-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
net: use object destructuring #20959
Conversation
lib/net.js
Outdated
var port = options.port; | ||
var localAddress = options.localAddress; | ||
var localPort = options.localPort; | ||
var { host = 'localhost', port, localAddress, localPort } = options; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not exactly the same as before. I think it is fine but host = 'localhost'
!== options.host || 'localhost'
. The first part is only going to set it to localhost in case host is undefined while the latter is going to do that for any falsy value.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not strict equal but doesn't break CI. Should I revert it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would prefer it if we reverted this change, or at least the part with localhost
, other changes LGTM
@@ -244,7 +243,7 @@ function Socket(options) { | |||
|
|||
options.readable = options.readable || false; | |||
options.writable = options.writable || false; | |||
const allowHalfOpen = options.allowHalfOpen; | |||
const { allowHalfOpen } = options; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there consensus that changes like this are desirable? It's not obvious to me that destructuring is better (or worse) than the existing straightforward assignment in this case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Umm... It's just personal preference. I'm free to revert it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Trott I just guessed that you do not block this and it is author-ready. If that is not the case, please remove the label again.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@BridgeAR Correct, not blocking. Thanks for checking.
61c8535
to
c43fca8
Compare
Landed in a69a29d |
PR-URL: #20959 Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #20959 Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes