Inclusivity WG at Node Interactive North America

[hackygolucky]

Purpose

WG meeting at Node Interactive call for attendance and discussion

Proposal

I'd love for those who will be at Node Interactive and would like to talk about the strategy moving forward to have time to do so. I'm going to be filing for time during Collaboration Summit so that there is space allotted for those who are interested in participating in these conversations a private space to do so(you don't have to be a current member of the Inclusivity WG, but there will be guidelines/CoC to help with communicating kindly in this private space). The strategy laid out for the short term is very high level and needs implementation details laid out by the Inclusivity WG and larger community. This would be a great in-person session to get this started in.

Focus

For those of you who missed it, the TSC proposed an investigation into future responsibilities and that task was taken on by @hackygolucky from the Node.js Foundation. The results of that investigation are going to be shared with Inclusivity and the TSC, November 27(the deadline for input from the Board of the Foundation).

If you'll be there, please comment below! It'd be awesome to see a combination of new and legacy faces at the table.

[Trott]

I'll be at Node Interactive in Austin so I should be able to go to this.

[nebrius]

I'll be there.

[Trott]

The results of that investigation are going to be shared with Inclusivity and the TSC,

Would it be possible to share the results here, in the issue tracker? Or, if confidentiality is needed for the time being, perhaps via email to the people listed as WG members in the README?

[hackygolucky]

Ah yes! I should have been explicit in stating it will also be posted at
the same time to the Inclusivity WG. It is most relevant here of all
places.

I'm also happy to seek guidance via email. Thanks @Trott

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016, 7:10 PM Rich Trott notifications@github.com wrote:

The results of that investigation are going to be shared with Inclusivity
and the TSC,

Would it be possible to share the results here, in the issue tracker? Or,
if confidentiality is needed for the time being, perhaps via email to the
people listed as WG members in the README?

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#151 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB46oBM1es3EhXx730IsB1zWhm8yguovks5q_O0GgaJpZM4K122i
.

[Trott]

Is there any reason to wait until the end of the month? Can the results, or a draft, be shared now-ish?

[hackygolucky]

I gave the Board until Nov. 27 to share any feedback before I published it
for the TSC. I guess that certainly does not negate granting access to the
doc for folks interested in the Inclusivity WG and then I can share with
the TSC at large after that date.

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016, 9:58 AM Rich Trott notifications@github.com wrote:

Is there any reason to wait until the end of the month? Can the results,
or a draft, be shared now-ish?

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#151 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB46oORgIY7IdAazdYrS3KUGgT2h8hvSks5q_byxgaJpZM4K122i
.

[nebrius]

FYI I updated openjs-foundation/summit#35 to include the Inclusivity session. For the time being, I listed myself and @hackygolucky as the leads for the session. Does this work for you @hackygolucky? I'm also fine taking either you or myself off as organizers.

[hackygolucky]

Thanks @nebrius! I was waiting to hear back for interest. Sounds great.

[nebrius]

I bet a number of people will be interested. This repo doesn't have many eyes on it anymore, so I wouldn't expect much activity in this thread.

[hackygolucky]

Just signed us up for meeting in "Outside Griffin #1" on Dec. 2, 11am-12pm. Let me know if y'all really want to attend and that conflicts! If we end up hashing it out the afternoon prior at the first afternoon of the summit, that's fine by me, too.