Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RHELC-1173] Replace the word skip in report messages #990

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 30, 2024

Conversation

pr-watson
Copy link
Contributor

@pr-watson pr-watson commented Nov 22, 2023

This PR replaces the use of 'skip' and 'skipping' with 'Did not perform' in the preconversion analysis report messages so as to not create confusion with the skip status put in place for when we cannot run an action because another one failed.

Jira Issues: RHELC-1173

Checklist

  • PR has been tested manually in a VM (either author or reviewer)
  • Jira issue has been made public if possible
  • [RHELC-] is part of the PR title
  • GitHub label has been added to help with Release notes
  • PR title explains the change from the user's point of view
  • Code and tests are documented properly
  • The commits are squashed to as few commits as possible (without losing data)
  • When merged: Jira issue has been updated to Release Pending if relevant

@pr-watson pr-watson added kind/feature New feature or request tests/all Run the full test suite. Equivalent to `/packit test`. labels Nov 22, 2023
@has-bot
Copy link
Member

has-bot commented Nov 22, 2023

/packit test


@oamg/conversions-qe please review results and provide ack.

@pr-watson pr-watson changed the title [RHELC-1173] Replace the word 'skip' in report messages with 'Do not … [RHELC-1173] Replace the word 'skip' in report messages Nov 22, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 22, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (0309446) 94.35% compared to head (c46394d) 94.35%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #990   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.35%   94.35%           
=======================================
  Files          47       47           
  Lines        4588     4588           
  Branches      819      819           
=======================================
  Hits         4329     4329           
  Misses        182      182           
  Partials       77       77           
Flag Coverage Δ
centos-linux-7 89.57% <90.00%> (ø)
centos-linux-8 90.56% <100.00%> (ø)
centos-linux-9 90.62% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Venefilyn
Copy link
Member

Needs rebase

@pr-watson pr-watson force-pushed the rename-skip branch 3 times, most recently from d3dcb44 to e03bf69 Compare January 24, 2024 17:00
@Venefilyn
Copy link
Member

/packit test

@Venefilyn Venefilyn changed the title [RHELC-1173] Replace the word 'skip' in report messages [RHELC-1173] Replace the word skip in report messages Jan 25, 2024
@Venefilyn
Copy link
Member

Integration tests failing, likely some integration tests need to be updated. Not on VPN atm

@pr-watson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated integration tests, thanks @SpyTec

@pr-watson
Copy link
Contributor Author

/packit test

Copy link
Member

@Venefilyn Venefilyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing integration test updates in test_verify_latest_kernel_check_passes_with_failed_repoquery() in test_kernel_check_verification.py

@pr-watson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Missing integration test updates in test_verify_latest_kernel_check_passes_with_failed_repoquery() in test_kernel_check_verification.py

Good catch, thanks I just updated it

@Venefilyn
Copy link
Member

/packit test

@Venefilyn Venefilyn merged commit f1e097c into oamg:main Jan 30, 2024
52 of 57 checks passed
@Venefilyn Venefilyn mentioned this pull request Feb 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature New feature or request merge-after-tests-ok tests/all Run the full test suite. Equivalent to `/packit test`.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants