-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 231
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace date-fns
by date-and-time-formatter
#443
Conversation
date-fns
by date-and-time-formatter
7fd13e6
to
28f51ae
Compare
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ const args = yargs(argsBeforeSep) | |||
}, | |||
'timestamp-format': { | |||
alias: 't', | |||
describe: 'Specify the timestamp in moment/date-fns format.', | |||
describe: 'Specify the timestamp in Unicode LDML format.', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While this is technically correct, I wonder how many people won't know how to find usage examples for LDML.
For instance, for me, Google returns one result for "unicode ldml" in the first page that is more "straight to the point" IMO:
https://stackoverflow.com/q/39904392/2083599
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point! Should we explicitly link https://unicode.org/reports/tr35/tr35-dates.html#Date_Format_Patterns in this description?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably, but i'm worried it might not be formatted well by yargs.
Something like #445 (or better) is looking promising now...
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ export type ConcurrentlyOptions = BaseConcurrentlyOptions & { | |||
|
|||
/** | |||
* Date format used when logging date/time. | |||
* @see https://date-fns.org/v2.0.1/docs/format | |||
* @see https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/tr35-dates.html#Date_Field_Symbol_Table |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
* @see https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/tr35-dates.html#Date_Field_Symbol_Table | |
* @see https://unicode.org/reports/tr35/tr35-dates.html#Date_Format_Patterns |
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ export const success = 'all' as SuccessCondition; | |||
|
|||
/** | |||
* Date format used when logging date/time. | |||
* @see https://date-fns.org/v2.0.1/docs/format | |||
* @see https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/tr35-dates.html#Date_Field_Symbol_Table |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
* @see https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/tr35-dates.html#Date_Field_Symbol_Table | |
* @see https://unicode.org/reports/tr35/tr35-dates.html#Date_Format_Patterns |
@@ -346,7 +348,7 @@ For more details, visit https://github.com/open-cli-tools/concurrently | |||
Anything else means all processes should exit successfully. | |||
- `restartTries`: how many attempts to restart a process that dies will be made. Default: `0`. | |||
- `restartDelay`: how many milliseconds to wait between process restarts. Default: `0`. | |||
- `timestampFormat`: a [date-fns format](https://date-fns.org/v2.0.1/docs/format) | |||
- `timestampFormat`: a [Unicode LDML format](https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/tr35-dates.html#Date_Field_Symbol_Table) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- `timestampFormat`: a [Unicode LDML format](https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/tr35-dates.html#Date_Field_Symbol_Table) | |
- `timestampFormat`: a [Unicode LDML date format](https://unicode.org/reports/tr35/tr35-dates.html#Date_Format_Patterns) |
It would be helpful to either upgrade to Thanks everyone!! |
Hey! This is now fixed in v9.0.0. |
Fixes #436
Backwards-compatible because
date-fns
follows Unicode LDML too (well, more or less https://blog.date-fns.org/v2-unicode-tokens/)