-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tools: update paths in v8_external_snapshot.gypi #29363
Conversation
Update the paths to source files in v8_external_snapshot.gypi this was broken and went unnoticed since this target is never really built by default. Fixes: nodejs#28964
Me too. Why the CI doesn't fail. Is it we need to enhance in CI or remove the target. |
We never set |
@bnoordhuis perfect! I'll remove the target in that case and update the PR appropriately. |
Closing this in favor of a new PR since that'll be less confusing. |
Delete the v8_external_snapshot target from gyp and disable the v8_use_external_startup_data option since it is never used anyway. Refs: nodejs#29363 (comment) Fixes: nodejs#28964
Delete the v8_external_snapshot target from gyp and disable the v8_use_external_startup_data option since it is never used anyway. Refs: #29363 (comment) Fixes: #28964 PR-URL: #29369 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Delete the v8_external_snapshot target from gyp and disable the v8_use_external_startup_data option since it is never used anyway. Refs: #29363 (comment) Fixes: #28964 PR-URL: #29369 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Update the paths to source files in v8_external_snapshot.gypi this was
broken and went unnoticed since this target is never really built by
default.
Fixes: #28964
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes/cc @refack @gengjiawen
I'm not sure how relevant this is and if CI can even check for this. Maybe we should consider just removing this target at some point?