-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: README about the project. #9
Comments
inclyc
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 16, 2023
inclyc
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 21, 2024
While bumping my system flake I ran into a test failing due to an out-of-bounds access. It got caught by `_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS`. I guess the not-so-recent [bump](https://www.github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/298047) of meson in nixpkgs brought in this [commit](https://www.github.com/mesonbuild/meson/pull/12683) from meson 1.4.0. Here's the failing test logs and a backtrace: ```bash nixd-nightly> >>> MALLOC_PERTURB_=222 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/build/3gwj8jwd4ypvcahxqv3cn2fq617fm7v2-source/build/libnixbc:/build/3gwj8jwd4ypvcahxqv3cn2fq617fm7v2-source/build/libnixf:/build/3gwj8jwd4ypvcahxqv3cn2fq617fm7v2-source/build/libbc ASAN_OPTIONS=halt_on_error=1:abort_on_error=1:print_summary=1 UBSAN_OPTIONS=halt_on_error=1:abort_on_error=1:print_summary=1:print_stacktrace=1 /build/3gwj8jwd4ypvcahxqv3cn2fq617fm7v2-source/build/libnixf/unit-libnixf-parse nixd-nightly> ✀ nixd-nightly> stdout: nixd-nightly> Running main() from /build/source/googletest/src/gtest_main.cc nixd-nightly> [==========] Running 90 tests from 2 test suites. nixd-nightly> [----------] Global test environment set-up. nixd-nightly> [----------] 15 tests from LexerTest nixd-nightly> [ RUN ] LexerTest.Integer nixd-nightly> stderr: nixd-nightly> /nix/store/NN152MGPDFCW92B3B03G9KMNLPD9JRIS-gcc-13.2.0/include/c++/13.2.0/string_view:258: constexpr const std::basic_string_view<_CharT, _Traits>::value_type& std::basic_string_view<_CharT, _Traits>::operator[](size_type) const [with _CharT = char; _Traits = std::char_traits<char>; const_reference = const char&; size_type = long unsigned int]: Assertion '__pos < this->_M_len' failed. ``` lldb backtrace: ```c++ (lldb) process launch --environment LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/xokdvium/Work/Programming/nixd/build/libnixf:/home/xokdvium/Work/Programming/nixd/build/libbc:/home/xokdvium/Work/Programming/nixd/build/libnixbc:/nix/store/fivm0vvpkfm933fd5gqj3dzni0pp50cg-pipewire-1.0.4-jack/lib ASAN_OPTIONS=halt_on_error=1:abort_on_error=1:print_summary=1 MALLOC_PERTURB_=239 UBSAN_OPTIONS=halt_on_error=1:abort_on_error=1:print_summary=1:print_stacktrace=1 Process 433026 launched: '/home/xokdvium/Work/Programming/nixd/build/libnixf/unit-libnixf-parse' (x86_64) Running main() from /build/source/googletest/src/gtest_main.cc [==========] Running 90 tests from 2 test suites. [----------] Global test environment set-up. [----------] 15 tests from LexerTest [ RUN ] LexerTest.Integer /nix/store/NN152MGPDFCW92B3B03G9KMNLPD9JRIS-gcc-13.2.0/include/c++/13.2.0/string_view:258: constexpr const std::basic_string_view<_CharT, _Traits>::value_type& std::basic_string_view<_CharT, _Traits>::operator[](size_type) const [with _CharT = char; _Traits = std::char_traits<char>; const_reference = const char&; size_type = long unsigned int]: Assertion '__pos < this->_M_len' failed. Process 433026 stopped * thread #1, name = 'unit-libnixf-pa', stop reason = signal SIGABRT frame #0: 0x00007ffff7abfefc libc.so.6`__pthread_kill_implementation + 268 libc.so.6`__pthread_kill_implementation: -> 0x7ffff7abfefc <+268>: movl %eax, %ebx 0x7ffff7abfefe <+270>: negl %ebx 0x7ffff7abff00 <+272>: cmpl $0xfffff000, %eax ; imm = 0xFFFFF000 0x7ffff7abff05 <+277>: movl $0x0, %eax (lldb) bt * thread #1, name = 'unit-libnixf-pa', stop reason = signal SIGABRT * frame #0: 0x00007ffff7abfefc libc.so.6`__pthread_kill_implementation + 268 frame #1: 0x00007ffff7a6fe86 libc.so.6`raise + 22 frame #2: 0x00007ffff7a58935 libc.so.6`abort + 215 frame #3: 0x00007ffff7d289fe libstdc++.so.6`std::__glibcxx_assert_fail(char const*, int, char const*, char const*) + 94 frame #4: 0x00007ffff7f79f60 libnixf.so`std::basic_string_view<char, std::char_traits<char>>::operator[](this=<unavailable>, __pos=<unavailable>) const at string_view:258:2 frame #5: 0x00007ffff7f782d6 libnixf.so`nixf::Lexer::consumeManyOf(std::basic_string_view<char, std::char_traits<char>>) [inlined] nixf::Lexer::peekUnwrap(this=0x00007fffffff73b0) const at Lexer.h:113:64 frame #6: 0x00007ffff7f782ca libnixf.so`nixf::Lexer::consumeManyOf(this=0x00007fffffff73b0, Chars=<unavailable>) at Lexer.cpp:57:33 frame #7: 0x00007ffff7f79258 libnixf.so`nixf::Lexer::lexNumbers() [inlined] nixf::Lexer::consumeManyDigits(this=0x00007fffffff73b0) at Lexer.h:81:25 frame #8: 0x00007ffff7f7923f libnixf.so`nixf::Lexer::lexNumbers(this=0x00007fffffff73b0) at Lexer.cpp:195:30 frame #9: 0x00007ffff7f79587 libnixf.so`nixf::Lexer::lex(this=0x00007fffffff73b0) at Lexer.cpp:471:15 frame #10: 0x0000000000408a77 unit-libnixf-parse`(anonymous namespace)::LexerTest_Integer_Test::TestBody(this=0x00000000004844b0) const at Lexer.cpp:32:21 frame #11: 0x00007ffff7f0625d libgtest.so.1.14.0`void testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) + 77 frame #12: 0x00007ffff7eed06e libgtest.so.1.14.0`testing::Test::Run() + 206 frame #13: 0x00007ffff7eed225 libgtest.so.1.14.0`testing::TestInfo::Run() + 405 frame #14: 0x00007ffff7eed457 libgtest.so.1.14.0`testing::TestSuite::Run() + 519 frame #15: 0x00007ffff7efc9e7 libgtest.so.1.14.0`testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() + 1143 frame #16: 0x00007ffff7eed65b libgtest.so.1.14.0`testing::UnitTest::Run() + 123 frame #17: 0x00007ffff7f230c0 libgtest_main.so.1.14.0`main + 64 frame #18: 0x00007ffff7a5a10e libc.so.6`__libc_start_call_main + 126 frame #19: 0x00007ffff7a5a1c9 libc.so.6`__libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.34 + 137 frame #20: 0x00000000004073a5 unit-libnixf-parse`_start + 37 ``` Maybe it's a good idea to bump nixpkgs for the new default meson behavior or enable stdlib assertions with bounds-checking explicitly?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
add README.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: