Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is it possible to build without docker, or with the docker alternative podman #8

Open
dko1905 opened this issue Oct 26, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@dko1905
Copy link

dko1905 commented Oct 26, 2021

What the title says.

@nuta
Copy link
Owner

nuta commented Oct 26, 2021

Docker is used to avoid dealing with boring build errors. I haven't tried yet podman but I believe replacing Docker with it is not that difficult.

nuta added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 4, 2021
It helps where an error is constructed:

[   0.585] [7:curl] syscall: close(ffffffffffffffff, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
[   0.585] WARN: close: error: EBADF: This error originates from:
    #1: ffff800000184219  kerla::printk::capture_backtrace()+0x79
    #2: ffff8000001dbb13  kerla::result::Error::new()+0x23
    #3: ffff8000001dc0e7  <kerla::result::Error as c...la::result::Errno>>::from()+0x17
    #4: ffff800000211177  <T as core::convert::Into<U>>::into()+0x17
    #5: ffff8000001fcb55  kerla::fs::opened_file::OpenedFileTable::close()+0xa5
    #6: ffff80000010b124  kerla::syscalls::close::<i...yscallHandler>::sys_close()+0xa4
    #7: ffff80000011bf62  kerla::syscalls::SyscallHandler::do_dispatch()+0x4e62
    #8: ffff8000001168fc  kerla::syscalls::SyscallHandler::dispatch()+0x1ac
@nuta nuta removed the enhancement label Nov 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants