-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
handle pkgs with no timestamps #12
Conversation
@@ -41,6 +41,20 @@ def conda_search_result(): | |||
subdir : linux-ppc64le | |||
url : https://repo.anaconda.com/pkgs/main/linux-ppc64le/ | |||
md5 : 4691146ff587f371f83f0e7bab93b63b | |||
dependencies: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added a no timestamp version here too, though its not really a problem when doing env file validation at the moment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Looks like it will prefer results that have timestamps, if there's ever one that doesn't and one that does, which is probably good.
yeah - at this point we''re assuming only mistaken or old out of date packages have missing timestamps. |
Checklist before submitting
Description
Some packages in defaults don't have timestamps!
For example:
cookies-2.2.1-py36_0.tar.bz2
This checks for a timestamp before doing checks with it.
Review process to land