-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Enhancement] Change assertion logic inference cfg.model.test_cfg #3012
Merged
xiexinch
merged 5 commits into
open-mmlab:dev-1.x
from
LHamnett:bug_fix_fix_assert_error_cfg.model.test_cfg
Jun 19, 2023
Merged
[Enhancement] Change assertion logic inference cfg.model.test_cfg #3012
xiexinch
merged 5 commits into
open-mmlab:dev-1.x
from
LHamnett:bug_fix_fix_assert_error_cfg.model.test_cfg
Jun 19, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
xiexinch
reviewed
May 17, 2023
Comment on lines
329
to
332
if isinstance(self.test_cfg.mode, dict): | ||
assert self.test_cfg['mode'] in ['slide', 'whole'] | ||
else: | ||
assert self.test_cfg.mode in ['slide', 'whole'] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about convert the self.test_cfg
to mmengine.Config
at the init function?
class EncoderDecoder:
def __init__(...):
...
self.test_cfg = Config(test_cfg)
...
xiexinch
changed the title
Change assertion logic inference cfg.model.test_cfg
[Enhancement] Change assertion logic inference cfg.model.test_cfg
Jun 16, 2023
xiexinch
approved these changes
Jun 16, 2023
…rt_error_cfg.model.test_cfg
nahidnazifi87
pushed a commit
to nahidnazifi87/mmsegmentation_playground
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2024
…en-mmlab#3012) ## Motivation In encode_decoder.py , assertion logic is not working correctly if user modifes cfg.test_cfg and defines it in a dictionary format. See: open-mmlab#3011 ## Modification Slight change to assertion behaviour to change assertion depending on if received test_cfg object is a dict or not. ## BC-breaking (Optional) Unsure - I believe this will not break any downstream tasks as the previous logic is still included ## Use cases (Optional) n/a --------- Co-authored-by: xiexinch <xiexinch@outlook.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
In encode_decoder.py , assertion logic is not working correctly if user modifes cfg.test_cfg and defines it in a dictionary format. See: #3011
Modification
Slight change to assertion behaviour to change assertion depending on if received test_cfg object is a dict or not.
BC-breaking (Optional)
Unsure - I believe this will not break any downstream tasks as the previous logic is still included
Use cases (Optional)
n/a