Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document/check behaviour of egeria cohort if Kafka becomes unavailable #6813

Closed
planetf1 opened this issue Aug 17, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed
Labels
message-bus message bus, async processessing, topics no-issue-activity Issues automatically marked as stale because they have not had recent activity. performance Performance & Scalability/reliability related

Comments

@planetf1
Copy link
Member

#6791 addressed some issues with server startup & Kafka availability
#5471 proposes a framework for checking connector status

This issue is being opened to clarify how Egeria currently behaves if Kafka becomes unavailable during normal operation.

This needs to be documented, we need to check the behaviour is reasonable, and ensure appropriate information is available for any orchestrating environments (k8s, other apps) to act.

Opening to track discussion/investigation

@planetf1 planetf1 self-assigned this Aug 24, 2022
@planetf1 planetf1 added message-bus message bus, async processessing, topics security Security related (high priority) labels Aug 24, 2022
@planetf1 planetf1 added performance Performance & Scalability/reliability related and removed security Security related (high priority) labels Sep 30, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 20 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-issue-activity Issues automatically marked as stale because they have not had recent activity. label Nov 30, 2022
@planetf1 planetf1 removed the no-issue-activity Issues automatically marked as stale because they have not had recent activity. label Nov 30, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 20 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-issue-activity Issues automatically marked as stale because they have not had recent activity. label Jan 30, 2023
@planetf1 planetf1 removed the no-issue-activity Issues automatically marked as stale because they have not had recent activity. label Feb 6, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 8, 2023

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 20 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-issue-activity Issues automatically marked as stale because they have not had recent activity. label Apr 8, 2023
@planetf1 planetf1 removed the no-issue-activity Issues automatically marked as stale because they have not had recent activity. label Apr 14, 2023
@planetf1 planetf1 removed their assignment May 15, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 20 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-issue-activity Issues automatically marked as stale because they have not had recent activity. label Jul 15, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Aug 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
message-bus message bus, async processessing, topics no-issue-activity Issues automatically marked as stale because they have not had recent activity. performance Performance & Scalability/reliability related
Projects
No open projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant