-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
adding 1.0 for review #1
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,3 +1,80 @@ | ||
# The Nivenly Covenant | ||
# The Nivenly Covenant 1.0 | ||
|
||
Include a published and publicly accessible statement you to agree and commit to the following terms. | ||
|
||
``` | ||
<Entity,Person(s),Authors,Organization(s)> herby agree an unequivocally commit to the fullest | ||
extent of our understanding, our intentions, and our goals to The Nivenly Covenant 1.0 | ||
``` | ||
|
||
### 1. Sustainability | ||
|
||
We agree that sustainability is our critical priority, and is necessary for the longevity of future generations of stewards and technologists. | ||
|
||
We agree to prioritize the sustainability, mental, and physical health, well-being, overall working condition, and operational excellence for the people working on the project, the source code of the project, and the day-to-day operations of the project. | ||
|
||
We understand that the longevity and success of this project is intended to be given to another generation of stewards long after the original authors have completed their work on the project. We aim to leave this project in better condition than we inherited it. | ||
|
||
We understand that "right" is more important than "right now", and that future generations are more important than the needs of today. | ||
|
||
Given the decision between profit and sustainability, we unequivocally chose sustainability. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We need to have some phrasing around "We understand the difference between not making a profit right now and actively running at a deficit." Basically I want to have something that prompts active thought that "not at a profit" doesn't immediately watersled into "hemorrhaging money". There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. i think this is part of the definition of sustainability but it would be good to call that out. |
||
|
||
### 2. Ownership | ||
|
||
We agree to examine our relationship with ownership, and understand the consequences of our decisions with regard to ownership. | ||
|
||
#### 2.a Equal Ownership | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. is this a "choose one" thing? |
||
|
||
We acknowledge that an imbalance in ownership creates an imbalance in the health of our people and our works. | ||
|
||
We understand that private ownership is a great responsibility that requires special attention to detail in order to operate sustainably. We have considered releasing our work to the public domain and have determined that private ownership is a more appropriate ownership model for our work. | ||
|
||
If we chose to instill a concept of ownership for the project, we agree to share the ownership equally amongst those that maintain and contribute to the project. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. can we require a "notice-type license" compatible with Apache 2.0? |
||
|
||
#### 2.b Stewardship | ||
|
||
As an alternative to private ownership, we have considered releasing our work to the public domain. | ||
|
||
We understand that the public domain is a dedicated space, where there is no concept of private ownership. In the event we release our project to the public domain, we agree to serve needs of the general public and act as responsible software stewards. We understand that we have an obligation to the public conservation of our work. As a steward we understand we are in position of burden; and not that of authority. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. can we require a "public domain" license like CC0 or similar? something well-recognised. |
||
|
||
### 3. Violence and Authoritarianism | ||
|
||
We unequivocally condone violence and authoritarianism in any form. | ||
|
||
All violent and authoritarian entities are forbidden from our works to the fullest extent permissible by our ownership model and law. | ||
dmah42 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
If the works are privately owned, we forbid any violent or authoritarian entities from using the software, contributing to the software, or selling the software. | ||
|
||
If the works are public domain, we forbid any violent or authoritarian entity from contributing to our stewardship of the software. We agree that any violent or authoritarian entity can not serve the needs of the general public. | ||
|
||
The list includes (but is not limited to): | ||
|
||
- Police and Law enforcement organizations | ||
- Military organizations | ||
- Totalitarian and authoritarian government | ||
- Offensive military operations | ||
- Anti-human-rights organizations, or their affiliates | ||
- Pro-gun, firearm, or ballistics organizations | ||
- Tactical equipment and weapons distributors, resellers, manufacturers, and trading bodies | ||
- Affiliates contributing to the success of any violent or authoritarian entity | ||
|
||
### 4. Human Rights | ||
|
||
We agree that all lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and sexual identity, expression, or orientation should be protected by the fullest extent of law, culture, and legitimacy possible. | ||
|
||
We agree that all races, and ethnic backgrounds should have equal rights, experience, and psychological safety of mind. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We should devote equal amounts of verbiage to race / ethnicity as we do to "The Alphabet" or we should be more succinct about The Alphabet, e.g. "We agree that all queer people should be protected by ...". I lean more toward being verbose with race / ethnicity, for the same reason we have about 13 rules beyond "Don't Be A Dick" to address common "whataboutisms". My opinion is that we should include the common terminology that is understood in the DEI space around race, e.g.: "We agree that all races, ethnicities, national origin", "including but not limited to those who are Black, Indigenous, Hispanic, ..." and just be specific. In both cases acknowledge that the list is not exhaustive. |
||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. can we also add some ableism language here? i mean all of this should be protected under the law but .. you know. |
||
All entities, individuals, organizations, and contributors who have demonstrated belief or activism otherwise, will be forbidden from our project. This includes but is not limited to: | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Similar to the above, we have 4 items of specificity for The Alphabet but only one specific to racism. I think we should call out examples of racism, just like we call out anti-trans practices separately from anti-lgbtq+ organizations, even though the former would fall under the latter. |
||
|
||
- Anti-lgtbq+ organizations | ||
- Religious organizations and beliefs condemning lgbtq+ legitimacy, lifestyle, culture | ||
- Anti-lgtbq+ marriage organizations or beliefs | ||
- Organizations actively working against transgender name changing, gender marker changing, or birth certificate amendments | ||
- Openly racists organizations, or organizations condoning the current state of police violence | ||
- Pro-police organizations | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we define sustainability or is the determination of the project's adherence to this something for a Tech Advisory Group to determine?