Fixes need for Matrix objects as output of assay #43
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes the issue reported in #42, which caught an out-of-date use of
t()
on the object produced bySummarizedExperiment::assay()
, which (at least as of Bioconductor 3.7) returns an object of classDataFrame
. Inbiomarkertmle()
,t()
and other downstream functions (e.g.,limma::normalizeBetweenArrays()
) require aMatrix
-like object, a status for whichDataFrame
apparently does not qualify. This has been fixed by adding an explicit call toas.matrix
. The opportunity is also taken to amend documentation and make other less-intrusive packaging changes.Changes
assay()
to classMatrix
pkgdown
site.R
files have been amended for the sake of clarityS4Vectors
via@import
to satisfypkgdown