Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request to Add a oneAPI Sample Jacobi #487

Closed
nsaiapova opened this issue Apr 30, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #506
Closed

Request to Add a oneAPI Sample Jacobi #487

nsaiapova opened this issue Apr 30, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #506
Assignees
Labels
approved enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@nsaiapova
Copy link
Contributor

nsaiapova commented Apr 30, 2021

Summary

This is a request for a new code Sample called Jacobi.

Purpose

The sample code contains several bugs, so our users can try the debugger to find and fix real bugs in this sample.

Domain

Tools / ApplicationDebugger

Description

This is a new sample for the Application debugger. It is more complicated than the Array transform and has several bugs introduced intentionally.
The program solves the linear equation Ax=b, where matrix A is a n x n sparse matrix with diagonals [1 1 4 1 1], vector b is set such that the solution is a [1 1 ... 1]^T. The linear system is solved via Jacobi iteration. Each Jacobi iteration submits a kernel to the device (CPU, GPU, FPGA).
@barisaktemur
@JoeOster

Dependencies

oneAPI BaseKit: DPCPP compiler

Proposed folder Location

Tools/ApplicationDebugger/jacobi

@nsaiapova nsaiapova added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 30, 2021
@JoeOster
Copy link
Contributor

JoeOster commented May 7, 2021

Presented to and approved by the samples Working group on 05/07/21

@JoeOster JoeOster linked a pull request May 20, 2021 that will close this issue
17 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants