Support for images inside a step

[jornncc]

First of all, great project and work. Really enjoy the many features, especially promised based before & after support.

Have you considered adding support for letting the user specify images inside a step?

What I found out is that I can use markup inside the content, such as this:

tour.steps = [{ target: '#tour-field-list-container', content: '<strong>When creating reports</strong><br>Select fields by checking the box or dragging to the columns list.', }, {

This would create a dialog looking like this:

Next I was going to try to provide an image tag to see if that would work... but it would be great to be able to provide:
title: <title>,
content: <... the above...>
image:

To build something out of the box...

Thoughts?

[tannerlinsley]

I would first explore making it so directives compile inside the content.
This would give you the ability to extend the content any way you want.
Just build a new component and let it do it's thing. Thoughts?

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:16 AM jornncc notifications@github.com wrote:

First of all, great project and work. Really enjoy the many features,
especially promised based before & after support.

Have you considered adding support for letting the user specify images
inside a step?

What I found out is that I can use markup inside the content, such as this:

tour.steps = [{
target: '#tour-field-list-container',
content: 'When creating reports
Select fields by
checking the box or dragging to the columns list.',
}, {

This would create a dialog looking like this:
[image: screen shot 2016-05-20 at 8 15 06 am]
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/15808559/15432422/08010998-1e63-11e6-8a06-8879e0542387.png

Next I was going to try to provide an image tag to see if that would
work... but it would be great to be able to provide:
title: ,
content: <... the above...>
image:

To
build something out of the box...

Thoughts?

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#28

[jornncc]

That would be much better than my suggestion... That would be awesome.