Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RTM] ENH: Enable brain extraction with NKI template #729

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 7, 2017

Conversation

effigies
Copy link
Member

@effigies effigies commented Sep 29, 2017

State of this PR

This PR builds in the infrastructure for using alternative templates, and adds an option to use the NKI template instead of the default OASIS.

Something similar has been done in the @kochalka branch, which suggests that the ability to customize skull-stripping templates is desired by at least some users.

That said, I don't recommend adding NKI as an option without specific user demand or a demonstration that it improves skull-stripping in some cases.

Original text

An attempt to address #701. There was previous discussion of using the NKI template as an alternative to OASIS. In that case, the issue was wrap-around, so it's not clear that we're going to see any improvement here.

I was able to replicate the poor skull stripping locally. Incidentally, the FreeSurfer reconstruction looked great despite that, possibly due to T2 pial surface refinement.

Will report back on skull-strip quality in the morning.

@effigies effigies changed the title [WIP] ENH: Enable brain extraction with NKI template [RTM] ENH: Enable brain extraction with NKI template Oct 5, 2017
@chrisgorgo
Copy link
Contributor

If FreeSurfer masks looked good it might be to revisit #431.

@oesteban oesteban merged commit c884c4b into nipreps:master Oct 7, 2017
@effigies effigies deleted the enh/nki_brain_extraction branch October 7, 2017 11:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants