Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(testing): support cypress 11 #13075

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 9, 2022

Conversation

barbados-clemens
Copy link
Contributor

@barbados-clemens barbados-clemens commented Nov 8, 2022

Current Behavior

Nx does not support cypress 11

Expected Behavior

Nx supports cypress 11

TODO:

  • waiting on v11 to be published to npm

Related Issue(s)

context about CT changes
https://www.cypress.io/blog/2022/11/04/upcoming-changes-to-component-testing/

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 8, 2022

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Updated
nx-dev ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Nov 8, 2022 at 10:40PM (UTC)

@barbados-clemens barbados-clemens self-assigned this Nov 8, 2022
@barbados-clemens barbados-clemens added the scope: testing tools Issues related to Cypress / Jest / Playwright / Vitest support in Nx label Nov 8, 2022
Copy link
Member

@AgentEnder AgentEnder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉 🔥 🚀

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has already been merged/closed. If you experience issues related to these changes, please open a new issue referencing this pull request.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 17, 2023
@barbados-clemens barbados-clemens deleted the feat/cypress-11 branch March 17, 2023 02:40
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
scope: testing tools Issues related to Cypress / Jest / Playwright / Vitest support in Nx
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants