mesh_rssi_threshold #32
Comments
|
Can you please apply this patch. It should fix the problem. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg109812.html Chun-Yeow On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:19 AM, ansanto notifications@github.com wrote:
|
|
Ok, I'll patch nl80211.c openwrt version according to your tip. Antonio |
mporsch
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 18, 2013
There is a loop in do_mlockall() that lacks a preemption point, which
means that the following can happen on non-preemptible builds of the
kernel. Dave Jones reports:
"My fuzz tester keeps hitting this. Every instance shows the non-irq
stack came in from mlockall. I'm only seeing this on one box, but
that has more ram (8gb) than my other machines, which might explain
it.
INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU { 3} (t=6500 jiffies g=470344 c=470343 q=0)
sending NMI to all CPUs:
NMI backtrace for cpu 3
CPU: 3 PID: 29664 Comm: trinity-child2 Not tainted 3.11.0-rc1+ #32
Call Trace:
lru_add_drain_all+0x15/0x20
SyS_mlockall+0xa5/0x1a0
tracesys+0xdd/0xe2"
This commit addresses this problem by inserting the required preemption
point.
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
silverjam
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 19, 2013
There is a loop in do_mlockall() that lacks a preemption point, which
means that the following can happen on non-preemptible builds of the
kernel:
> My fuzz tester keeps hitting this. Every instance shows the non-irq stack
> came in from mlockall. I'm only seeing this on one box, but that has more
> ram (8gb) than my other machines, which might explain it.
>
> Dave
>
> INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU { 3} (t=6500 jiffies g=470344 c=470343 q=0)
> sending NMI to all CPUs:
> NMI backtrace for cpu 3
> CPU: 3 PID: 29664 Comm: trinity-child2 Not tainted 3.11.0-rc1+ #32
> task: ffff88023e743fc0 ti: ffff88022f6f2000 task.ti: ffff88022f6f2000
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810bf7d1>] [<ffffffff810bf7d1>] trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x21/0xb0
> RSP: 0018:ffff880244e03c30 EFLAGS: 00000046
> RAX: ffff88023e743fc0 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 000000000000003c
> RDX: 000000000000000f RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffffffff81033cab
> RBP: ffff880244e03c38 R08: ffff880243288a80 R09: 0000000000000001
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff880243288a80
> R13: ffff8802437eda40 R14: 0000000000080000 R15: 000000000000d010
> FS: 00007f50ae33b740(0000) GS:ffff880244e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 000000000097f000 CR3: 0000000240fa0000 CR4: 00000000001407e0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600
> Stack:
> ffffffff810bf86d ffff880244e03c98 ffffffff81033cab 0000000000000096
> 000000000000d008 0000000300000002 0000000000000004 0000000000000003
> 0000000000002710 ffffffff81c50d00 ffffffff81c50d00 ffff880244fcde00
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ>
> [<ffffffff810bf86d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10
> [<ffffffff81033cab>] __x2apic_send_IPI_mask+0x1ab/0x1c0
> [<ffffffff81033cdc>] x2apic_send_IPI_all+0x1c/0x20
> [<ffffffff81030115>] arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace+0x65/0xa0
> [<ffffffff811144b1>] rcu_check_callbacks+0x331/0x8e0
> [<ffffffff8108bfa0>] ? hrtimer_run_queues+0x20/0x180
> [<ffffffff8109e905>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xb5/0x100
> [<ffffffff81069557>] update_process_times+0x47/0x80
> [<ffffffff810bd115>] tick_sched_handle.isra.16+0x25/0x60
> [<ffffffff810bd231>] tick_sched_timer+0x41/0x60
> [<ffffffff8108ace1>] __run_hrtimer+0x81/0x4e0
> [<ffffffff810bd1f0>] ? tick_sched_do_timer+0x60/0x60
> [<ffffffff8108b93f>] hrtimer_interrupt+0xff/0x240
> [<ffffffff8102de84>] local_apic_timer_interrupt+0x34/0x60
> [<ffffffff81718c5f>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x3f/0x60
> [<ffffffff817178ef>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x80
> [<ffffffff8170e8e0>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
> [<ffffffff8105f101>] ? __do_softirq+0xb1/0x440
> [<ffffffff8105f64d>] irq_exit+0xcd/0xe0
> [<ffffffff81718c65>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x45/0x60
> [<ffffffff817178ef>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x80
> <EOI>
> [<ffffffff8170e8e0>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
> [<ffffffff8170b830>] ? wait_for_completion_killable+0x170/0x170
> [<ffffffff8170c853>] ? preempt_schedule_irq+0x53/0x90
> [<ffffffff8170e9f6>] retint_kernel+0x26/0x30
> [<ffffffff8107a523>] ? queue_work_on+0x43/0x90
> [<ffffffff8107c369>] schedule_on_each_cpu+0xc9/0x1a0
> [<ffffffff81167770>] ? lru_add_drain+0x50/0x50
> [<ffffffff811677c5>] lru_add_drain_all+0x15/0x20
> [<ffffffff81186965>] SyS_mlockall+0xa5/0x1a0
> [<ffffffff81716e94>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
This commit addresses this problem by inserting the required preemption
point.
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
silverjam
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 19, 2013
As the new x86 CPU bootup printout format code maintainer, I am taking immediate action to improve and clean (and thus indulge my OCD) the reporting of the cores when coming up online. Fix padding to a right-hand alignment, cleanup code and bind reporting width to the max number of supported CPUs on the system, like this: [ 0.074509] smpboot: Booting Node 0, Processors: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 OK [ 0.644008] smpboot: Booting Node 1, Processors: #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 OK [ 1.245006] smpboot: Booting Node 2, Processors: #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 OK [ 1.864005] smpboot: Booting Node 3, Processors: #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 OK [ 2.489005] smpboot: Booting Node 4, Processors: #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 OK [ 3.093005] smpboot: Booting Node 5, Processors: #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 OK [ 3.698005] smpboot: Booting Node 6, Processors: #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 OK [ 4.304005] smpboot: Booting Node 7, Processors: #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 OK [ 4.961413] Brought up 64 CPUs and this: [ 0.072367] smpboot: Booting Node 0, Processors: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 OK [ 0.686329] Brought up 8 CPUs Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Libin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> Cc: wangyijing@huawei.com Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: guohanjun@huawei.com Cc: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130927143554.GF4422@pd.tnic Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
silverjam
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 19, 2013
Turn it into (for example): [ 0.073380] x86: Booting SMP configuration: [ 0.074005] .... node #0, CPUs: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 [ 0.603005] .... node #1, CPUs: #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 [ 1.200005] .... node #2, CPUs: #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 [ 1.796005] .... node #3, CPUs: #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 [ 2.393005] .... node #4, CPUs: #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 [ 2.996005] .... node #5, CPUs: #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 [ 3.600005] .... node #6, CPUs: #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 [ 4.202005] .... node #7, CPUs: #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 [ 4.811005] .... node #8, CPUs: #64 #65 #66 #67 #68 #69 #70 #71 [ 5.421006] .... node #9, CPUs: #72 #73 #74 #75 #76 #77 #78 #79 [ 6.032005] .... node #10, CPUs: #80 #81 #82 #83 #84 #85 #86 #87 [ 6.648006] .... node #11, CPUs: #88 #89 #90 #91 #92 #93 #94 #95 [ 7.262005] .... node #12, CPUs: #96 #97 #98 #99 #100 #101 #102 #103 [ 7.865005] .... node #13, CPUs: #104 #105 #106 #107 #108 #109 #110 #111 [ 8.466005] .... node #14, CPUs: #112 #113 #114 #115 #116 #117 #118 #119 [ 9.073006] .... node #15, CPUs: #120 #121 #122 #123 #124 #125 #126 #127 [ 9.679901] x86: Booted up 16 nodes, 128 CPUs and drop useless elements. Change num_digits() to hpa's division-avoiding, cell-phone-typed version which he went at great lengths and pains to submit on a Saturday evening. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: huawei.libin@huawei.com Cc: wangyijing@huawei.com Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: guohanjun@huawei.com Cc: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130930095624.GB16383@pd.tnic Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
silverjam
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 19, 2013
The 'driver' field of the i2c_client struct is redundant. The same data can be accessed through to_i2c_driver(client->dev.driver). The generated code for both approaches in more or less the same. E.g. on ARM the expression client->driver->command(...) generates ... ldr r3, [r0, #28] ldr r3, [r3, #32] blx r3 ... and the expression to_i2c_driver(client->dev.driver)->command(...) generates ... ldr r3, [r0, #160] ldr r3, [r3, #-4] blx r3 ... Other architectures will generate similar code. All users of the 'driver' field outside of the I2C core have already been converted. So this only leaves the core itself. This patch converts the remaining few users in the I2C core and then removes the 'driver' field from the i2c_client struct. Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
silverjam
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 19, 2013
There is a defect in imx6 LPM design. When SW tries to enter low power mode with following sequence, the chip will enter low power mode before A9 CPU execute WFI instruction: 1. Set CCM_CLPCR[1:0] to 2'b00; 2. ARM CPU enters WFI; 3. ARM CPU wakeup from an interrupt event, which is masked by GPC or not visible to GPC, such as interrupt from local timer; 4. Set CCM_CLPCR[1:0] to 2'b01 or 2'b10; 5. ARM CPU execute WFI. Before the last step, the chip will enter WAIT mode if CCM_CLPCR[1:0] is set to 2'b01, or enter STOP mode if CCM_CLPCR[1:0] is set to 2'b10. The patch implements a recommended workaround for this issue. 1. SW triggers irq #32(IOMUX) to be always pending manually by setting IOMUX_GPR1_GINT bit; 2. SW should then unmask it in GPC before setting CCM LPM; 3. SW should mask it right after CCM LPM is set (bit0-1 of CCM_CLPCR). Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
ctwitty
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 13, 2014
Lockdep complains about btrfs's async commit: [ 2372.462171] [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] [ 2372.462191] 3.12.0+ #32 Tainted: G W [ 2372.462209] ------------------------------------- [ 2372.462228] ceph-osd/14048 is trying to release lock (sb_internal) at: [ 2372.462275] [<ffffffffa022cb10>] btrfs_commit_transaction_async+0x1b0/0x2a0 [btrfs] [ 2372.462305] but there are no more locks to release! [ 2372.462324] [ 2372.462324] other info that might help us debug this: [ 2372.462349] no locks held by ceph-osd/14048. [ 2372.462367] [ 2372.462367] stack backtrace: [ 2372.462386] CPU: 2 PID: 14048 Comm: ceph-osd Tainted: G W 3.12.0+ #32 [ 2372.462414] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./To be filled by O.E.M., BIOS 080015 11/09/2011 [ 2372.462455] ffffffffa022cb10 ffff88007490fd28 ffffffff816f094a ffff8800378aa320 [ 2372.462491] ffff88007490fd50 ffffffff810adf4c ffff8800378aa320 ffff88009af97650 [ 2372.462526] ffffffffa022cb10 ffff88007490fd88 ffffffff810b01ee ffff8800898c0000 [ 2372.462562] Call Trace: [ 2372.462584] [<ffffffffa022cb10>] ? btrfs_commit_transaction_async+0x1b0/0x2a0 [btrfs] [ 2372.462619] [<ffffffff816f094a>] dump_stack+0x45/0x56 [ 2372.462642] [<ffffffff810adf4c>] print_unlock_imbalance_bug+0xec/0x100 [ 2372.462677] [<ffffffffa022cb10>] ? btrfs_commit_transaction_async+0x1b0/0x2a0 [btrfs] [ 2372.462710] [<ffffffff810b01ee>] lock_release+0x18e/0x210 [ 2372.462742] [<ffffffffa022cb36>] btrfs_commit_transaction_async+0x1d6/0x2a0 [btrfs] [ 2372.462783] [<ffffffffa025a7ce>] btrfs_ioctl_start_sync+0x3e/0xc0 [btrfs] [ 2372.462822] [<ffffffffa025f1d3>] btrfs_ioctl+0x4c3/0x1f70 [btrfs] [ 2372.462849] [<ffffffff812c0321>] ? avc_has_perm+0x121/0x1b0 [ 2372.462873] [<ffffffff812c0224>] ? avc_has_perm+0x24/0x1b0 [ 2372.462897] [<ffffffff8107ecc8>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xa8/0x100 [ 2372.462922] [<ffffffff8117b145>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2e5/0x4e0 [ 2372.462946] [<ffffffff812c19e6>] ? file_has_perm+0x86/0xa0 [ 2372.462969] [<ffffffff8117b3c1>] SyS_ioctl+0x81/0xa0 [ 2372.462991] [<ffffffff817045a4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2 ==================================================== It's because that we don't do the right thing when checking if it's ok to tell lockdep that we're trying to release the rwsem. If the trans handle's type is TRANS_ATTACH, we won't acquire the freeze rwsem, but as TRANS_ATTACH fits the check (trans < TRANS_JOIN_NOLOCK), we'll release the freeze rwsem, which makes lockdep complains a lot. Reported-by: Ma Jianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
ctwitty
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 13, 2014
Improve the comment of SW workaround for CCM lpm issue using hardware errata description to avoid confusion. ERR007265: CCM: When improper low-power sequence is used, the SoC enters low power mode before the ARM core executes WFI. Software workaround: 1) Software should trigger IRQ #32 (IOMUX) to be always pending by setting IOMUX_GPR1_GINT. 2) Software should then unmask IRQ #32 in GPC before setting CCM Low-Power mode. 3) Software should mask IRQ #32 right after CCM Low-Power mode is set (set bits 0-1 of CCM_CLPCR). Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <b20788@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
ctwitty
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 26, 2014
I can trigger a lockdep warning: # mount -t cgroup -o cpuset xxx /cgroup # mkdir /cgroup/cpuset # mkdir /cgroup/tmp # echo 0 > /cgroup/tmp/cpuset.cpus # echo 0 > /cgroup/tmp/cpuset.mems # echo 1 > /cgroup/tmp/cpuset.memory_migrate # echo $$ > /cgroup/tmp/tasks # echo 1 > /cgruop/tmp/cpuset.mems =============================== [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ] 3.14.0-rc1-0.1-default+ #32 Not tainted ------------------------------- include/linux/cgroup.h:682 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! ... [<ffffffff81582174>] dump_stack+0x72/0x86 [<ffffffff810b8f01>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x101/0x140 [<ffffffff81105ba1>] cpuset_migrate_mm+0xb1/0xe0 ... We used to hold cgroup_mutex when calling cpuset_migrate_mm(), but now we hold cpuset_mutex, which causes task_css() to complain. This is not a false-positive but a real issue. Holding cpuset_mutex won't prevent a task from migrating to another cpuset, and it won't prevent the original task->cgroup from destroying during this change. Fixes: 5d21cc2 (cpuset: replace cgroup_mutex locking with cpuset internal locking) Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+ Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> Sigend-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
ctwitty
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 26, 2014
When doing some numa tests on powerpc, I triggered an oops bug. I find it is caused by using page->_last_cpupid. It should be initialized as "-1 & LAST_CPUPID_MASK", but not "-1". Otherwise, in task_numa_fault(), we will miss the checking (last_cpupid == (-1 & LAST_CPUPID_MASK)). And finally cause an oops bug in task_numa_group(), since the online cpu is less than possible cpu. This happen with CONFIG_SPARSE_VMEMMAP disabled Call trace: SMP NR_CPUS=64 NUMA PowerNV Modules linked in: CPU: 24 PID: 804 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted3.13.0-rc1+ #32 task: c000001e2746aa80 ti: c000001e32c50000 task.ti:c000001e32c50000 REGS: c000001e32c53510 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted(3.13.0-rc1+) MSR: 9000000000009032 <SF,HV,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI> CR:28024424 XER: 20000000 CFAR: c000000000009324 DAR: 7265717569726857 DSISR:40000000 SOFTE: 1 NIP .task_numa_fault+0x1470/0x2370 LR .task_numa_fault+0x1468/0x2370 Call Trace: .task_numa_fault+0x1468/0x2370 (unreliable) .do_numa_page+0x480/0x4a0 .handle_mm_fault+0x4ec/0xc90 .do_page_fault+0x3a8/0x890 handle_page_fault+0x10/0x30 Instruction dump: 3c82fefb 3884b138 48d9cff1 60000000 48000574 3c62fefb3863af78 3c82fefb 3884b138 48d9cfd5 60000000 e93f0100 <812902e4> 7d2907b45529063e 7d2a07b4 ---[ end trace 15f2510da5ae07cf ]--- Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan <pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Using compat-wireless 2013-06-27 (from mirror openwrt) I can't set the rssi threshold by negative values, i.e. entering:
iw dev wlan0-2 set mesh_param mesh_rssi_threshold=-70
I get the error message:
command failed: Invalid argument (-22)
Previous compat-wireless 2012-04-17 gives no error and succesfully shows that negative value in iw dev get mesh_param.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: