WBls ontology: no 'cleavage stage' ?

[ANiknejad]

Hello,

I am wondering why

WBls:0000006
name: 1-cell embryo Ce (C elegans)

up to

WBls:0000085
name: 24-cell embryo Ce

are all part_of WBls:0000005 ! blastula embryo Ce, without any previous 'cleavage stage'?

(not sure I should post here, or maybe there?
https://github.com/draciti/Life-stage-obo
sounds not active for issues anyway...)

[uberon]

On obofoundry.org/ontology/wbls.html we don't have a tracker listed, but
we do have
https://raw.github.com/draciti/Life-stage-obo/master/worm_development.obo
listed as being the source for the build, so that would probably be the
best tracker to use.

We also have Web registered as the contact but the GitHub repo is
Daniela's. Daniela, should we have you registered in OBO?

On 25 Jul 2016, at 6:22, ANiknejad wrote:

Hello,

I am wondering why

WBls:0000006
name: 1-cell embryo Ce (C elegans)

up to

WBls:0000085
name: 24-cell embryo Ce

are all part_of WBls:0000005 ! blastula embryo Ce, without any
previous 'cleavage stage'?

(not sure I should post here, or maybe there?
https://github.com/draciti/Life-stage-obo
sounds not active for issues anyway...)

---

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#35

[fbastian]

I believe this a related to "cleavage" in nematode having a slightly different meaning than in other species? @aechchiki should have information about this.