Follow prometheus metric name best practices #67
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Breaking Change for Prometheus: OhmGraphite has not been following Prometheus best practices when it came to naming metrics. Metric names now look like "ohm_cpu_celsius" with only the "hardware" and "sensor" labels remaining. The following changes have been implemented:
app
metric label has been removed in favor of a metric namespace prefix of "ohm"hardware_type
metric label has been removed in favor of encapsulating it into the metric name (eg: "cpu", "nic").sensor_index
metric label has been removed. This label proved superfluous as every sensor can be uniquely identified by it's name.host
metric label has been removed: This falls in line with other prometheus exporters like node_exporter, which does not export the host as a label.Thanks @henriquegemignani for kicking off the initial work, let me know if you think this change is worse / better.
I'll let this PR linger for a little bit to allow for a potential discussion.