
  Lines        2424     3347     +923     
==========================================
+ Hits         1890     2680     +790     
- Misses        534      667     +133     
Flag Coverage Δ
unit-tests-16.x 80.07% <85.59%> (+2.10%) ⬆️
unit-tests-18.x ?
unit-tests-20.x ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jsumners-nr jsumners-nr merged commit e428e65 into newrelic:main Feb 1, 2024
8 checks passed
@jsumners-nr jsumners-nr deleted the bedrock-server branch February 1, 2024 14:28
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Feb 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants