Support Chinese time

[quxiaolong1504]

Support Chinese time parse

Example:

AfterTime

后天中午
下月6号

Weekday

下周三 下下周二

[quxiaolong1504]

@olebedev here

[olebedev]

Hey @quxiaolong1504,

Thank you for your contribution. However, I am not sure if I am qualified to verify the language-specific stuff here. From the perspective of the code structure and testing it looks good to me 👍

Before merging, I would like to see some test results. Can you rebase of this #31 so we can see in it your PR?

[quxiaolong1504]

Hello @olebedev i rebase #31 . But the test was not triggered.

[olebedev]

No idea why it hasn't been triggered. I checked out the branch and got an error:

λ go test ./...
?   	github.com/olebedev/when	[no test files]
?   	github.com/olebedev/when/rules	[no test files]
ok  	github.com/olebedev/when/rules/br	0.724s
ok  	github.com/olebedev/when/rules/common	0.522s
ok  	github.com/olebedev/when/rules/en	1.318s
ok  	github.com/olebedev/when/rules/ru	1.029s
--- FAIL: TestExactMonthDate (0.00s)
    require.go:157: 
        	Error Trace:	zh_test.go:24
        	            				exact_month_test.go:33
        	Error:      	Not equal: 
        	            	expected: 0
        	            	actual  : 3
        	Test:       	TestExactMonthDate
        	Messages:   	[zh.ExactMonthDate] index #6
FAIL
FAIL	github.com/olebedev/when/rules/zh	1.517s
FAIL

[5idu]

How is the issue going, this function is really great, looking forward to it!

[olebedev]

@quxiaolong1504, friendly ping

[olebedev]

Hello @5idu,

I noticed your interest in this feature. Would you be willing to take over from @quxiaolong1504 and work on it? I believe this is the only remaining step needed to complete it. That would be fantastic while we wait for @quxiaolong1504.

Best regards,
Oleg

[RexSkz]

I'm also interested in this feature. I just found that test cases are triggered, but there's a bug in the code:

The source "十一月一日" (Nov 1st) is parsed to "一月一日" (Jan 1st), and the index is also wrong.

I'd like to help fixing it~

[olebedev]

Hey @quxiaolong1504, do you think this one is still relevant, given we already have most of the change landed in this #39 PR? Feel free to close it, if you think it's appropriate :)