Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes for #100 (stall of transmit logic) and #102 (packet corruption) #103

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 9, 2024

Conversation

ntruchsess
Copy link
Owner

Fixes for #100 and #102

(unfortunally these fixes come with a penalty of 116 bytes flash though...)

@ntruchsess ntruchsess changed the title Fixes for #100 and #102 Fixes for #100 (stall of transmit logic) and #102 (packet corruption) Nov 7, 2014
@DrewJaworskiRIS
Copy link

Are you still planing to merge this request, or do you need more testing to be sure?

@ntruchsess
Copy link
Owner Author

While it seems to work It still needs a bit of refactoring as it implements a retransmit-logic that is useful for UDP packets but unnecessary for TCP (as TCP will retransmit lost packages anyway). Simplifying this part should result in smaller footprint. Unfortunately I'm quite busy these days - hope to have time for this issue during winter-holidays. If you feel you might contribute please go ahead :-)

@GunterO
Copy link

GunterO commented Dec 25, 2014

Well, this version is running rock solid for quite some time now on my projects, I think you nailed the problem. Thanks for all your effort Norbert!
And, happy X-mass :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants