Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 1, 2023. It is now read-only.

missing deactivate from virtualenv - nupic-linux64 #366

Closed
breznak opened this issue Oct 31, 2013 · 3 comments
Closed

missing deactivate from virtualenv - nupic-linux64 #366

breznak opened this issue Oct 31, 2013 · 3 comments

Comments

@breznak
Copy link
Member

breznak commented Oct 31, 2013

@oxtopus I need to run virtualenv to get proper version of python, to quit from there it provides deactivate (shell function? it's not a file). Yet, if I run source nupic-linux64/bin/activate in there to get to use this repo, the deactivate works only once (get's me out of nupic-linux64 env..probably?), and I'm stuck in the python env w/o any means to exit. I need to close whole shell session.

Should nupic-linux64 provide it's own version of deactivate, so these stack up and i have 1 for nupic-linux64 and 1 for python env?

Thanks!

@oxtopus
Copy link
Contributor

oxtopus commented Oct 31, 2013

That sounds reasonable. It'd be trivial to rename the command to something
unique to nupic and it's early enough that such a change wouldn't cause
much disruption.

On Wednesday, October 30, 2013, breznak wrote:

@oxtopus https://github.com/oxtopus I need to run virtualenv to get
proper version of python, to quit from there it provides deactivate (shell
function? it's not a file). Yet, if I run source nupic-linux64/bin/activate
in there to get to use this repo, the deactivate works only once (get's me
out of nupic-linux64 env..probably?), and I'm stuck in the python env w/o
any means to exit. I need to close whole shell session.

Should nupic-linux64 provide it's own version of deactivate, so these
stack up and i have 1 for nupic-linux64 and 1 for python env?

Thanks!


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/366
.

@breznak
Copy link
Member Author

breznak commented Oct 31, 2013

👍 thank you, that'd be great.

@breznak
Copy link
Member Author

breznak commented Nov 5, 2013

already fixed by @oxtopus in 9e4df07ee03184d670a88, thank you! (PS: I noticed just now, didnt know you fixed it aready :) )
@rhyolight this bug is successfully resolved. Closing.

@breznak breznak closed this as completed Nov 5, 2013
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants