Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue996 hydronictest #997

Merged
merged 67 commits into from
Jul 14, 2020
Merged

Issue996 hydronictest #997

merged 67 commits into from
Jul 14, 2020

Conversation

Mathadon
Copy link
Member

this is for #996

further revisions are still required

@dhblum can you comment further on the remaining features that still have to be added?

- added occupancy schedule
- assigned units to inputs and outputs
- finite heater capacity
- added pressure drop for radiator
@Mathadon Mathadon self-assigned this Mar 21, 2019
@dhblum
Copy link
Contributor

dhblum commented Mar 29, 2019

I emailed to you Review 2 using BOPTEST review guide.

Discussion of any additional remaining features forthcoming soon.

@damienpicard
Copy link
Contributor

So, shall I still wait before looking at it then?

@Mathadon
Copy link
Member Author

Mathadon commented May 2, 2019

@damienpicard indeed no need to merge/review this yet

@dhblum
Copy link
Contributor

dhblum commented Jun 17, 2020

I think PI reference should equal setback temperature, and system sized appropriately to meet setpoints. Maybe not immediately, but within a reasonable time.

@dhblum
Copy link
Contributor

dhblum commented Jun 17, 2020

Actually, let me rephrase a bit. I agree with you for the most part. I think I'm just making a stronger preference for increasing the system size to meet setpoints, rather than assume that the system is undersized for the baseline controller that would likely come with such a system. To me, this assumes some design flaw and arbitrarily puts the baseline controller at a disadvantage.

@dhblum
Copy link
Contributor

dhblum commented Jun 25, 2020

So define comfort at 16 C, PI reference at 16 C (+ whatever deadband), increase system size by ~30%?

@javiarrobas
Copy link
Contributor

Increasing nominal heating capacity of boiler and radiators from 3 kW to 5 kW seems to work just fine. I've also decreased proportional constant and deadband from 0.2 degC to 0.1 degC as seems to improve the baseline. I've updated #1146 and the testcase documentation with these changes. These are the simulation results:

SingleZoneResidentialHydronic

If you agree with the changes and have no further comments I'll update ibpsa/project1-boptest#201 by re-compiling the model and updating references. After that the testcase should be ready to merge.

@dhblum
Copy link
Contributor

dhblum commented Jul 3, 2020

The new results look good to me! I don't have further comments on them. Thanks @JavierArroyoBastida!

@Mathadon
Copy link
Member Author

Mathadon commented Jul 3, 2020

Looks good indeed :) Is this ready for a review before merging?

@javiarrobas
Copy link
Contributor

Great! I'd say the model is ready for review but the BOPTEST case still needs an update. I'll let you know once that's done for a complete review.

@Mathadon
Copy link
Member Author

This is ready to be merged once the unit tests pass.

@Mathadon Mathadon merged commit 1eb6bbf into master Jul 14, 2020
@Mathadon Mathadon deleted the issue996_hydronictest branch July 14, 2020 20:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants