Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/ADF-421/Extend remote list with extra optional parameter to define dependency field #107

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 12, 2021

Conversation

shpran
Copy link
Contributor

@shpran shpran commented Aug 7, 2021

Relates to: ADF-421

  • Extend remote list with extra optional parameter to define dependency field
  • Add and configure feature flag for this feature

Require PR: oat-sa/tao-core#3045

@shpran shpran force-pushed the feature/adf-421/remote-list-dependency-uri branch from f2422d9 to fa06398 Compare August 8, 2021 22:27
@github-actions
Copy link

Version

Target Version 6.2.0
Last version 6.1.0

There are 0 BREAKING CHANGE, 1 feature, 0 fix

Copy link
Contributor

@boajer boajer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • New code is covered by tests (if applicable)
  • Tests are running successfully (old and new ones) on my local machine (if applicable)
  • New code is respecting code style rules
  • New code is respecting best practices
  • New code is not subject to concurrency issues (if applicable)
  • Feature is working correctly on my local machine (if applicable)
  • Acceptance criteria are respected
  • Pull request title and description are meaningful

$class->setPropertyValue($propertySource, $values[tao_actions_form_RemoteList::FIELD_ITEM_URI_PATH]);

if ($this->isListsDependencyEnabled()) {
$propertySource = new RdfProperty(RemoteSourcedListOntology::PROPERTY_DEPENDENCY_ITEM_URI_PATH);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This means we are duplicating data from the new table also in statements table?

Copy link
Contributor

@gabrielfs7 gabrielfs7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • New code is covered by tests (if applicable)
  • Tests are running successfully (old and new ones) on my local machine (if applicable)
  • New code is respecting code style rules
  • New code is respecting best practices
  • New code is not subject to concurrency issues (if applicable)
  • Feature is working correctly on my local machine (if applicable)
  • Acceptance criteria are respected
  • Pull request title and description are meaningful

Copy link
Contributor

@chinnu-focaloid chinnu-focaloid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • New code is covered by tests (if applicable)
  • Tests are running successfully (old and new ones) on my local machine (if applicable)
  • New code is respecting code style rules
  • New code is respecting best practices
  • New code is not subject to concurrency issues (if applicable)
  • Feature is working correctly on my local machine (if applicable)
  • Acceptance criteria are respected
  • Pull request title and description are meaningful

@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
"require": {
"oat-sa/oatbox-extension-installer": "~1.1||dev-master",
"oat-sa/generis" : ">=14.0.0",
"oat-sa/tao-core" : ">=47.0.0"
"oat-sa/tao-core" : ">=48.23.0"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Make sure to validate the version before merge

@shpran shpran merged commit 481e533 into develop Aug 12, 2021
@shpran shpran deleted the feature/adf-421/remote-list-dependency-uri branch August 12, 2021 11:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants