Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to flow-go v0.34.0-crescendo-preview.1 #16

Merged

Conversation

turbolent
Copy link
Member

@turbolent turbolent requested a review from a team February 20, 2024 21:41
@turbolent turbolent changed the title Update to Cadence v1.0.0-M7 Update to flow-go v0.34.0-crescendo-preview.1 Feb 20, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (48af911) 58.62% compared to head (cbd96e9) 58.62%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                   Coverage Diff                   @@
##           feature/stable-cadence      #16   +/-   ##
=======================================================
  Coverage                   58.62%   58.62%           
=======================================================
  Files                          29       29           
  Lines                        2202     2202           
=======================================================
  Hits                         1291     1291           
  Misses                        725      725           
  Partials                      186      186           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 58.62% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@turbolent turbolent merged commit cd94206 into feature/stable-cadence Feb 20, 2024
2 checks passed
@turbolent turbolent deleted the auto-update-onflow-cadence-v1.0.0-M7 branch February 20, 2024 21:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants