move the notify-crontab to its own script #2391
Conversation
Signed-off-by: szaimen <szaimen@e.mail.de>
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
@szaimen Thanks! Could you please fix the failing tests, and I'll finish it off. |
done |
|
Thanks! Will have a look tomorrow! 🥇 |
|
Not tested, but looks good to me. |
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hansson <mailto@danielhansson.nu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hansson <mailto@danielhansson.nu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hansson <mailto@danielhansson.nu>
|
OK, so coding wise almost done, but the issue that remains is how to fetch the correct Any idea @szaimen? |
|
OK, so for an idea at least:
|
Did you enable the files_external app? |
Haha yes. :D |
|
@szaimen Can you check the output of the above command and form a variable that will be the actual Thanks! |
|
You can use a local external storage mount as example. That should have the same output... |
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hansson <mailto@danielhansson.nu>
|
OK, grepped it from DB. Can you please test if this works: https://github.com/nextcloud/vm/pull/2391/files#diff-67bceb0888b398c45857e1bc41f753da1a696075ff08b9b82f8136bc6af0139aR1124-R1134 Thanks! |
nextcloud_update.sh
Outdated
| @@ -1121,6 +1121,18 @@ then | |||
| print_text_in_color "$ICyan" "Nextcloud crontab updated to run every 5 minutes." | |||
| fi | |||
|
|
|||
| # Replace iNotify checker with a script instead | |||
| if crontab -u www-data -l | grep -q "files_external:notify -v" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why not get the ids from the crontab? That would be a much safer way imho...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The crontab might not be true (not used, leftover, etc), but the DB is.
Also, will several mounts generate several crontab-rows?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The crontab might not be true (not used, leftover, etc), but the DB is.
However the user might not have axtivated the feature for all mounts and does not want to do so.
Also, will several mounts generate several crontab-rows?
Yes. Each mount for which the feature was activated will have its own row.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm... It makes it a bit more complicated.
Maybe the best option here is to just ditch the replacement to the new way of doing it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hansson <mailto@danielhansson.nu>
Close #2356
Signed-off-by: szaimen szaimen@e.mail.de