[Fix] Fix wildreceipt metafile

[xinke-wang]

No description provided.

[xinke-wang]

It seems the test of the visualizer occasionally failed. @Harold-lkk

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 85.81% // Head: 85.83% // Increases project coverage by +0.02% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (baf0d89) compared to base (31c41d8).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

❗ Current head baf0d89 differs from pull request most recent head 46a0d06. Consider uploading reports for the commit 46a0d06 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           dev-1.x    #1528      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    85.81%   85.83%   +0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          158      158              
  Lines         9881     9881              
  Branches      1368     1368              
===========================================
+ Hits          8479     8481       +2     
+ Misses        1159     1154       -5     
- Partials       243      246       +3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	85.83% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
.../models/textdet/postprocessors/db_postprocessor.py	90.41% <0.00%> (-2.74%)	⬇️
mmocr/datasets/transforms/textdet_transforms.py	90.74% <0.00%> (-0.80%)	⬇️
...r/models/kie/postprocessors/sdmgr_postprocessor.py	95.58% <0.00%> (+10.29%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.