Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding ONT read support for ampliseq #741

Open
ShareiFae opened this issue May 13, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Adding ONT read support for ampliseq #741

ShareiFae opened this issue May 13, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ShareiFae
Copy link

Description of feature

Would it be possible to add support for Oxford Nanopore Technology reads? I've found two projects (the second integrating the first) that might allow a quick implementation.

https://github.com/treangenlab/emu
https://github.com/genomic-medicine-sweden/gms_16S

@ShareiFae ShareiFae added the enhancement New feature or request label May 13, 2024
@d4straub
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @ShareiFae ,
emu seems indeed interesting, its also available as container https://bioconda.github.io/recipes/emu/README.html.
However, if I understood correctly, it compares sequences to a database and makes count tables from that. It is not a reference-free (de-novo) representative sequence (OTU/ASV/whatever) calculation like DADA2 or Deblur. Therefore I have the impression the tool is misplaced in this pipeline. Let me know if you have a different opinion.

@ShareiFae
Copy link
Author

A shame, the downstream analysis and the report of this pipeline is really really good and I would like it to have it with nanopore data even it they cannot be done exactly the same way.

With EMU, as demonstrated by this other pipeline, you can create a phyloseq object that functions as Pseudo OTU tables:
https://github.com/josephpetrone/RESCUE/blob/master/detailed_steps.md#rstudio-and-phyloseq-handoff
https://github.com/josephpetrone/RESCUE

I've also found a pipeline that utilizes Quiime:
https://github.com/MaestSi/MetONTIIME

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants