Be able to have user annotations on generated Q&A #1705
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1705 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 82.12% 82.11% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 334 334
Lines 19460 19446 -14
==========================================
- Hits 15982 15968 -14
Misses 3478 3478
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
ccasimiro88
reviewed
Jan 9, 2024
lferran
force-pushed
the
add-qa-annotations
branch
from
52125a1
to
9c1d8e3
Compare
jotare
approved these changes
Jan 9, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Extends HTTP interface to support annotations on QA from the user.
The goal is so that anyone training QA models with nucliadb (i.e: the LLM team at nuclia) have a way to manually annotate paragraphs / cancel QA pairs generated by the model under test.
How was this PR tested?
Integration tests