Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

README and ReadTheDocs feedback #13

Closed
numberoverzero opened this issue Jul 20, 2015 · 1 comment · Fixed by #56
Closed

README and ReadTheDocs feedback #13

numberoverzero opened this issue Jul 20, 2015 · 1 comment · Fixed by #56
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@numberoverzero
Copy link
Owner

There needs to be significant iteration on the docs for bloop before a 1.0 release, as many of the features are unlikely to be needed by the first waves of users (such as contextual config swapping, custom object loading, or even custom types).

@numberoverzero numberoverzero self-assigned this Jul 20, 2015
@numberoverzero numberoverzero added this to the 1.0 milestone Jul 20, 2015
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2016
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2016
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 28, 2016
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 3, 2016
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 3, 2016
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 5, 2016
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 7, 2016
@numberoverzero numberoverzero mentioned this issue Jul 24, 2016
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 6, 2016
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 6, 2016
still TODO: Conditions."Query, Scan"
@numberoverzero
Copy link
Owner Author

numberoverzero commented Aug 7, 2016

Remaining sections:

numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 7, 2016
Comparing the previous documentation to other projects (especially
pytest, flask) I think I was trying to cover absolutely every
aspect, in as much detail as possible.  That seemed reasonable at
the time, because I'm familiar with the code.

Stepping back, it seems unapproachable in its sudden depth.  I'm
going to try another approach that walks through different options
as users might discover them.  That also means staying away from
"this is how DynamoDB works" as much as possible.  That can live in
a section in the future if it's something people want.
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 7, 2016
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 7, 2016
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 7, 2016
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 7, 2016
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 7, 2016
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 7, 2016
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 7, 2016
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 8, 2016
Almost done!  Need to finish Properties in Query/Scan.
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 8, 2016
Didn't know ..attribute existed, and now it's beautiful.
My hacked-together attempt was failing as the notes expanded past
speciying a default value.

:party-parrot:
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2016
Still incomplete in types:

* TypedMap
* Map
* Custom Types
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 10, 2016
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 10, 2016
Now for 05_conditions!  So close!
numberoverzero added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant